Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture: A Novel of Mathematical Obsession
Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture: A Novel of Mathematical Obsession
Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture: A Novel of Mathematical Obsession
Ebook179 pages3 hours

Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture: A Novel of Mathematical Obsession

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

In this critically acclaimed international bestseller, Petros Papachristos, a mathematical prodigy, has devoted much of his life trying to prove one of the greatest mathematical challenges of all time: Goldbach's Conjecture, the deceptively simple claim that every even number greater than two is the sum of two primes. His feverish and singular pursuit of this goal has come to define his life. Now an old man, he is looked on with suspicion and shame by his family-until his ambitious young nephew intervenes.

Seeking to understand his uncle's mysterious mind, the narrator of this novel unravels his story, a dramatic tale set against a tableau of brilliant historical figures-among them G. H. Hardy, the self-taught Indian genius Srinivasa Ramanujan, and a young Kurt Gödel. Meanwhile, as Petros recounts his own life's work, a bond is formed between uncle and nephew, pulling each one deeper into mathematical obsession, and risking both of their sanity.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 1, 2010
ISBN9781608196449
Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture: A Novel of Mathematical Obsession
Author

Apostolos Doxiadis

Apostolis Doxadis received a Bachelor's Degree in Mathematics from Columbia University and a Master's Degree in Applied Mathematics from the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes in Paris. He has run a number of successful computer companies, as well as written and directed for both the screen and the stage. The second of his two feature films, Tetriem, won the prize of the International Center for Artistic Cinema at the 1988 Berlin International Film Festival. Mr. Doxiadis lives in Athens, Greece

Related to Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture

Related ebooks

Mathematics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture

Rating: 3.664556936708861 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

237 ratings15 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I stopped enjoying anything to do with mathematics after my 10th grade geometry teacher responded to a request for extra help with a concept by more or less saying I was an idiot to do so "on one of the simplest things we covered all year." I never opened that geometry book again (and only passed by the skin of my teeth and the fact I had gotten good marks in earlier terms that balanced out the final ones.) So, when I figured out that Apostolos Doxiadis' "Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture" was about math, I viewed it with a little trepidation.However, I found the story completely engrossing, even when the mathematics got in a bit over my head. The novel is the story of Petros Papachristos, a number theorist who failed to achieve his life's work of proving the impossibly hard Goldbach Conjecture, which says that every even number greater than 2 is the sum of two primes. While the book does get into math, it's much more the story of a man who was obsessed with his life's work and what happened once that work was over. The story was pretty interesting, as were the characters so I'm glad I read this one.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found myself enjoying this book when I realized it's best read as a myth, not as a straight work of fiction. Knowledge of the formulas of higher mathematics isn't necessary but knowledge of the pursuit of proofs and the names of some of the most famous practitioners would be helpful. A quick read, and a good one.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Has been "Owned but unread" on my bookshelf for a very long time. I picked it up when reshelving and polished it off in some short but fairly intense reading shifts between "other stuff". I found it simultaneously a both playful and serious read, and welcomed the focus on human frailties and eccentricities.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Enjoyable quick read. As a novel it was good (not great). But then again how many good novels combine some non-trivial and intersting mathematical ideas? I havn't run across many (if you have please tell me about them! "White Light" by Rudy Rucker is the only one that comes to mind). In other words if you're into mathematics you will enjoy this.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Oh man. That one truly sucked.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture
    Apostolos Doxiadis
    (Faber, £6.99)
    Buy it at a discount at BOL

    It is a matter of some concern over and above the purely literary when a publisher, in whom the present reviewer has to declare an interest, announces that it is prepared to give away a cool $1 million. And all the more so when, in the last financial year, it made a profit of only £256,000, a sum I had thought perfectly respectable until announcement of this damn fool publicity stunt was made.

    You are all presumably familiar with Goldbach's Conjecture. For those who are not, it is this: that every even number greater than two is the sum of two prime numbers. Now, while this conjecture has been painstakingly verified for all numbers up to a gadzillion, no one has supplied an actual proof for every number in the universe. And they've been trying since 1742.

