Choosing Craft: The Artist's Viewpoint
By Vicki Halper
()
About this ebook
The anthology is organized according to four activities that ground a professional life in craft--inspiration, training, economics, and philosophy. Halper and Douglas mined a wide variety of sources for their material, including artists' published writings, letters, journal entries, exhibition statements, lecture notes, and oral histories. The detailed record they amassed reveals craft's dynamic relationships with painting, sculpture, design, industry, folk and ethnic traditions, hobby craft, and political and social movements. Collectively, these reflections form a social history of craft.
Choosing Craft ultimately offers artists' writings and recollections as vital and vivid data that deserve widespread study as a primary resource for those interested in the American art form.
Related to Choosing Craft
Related ebooks
Makers: A History of American Studio Craft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Contemporary British Studio Pottery: Forms of Expression Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting about Visual Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Companion to American Art Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Necessity of Sculpture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew Masters of Woodturning: Expanding the Boundaries of Wood Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Art and Celebrity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMid-Century Modernism and the American Body: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Power in Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLenore Tawney: Mirror of the Universe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Theory of Craft: Function and Aesthetic Expression Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Crafting a Continuum: Rethinking Contemporary Craft Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAntony Gormley on Sculpture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Isa Genzken: Sculpture as World Receiver Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExploring Contemporary Craft: History, Theory and Critical Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking Is Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlack Mountain College Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This Model World: Travels to the Edge of Contemporary Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCraftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5California Society of Printmakers: One Hundred Years, 1913-2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlank Canvas: Art School Creativity From Punk to New Wave Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Studio Reader: On the Space of Artists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnarchists, Beats and Dadaists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDolls In Canada Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Computer in the Art Room: the Origins of British Computer Arts 1950-1980 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wen Redmond's Digital Fiber Art: Combine Photos & Fabric - Create Your Own Mixed-Media Masterpiece Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Craft Perception and Practice: A Canadian Discourse, Volume 3 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreaming Red: Creating ArtPace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerspectives on contemporary printmaking: Critical writing since 1986 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Live Form: Women, Ceramics, and Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArt Ink It!: Paint With Ink and Make Jewelry from Your Clippings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Art For You
The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art & Fear: Observations on the Perils (and Rewards) of Artmaking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Creative, Inc.: The Ultimate Guide to Running a Successful Freelance Business Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bibliophile: An Illustrated Miscellany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Creative Habit: Learn It and Use It for Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All the Beauty in the World: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shape of Ideas: An Illustrated Exploration of Creativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art 101: From Vincent van Gogh to Andy Warhol, Key People, Ideas, and Moments in the History of Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Draw Like an Artist: 100 Flowers and Plants Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And The Mountains Echoed Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Find Your Artistic Voice: The Essential Guide to Working Your Creative Magic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Designer's Dictionary of Color Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Designer's Guide to Color Combinations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Botanical Drawing: A Step-By-Step Guide to Drawing Flowers, Vegetables, Fruit and Other Plant Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Make Your Art No Matter What: Moving Beyond Creative Hurdles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Draw and Paint Anatomy, All New 2nd Edition: Creating Lifelike Humans and Realistic Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art Models 10: Photos for Figure Drawing, Painting, and Sculpting Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Lioness of Boston: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Electric State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Morpho: Anatomy for Artists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World Needs Your Art: Casual Magic to Unlock Your Creativity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related categories
Reviews for Choosing Craft
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Choosing Craft - Vicki Halper
Choosing Craft
Choosing Craft
THE ARTIST’S VIEWPOINT
Edited by VICKI HALPER and DIANE DOUGLAS
The University of North Carolina Press
Chapel Hill
© 2009 The University of North Carolina Press
All rights reserved
Manufactured in the United States of America
Designed by Richard Hendel
Set in TheSerif types by Tseng Information Systems, Inc.
The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.
