Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Hollow: A Hercule Poirot Mystery: The Official Authorized Edition
The Hollow: A Hercule Poirot Mystery: The Official Authorized Edition
The Hollow: A Hercule Poirot Mystery: The Official Authorized Edition
Ebook319 pages4 hours

The Hollow: A Hercule Poirot Mystery: The Official Authorized Edition

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Agatha Christie’s classic, The Hollow, finds Poirot entangled in a nasty web of family secrets when he comes across a fresh murder at an English country manor.

A far-from-warm welcome greets Hercule Poirot as he arrives for lunch at Lucy Angkatell’s country house. A man lies dying by the swimming pool, his blood dripping into the water. His wife stands over him, holding a revolver.

As Poirot investigates, he begins to realize that beneath the respectable surface lies a tangle of family secrets and everyone becomes a suspect.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherHarperCollins
Release dateOct 3, 2006
ISBN9780061746864
Author

Agatha Christie

Agatha Christie is the most widely published author of all time, outsold only by the Bible and Shakespeare. Her books have sold more than a billion copies in English and another billion in a hundred foreign languages. She died in 1976, after a prolific career spanning six decades.

Read more from Agatha Christie

Related to The Hollow

Titles in the series (45)

View More

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for The Hollow

Rating: 3.6840063263975154 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

644 ratings24 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Hollow (1946) (Poirot # 26) by Agatha Christie. The Hollow is the name of the estate where this murder mystery is set. It is also a description of what Poirot thinks about the people living there. They seem empty of life, hollow shells that are giving a simulation of people doing the things they would normally be doing. All that is except for the one who is dead. Originally the title included an s at the end of Hollow, which inclines me to think Dame Agatha had originally been talking about the cast of characters rather than the location. Either way, this is a discernibly different type of storytelling for her. We all know there will be a murder, but the corpse doesn’t present itself until almost a third of the way in the story. Poirot comes into play at about the same time and, initially irritated at the pandering quality of the tableaux displayed to him which he has fancied as some type of party game, he quickly surmises that the woman holding the gun over the body laid out next to and dripping blood in the pool, may indeed have actually killed the man at her feet.Two of the other houseguests are arriving on the scene as well as the rather bemusing lady of the house. Several people are automatically suspect, others add their names to that list, the history of the dead person is locked into, a Hollywood movie star who just “Happens” to be staying at the next abode may be involved, and the local police even suspect Poirot. This is an interesting little poser as it is quickly shown that the most likely person to have not committed the murder is the woman found holding the gun. Dame Agatha out did herself in setting up this cozy little mystery. The portraits of all involved will leave you questioning means and motive. Just remember, the lady of the house did prove to be a very keen pistol woman.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In which a man bleeds to death by a country house swimming pool, and Poirot stumbles across the body.

    "The Hollow" is one of Christie’s most enigmatic works: she herself was immensely proud of it, but felt it wasn’t perfect (and a large part of that due to Poirot’s presence). The murder itself seems stock-standard: a man shot by the pool of a country house, where the residents of both The Hollow and the nearby cottage possess motives, and red herrings are seemingly endless. Poirot, needless to say, is staying in a nearby cottage, and begins to realise that the killer is trying their darndest to cover up the crime.

    Yet "The Hollow" borders on a Christie masterpiece for a few reasons: the author’s contrivances are revealed to be those of the characters; the mystery itself is intriguing on account of being a psychological investigation: Poirot himself is a guest character, and we’re here privy to the inner workings of the family and their friends as the investigation goes on. As many critics have noted, this is a novel told internally, which makes it all the more impressive that the David Suchet adaptation worked so well.

    Famously, Hercule Poirot’s entrance comes so late in the book (and, indeed, his involvement still remains minimal) that Christie herself later thought it a mistake, writing him out of the subsequent stage adaptation. Christie had not written a Poirot novel since "Five Little Pigs" – itself a breakthrough novel - four years earlier. When he returned again, Poirot would be plotting retirement in "The Labours of Hercules" and then – with the bleak atmosphere of "Taken at the Flood" - the great Belgian would begin his final stage, as an older man out of place with the world. Christie, meanwhile, was writing less but also devoting more time to Miss Marple.

    "The Hollow" is not my favourite Christie. While her ambition is admirable, and the mystery very well-constructed, there’s still only so far Christie’s skill as a psychoanalytical author could go in this context: basically one long con perpetrated on both us and Poirot. Beyond this, Poirot’s limited presence means we don’t get to see his thought processes, and thus lose most of his characterisation. Finally, there’s that inherent bias which comes from having read Christie since I was about 7: I do like a good tale where we meet the detective and the suspects, have interviews and go about in a usual way. All this, though, is not meant to be damning: "The Hollow" is a very worthy novel; it’s just that – for me at least – it stands out because it is so different to much of Christie’s fare: a success by context, if you will. A classic, yes. A masterpiece, nearly… but not quite.

    [Unsurprisingly, the title was changed in the US to the more sensational "Murder After Hours". Seriously, Google book covers of these novels sometime and check out some of the mid-century American covers. Ridiculously sensationalised!]

