The Christian Science Monitor

A(n) historical take on the evolving use of a/an

Source: Staff

Few people would disagree that the spread of the coronavirus is , having “great and lasting importance.” (We hope that it will soon be , “concerning past events,” too.) English speakers do disagree, though – sometimes vehemently – about how to use these two words. Is it “ historic event” or “ historic event”? And what’s behind the argument?

Citiți o mostră, înregistrați-vă pentru a citi în continuare.

Mai multe de la The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor3 min citite
Finding The Universal Human Story
Why does the effort to rebuild a tiny Japanese fishing village, 10 years after a tsunami, matter to someone living in Australia or Canada or the U.S.?
The Christian Science Monitor5 min cititeAmerican Government
Biden’s Big COVID-19 Aid Package: What’s In The Bill?
The U.S. coronavirus relief bill is massive and moving through Congress on party-line votes. Stimulus payments and public health are just the start.
The Christian Science Monitor4 min cititeAmerican Government
Fair Or Not, The Race Of Biden’s EPA Nominee Raises Expectations
EPA administrator nominee Michael Regan has a mixed record: genuine interest in citizens’ concerns alongside decisions that ignore those concerns.