The University of North Carolina Press has been a member of the Green Press Initiative since 2003.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Choosing craft : the artist’s viewpoint / edited by Vicki Halper and Diane Douglas.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8078-3119-9 (cloth : alk. paper)
1. Handicraft—United States—History. 2. Artisans—United States—Anecdotes. I. Halper, Vicki. II. Douglas, Diane, 1951-TT23.C56 2009
745.5—dc22 2008043772
13 12 11 10 09 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
PART 1: CHOOSING CRAFT
1 INTEGRATING ART AND LIFE
Anni Albers, 1944
George Nakashima, 1953
Marguerite Wildenhain, 1959
Mary Caroline (M. C.) Richards, 1962
Val Cushing, James McKinnell,
Daniel Rhodes, and Robert Turner, 1966
Paul Manners, 1978
Miriam Schapiro, 1980
Arthur Espenet (Art) Carpenter, 1982
Scott Burton, 1987
Robert Kehlmann, 1988
Joyce Scott, 1995
Bruce Metcalf, 2002
Consuelo Jimenez Underwood, 2005
2 INHERITING A PATH
Darrell Adams, 1992
Nora Naranjo-Morse, 1994
Diego Romero, 1994
Mark Lindquist, 2001
Sonya Y. S. Clark, 2004
Robert Ebendorf, 2004
Mary Lee Bendolph, 2006
3 RESPONDING TO MATERIALS
George Nakashima, 1953, 1981
Albert Paley, 1982
Mary Lee Hu, 1985
Paul Marioni, 1985
Nick Cave, 1989
Ann Hamilton, 1990
Warren Seelig, 1992
Erika Ayala Stefanutti and Gary Griffin, 1994
Michael Lucero, 1996 58
Lesley Dill, 2000
Bruce Metcalf, 2000
Dorothy Gill Barnes, 2003
Sheila Hicks, 2004
Gerhardt Knodel, 2004
PART 2: GETTING AN EDUCATION
4 TRAINING WITH MASTERS
Tage Frid, 1975
Paul Soldner, 1978
Warren MacKenzie, 1981
Richard Marquis, 1995
Fritz Dreisbach, 2004
Tom Joyce, 2004
5 STUDYING IN THE ACADEMY
Harvey Littleton, 1963
Marguerite Wildenhain, 1973
Wendell Castle, 1981
Lillian Elliott, 1989
Angela Fina, 1989–90
Stephen DeStaebler, 1994
Arline Fisch, 2001
Harvey Littleton, 2001
6 LEARNING IN COMMUNITIES
Dale Chihuly and Lewis (Buster) Simpson, 1972
Margret Craver, 1982
Albert Paley, 1982
Judy Kensley McKie, 1986
Richard Notkin, 1998
Gyöngy Laky, 1998–99
Arline Fisch, 2001
L. Brent Kington, 2001
Fritz Dreisbach, 2004
Gerry Williams, 2004
Sabrina Gschwandtner, 2007
PART 3: MAKING A LIVING
7 STARTING A BUSINESS
Charles M. Harder, 1945
Edith Heath, 1957, 1990–92, 1994
Jack Lenor Larsen, 1971
John Lewis, 1978
Helena Hernmarck, 1987
Norma Minkowitz, 1987
Byron Temple, 1987
Margaret De Patta, 1989
Richard Marquis, 1989
Sheila Hicks, 2004
8 ENGAGING THE MARKET
Marguerite Wildenhain, 1957
Arline Fisch, 1981
Henry Halem, 1982–83
Alphonse Mattia, 1985
Francis Whitaker, 1986
Donald Friedlich, 1988
Nora Naranjo-Morse, 1992
Betty Woodman, 1998
Jun Kaneko, 2000
Fritz Dreisbach, 2004
9 WORKING FOR INDUSTRY
Dorothy Liebes, 1947, 1960
Charles Ormond Eames Jr., 1957
Jack Lenor Larsen, 1958
Kay Sekimachi, 1963
John Prip, 1964
Bill Brown, 1980
Ed Rossbach, 1982
Katherine Westphal, 1984
Daniel Owen (Dan) Dailey, 1989
Lillian Elliott, 1989
Arline Fisch, 2001
Robert Ebendorf, 2004
PART 4: CONFRONTING CRAFT
10 TESTING TRADITION
Marguerite Wildenhain, 1953
Charles Ormond Eames Jr., 1957
Peter Voulkos, 1957
Richard Artschwager, 1965
Claes Oldenburg, 1965
Robert Arneson, 1974
James Krenov, 1975
John Mason, 1977
Howard Kottler, 1977, 1978
John McQueen, 1978
Ed Rossbach, undated
Wayne Higby, 1982
David Huchthausen, 1984
Wendell Castle, 1985
Stanley Lechtzin, 1988
Mike Kelley, 1991
Arline Fisch, 1994
Rosemary Apple Blossom Lonewolf, 1996
Richard Notkin, 1997
Betty Woodman, 1998
Mark Hewitt, 2000
Michael James, 2003
Josiah McElheny, 2004
11 CRITIQUING CULTURE
Ed Rossbach, 1973
Robert Kehlmann, 1979
Judy Chicago, 1979, 1980
James Melchert, 1980
Katherine Westphal, 1984
Susan Kingsley, 1987
Keith A. Lewis, 1991
Lou Cabeen, 1993
Garth Johnson, 2000
Tom Joyce, 2004
Liz Collins, Sabrina Gschwandtner, Cat Mazza, and Allison Smith, 2008
Index
Preface
Choosing Craft is an assemblage of artists’ words describing their lives, work, ideas, and values as they relate to the history and practice of craft in the United States. It is an anecdotal narrative, thematically arranged, that examines the post–World War II development of modern craft, which came of age beside modernist painting and sculpture and was seminally influenced by them as well as by traditional and industrial practices.
