Manhattan Institute

Let People Be Wrong

Political opinions don’t have to trump personal relations.

Some people are wrong on the Internet, right now. Some are wrong in your social media feeds, and there’s a good chance you’re already friends with at least one such person. People get things wrong all the time.

Other people being wrong presents you with choices. You can engage, or not. If you engage, you could disagree, or not. If you disagree, you could argue and potentially damage the relationship—or not.

Maybe you don’t know the person who’s wrong. Maybe there’s a relationship waiting to happen, and while it might not amount to anything, it may also become one of your most fulfilling. It might lead to an acquaintance, a friend, even a spouse. Again, you face the same choices.

In today’s heated climate, an unheard-of option is to engage someone who you believe is wrong but not disagree with him. It may seem strange or even impossible that you could do this, especially if you find his belief offensive or repugnant. How could this be accomplished? You can let him be wrong.

One of the most malignant aspects of our culture is that it’s considered a virtue to “call out,” or correct, views with which we disagree. But this is usually the worst option, especially if you want to change someone’s mind or develop a friendship.

Letting people be wrong can initiate a revolution in your relationships. Few people like to be told that they’re wrong, and on many topics—say, your neighbors’ hot takes on immigration policy or homelessness—their utterly incorrect views are utterly irrelevant to your relationship. You have relationships at work, at home, with your neighbors, in your communities, at the stores where you shop, with your friends, and elsewhere. Few of these relationships are about politics, and none need be jeopardized just because you have such a problem with their views that you can’t leave the point of disagreement alone.

Once you let others be wrong, you’ll see a wide variety of ways to engage someone who holds false beliefs, no matter how offensive you find them. You can become curious about what they believe and why they believe it, which may lead you to ask questions, listen to their answers, and better understand their position. This will open the door to learning from the person with whom you’re speaking, which often elicits reciprocity and gets them listening and learning from you. You’ll build rapport and develop new and deeper relationships. You’ll come to understand people with whom you disagree, and they’ll come to understand you better—and want to do so. If you genuinely espouse different values than your partner in conversation, you’ll each be able to see the other’s motivations charitably, as positions held by good people. Barriers and differences will break down, even while disagreements may persist.

Human psychology is such that one of the most effective ways to change someone’s mind, if that’s your goal, is through trust and respect. Letting friends hold beliefs and opinions that you think are false, and letting them know that you’re still friends, can generate precisely those shared virtues. Research consistently shows that central to influencing others is a sense of psychological safety, which can be fostered by respecting people enough to let disagreements come second to your relationship.

Maybe your goal isn’t to change anyone’s mind. It doesn’t have to be. Our lives improve by increasing the number of positive, healthy relationships we have. Letting friends be wrong is an antidote to loneliness, an opportunity to benefit from a diversity of thoughts, and a way to deepen and strengthen our friendships. The way forward in many cases is simply to let people be wrong.

More from Manhattan Institute

Manhattan Institute6 min readPolitics
The Happiest Warrior
Bruce Herschensohn would hate what I’m about to do. He always lamented that Years of Lightning, Day of Drums—the acclaimed documentary he produced about the life and assassination of President John F. Kennedy—tended to get re-aired on the anniversary
Manhattan Institute3 min readCrime & Violence
The New Untouchables
Seattle policymakers want to provide the city’s underclass with blanket immunity for misdemeanor crime.
Manhattan Institute19 min readEthnic Studies
The Bias Narrative v. the Development Narrative
Editor’s note: The following is an edited version of the lecture that Professor Loury presented to faculty and students in MIT’s Department of Economics in October 2020. Let me be provocative right at the start. George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis

Related Books & Audiobooks