    Rating: 9/10

    Poirot ranking: 7th out of 38.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Recently read a review touting this as one of Christie's best. I was disappointed. I enjoyed reading another Hercule Poirot mystery but I was never hooked. In this one, he is invited to lunch at a neighbor's in the country and when he arrives he finds a murder has just been committed. It's the typical "Sunday in the country" with lots of houseguests and seems obvious who committed the crime. Obviously, not to be. Poirot curiously does not do any investigating; however, we learn who did it by the people who kept confiding in Poirot over the course of the investigation. I didn't find any of the characters engaging and just finished it to see who was really the culprit. It goes without saying, that Poirot was his usual wonderful character.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Also: Murder After Hours

    Romance, triangles, jealousy, family, secrets from the past, & murder.....

    For some reason I am always surprised when there is romance in Christie's mysteries, not so much as a basis for murder, but when people actually get together & have a life after murder..... In this book there were several romances: past, present, and future. There was also two interlocked triangles and unrequited love, which in part were the basis for the murder.

    M. Poirot is invited to lunch during a family gathering at a neighboring home. When he arrives he finds a dying man, John Christow, laying next to the pool, his wife, Gerta, w/ a gun in her hands. The dying man's last words in the tone of a plea/question (calling the name of his mistress who is standing there)... "Henrietta".

    Henrietta comes to Gerta to comfort her & takes the gun out of her hand, then quite "accidentally" drops the gun in the pool, thus obliterating all fingerprints. As the story moves forward we are privy to the fact that the gun that was dropped in the pool was not the gun that killed John.

    It seems as everyone in the house knows who killed John and is intent on protecting the person.... It take M. Poirot quite awhile before he is able to come to the correct murderer.

    There was only one racial reference (rolling my eyes here), but I didn't like the book. It seemed to be missing something and the characters seemed flat and boring....
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Hollow by Agatha Christie - very good

    I read so many of Agatha Christie's books that I'm running out of things to say about them. The fact that I keep returning is probably all the testament I need to give. Other authors run out of original ideas or their books become formulaic etc. Not the case here. Even when I've read a book that I've seen the TV adaptation of (as with this one) there are enough twists and red herrings to make me wonder if the TV changed the ending (it has been known).

    This particular book is one of the later (post WW2) 'Poirot' mysteries. He walks in on what he initially thinks is a murder mystery - it looks so staged - John Christow is lying by the swimming pool, breathing his last. His wife is standing over him with a gun in her hand. As he dies he says just one word: "Henrietta" - the name of his mistress. The question is: are things really as they seem?
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Sad, not her best mystery, but lovely characterisation,
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A houseparty gathers, Poirot is invited to lunch, and inevitably someone is murdered. Investigations lead to increasingly more confusion and clues leading to false trails. So cleverly written that even the second time of reading I had forgotten which clues were real and couldn't guess 'whodunit' until the last moment.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Monsieur Poirot is terribly fun as a character. So full of himself. Christie clearly enjoyed her creation yet equally clearly tires of him sometimes. We, the readers, get to luxury of enjoying him at our will. The Hollow will engage your wits and challenge your prowess as a detective.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a fascinating tale with bluff and double bluff centred around a fascinating family. The characterisation in this novel is superb.. The plot is peppered with red herrings, but Poirot gets there in the end.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I read this book mostly in one day. The narrative was one of the easiest and fastest I've ever come across. But the urgency of the murderer's impending doom wasn't present in the fabric of this story. You never had the feeling that all these words were converging to a brilliant denouement. Poirot made literally a guest appearance. He usually does that figuratively. I was bogged down by what the author wanted to pass for character development here. But maybe there was a tad too much of a touch of romance in the air. Romance and melodrama seemed to go hand in hand back then. The couple hasn't aged well though.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Poor Hercule Poirot. He can't get away from murder, not even at his weekend cottage. His neighbors at the Hollow, the Angkatells, are having a weekend house party, and they've invited Poirot for Sunday lunch. He arrives to find his hosts and their guests gathered around a body by the swimming pool; apparently his hosts have planned a murder game to entertain their guests. Poirot soon realizes that the scene is no game. One of the guests, Dr. John Christow, has been shot. The doctor's wife, Gerda, is holding a pistol, with the other guests surrounding her. Did Mrs. Christow shoot her husband? No one who knows her believes her to be capable of murder. If she didn't do it, who did? His mistress, the artist Henrietta? Edward Angkatell, who's in love with Henrietta? Poor cousin Midge, who's in love with Edward? Or maybe Veronica Cray, a woman from Dr. Christow's past who just happens to be renting a nearby cottage?Christie fills a typical country house party with stock characters (a doctor, an actress, an artist, a brooding student, and a poor relation), but she still manages to find a new twist for the murder. Poirot's best cases are behind him at this point in Christie's publishing career. This is a solid mystery, but not a particularly memorable one.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Up to Christie's usual standard in terms of plot. I wouldn't have guessed what the murderer did at the very end, quite out of character if you ask me and what Christie says throughout about women working is frankly strange but the rest was good.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book made me want to read Christie's Mary Westmacott novels. I say this because even though this is a Poirot novel, Poirot is a minor character. The main focus of this book is to develop the characters of a very interesting family. I felt that the mystery came in second place to character development. For instance, I very quickly guessed who the murderer was and it turned out I was right. However, I still enjoyed the book and couldn't put it down due to the interesting people. Now I am convinced that I would enjoy reading a Christie novel even if it is NOT a mystery!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Terrible lady novelist bring us the best ever description of terrible lady drivers.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Not one of her better efforts. Poirot is almost a peripheral character in this one. Loads of melodrama and not much crime.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    (mild spoilers)
    I posit that John Chrystom is the most insufferable character Agatha Christie ever wrote, closely followed by Henrietta.
    Christie certainly wrote some distasteful characters but in John's case we have to spend 1/3 of the book inside his dull, smug, self-obsessed, spiteful little brain while he endlessly analyzes his prosaic feelings of vague dissatisfaction with his comfortable upper class life and makes cruel observations about his patients, secretary, ex-gf, mistress, children, and wife (whom, he openly admits, he married because she is ugly, gormless and worships him). It's just whine, whine, whine, bully, bully, bully, nonstop.