As an art discipline, craft has been poorly documented in academic and critical journals and texts and largely omitted from the art-historical canon. Reasons for this marginalization are many.¹ The nature of craftwork—its historical associations with artisanal labor; folk, ethnic, and communal traditions; and the anonymous production, often by women, of items for domestic use—distanced it from many core values and protagonists of high modernism. Given the general disinterest of the mainstream art establishment, craft scholarship—historical documentation, critique, and theory—developed as a separate track in insular contexts driven primarily by practitioners themselves.
Makers’ letters, reports from craft conferences, articles in medium-specific periodicals, lecture notes, and oral histories constitute the primary documentary record of modern craft history. We targeted these materials as the foundation and research focus for this book. Our purpose is to present artists’ writings and recollections as vital and vivid data that deserve widespread study as a primary resource for craft scholarship.
Following the lead of these artist-constructed sources, we listened as makers argued, theorized, wondered, and rhapsodized about craft. Our method was open-ended and inclusive in examining their motives, training, work habits, markets, and diverse networks of association. What emerged from this investigation to become the organizing structure of this anthology was a picture of craft as cultural labor drawn from individual artists’ experiences and opinions. This perspective differs from many other artists-on-art books, which often exclude matters of lifestyle and economics in favor of a narrower focus on aesthetics alone.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
We concentrated on the post–World War II period because of the availability of printed materials and interviews and the huge growth of the studio craft movement in that era. The war sets the historical context for the anthology. It prompted the emigration to the United States of influential artists, particularly refugees from Nazi Germany, such as Anni Albers and Marguerite Wildenhain, whose education, employment, and lives were threatened by the Holocaust. American veterans returning from European and Asian fronts, such as Peter Voulkos, brought personal knowledge of other cultures and were able to enter university arts programs without concern about cost or parental disapproval thanks to tuition provided by the G.I. Bill. Conscientious objectors such as Paul Soldner and Robert Turner, who had refused to fight in the war, and Japanese American internees such as George Nakashima joined with others who were dismayed at the slaughter and opposed to the growing corporate influence in American economics. They swelled the ranks of makers who viewed a life in the crafts as an alternative to social conformity and traditional careers.
Those who chose craft after World War II entered an international art world soon to be dominated for the first time by American artists rather than Parisians. Abstract expressionist, or New York school, painters, including Jackson Pollock and Willem de Kooning, strongly influenced the aesthetics of Peter Voulkos and his followers. Energized by developments in the art world, Rose Slivka, the influential writer and editor in chief of Craft Horizons magazine from 1959 to 1979, promoted a shift away from traditional craft forms, skills, and techniques toward a vision of craft that emphasized innovation and individual expression. She championed Voulkos’s work with the same zeal and heroic claims that Clement Greenberg used in promoting the American abstract painters.
Slivka’s view of craft as sculpture introduced a debate that would pervade teaching, criticism, and marketing for the remainder of the twentieth century. Makers, critics, and historians splintered into fractious subgroups over the questions What is craft?
and Is it art?
At the extremes, traditional practitioners opposed innovators, producers resented academics, professionals were split from hobbyists, and industrial designers were banned.
The social ferment of the 1960s and 1970s, expressed in the civil rights movement, hippie counterculture, and Vietnam War protests, reinforced the post–World War II attraction of craft production as an antiestablishment activity. Choosing craft was a way of choosing to live off the grid
in relation to the dominant capitalist culture. This identification of craft with the counterculture waned as the century progressed. Makers became more entrepreneurial about marketing, and commercial outlets (particularly galleries and craft fairs) proliferated. Craft was more frequently exhibited and collected in nonspecialized art museums, further diminishing the isolation of the field.
The political and aesthetic alignments of craft and postmodern art became increasingly clear in the late twentieth century. The marginalization of craft outside the art establishment was illustrative of feminists’ critiques of the exclusion of women from the art-historical canon and disdain of the domestic as a valid subject for making art. So, too, craft’s roots in ethnic and traditional communities connected it to artists’ critiques arising from multiculturalism and their interrogation of labor practices and globalization.