    So where mathematics flounders, literature steps in to lend a hand, and this is where Faber's publicity stunt comes in: tied to the hardback publication of this novel last April and still unclaimed. (One imagines listless coteries of mathematicians, preferring to work on anything on earth rather than Goldbach's Conjecture, until the Faber offer comes along. It is bankrolled, incidentally, by Bloomsbury US, so I suppose that, as their coffers are bursting with gold clawed from the pockets of Harry Potter fans, no one at Faber is really that worried.) By the way, Goldbach himself, and indeed this novel's narrator until about page 41, would be ineligible for the prize, being respectively non-US and non-UK citizens, and, in the latter case, under 18.


    Sign up to our Bookmarks newsletter
    Read more
    But that is nit-picking. For, when science meets art, the results are acclaimed around the world. I count 24 different encomia printed within and without the book itself, from George Steiner to the Morning Star . The book is manifestly readable, its scanty characterisation and liberal use of exclamation marks no bar to one's enjoyment; the mathematics has been made light and fluffy enough for ordinary people, and there is a cunning blend of fiction and reality (pen portraits of the Trinity trinity of mathematicians G H Hardy, JE Littlewood and Srinivasa Ramanjuan, with cameos from Alan Turing and Kurt Gödel). One imagines Doxiadis knows whereof he speaks: he was apparently admitted to Columbia University after presenting an original paper to the Department of Mathematics, has written at least four other novels, directed for the theatre, won a prize at the Berlin International Film Festival, and translated Hamlet and Mourning Becomes Electra , for crying out loud.

    The story is poignant: the narrator (unnamed; it is possible he is a version of Doxiadis himself) has an Uncle, gifted but broken, presumably in the course of trying to solve this Conjecture; he makes his nephew promise that he will never pursue a career in mathematics. It is a portrait of mathematical genius, of relentless application and insanity; and it makes the character of the driven mathematician less of a mystery. To paraphrase more of the book would be to spoil its simple impact. As for Goldbach's Conjecture itself, I have discovered a most marvellous proof of this, only I do not have enough space in this review to . . . oh, wait, that's a Fermat's Last Theorem joke.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is the story of the relationship between a man and his uncle, Petros Papachristos. Petros spent most of his life obsessed with solving Goldbach's Conjecture, one of the unproven conjectures of mathematics. There is a little bit of math - enough to talk about at a cocktail party, not to sit down and work through. There are famous mathematicians as minor characters, such as Godel and Turing. And there is a great obsession, and how it affected the man's life. The book is a fast read and particularly fun for mathematicians.