    Then we spend 1/3 of the book inside his mistress Henrietta's brain while she meditates endlessly on how magnificent and selfless and brilliant he is, and how he's the only one who is Truly Alive, and how her only desire is to serve him, body and soul, so he can keep being the wonderful doctor he is.

    This is all the more infuriating because Henrietta is portrayed as intelligent, generous, independent, and dynamic, with a brilliant career as an artist--which John sulkily demands she give up because it takes her attention away from him.

    Is there any kind of comeuppance or epiphany? Nope. The book ends with an entire barfy chapter in praise of the glorious vitality of Dr. John Chrystom while Henrietta laments that she is limited to expressing herself through art, like the sad subhuman she is.

    I've read every single Agatha Christie novel and short story two or three times over the past 20 years and like (or at least get) nearly all of her characters, but I am totally at a loss as to what she was going for with John.
    The remaining non John-centered 1/3 of the book is pretty fun, especially Lucy's scenes, and the mystery itself was decent. But I recommend skimming this one pretty heavily unless you enjoy depressing, aggravating melodrama.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I hadn't actually read this one, I don't think, before listening to it as an audiobook. I was utterly charmed and really appreciated it. I will look forward to reading it as a book someday, when I've forgotten a bit of the plot. I really appreciated the internal monologues, so different than the rest of her mysteries.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This one definitely goes on my “favorite Christie’s” list. It started out in typical fashion for me as I read with one part of my mind and used the other part trying to figure out who the victim would be, but gradually I became completely absorbed in the story and especially the characters. The book was full of surprises for me, not only keeping me guessing but also keeping me utterly entranced. The biggest surprise for me was that for the first time with Agatha Christie, when I closed the book at the final page I was crying.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    If you've been reading the Agatha Christie novels in order then you'll remember that you have already met Lady Lucy Angkatell in Baghdad. In the following extract she is talking about the composition of her impending house party. Hercule Poirot is staying in one of the nearby cottages (ironically called Resthaven), which he has bought after pressure from friends, even though he doesn't actually like country life. Lady Angkatell stretched out fluttering white hands in a lovely, helpless gesture. ‘All the wrong people coming–the wrong people to be together, I mean–not in themselves. They’re all charming really.’ ‘Who is coming?’ ‘The ingredients of the pudding are not promising,’ murmured Midge. Lucy smiled at her. ‘Sometimes,’ she said meditatively, ‘things arrange themselves quite simply. I’ve asked the Crime man to lunch on Sunday. It will make a distraction, don’t you think so?’ ‘Crime man?’ ‘Like an egg,’ said Lady Angkatell. ‘He was in Baghdad, solving something, when Henry was High Commissioner. Or perhaps it was afterwards? We had him to lunch with some other Duty people. He had on a white duck suit, I remember, and a pink flower in his buttonhole, and black patent-leather shoes. I don’t remember much about it because I never think it’s very interesting who killed who. I mean, once they are dead it doesn’t seem to matter why, and to make a fuss about it all seems so silly…’ THE HOLLOW contains an interesting exploration of what binds people together. It seems to me that it would make a very good classroom discussion book. But he half-closed his eyes and conjured them up–all of them–seeing them clearly in his mind’s eye. Sir Henry, upright, responsible, trusted administrator of Empire. Lady Angkatell, shadowy, elusive, unexpectedly and bewilderingly charming, with that deadly power of inconsequent suggestion. Henrietta Savernake, who had loved John Christow better than she loved herself. The gentle and negative Edward Angkatell. The dark, positive girl called Midge Hardcastle. The dazed, bewildered face of Gerda Christow clasping a revolver in her hand. The offended adolescent personality of David Angkatell. There they all were, caught and held in the meshes of the law. Bound together for a little while in the relentless aftermath of sudden and violent death. There are a number of issues that surface. As after Word War One, Christie appears to be struck by the way the world has changed, not just politically but economically and socially.There's no mention of the Second World War but I assumed that THE HOLLOW was set more or less in the "present", that is, immediately after the war. Those with titles and or money don't seem to be aware that their way of life is endangered. The days of servants and large houses are numbered. Girls, like Midge Hardcastle have to work, and they can't always get jobs they like. Lucy, Henry, Edward–yes, even Henrietta–they were all divided from her by an impassable gulf–the gulf that separates the leisured from the working. They had no conception of the difficulties of getting a job, and once you had got it, of keeping it! One might say, perhaps, that there was no need, actually, for her to earn her living. Lucy and Henry would gladly give her a home–they would with equal gladness have made her an allowance. Edward would also willingly have done the latter. But something in Midge rebelled against the acceptance of ease offered her by her well-to-do relations. To come on rare occasions and sink into the well-ordered luxury of Lucy’s life was delightful. She could revel in that. But some sturdy independence of spirit held her back from accepting that life as a gift. The same feeling had prevented her from starting a business on her own with money borrowed from relations and friends. She had seen too much of that. There's a stage like quality to THE HOLLOW. It is easy to imagine it is a stage set and adapting it as a play would have been relatively easy. The action takes place episodically and indeed Poirot, when he first arrives, believes he has come across a tableau staged for his benefit. Hercule Poirot stepped out on to the open space surrounding the swimming pool, and immediately he, too, stiffened, but with annoyance. It was too much–it was really too much! He had not suspected such cheapness of the Angkatells. The long walk by the road, the disappointment at the house–and now this! The misplaced sense of humour of the English! He was annoyed and he was bored–oh, how he was bored. Death was not, to him, amusing. And here they had arranged for him, by way of a joke, a set-piece. For what he was looking at was a highly artificial murder scene. By the side of the pool was the body, artistically arranged with an outflung arm and even some red paint dripping gently over the edge of the concrete into the pool. It was a spectacular body, that of a handsome fair-haired man. Standing over the body, revolver in hand, was a woman, a short, powerfully built, middle-aged woman with a curiously blank expression.This sense of something staged, something artificial, crops up again and again, and adds to the mystery. Poirot thinks he is being directed and manipulated but he is not quite sure by whom.I could really go on discussing this book ad nauseam, but you really need to read it for yourself!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Since she was a woman of disconcertingly rapid thought processes, Lady Angkatell, as was her invariable custom, commenced the conversation in her own mind, supplying Midge’s answers out of her own fertile imagination. The conversation was in full swing when Lady Angkatell flung open Midge’s door.
    ‘–And so, darling, you really must agree that the weekend is going to present difficulties!’ ‘Eh? Hwah!’ Midge grunted inarticulately, aroused thus abruptly from a satisfying and deep sleep."