The twenty-first century heralded a rapprochement between the industrial design community and the craft establishment, which began again to embrace artist-designed, mass-produced objects. Important institutions that once featured the word craft
in their titles changed their names to reflect openness to other arts and to industry—for example, the American Craft Museum in New York became the Museum of Arts and Design (2002) and the California College of Arts and Crafts became the California College of the Arts (2003). These movements toward hybridization signaled a reversal of the previous generation’s urge to separate craft from other art practices. Choosing Craft was compiled within this pluralistic context.
METHODOLOGY
We began our research with a targeted list of about 100 artists whom we deemed to be important and influential to the field. This list grew to more than 150 makers after consultation with other historians and through leads we encountered in our research. We attempted to locate writings and interviews for each of the targeted artists; we neither conducted interviews ourselves nor transcribed materials that existed solely on audio tape or film. Whenever possible, we tried to find sources contemporaneous with the events described.
Choosing Craft does not offer a linear history recording the flow of people and events that shaped the field. Organized by cultural topics rather than chronology, it focuses instead on dominant themes—inspiration, educational opportunities, working conditions, and philosophical tensions—that shaped and continue to shape the field. A noteworthy finding of our research is that so many fundamental questions about craft are recurrent. Concerns about technique and technology, ornamentation and utility, tradition and innovation are not the proving ground or battleground for any single generation. Our approach highlights the emergence and resurgence of these central themes and tensions throughout the period without attempting to resolve conflicts or ambiguities about craft’s definition or disciplinary borders—for example, distinctions between craft, design, and fine art. Our editorial perspective, grounded in the field of cultural studies, identifies a web of networks rather than one essential character for craft. It examines craft’s multiple roots in and ongoing relationships with painting and sculpture, design, industry, folk and ethnic traditions, hobby craft, and political and social movements.²
More than 100 different makers are represented in Choosing Craft, some with multiple entries. Our primary criterion for selection was pertinent content and vivid words, with wide allowances made for the difference between written texts, which are reviewed and edited, and transcribed interviews, which may have the hesitations, repetitions, and colloquialisms of informal conversation. We have attempted to do justice to the broad range of craft contexts and to represent a spectrum of artists whose training and cultures differ. Included are the words of teachers and students, masters and apprentices, designers and producers, Native Americans and immigrants, the status quo and the disaffected. Recognized leaders in the field are featured along with artists not traditionally associated with craft.
Our choices of terminology support this philosophical perspective. The designators artists
and makers
are used generically and interchangeably to describe the variety of participants included in the text. We also use potter
or metalsmith,
for example, when applicable. We deliberately do not use the terms artisan
and craftsman
to avoid implying categorical distinctions between craft, design, and art.
ORGANIZATION
Choosing Craft is organized according to four seminal activities that ground a professional life in the crafts. Each is explored in depth as a part in the anthology. The first and most elemental activity is the commitment to pursue craft as a vocation, which is described in part 1, Choosing Craft.
The chapters in this first part articulate the values, inspirations, and experiences that attract artists to their professions.
Getting an Education,
the second part, explores the varied ways artists learned their craft in the aftermath of World War II, when there were few prescribed paths to guide their efforts. The find-it-yourself
and do-it-yourself
nature of training for the postwar generation profoundly influenced the character and structure of craft education in subsequent decades, resonating with the counterculture ethos of the 1960s and 1970s. The entrepreneurial spirit that initiated new academic institutions and programs also stimulated options in nonacademic training. These include artists’ support groups and communities of practice—for example, shared work sites, annual conferences, sales and marketing networks, and virtual communication exchanges—which have remained a distinctive and influential feature of craft education to this day.
Making a Living,
part 3, looks at the economics of craft, featuring artists who produce one-of-a-kind and limited-edition objects along with those who design mass-produced goods for others. They sell their art through fairs, galleries, department stores, and wholesalers. There is enormous diversity in their professional roles, with many artists supplementing their positions as sole practitioners in order to design or produce for industry. At play are considerations of income, creative vision, affiliation, tolerance (or, in some cases, hunger) for risk, and preference for working alone or with others.
In Confronting Craft,
the anthology’s final part, artists reflect on the definition and boundaries of craft as a discipline and its relationship with the culture as a whole. Here makers accept or reject traditional constraints and open themselves to new influences and challenges. Spirited philosophical, cultural, and political confrontations highlight artists as agents of change who make or break rules and as individuals confronting established networks of power.
Choosing Craft demonstrates that the impulses to learn, make, and theorize about craft have always been, and remain, complicated and multifaceted.³ Craft absorbs and affects many art practices. Its history in modern America is intertwined with industrial, cultural, and intellectual history. That is why we believe it is best studied through an interdisciplinary approach. We hope that Choosing Craft promotes broader recognition and study of craft within the larger narrative of American art and cultural history.