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Pseudoscientific....you never actually more than scratches at the mathematics; i.e. whatever puzzle would have served as the propeller of the story. The story has a thin plot; it is about the storyteller and his relationship to the uncle, the mathematician, the failure who never becomes the one to prove Golbachs conjecture, and the uncle`s influence on his career choice, why he never became a mathematician himself in the end. Good idea set up with unusual props - it could have been.... But the story fails psychologically in the end when the nephew starts a crusade to make his old uncle come to terms with his failure. This is an act absolutely incongruent with the carefully displayed longstanding and growing sympathy between uncle and nephew, and of the empathy the more mature nephew developes towards his uncle through the combined knowledge begot from his own journey in to the mathematician´s world and the close greek kinship. The nephew´s crusade against what he perceives as illusions of his uncle, precipitates the uncle´s last go at the puzzle, and eventually his death, a premature death the nephew easily washes his hands of. The nephew´s character transformation is not tragic (unleashed unknowingly with disastrous results) they are just unbelievable. Psychologically dysfunctional added to the fact that we never come close to mathematics per se leaves the book standing shakely on both legs.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Remarkably readable tale hiding behind a daunting title that promises advanced mathematics. The narrative is entirely engaging as an enquiring narrator reveals the life and egocentricity of a brilliant self-defeating uncle.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Uncle Petros is "off limits" for the narrator; for years this uncle tried to solve one of the most difficult problems in math, goldbach's conjecture, however, failing to do so. The story is a combination of the present, in which the narrator and uncle Petros interact, and the past, with uncle Petros quest in math. A nice combination of mathematical insights and information and a well written story.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A young man tells his own and his uncle's story. The elder is an research mathematician who by delaying publication of his theories lost the race for publication and as is no second place reward in science was viewed by himself and his family as a failure. Intellectual angst for a change.Well written and entertaining .
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Uncle Petros and Golbach’s ConjectureUncle Petros and Golbach’s Conjecture was originally a best selling Greek novel and has now been published over 20 languages so don’t get switched off by the title and subject matter. Forget about it being about maths and in fact think of Moby Dick to place this book. It’s about obsession and pride in chasing the impossible dream. You understand the thrill and terror of chasing impossible dreams. Right now let’s get the maths out of the way. Golbach’s Conjecture first stated in the 18th century suggests that:Every even integer greater than 2 can be written as the sum of two primes.But mathematicians lack proof that in all circumstance it would hold. For example think about Physics where if dealing with the very big or the very small ordinary scientific understanding ceases to work. So could this be the case in Mathematics? Yes over my head as well! But the author is a childhood mathematical genius who submitted original research at 15 before even starting his degree and also an acclaimed film maker and writer. So he both understands the mathematical issues and can write so that we understand and care. We first meet Uncle Petros in the 1970’s through the eyes of the beloved favourite nephew as a teenager. Petros is dismissed as the family failure that supports him through the family business while he does nothing but read books and plays chess. He leaves his home only once a month to do the books of a charity founded by his father. The beloved favourite nephew is met by a wall of adult silence when he tried to find out what the anger of the family is about. A chance phone call and a subsequent letter lead him to discover that far from a failure Uncle Petros had been a professor of mathematics in the 20’s and 30’s at a prestigious German University. This makes him as obsessive as his Uncle as he struggles to discover the Truth of the family scandal.He tries to become a mathematician to help him challenge and understand what had obsessed his Uncle. This causes huge family problems- this is a Greek family remember where honouring your family and Father is a top rule in life. He finally manages to get the story of his Uncles obsessive hunt out in the open but at a high personal cost to his own ambitions. It is clear that Uncle Petros is a genius who will never be known as his hopes are dashed in the 30’s by the publication of Kurt Godel’s Theorem. Yes more maths but not much so don’t leave. This solves the problem of completeness by showing that any theory of numbers will contain unprovable propositions. Alan During (him of how do we know a computer has human intelligence- asked before computers were developed- now that’s what being clever is about) then demonstrates that theorists have no idea which proposition is merely hard to prove and which are impossible to prove. Hence, Uncle Petros has no way of knowing if spending all his life in trying solve the Golbach’s Conjecture is a possible but hard task or impossible task. He gives up, his dreams and hopes ended. The beloved nephew is finding the truth is released from his obsession and so escapes the fate of his Uncle but then realises that a psychological lie has taken place which he needs to lance but this has tragic consequences.Uncle Petros and Golbach’s Conjecture is highly recommended Greek tragedy in less then 200 pages about theoretical maths and why love and life is about how you answer the Bette Davis Theorem:Oh, don't let's ask for the moon. We've already got the stars.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A really enjoyable novel, which is mostly an elderly man's telling of his life, where he tries and fails to prove one of the most persistantly unproved theorems. It's really about what it is like to be a research mathematician (I had to think really hard to even spell it!). Several famous mathematicians make cameos: Hardy, his indian protege whose name I forget, Godel and of course Turing. He dies a failure, but his end is put rather beautifully.He also dreams about the integers, especially the primes. I thought that I was alone in doing this.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This work of fiction relates what is a plausible story of the complex effects a man of science (in this case mathematics) has on his family and community and the world. The main subject of the book, Uncle Petros, is seen by many, particularly those who were closest to him, to have squandered his gift of knowledge on a single problem that, even if he had solved it would not have meant much to them. Uncle Petros was trying to solve one of the hard problems of mathematics called Goldbach's conjecture and although he worked on it for many years he was unable to prove it. Uncle Petros is a fictional character, but may be loosely based on a real mathematician, C.D. Papakyriakopoulos who did in fact work many years on a different, but also very difficult mathematical problem called the Poincare conjecture. Papakyriakopoulos failed to solve the Poincare conjectue (as did many, many other mathematicians for over 100 years). However, his "failure" resulted in great progress in several areas of mathematics and science. In fact, unlike the Goldbach conjecture the Poincare conjecture has recently been proven, based in part on the advances made by many mathematicians, inlcuding Papakyriakopoulos. The author, Apostolos Doxiadis is the son of a famous and very influential architect Konstantinos Apostolos Doxiadis. Apostolos studied mathematics at Columbia University and did graduate work in Paris. He has several other published works, but Uncle Petros is by far the most widely known at least in the US. "Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture" is very readable and enjoyable book whether or not you are interested in math. I look forward to other works from Doxiadis.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A boy discovers that his ageing, reclusive uncle, derided by the family as a failure, was in fact once a celebrated mathematician. He then embarks on a quest to discover what happened in his uncle's life. Written with an engaging, light touch (there's no difficult maths), this novella is an immensely worthwhile exploration of genius and obsession.