    A house party in the country, where each guest struggles with some internal conflict. The plot is pretty standard for a Christie novel, and so it the resolution. What really drew me to the book, tho, was it's focus on the characters. Not all of the characters are likable, some are down-right horrible, but what I really liked was that many of them are either transformed by the events of the book or undergo some serious soul searching.

    The weakest part of the book was the ending. Although, it makes for a convenient conclusion, this is one of the Christie books where I felt she could have strayed from the path of formula and presented something more - not controversial, but - challenging as she had done in some of her other books - Endless Night for example.

    Despite the weak(-ish) ending, I immensely enjoyed the book. I think this is the one that made me constantly think about why I prefer Poirot to Marple (even Poirot is almost a nuisance in this one). I believe the reason I am drawn to Poirot instead of Marple is their difference in outlook - where Marple seems a grounded old lady without many quirks, I have always found her to be a bit of a judgmental snob who seeks out the worst in people - and the gloats when her expectations are confirmed.

    Poirot on the other hand gives the appearance of an eccentric but for all his quirks, he still manages to express his faith in and hopes for many of the characters he encounters. I really noticed this in his observations about Lady Angkatell, the most beautiful of which was:

    "Hercule Poirot thought: ‘She is old–her hair is grey–there are lines in her face. Yet she has magic–she will always have magic…’ "
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Poirot is invited to his neighbor's country cottage. When he arrives, he sees Dr. John Christow surrounded by others. John mutters one word, then dies. One of the group tosses a gun into the pool. Poirot thinks it looks too staged. As he examines the scene, many questions arise, as well as discrepancies.Dr. Christow was a cheater, but was his jilted lover the murderer? I had seen the Poirot movie on PBS, and I was curious to read the original book.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Several qualities appeal to me about The Hollow, an Hercule Poirot mystery. The mystery centers around the murder of a prominent doctor who is apparently shot by his wife during a weekend house party in the country. Two characters Lady Lucy Angkatell and Henrietta Savernake stand out in the story as uniquely well-drawn by Agatha Christie.