NOTES ON USING THIS BOOK
All entries are chronological within each chapter; each chapter starts anew with the postwar years. However, because many entries are reminiscences, which are dated by the time of writing or recording rather than the years being referenced, the chronology is not always strict.
In editing the entries, we use standard ellipses (three or four dots) to indicate where a phrase or sentence has been omitted or where an interviewer’s interjection or question was left out because of irrelevance to the flow of the artist’s thought. An entire line of dots is used to indicate longer excluded passages.
NOTES
1. See James H. Sanders, Moving Beyond the Binary,
in Objects and Meaning: New Perspectives on Art and Craft, edited by M. Anna Fariello and Paula Owen (Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2004), 88–103.
2. Many art critics and historians have recognized craft’s polyglot nature and argued for research and analysis of the field informed by material culture studies, social history, and cultural studies. The following scholars and their ideas have been especially influential for us: John Michael Vlatch, The Afro-American Tradition in Decorative Arts (Cleveland: Cleveland Museum of Art, 1978); Arthur Danto, Furniture as Art,
Nation, April 23, 1990, 571–75; Cheryl White, The Voices of Craft,
Art-week 27 (November 1996): 12–17; Paula Owen, Labels, Lingo, and Legacy: Crafts at a Crossroads,
in Fariello and Owen, Objects and Meaning, 24–35; Glenn Adamson and Edward Ned
Cooke Jr., Conference Preview,
American Craft Council News and Views 1, no. 2 (2006): 8–11; and Edward S. Cooke Jr., Modern Craft and the American Experience,
American Art 21, no. 1 (Spring 2007): 2–9. Glen Adamson’s excellent Thinking through Craft (Oxford: Berg, 2007) was published as this book went to press.
3. See Katy Kline, introduction to Subversive Crafts (Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology List Visual Arts Center, 1993); Paul Greenhalgh, Craft and Modernity,
in Exploring Contemporary Craft: History, Theory and Critical Writing, edited by Jean Johnson (Toronto: Coach House Books, 2002), 43, 118; and Lesley Jackson, Craft Wars,
16 Icon (October 2004),
Acknowledgments
Choosing Craft was conceived at a 2003 gathering of artists, curators, and academics at the University of North Carolina’s Center for Craft, Creativity and Design (CCCD). The purpose of the colloquium was to delineate the scope and contents of the first college textbook documenting the history of American studio craft and promoting its inclusion in the larger narrative of American art. The authors, who were present at this meeting, additionally proposed a complementary anthology, Choosing Craft, that would provide artists’ perspectives on craft history.
The University of North Carolina Press agreed to publish the anthology and be the conduit for grants. The Windgate Foundation, whose support of scholarship in the crafts is unexcelled, provided funds for research, rights and reproductions, and manuscript preparation. Matching grants were given by the National Endowment for the Arts and the CCCD. In addition, the Smithsonian American Art Museum awarded a James Renwick Senior Fellowship to Vicki Halper for research at the Archives of American Art, the nation’s largest repository of artists’ papers. We are endlessly grateful to the funders and UNC Press for their support.
We are deeply appreciative of those who have encouraged this project, given us advice, critiqued our results, located materials, and granted permissions.
For the provision of essential support, we thank the participants of the 2003 gathering at the Center for Craft, Creativity and Design, which inspired Choosing Craft, and Dian Magie, the center’s remarkable director; Charles Grench, senior editor at the University of North Carolina Press, who shepherded this project to completion and oversaw its funding and the readers whose insightful suggestions improved our work; Jennifer Mills, our indispensable research associate; Petra Siemion, who transcribed entries and prepared the manuscript; and Peggy Weiss, who helped with artists’ biographies.
