Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method
Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method
Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method
Ebook215 pages5 hours

Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

2/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Much of the work of user-centered design practitioners involves some type of interviewing. While interviewing is an important skill, many colleagues have little or no formal training in interviewing methods and often learn on the job with limited feedback on the quality of their interviews.

This book teaches readers about the three basic interview methods: structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, and unstructured interviews. The author discusses the various strengths, weaknesses, issues with each type of interview, and includes best practices and procedures for conducing effective and efficient interviews. The book dives into the detailed information about interviews that haven’t been discussed before – readers learn how and when to ask the "how" and "why" questions to get a deeper understanding of problems, concepts, and processes, as well as discussions on laddering and critical incident techniques.

Because so much of what UX practitioners do involves good interviewing skills, this is your one-stop resource with the definitions, processes, procedures and best practices on the basic approaches.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 23, 2013
ISBN9780124104501
Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners: A User-Centered Design Method
Author

Chauncey Wilson

Chauncey Wilson is a UX Architect with 40 years of experience in human factors, usability, and user experience design. He has published and presented widely at UXPA, STC, CHI, APA, and HFES conferences. The author has published several books and chapters on usability engineering, brainstorming, surveys, victimization, and inspection methods. He has worked in small and large firms, started teams, consulted for a large firm, and consulted as a lone consultant. He enjoys the role of mentor and always tries to highlight the pros and cons of methods, principles, and processes. He is a member of the Skeptic’s society and enjoys the role of “Chief Skeptic.” Chauncey does not believe in magic numbers, miracle methods, or methodolotry.

Read more from Chauncey Wilson

Related to Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners

Related ebooks

Computers For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
2/5

1 rating0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners - Chauncey Wilson

    1

    Structured Interviews

    The structured interview method ask interviewers to ask a fixed set of questions in a standardized manner. This chapter provides strengths and weaknesses of this method, the procedures for planning and conducting structured interviews, and tips for gathering reliable data. The structured interview is useful for gather demographics, understanding user knowledge, comparing results across groups on a fixed set of responses, and gathering attitude and opinion data.

    Keywords

    Interview; questionnaire; standardized interview; structured interview; semi-structured interview

    Outline

    Overview of Structured Interviews

    When Should You Use Structured Interviews?

    Strengths

    Weaknesses

    What Do You Need to Use Structured Interviews?

    Personnel, Participants, and Training

    Hardware and Software

    Documents and Materials

    Procedures and Practical Advice on Structured Interviews

    Planning the Structured Interview

    Training Your Interview Team on How to Standardize the Structured Interview

    Conducting the Structured Interview

    After the Structured Interview Session

    Variations and Extensions to Structured Interviews

    Major Issues with Structured Interviews

    Low Popularity

    Sensitive Topics

    Data Quality: Types of Questions That May Lead to Poor Data Quality

    Conclusions

    Alternate Names: Directive interview, researcher-administered survey, standardized interview

    Related Methods: Questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, unstructured interviews

    Overview of Structured Interviews

    The structured interview is a verbal questionnaire in which the interaction is limited by a script and a fixed set of questions. You might be familiar with structured interviews from those intrusive phone surveys that you get in the evening when you are sitting down to dinner with your family. Just as you are about to partake of a culinary feast, you get a call. Someone introduces himself as part of the Howard Survey Company, and he wants to ask you a few questions. You must decide between eating hot food and taking the survey.

    Structured interviews can be conducted in person, over the phone, or through collaboration technologies such as chat. The structured interview has a specific format that interviewers are asked to follow with as little deviation as possible. It uses both closed and open questions to gather information on specific issues but most often asks participants to select a response from a numerical range or set of fixed responses.

    Every participant is generally asked the same questions in the same order (or an order prescribed by screening questions). For closed questions, participants answer questions using standardized response categories. Here is a simple example of a closed question with standard response categories:

    How would you rate the usability of Product X? Very Good, Good, Fair, or Poor

    The emphasis on standardization of the questions and responses is to ensure that answers can be reliably grouped and compared.

    What if People Don’t Give You Standardized Answers?

    For the question provided previously about the usability of a product, you might get an answer such as the following: The usability is pretty good. Does this mean that the usability is good or fair? Asking the participant what good or fair means is a bad practice because participants respond differently to response scales with different numbers of items; here, you now have a scale with two items rather than the original four items (Fowler & Mangione, 1990). The appropriate thing to do is to repeat all the response alternatives to make sure the answer is not a function of the interviewer’s scale truncation. Repeating the response categories each time can feel awkward, especially if you have a long list of rating scales, but consistent repetition is important for consistency. You might include a note in your script that you will be repeating the scale each time to ensure consistency across all your

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1