    Lady Lucy is presented as a slightly fey woman who wanders around her world talking to herself and others in language bits which seem to have no beginning or end. The author captures her world and her character almost completely through her conversation. While the characters around her seem unable to understand what she is saying as a reader it is wonderful to use her "stories and comments about others" to capture Lady Lucy's real self. The link between Lucy's inner and outer world never breaks but is only apparent to Lucy herself and the few who actually listen to what she says.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Reading Agatha Christie always brings pleasure. The Hollow follows Christie’s formula for a fun mystery with the range of suspects and Hercule Poirot utilizing his gray cells. The end result provided much discussion concerning all the red herrings. This story follows the murder of Dr. John Christow. His wife, Gerda, stands in front of the dead John, holding a gun. Hercule Poirot had been walking to the neighbor’s house and heard the shot and arrived minutes after the incident. But all does not fall exactly as the scene appears. Poirot remarks many times that the murder seems staged. The gun that Gerda holds turns out to not be the weapon that killed John. As usual, Christie introduces many other suspects in the quest of finding John’s killer. I thought many times that maybe John’s office manager might be guilty, but Beryl disappears from the storyline. Next, we have an old love, Veronica, and a new love, Henrietta, that might have motives. And what a dipsy character Lady Lucy Angkatell. She skips in and out of the activities like a fairy. A lovely cast of murderers.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I am not ashamed to say that she got me - I didn't figure it out before the reveal. My money was on the wrong persom as the murderer. I take pride in solving the mysteries before the author reveals the culprit, but this not the first time Christie has stumped me. This is a great plot with her usual quirkey characters and of course, the magnificent Poirot. It's been a while since I read a Christie book andI had forgotten how well she writes. This is a very readable story for the mystery lover and it has a couple of unique twists a la Christie.

Book preview

The Hollow - Agatha Christie

One

At six thirteen a.m. on a Friday morning Lucy Angkatell’s big blue eyes opened upon another day and, as always, she was at once wide awake and began immediately to deal with the problems conjured up by her incredibly active mind. Feeling urgently the need of consultation and conversation, and selecting for the purpose her young cousin, Midge Hardcastle, who had arrived at The Hollow the night before, Lady Angkatell slipped quickly out of bed, threw a négligée round her still graceful shoulders, and went along the passage to Midge’s room. Since she was a woman of disconcertingly rapid thought processes, Lady Angkatell, as was her invariable custom, commenced the conversation in her own mind, supplying Midge’s answers out of her own fertile imagination.

The conversation was in full swing when Lady Angkatell flung open Midge’s door.

"—And so, darling, you really must agree that the weekend is going to present difficulties!"

Eh? Hwah! Midge grunted inarticulately, aroused thus abruptly from a satisfying and deep sleep.

Lady Angkatell crossed to the window, opening the shutters and jerking up the blind with a brisk movement, letting in the pale light of a September dawn.

Birds! she observed, peering with kindly pleasure through the pane. So sweet.

What?

"Well, at any rate, the weather isn’t going to present difficulties. It looks as though it has set in fine. That’s something. Because if a lot of discordant personalities are boxed up indoors, I’m sure you will agree with me that it makes it ten times worse. Round games perhaps, and that would be like last year when I shall never forgive myself about poor Gerda. I said to Henry afterwards it was most thoughtless of me—and one has to have her, of course, because it would be so rude to ask John without her, but it really does make things difficult—and the worst of it is that she is so nice—really it seems odd sometimes that anyone so nice as Gerda is should be so devoid of any kind of intelligence, and if that is what they mean by the law of compensation I don’t really think it is at all fair."

"What are you talking about, Lucy?"

The weekend, darling. The people who are coming tomorrow. I have been thinking about it all night and I have been dreadfully bothered about it. So it really is a relief to talk it over with you, Midge. You are always so sensible and practical.

Lucy, said Midge sternly. Do you know what time it is?

Not exactly, darling. I never do, you know.

It’s quarter past six.

Yes, dear, said Lady Angkatell, with no signs of contrition.

Midge gazed sternly at her. How maddening, how absolutely impossible Lucy was! Really, thought Midge, I don’t know why we put up with her!

Yet even as she voiced the thought to herself, she was aware of the answer. Lucy Angkatell was smiling, and as Midge looked at her, she felt the extraordinary pervasive charm that Lucy had wielded all her life and that even now, at over sixty, had not failed her. Because of it, people all over the world, foreign potentates, ADCs, Government officials, had endured inconvenience, annoyance and bewilderment. It was the childlike pleasure and delight in her own doings that disarmed and nullified criticism. Lucy had but to open those wide blue eyes and stretch out those fragile hands, and murmur, "Oh! but I’m so sorry…" and resentment immediately vanished.

Darling, said Lady Angkatell, "I’m so sorry. You should have told me!"

I’m telling you now—but it’s too late! I’m thoroughly awake.

"What a shame! But you will help me, won’t you?"

About the weekend? Why? What’s wrong with it?

Lady Angkatell sat down on the edge of the bed. It was not, Midge thought, like anyone else sitting on your bed. It was as insubstantial as though a fairy had poised itself there for a minute.