For advice, recommendations, referrals, and criticism, we are indebted to
Glenn Adamson, head of graduate studies, Victoria and Albert Museum
Susan Tabor Avila, artist
Jim Baker, director, Anderson Ranch
Bruce Bernstein, assistant director for cultural resources, National Museum of the American Indian
Garth Clark, ceramics historian and former director, Garth Clark Gallery
Stephen A. Clerico, administrative assistant, Furniture Society of America
Edward S. Cooke Jr., Charles F. Montgomery Professor of American Decorative Arts, Yale University
Susan Cummins, director, Rotasa Foundation
Andrew Glasgow, executive director, Furniture Society of America
Amelia Goerlitz, fellowship program administrator, Smithsonian American Art Museum
Tony Hepburn, former artist-in-residence and head of the Ceramics Department, Cranbrook Academy of Art
Patricia Hickman, professor emeritus of art, University of Hawaii
Jane Milosch, former curator, Renwick Gallery of the Smithsonian American Art Museum
Liza Kirwin, curator of manuscripts, Archives of American Art
Albert LeCoff, director, The Wood Turning Center
Patricia Malarcher, editor, Surface Design Journal
Rick Mastelli, artist, editor, and principal, Image & Word
Lydia Matthews, associate dean of educational programs, associate professor, The New School
Paula Owen, president, Southwest School of Art and Craft
Bruce Pepich, director, Racine Art Museum
Beth Sellars, independent curator
Patterson Sims, director, Montclair Art Museum
JoAnn Stabb, lecturer emerita of design, University of California, Davis
Davira Taragin, director of exhibitions and programs, Racine Art Museum
Karen Tsujimoto, senior curator of art, Oakland Museum of California
Katherine Westphal, artist
For stewardship of source materials and attentive help, we are beholden to librarians and archivists nationwide, in particular
Columbia University, rare book and manuscript librarians
Gail Bardhan and Elizabeth Hylen, Rakow Research Library, The Corning Museum of Glass
Elizabeth Gulacsy, Scholes Library, Alfred University
Wendy Hurlock, Archives of American Art
Amanda Jacobs, Archives of California Art
Seattle Public Library, periodicals division staff
Gerald Stone, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley
David Shuford, American Craft Council library
For assistance in locating photographs, we thank
Josh DeWeese, former resident director, Archie Bray Foundation
Kate Elliott, Elliott Brown Gallery
Arline Fisch, professor emerita of art, San Diego State University
Michael James, professor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Sam Jornlin, Voulkos & Co. Catalogue Project
Ree Kaneko, cofounder, Bemis Center for Contemporary Art
Robert Kehlmann, artist
Stuart Kestenbaum, director, Haystack Mountain School of Crafts
Susan Kingsley, artist
Frank Lloyd and Paul Rand, Frank Lloyd Gallery
John McQueen, artist
Michele Rogers, director, Bartow History Center
Peter Russo, program coordinator, Dieu Donné Papermill
Holly Sabin, Perimeter Gallery
Jay Stewart, trustee, Brian and Edith Heath Trust
Katherine Westphal, artist
For love and support, we treasure our families. Our heartfelt thanks to Gerry, Steve, David, and Ari.
Above all, we thank the artists who are the inspiration for this book.
Note: All attempts have been made to contact copyright holders to the materials reproduced in Choosing Craft. We apologize to any copyright holders we have been unable to locate or have inadvertently missed and ask that they contact the University of North Carolina Press.
Choosing Craft
Part 1: Choosing Craft
Pursuing a career in crafts in the United States after World War II was a personal choice. Gender, family, or ethnic heritage might influence a maker’s profession but seldom mandated it. Instead Americans entered the crafts through diverse, sometimes unpredictable routes. In the chapters in part 1, three paths into the field are explored: a desire to have a career that is compatible with one’s values, particularly opposition to a militarist or consumerist society; the influence of childhood experience and ancestry; and the lure of one of the traditional craft materials—clay, metal, fiber, wood, and glass. These paths are not mutually exclusive.
Chapter 1: Integrating Art and Life
The notion that making craft is an answer to society’s ills and a route to spiritual and moral health has been prominent since the British arts and crafts movement of the Victorian era. In reaction to the Industrial Revolution, which they linked to the degradation of the work force, English theorists John Ruskin, William Morris, and others advocated a return to handcraft. They believed such a return would promote the integrity and moral health of workers and the culture as a whole.
After World War II, many who chose to pursue craft professionally reiterated notions that personal and societal well-being was only possible outside the military-industrial complex and the corporate world. Crafts became a vocation that reinforced an ideal vision of society without moral compromise.
World War II looms over midcentury makers. Anni Albers and Marguerite Wildenhain, both refugees from Nazi Germany, see the discipline and self-direction of craft as a source of social integrity and an antidote to cultural chaos. Robert Turner, a conscientious objector during that war, notes that he and his colleagues were more concerned with a simple, independent way of life than with the objects they produced. His use of the word integration
to define a value-centered life can be compared with M. C. Richards’s term centering,
which refers less to lifestyle than to a psychological state conducive to personal growth.
In the 1960s and 1970s craft also became a way of affirming links to gender, class, and ethnicity. Still antiestablishment, makers whose intent was overtly political changed the language and content of craft by including implied or overt commentary on social issues in the objects they created. Miriam Schapiro and other feminists, for example, embraced craft as a way to identify with the history and culture of women. They associated craft with decorativeness, domesticity, small scale, and intensity of labor—characteristics rejected in abstract expressionist painting, among other movements acclaimed by the art world establishment of the era. In recent years, with the growth of identity politics initiated by the women’s movement, Joyce Scott links craft with her social class and Consuelo Underwood with her ethnic heritage.