Book preview

Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture - Apostolos Doxiadis

Uncle Petros and

Goldbach’s Conjecture

A Novel of Mathematical Obsession

APOSTOLOS DOXIADIS

BLOOMSBURY

NEW YORK • BERLIN • LONDON

Archimedes will be remembered when Aeschylus

is forgotten, because languages die and mathematical

ideas do not. ‘Immortality’ may be a silly word,

but probably a mathematician has the best

chance of whatever it may mean.

G. H. HARDY, A Mathematician’s Apology

Uncle Petros and

Goldbach’s Conjecture

Contents

One

Two

Three

Acknowledgements

A Note on the Author

One

Every family has its black sheep — in ours it was Uncle Petros.

My father and Uncle Anargyros, his two younger brothers, made sure that my cousins and I should inherit their opinion of him unchallenged.

‘That no-good brother of mine, Petros, is one of life’s failures,’ my father would say at every opportunity And Uncle Anargyros, during the family get-togethers from which Uncle Petros routinely absented himself, always accompanied mention of his name with snorts and grimaces expressing disapproval, disdain or simple resignation, depending on his mood.

However, I must say this for them: both brothers treated him with scrupulous fairness in financial matters. Despite the fact that he never shared even a slight part of the labour and the responsibilities involved in running the factory that the three inherited jointly from my grandfather, Father and Uncle Anargyros unfailingly paid Uncle Petros his share of the profits. (This was due to a strong sense of family, another common legacy.) As for Uncle Petros, he repaid them in the same measure. Not having had a family of his own, upon his death he left us, his nephews, the children of his magnanimous brothers, the fortune that had been multiplying in his bank account practically untouched in its entirety.

Specifically to me, his ‘most favoured of nephews’ (his own words), he additionally bequeathed his huge library which I, in turn, donated to the Hellenic Mathematical Society. For myself I retained only two of its items, volume seventeen of Leonard Euler’s Opera Omnia and issue number thirty-eight of the German scientific journal Monatsheftefür Mathematik und Physik. These humble memorabilia were symbolic, as they defined the boundaries of Uncle Petros’ essential life-story. Its starting-point is in a letter written in 1742, contained in the former, wherein the minor mathematician Christian Goldbach brings to the attention of the great Euler a certain arithmetical observation. And its termination, so to speak, is to be found in pages 183-98 of the erudite Germanic journal, in a study entitled ‘On Formally Undecidable Propositions in Principia Mathematica and Related Systems’, authored in 1931 by the until then totally unknown Viennese mathematician Kurt Gödel.

*

Until I reached mid-adolescence I would see Uncle Petros only once a year, during the ritual visit on his name day, the feast of Saints Peter and Paul on the twenty-ninth of June. The custom of this annual meeting had been initiated by my grandfather and as a consequence had become an inviolable obligation in our tradition-ridden family. We journeyed to Ekali, a suburb of Athens today but in those days more of an isolated sylvan hamlet, where Uncle Petros lived alone in a small house surrounded by a large garden and orchard.