Lady Angkatell stretched out fluttering white hands in a lovely, helpless gesture.

"All the wrong people coming—the wrong people to be together, I mean—not in themselves. They’re all charming really."

"Who is coming?"

Midge pushed thick wiry black hair back from her square forehead with a sturdy brown arm. Nothing insubstantial or fairylike about her.

"Well, John and Gerda. That’s all right by itself. I mean, John is delightful—most attractive. And as for poor Gerda—well, I mean, we must all be very kind. Very, very kind."

Moved by an obscure instinct of defence, Midge said:

Oh, come now, she’s not as bad as that.

"Oh, darling, she’s pathetic. Those eyes. And she never seems to understand a single word one says."

She doesn’t, said Midge. Not what you say—but I don’t know that I blame her. Your mind, Lucy, goes so fast, that to keep pace with it your conversation takes the most amazing leaps. All the connecting links are left out.

Just like a monkey, said Lady Angkatell vaguely.

But who else is coming besides the Christows? Henrietta, I suppose?

Lady Angkatell’s face brightened.

Yes—and I really do feel that she will be a tower of strength. She always is. Henrietta, you know, is really kind—kind all through, not just on top. She will help a lot with poor Gerda. She was simply wonderful last year. That was the time we played limericks, or word-making, or quotations—or one of those things, and we had all finished and were reading them out when we suddenly discovered that poor dear Gerda hadn’t even begun. She wasn’t even sure what the game was. It was dreadful, wasn’t it, Midge?

Why anyone ever comes to stay with the Angkatells, I don’t know, said Midge. What with the brainwork, and the round games, and your peculiar style of conversation, Lucy.

"Yes, darling, we must be trying—and it must always be hateful for Gerda, and I often think that if she had any spirit she would stay away—but however, there it was, and the poor dear looked so bewildered and—well—mortified, you know. And John looked so dreadfully impatient. And I simply couldn’t think of how to make things all right again—and it was then that I felt so grateful to Henrietta. She turned right round to Gerda and asked about the pullover she was wearing—really a dreadful affair in faded lettuce green—too depressing and jumble sale, darling—and Gerda brightened up at once, it seems that she had knitted it herself, and Henrietta asked her for the pattern, and Gerda looked so happy and proud. And that is what I mean about Henrietta. She can always do that sort of thing. It’s a kind of knack."

She takes trouble, said Midge slowly.

Yes, and she knows what to say.

Ah, said Midge. But it goes further than saying. Do you know, Lucy, that Henrietta actually knitted that pullover?

Oh, my dear. Lady Angkatell looked grave. And wore it?

And wore it. Henrietta carries things through.

And was it very dreadful?

No. On Henrietta it looked very nice.

Well, of course it would. That’s just the difference between Henrietta and Gerda. Everything Henrietta does she does well and it turns out right. She’s clever about nearly everything, as well as in her own line. I must say, Midge, that if anyone carries us through this weekend, it will be Henrietta. She will be nice to Gerda and she will amuse Henry, and she’ll keep John in a good temper and I’m sure she’ll be most helpful with David.

David Angkatell?

Yes. He’s just down from Oxford—or perhaps Cambridge. Boys of that age are so difficult—especially when they are intellectual. David is very intellectual. One wishes that they could put off being intellectual until they were rather older. As it is, they always glower at one so and bite their nails and seem to have so many spots and sometimes an Adam’s apple as well. And they either won’t speak at all, or else are very loud and contradictory. Still, as I say, I am trusting to Henrietta. She is very tactful and asks the right kind of questions, and being a sculptress they respect her, especially as she doesn’t just carve animals or children’s heads but does advanced things like that curious affair in metal and plaster that she exhibited at the New Artists last year. It looked rather like a Heath Robinson stepladder. It was called Ascending Thought—or something like that. It is the kind of thing that would impress a boy like David…I thought myself it was just silly.

Dear Lucy!

But some of Henrietta’s things I think are quite lovely. That Weeping Ash tree figure, for instance.

Henrietta has a touch of real genius, I think. And she is a very lovely and satisfying person as well, said Midge.

Lady Angkatell got up and drifted over to the window again. She played absentmindedly with the blind cord.

Why acorns, I wonder? she murmured.

Acorns?

"On the blind cord. Like pineapples on gates. I mean, there must be a reason. Because it might just as easily be a fircone or a pear, but it’s always an acorn. Mast, they call it in crosswords—you know, for pigs. So curious, I always think."

Don’t ramble off, Lucy. You came in here to talk about the weekend and I can’t see why you were so anxious about it. If you manage to keep off round games, and try to be coherent when you’re talking to Gerda, and put Henrietta on to tame intellectual David, where is the difficulty?

Well, for one thing, darling, Edward is coming.

Oh, Edward. Midge was silent for a moment after saying the name.

Then she asked quietly:

What on earth made you ask Edward for this weekend?