The discussion of craft as a political tool continues in more theoretical, less personal terms, in chapter 11, Critiquing Culture.
Anni Albers in her studio at Black Mountain College, 1941. (Photo by Alex [Bill] Reed, courtesy of The North Carolina State Archives, © 2006 The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation/Artists Rights Society [ARS], New York)
ANNI ALBERS (b. 1899 in Berlin; d. 1994 in Orange, Connecticut) was Bauhaus-trained and director of its weaving workshop in Dessau and Berlin between 1930 and 1933. In 1933 Albers and her husband, the painter Josef Albers, left Nazi Germany to teach at Black Mountain College, North Carolina, where she was an assistant professor of art from 1933 to 1949.
Albers published this impassioned prescription for a renewed world in Design magazine in 1944, soon after the German surrender in World War II. She denigrates academic studies and proposes the creative arts, particularly craft, as the route to fostering courageous, antiauthoritarian, and disciplined individuals.
Our world goes to pieces, we have to rebuild our world. We investigate and worry and analyze and forget that the new comes about through exuberance and not through a defined deficiency. We have to find our strength rather than our weakness. Out of the chaos of collapse we can save the lasting: we still have our right
or wrong,
the absolute of our inner voice—we still know beauty, freedom, happiness .… unexplained and unquestioned.
Intuition saves us examination.
We have to gather our constructive energies and concentrate on the little we know, the few remaining constants. But do we know how to build? Education meant to prepare us. But how much of education is concerned with doing and how much with recording? How much of it with productive speculation and how much with repeating? Research work and engineering work, when they are creative, are too specialized to give any general basis of constructive attitude. We neglect a training in experimenting and doing; we feel safer as spectators.
We rather collect than construct.
We have to learn to respond to conditions productively. We cannot master them but we can be guided by them. Limitation from the outside can stimulate our inventiveness rather than confine it. We need such flexibility of reaction in times of crisis. Too much of our education provides instead of prepares and thus loses its serving role and tends to become an end in itself. We are proud of knowledge and forget that facts only give reflected light.
Education in general means to us academic education, which becomes synonymous with an unproductive one. If we want to learn to do, to form, we have to turn to art work, and more specifically to craft work as part of it. Here learning and teaching are directed toward the development of our general capacity to form. They are directed toward the training of our sense of organization, our constructive thinking, our inventiveness and imagination, our sense of balance in form—toward the apprehension of principles such as tension and dynamic .… the long list of faculties which finally culminate in a creative art, or, more specifically in a world of art. On the basis of a creative attitude we can then add necessary information, the specialized studies. Art work deals with the problem of a piece of art, but more, it teaches the process of all creating, the shaping out of the shapeless. We learn from it, that no picture exists before it is done, no form before it is shaped. The conception of a work gives only its temper, not its consistency. Things take shape in material and in the process of working it, and no imagination is great enough to know before they are done what they will be like.
We come to know in art work that we do not clearly know where we will arrive in our work, although we set the compass, our vision; that we are led, in going along, by material and work process. We have plans and blueprints, a shorthand of material and its treatment, but the finished work is still a surprise. We learn to listen to voices: to the yes or no of our material, our tools, our time. We come to know that only when we feel guided by them our work takes on form and meaning, that we are misled when we follow only our will. All great deeds have been achieved under a sense of guidance.
We learn courage from art work. We have to go where no one was before us. We are alone and we are responsible for our actions. Our solitariness takes on religious character. This is a matter of my conscience and me.
We learn to dare to make a choice, to be independent; there is no authority to be questioned. In art work there is no established conception of work; any decision is our own, any judgment. Still, there is one right opinion as to quality of a work of art, spontaneous and indisputable—one of our absolutes. There is a final agreement upon it, of those initiated, no matter how much personal taste or trends of the time influence the judgment.
In making our choice we develop a standpoint. How much of today’s confusion is brought about through not knowing where we stand, through the inability to relate experiences directly to us. In art work any experience is immediate. We have to apply what we absorb to our work of the moment. We cannot postpone the use of what we learn. Much of our education today prepares us for a later day, a day that never comes. Knowing for later is not knowing at all.