The contemptuous dismissal of their older brother by Father and Uncle Anargyros had puzzled me from my earliest years and had gradually become for me a veritable mystery. The discrepancy between the picture they painted of him and the impression I formed through our scant personal contact was so glaring that even an immature mind like mine was compelled to wonder.

In vain did I observe Uncle Petros during our annual visit, seeking in his appearance or behaviour signs of dissoluteness, indolence or other characteristics of the reprobate. On the contrary, any comparison weighed unquestionably in his favour: the younger brothers were short-tempered and often outright rude in their dealings with people while Uncle Petros was tactful and considerate, his deep-set blue eyes always kindling with kindness. They were both heavy drinkers and smokers; he drank nothing stronger than water and inhaled only the scented air of his garden. Furthermore, unlike Father, who was portly, and Uncle Anargyros, who was outright obese, Petros had the healthy wiriness resulting from a physically active and abstemious lifestyle.

My curiosity increased with each passing year. To my great disappointment, however, my father refused to disclose any further information about Uncle Petros beyond his dismissive incantation, ‘one of life’s failures’. From my mother I learned of his daily activities (one could hardly speak of an occupation): he got up every morning at the crack of dawn and spent most daylight hours slaving away in his garden, without help from a gardener or any modern labour-saving contraptions — his brothers erroneously attributed this to stinginess. He seldom left his house, except for a monthly visit to a small philanthropic institution founded by my grandfather, where he volunteered his services as treasurer. In addition, he sometimes went to ‘another place’, never specified by her. His house was a true hermitage; with the exception of the annual family invasion there were never any visitors. Uncle Petros had no social life of any kind. In the evenings he stayed at home and — here mother had lowered her voice almost to a whisper — ‘immersed himself in his studies’.

At this my attention suddenly peaked. ‘Studies? What studies?’

‘God only knows,’ answered Mother, conjuring up in my boyish imagination visions of esoterica, alchemy or worse.

A further unexpected piece of information came to identify the mysterious ‘other place’ that Uncle Petros visited. It was offered one evening by a dinner-guest of my father’s.

‘I saw your brother Petros at the club the other day. He demolished me with a Karo-Cann,’ said the guest, and I interjected, earning an angry look from my father: ‘What do you mean? What’s a Karo-Cann?’

Our guest explained that he was referring to a particular way of opening the game of chess, named after its two inventors, Messrs Karo and Cann. Apparently, Uncle Petros was in the habit of paying occasional visits to a chess club in Patissia where he routinely routed his unfortunate opponents.

‘What a player!’ the guest sighed admiringly. ‘If only he’d entered formal competition he’d be a Grand Master today!’

At this point Father changed the subject.

The annual family reunion was held in the garden. The grown-ups sat around a table that had been set up in a paved patio, drinking, snacking and making small-talk, the two younger brothers routinely exerting themselves (as a rule, not altogether successfully) to be gracious to the honouree. My cousins and I played among the trees in the orchard.

On one occasion, having made the decision to seek an answer to the mystery of Uncle Petros, I asked to use the bathroom; I was hoping I would get a chance to examine the inside of the house. To my great disappointment, however, our host indicated a small outhouse attached to the tool-shed. The next year (by that time I was fourteen) the weather came in aid of my curiosity. A summer storm forced my uncle to open the French windows and lead us into a space that had obviously been intended by the architect to serve as a living room. Equally obviously, however, the owner did not use it to receive guests. Although it did contain a couch, it was totally inappropriately positioned facing a blank wall. Chairs were brought in from the garden and placed in a semi-circle, where we sat like the mourners at a provincial wake.

I made a hasty reconnaissance, with quick glances all around. The only pieces of furniture apparently put to daily use were a deep, shabby armchair by the fireplace with a small table at its side; on it was a chessboard with the pieces set out as for a game in progress. Next to the table, on the floor, was a large pile of chess books and periodicals. This, then, was where Uncle Petros sat every night. The studies mentioned by my mother must have been studies of chess. But were they?