I didn’t, Midge. That’s just it. He asked himself. Wired to know if we could have him. You know what Edward is. How sensitive. If I’d wired back ‘No,’ he’d probably never have asked himself again. He’s like that.

Midge nodded her head slowly.

Yes, she thought, Edward was like that. For an instant she saw his face clearly, that very dearly loved face. A face with something of Lucy’s insubstantial charm; gentle, diffident, ironic….

Dear Edward, said Lucy, echoing the thought in Midge’s mind.

She went on impatiently:

"If only Henrietta would make up her mind to marry him. She is really fond of him, I know she is. If they had been here some weekend without the Christows…As it is, John Christow has always the most unfortunate effect on Edward. John, if you know what I mean, becomes so much more so and Edward becomes so much less so. You understand?"

Again Midge nodded.

And I can’t put the Christows off because this weekend was arranged long ago, but I do feel, Midge, that it is all going to be difficult, with David glowering and biting his nails, and with trying to keep Gerda from feeling out of it, and with John being so positive and dear Edward so negative—

The ingredients of the pudding are not promising, murmured Midge.

Lucy smiled at her.

Sometimes, she said meditatively, things arrange themselves quite simply. I’ve asked the Crime man to lunch on Sunday. It will make a distraction, don’t you think so?

Crime man?

Like an egg, said Lady Angkatell. He was in Baghdad, solving something, when Henry was High Commissioner. Or perhaps it was afterwards? We had him to lunch with some other Duty people. He had on a white duck suit, I remember, and a pink flower in his buttonhole, and black patent leather shoes. I don’t remember much about it because I never think it’s very interesting who killed who. I mean, once they are dead it doesn’t seem to matter why, and to make a fuss about it all seems so silly….

But have you any crimes down here, Lucy?

Oh, no, darling. He’s in one of those funny new cottages—you know, beams that bump your head and a lot of very good plumbing and quite the wrong kind of garden. London people like that sort of thing. There’s an actress in the other, I believe. They don’t live in them all the time like we do. Still, Lady Angkatell moved vaguely across the room, I dare say it pleases them. Midge, darling, it’s sweet of you to have been so helpful.

I don’t think I have been so very helpful.

Oh, haven’t you? Lucy Angkatell looked surprised. Well, have a nice sleep now and don’t get up to breakfast, and when you do get up, do be as rude as ever you like.

Rude? Midge looked surprised. Why! Oh! she laughed. I see! Penetrating of you, Lucy. Perhaps I’ll take you at your word.

Lady Angkatell smiled and went out. As she passed the open bathroom door and saw the kettle and gas ring, an idea came to her.

People were fond of tea, she knew—and Midge wouldn’t be called for hours. She would make Midge some tea. She put the kettle on and then went on down the passage.

She paused at her husband’s door and turned the handle, but Sir Henry Angkatell, that able administrator, knew his Lucy. He was extremely fond of her, but he liked his morning sleep undisturbed. The door was locked.

Lady Angkatell went on into her own room. She would have liked to have consulted Henry, but later would do. She stood by her open window, looked out for a moment or two, then she yawned. She got into bed, laid her head on the pillow and in two minutes was sleeping like a child.

In the bathroom the kettle came to the boil and went on boiling….

Another kettle gone, Mr. Gudgeon, said Simmons, the housemaid.

Gudgeon, the butler, shook his grey head.

He took the burnt-out kettle from Simmons and, going into the pantry, produced another kettle from the bottom of the plate cupboard where he had a stock of half a dozen.

There you are, Miss Simmons. Her ladyship will never know.

Does her ladyship often do this sort of thing? asked Simmons.

Gudgeon sighed.

Her ladyship, he said, is at once kindhearted and very forgetful, if you know what I mean. But in this house, he continued, I see to it that everything possible is done to spare her ladyship annoyance or worry.

Two

Henrietta Savernake rolled up a little strip of clay and patted it into place. She was building up the clay head of a girl with swift practised skill.

In her ears, but penetrating only to the edge of her understanding, was the thin whine of a slightly common voice:

"And I do think, Miss Savernake, that I was quite right! ‘Really,’ I said, ‘if that’s the line you’re going to take!’ Because I do think, Miss Savernake, that a girl owes it to herself to make a stand about these sort of things—if you know what I mean. ‘I’m not accustomed,’ I said, ‘to having things like that said to me, and I can only say that you must have a very nasty imagination!’ One does hate unpleasantness, but I do think I was right to make a stand, don’t you, Miss Savernake?"

Oh, absolutely, said Henrietta with a fervour in her voice which might have led someone who knew her well to suspect that she had not been listening very closely.

"‘And if your wife says things of that kind,’ I said, ‘well, I’m sure I can’t help it!’ I don’t know how it is, Miss Savernake, but it seems to be trouble wherever I go, and I’m sure it’s not my fault. I mean, men are so susceptible, aren’t they?" The model gave a coquettish little giggle.

Frightfully, said Henrietta, her eyes half-closed.

Lovely, she was thinking. Lovely that plane just below the eyelid—and the other plane coming up to meet it. That angle by the jaw’s wrong…I must scrape off there and build up again. It’s tricky.