We learn to trust our intuition. No explaining and no analyzing can help us recognize an art problem or solve it, if thinking is our only relation to it. We have to rely on inner awareness. We can develop awareness, and clear thoughts may help us cultivate it, but the essence of understanding art is more immediate than any thinking about it. Too much emphasis is given today in our general education to intellectual training. An overemphasis of intellectual work suggests an understanding on a ground which is not the ground of our own experiences. It transposes understanding into assumed experiences which can be right but may be wrong. Our valuation in school and university is almost entirely a valuation of intellectuality. The inarticulateness of the artistic person is interpreted easily as a lack of intelligence while it is rather an intelligence expressing itself in other means than words.
Our intellectual training affects our analytic—art work our synthetic ability. We are used to thinking of art work as developing taste or a sense for beauty if not as training artists. We think more of its aesthetic qualities than its constructive ones. But the constructive forces are the ones we will need today and tomorrow. We will have to construct, not analyze or decorate.
That field of art which is the least academic, the least fortified by authority, will be best fitted to prepare for constructive process. The fine arts have accumulated much dignity. The crafts? They have had a long rest. Industry overran them. We need too much too quickly for any handwork to keep up with. The crafts retreated, a defeated minority. We do not depend on their products now, but we need again their contact with material and their slow process of forming. The fine arts have specialized on a few materials today, oilpaints, watercolors, clay, bronze—mostly obedient materials. But any material is good enough for art work. The crafts, too, limited themselves; they kept to woodwork, weaving, etc. But their materials are less easily subordinated. The struggle with a rugged material teaches us best a constructive discipline.
Resistance is one of the factors necessary to make us realize the characteristics of our medium and make us question our work procedure. We have to parry the material and adjust our plans to those of this opponent. When experimenting, we are forced into flexibility of reaction to it—we have to use imagination and be inventive.
We learn patience and endurance in following through a piece of work. We learn to respect material in working it. Formed things and thoughts live a life of their own, they radiate a meaning. They need a clear form to give a clear meaning. Making something become real and take its place in actuality adds to our feeling of usefulness and security. Learning to form makes us understand all forming. This is not the understanding or misunderstanding we arrive at through the amateur explaining to the amateur—appreciating—this is the fundamental knowing.
The difficult problems are the fundamental problems; simplicity stands at the end, not at the beginning of a work. If education can lead us to elementary seeing, away from too much and too complex information, to the quietness of vision, and discipline of forming, it again may prepare us for the task ahead, working for today and tomorrow.
Source: Anni Albers, One Aspect of Art Work,
Design 46, no. 4 (December 1944): 21–22, reprinted in Selected Writings on Design (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 2001). © 2001 Anni Albers. Reprinted by permission of Wesleyan University Press.
GEORGE NAKASHIMA (b. 1905 in Spokane, Washington; d. 1990 in New Hope, Pennsylvania), an architect by training, learned fine cabinetry while interned during World War II. After his release in 1943, Nakashima settled in New Hope, Pennsylvania, where he established a workshop aimed at restoring a standard of excellence that he felt had been sacrificed in the drive toward commercial production of furniture.
Greatly influenced by Asian philosophy, Nakashima became a lifelong advocate for peace. In opposition to a society he views as materialistic, egoistic, and warmongering, he posits, in the typescript of a public lecture delivered in 1953, a decentralized culture in which design and handwork are integral to quiet, communal spirituality. (See also page 44.)
It seems to me that one of the most important aspects of design is integration: not only the relationship of design to the processes of manufacture, but to life itself and the creation of an environment. Design is not a free-wheeling object in space but must relate to its conditions. In a deeper sense, it is a question of the spirit and the aspirations and inspirations that are the avenue to spiritual expression. This again tempers the environment as men must, and civilizations must express themselves.
One of the greatest pitfalls at the present is the precious attitude of design for its own sake—really only a modernized version of that nineteenth century frivolity art for art’s sake.
The trivial and sensation-seeking search for novelty without sufficient relationship to its purpose .… is the selfish expression of the ego. Such design cannot help man toward a better life through ordering our world and its activities.
In relationship to the environment we seek, there seems to be a choice we must make: the search for the still waters or riding the main currents of our times. Peace, tranquility, quiet—or stimulation, excitements, trivial and restless activity. This choice is perhaps final.
The first and obvious one is the expression of our age, the urban, the intellectual, the proud, the beast of prey. The second, in juxtaposition, represents decentralization, the humble and poor in spirit, the worker, the legions who mope the streets, those who find the quiet monastic pools.…
For me there was but one choice: to protest against much that is of our age, accepting some of it, and to live creatively to that end. We must render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and today, Caesar is face to face with us on our doorstep.
Once the decision is made, the forms take shape. Truth is difficult to place in form. It is much easier to be clever, but we must have honesty to have a truly satisfactory environment.
As a short personal history, I would like to mention an education in this country and in France in architecture,