I couldn’t allow myself to jump to facile conclusions, as there were now new speculative possibilities. The main feature of the room we sat in — what made it so different from the living room in our house — was the overwhelming presence of books, countless books everywhere. Not only were all the visible walls of the room, corridor and entrance hall dressed from floor to ceiling with shelves crammed to overflowing, but books in tall piles covered most of the floor area as well. Most of them looked old and overused.

At first, I chose the most direct route to answering my question about their content: I asked, ‘What are all these books, Uncle Petros?’

There was a frozen silence, exactly as if I had spoken of rope in the house of the hanged man.

‘They are … old,’ he mumbled hesitantly, after casting a quick glance in the direction of my father. He seemed so flustered in his search for an answer, however, and the accompanying smile was so wan that I couldn’t bring myself to ask for further explanations.

’s. Among them, I discerned some more intelligible signs, +’s, =’s and ÷’s interspersed with numerals and letters both Latin and Greek. My rational mind overcame cabbalistic fantasies: it was mathematics!

I left Ekali that day totally preoccupied with my discovery, indifferent to the scolding I received from my father on the way back to Athens and to his hypocritical reprimands about my ‘rudeness to my uncle’ and ‘my busybody, prying questions’. As if it was the breach in savoir-vivre that had bothered him!

My curiosity about Uncle Petros’ dark, unknown side developed in the next few months into something approaching obsession. I remember compulsively drawing doodles combining mathematical and chess symbols in my notebooks during school classes. Maths and chess: in one of these most probably lay the solution to the mystery surrounding him, yet neither offered a totally satisfactory explanation, neither being reconcilable with his brothers’ contemptuously dismissive attitude. Surely, these two fields of interest (or was it more than mere interest?) were not in themselves objectionable. Whichever way you looked at it, being a chess player at Grand Master level or a mathematician who had devoured hundreds of formidable tomes did not immediately classify you as ‘one of life’s failures’.

I needed to find out, and in order to do so I even contemplated for a while a venture in the style of the exploits of my favourite literary heroes, a project worthy of Enid Blyton’s Secret Seven, the Hardy Boys, or their Greek soulmate, the ‘heroic Phantom Boy’. I planned, down to the smallest detail, a break-in at my uncle’s house during one of his expeditions to the philanthropic institution or the chess club, so I could lay my hands on palpable evidence of transgression.

As things turned out, I did not have to resort to crime to satisfy my curiosity. The answer I was seeking came and hit me, so to speak, over the head.

Here’s how it happened:

One afternoon, while I was alone at home doing my homework, the phone rang and I answered it.

‘Good evening,’ said an unfamiliar male voice. ‘I’m calling from the Hellenic Mathematical Society. May I speak to the Professor please?’

Unthinking at first, I corrected the caller: ‘You must have dialled the wrong number. There is no professor here.’

‘Oh, Fm sorry,’ he said. ‘I should have inquired first. Isn’t that the Papachristos residence?’

I had a sudden flash of inspiration. ‘Do you, perhaps, mean Mr Petros Papachristos?’ I asked.

‘Yes,’ said the caller, ‘Professor Papachristos.’

‘Professor’! The receiver nearly dropped from my hand. However, I suppressed my excitement, lest this windfall opportunity go to waste.

‘Oh, I didn’t realize you were referring to Professor Papachristos,’ I said ingratiatingly. ‘You see, this is his brother’s home, but as the Professor does not have a telephone’ — (fact) — ‘we take his calls for him’ (blatant lie).

‘Could I then have his address?’ the caller asked, but by now I had regained my composure and he was no match for me.

‘The Professor likes to maintain his privacy,’ I said haughtily. ‘We also receive his mail.’

I had left the poor man no options. ‘Then be so kind as to give me your address. On behalf of the Hellenic Mathematical Society, we would like to send him an invitation.’

The next few days I played sick so as to be at home at the usual time of mail delivery. I didn’t have to wait long. On the third day after the phone-call I had the precious envelope in my hand. I waited till after midnight for my parents to go to sleep and then tiptoed to the kitchen and steamed it open (another lesson culled from boys’

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1