Aloud she said in her warm, sympathetic voice:

"It must have been most difficult for you."

"I do think jealousy’s so unfair, Miss Savernake, and so narrow, if you know what I mean. It’s just envy, if I may say so, because someone’s better-looking and younger than they are."

Henrietta, working on the jaw, said absently: Yes, of course.

She had learned the trick, years ago, of shutting her mind into watertight compartments. She could play a game of bridge, conduct an intelligent conversation, write a clearly constructed letter, all without giving more than a fraction of her essential mind to the task. She was now completely intent on seeing the head of Nausicaa build itself up under her fingers, and the thin, spiteful stream of chatter issuing from those very lovely childish lips penetrated not at all into the deeper recesses of her mind. She kept the conversation going without effort. She was used to models who wanted to talk. Not so much the professional ones—it was the amateurs who, uneasy at their forced inactivity of limb, made up for it by bursting into garrulous self-revelation. So an inconspicuous part of Henrietta listened and replied, and, very far and remote, the real Henrietta commented, Common mean spiteful little piece—but what eyes…Lovely lovely lovely eyes….

Whilst she was busy on the eyes, let the girl talk. She would ask her to keep silent when she got to the mouth. Funny when you came to think of it, that that thin stream of spite should come out through those perfect curves.

Oh, damn, thought Henrietta with sudden frenzy, I’m ruining that eyebrow arch! What the hell’s the matter with it? I’ve overemphasized the bone—it’s sharp, not thick….

She stood back again frowning from the clay to the flesh and blood sitting on the platform.

Doris Saunders went on:

‘Well,’ I said, ‘I really don’t see why your husband shouldn’t give me a present if he likes, and I don’t think,’ I said, ‘you ought to make insinuations of that kind.’ It was ever such a nice bracelet, Miss Savernake, reely quite lovely—and of course I daresay the poor fellow couldn’t reely afford it, but I do think it was nice of him, and I certainly wasn’t going to give it back!

No, no, murmured Henrietta.

"And it’s not as though there was anything between us—anything nasty, I mean—there was nothing of that kind."

No, said Henrietta, I’m sure there wouldn’t be….

Her brow cleared. For the next half hour she worked in a kind of fury. Clay smeared itself on her forehead, clung to her hair, as she pushed an impatient hand through it. Her eyes had a blind intense ferocity. It was coming…She was getting it….

Now, in a few hours, she would be out of her agony—the agony that had been growing upon her for the last ten days.

Nausicaa—she had been Nausicaa, she had got up with Nausicaa and had breakfast with Nausicaa and gone out with Nausicaa. She had tramped the streets in a nervous excitable restlessness, unable to fix her mind on anything but a beautiful blind face somewhere just beyond her mind’s eye—hovering there just not able to be clearly seen. She had interviewed models, hesitated over Greek types, felt profoundly dissatisfied….

She wanted something—something to give her the start—something that would bring her own already partially realized vision alive. She had walked long distances, getting physically tired out and welcoming the fact. And driving her, harrying her, was that urgent incessant longing—to see

There was a blind look in her own eyes as she walked. She saw nothing of what was around her. She was straining—straining the whole time to make that face come nearer…She felt sick, ill, miserable….

And then, suddenly, her vision had cleared and with normal human eyes she had seen opposite her in the bus which she had boarded absentmindedly and with no interest in its destination—she had seen—yes, Nausicaa! A foreshortened childish face, half-parted lips and eyes—lovely vacant, blind eyes.

The girl rang the bell and got out. Henrietta followed her.

She was now quite calm and businesslike. She had got what she wanted—the agony of baffled search was over.

Excuse me speaking to you. I’m a professional sculptor and to put it frankly, your head is just what I have been looking for.

She was friendly, charming and compelling as she knew how to be when she wanted something.

Doris Saunders had been doubtful, alarmed, flattered.

"Well, I don’t know, I’m sure. If it’s just the head. Of course, I’ve never done that sort of thing!"

Suitable hesitations, delicate financial inquiry.

Of course I should insist on your accepting the proper professional fee.

And so here was Nausicaa, sitting on the platform, enjoying the idea of her attractions, being immortalized (though not liking very much the examples of Henrietta’s work which she could see in the studio!) and enjoying also the revelation of her personality to a listener whose sympathy and attention seemed to be so complete.

On the table beside the model were her spectacles…the spectacles that she put on as seldom as possible owing to vanity, preferring to feel her way almost blindly sometimes, since she admitted to Henrietta that without them she was so shortsighted that she could hardly see a yard in front of her.

Henrietta had nodded comprehendingly. She understood now the physical reason for that blank and lovely stare.

Time went on. Henrietta suddenly laid down her modelling tools and stretched her arms widely.

All right, she said, I’ve finished. I hope you’re not too tired?

Oh, no, thank you, Miss Savernake. It’s been very interesting, I’m sure. Do you mean, it’s really done—so soon?

Henrietta laughed.

"Oh, no, it’s not actually

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1