The Tower of Babel: Confirmed
()
About this ebook
Critics have often rejected the story because of its connection to the Old Testament, while ignoring other ancient documents from other cultures where the same story is told, often in connection to the flood.
The chapter before the one where this event is described in Genesis contains a listing of the descendants of Noah in a document known as the Table of Nations.
In this book, those nations will be traced through history using ancient sources whenever possible. This information will be combined with the history of man as written in DNA to confirm the truth of the story.
Related to The Tower of Babel
Related ebooks
Three Proofs for the Existence of God: Scientific Proof Historic Proof Prophetic Proof Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost City of the Exodus: The Archaeological Evidence behind the Journey Out of Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Historical Evidences of the Old Testament Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Two Babylons: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Babylonian Legends of the Creation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ancient Egyptian New Kingdom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Annals of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nations of the Old Testament: Their Relationship with Israel and Bible Prophecy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll About Israel: The Bible and Religion From God’s Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAncient History Refined Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Code Statistics: Original Matrix "Jesus Messiah" in Psalms 22, 23, 24 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmazing Discoveries That Unlock the Bible: A Visual Experience Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bible Code Statistics: The Alien Mystery Revealed! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legends of Babylon and Egypt in relation to Hebrew tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Beginning: Genesis, Chapters 1-4 -- Shedding New Light on Old Beliefs About the Creation of Mankind and the Garden of Eden Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Makers and Teachers of Judaism From the Fall of Jerusalem to the Death of Herod the Great Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Noah And The Great Flood: proof and effects Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Jesus and the Resurrection: Reflections of Christians from Islamic Contexts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAncient Truth: John's Revelation: Ancient Truth, #6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForbidden Theology: Origin of Scriptural God Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Archæology and the Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legends of Babylon and Egypt in Relation to Hebrew Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorks of Flavius Josephus Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Pentateuch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Creation to the Flood Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Code of Hammurabi Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Jerusalem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History For You
Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Things You're Not Supposed to Know: Secrets, Conspiracies, Cover Ups, and Absurdities Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The ZERO Percent: Secrets of the United States, the Power of Trust, Nationality, Banking and ZERO TAXES! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Whore Stories: A Revealing History of the World's Oldest Profession Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Richest Man in Babylon: The most inspiring book on wealth ever written Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 – 1066 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Power of Geography: Ten Maps That Reveal the Future of Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of The War of Art: by Steven Pressfield | Includes Analysis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secret History of the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Wordslut: A Feminist Guide to Taking Back the English Language Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Library Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Tower of Babel
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Tower of Babel - Michael Talley
The Tower of Babel: Confirmed
by Michael Talley
Copyright © 2016 by Michael Talley
All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review or scholarly journal.
First Printing: 2016
ISBN 978-1-365-13670-2
Michael Talley
Haendelstrasse 33
15711 Koenigs Wusterhausen
bwmgermany.wordpress.com
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank several of my friends in the ministry who encouraged me to pursue this project, my wife and children who listened to countless stories during the research and writing of the book, and Noah Vancina, who voluntarily gave of his time to edit the book during his internship here in Germany.
Introduction
Dr. Jerry A. Coyne, a professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago and author of Why Evolution is True, posted an article titled Adam and Eve: the ultimate standoff between science and faith (and a contest!),
in which he stated that, Genetic data show no evidence of any human bottleneck as small as two people: there are simply too many different kinds of genes around for that to be true.
[1] His premise is that if he can prove that mankind did not descend from Adam and Eve, then all belief in God based upon the Bible falls apart. He states that, Absent their existence, the whole story of human sin and redemption falls to pieces.
[2]
I have to give Dr. Coyne a little credit, because he is correct in one point. If God’s word cannot be trusted on page one, then it cannot be trusted on any other page. But as to his statement concerning genetic data, he has really gone out on a limb. Instead of showing evolution to be true, he has with one statement declared it to be false, for if all of the different kinds of genes
could not possibly have come from a group as small as two people, then it certainly could not have come from anything less!
You can give evolutionist as much leeway as you want, and even allow them their claim that humans evolved from lesser life forms. But you must then believe that all of these different kinds of genes
came from those life forms. And those life forms got them from where? Eventually you get caught in a slime pit that logically had to contain all the genes for all the various life forms. So the very reason he gives for rejecting the Bible is actually a much greater argument against evolution than it could ever be against the Bible.
The fact is, man did not evolve from animals. Instead, man was a special creation created by God on the same day that mammals were created. And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
[3]
Science tell us that the DNA of man and animals are similar to each other. Evolutionist point to these similarities as evidence of a common ancestor. In truth, the evidence actually points to a common creator. There are indeed many aspects of man that resemble those of the animals created earlier on the same day. It only makes sense that those systems, which are held in common, should be programmed using the same code. But there are, in addition to the similarities, also differences that are more than enough to divide the species into separate kinds.
The first chapter of Genesis contains a statement that should be acknowledged as the first of all scientific laws. It is the law which governs the DNA of plants, animals, and mankind. Ten times it says, after his kind
or after their kind.
Not only does this law rule out the possibility of evolution, it has been proven true by modern attempts at the modification of DNA. Corn can be genetically modified, but it is still corn. Ape DNA can and does mutate, but apes will never become human.
But these are not the only differences that distinguish man from animals. There is something much greater, which is found in Genesis 1:26: And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Such a statement was never made concerning any animal. This relationship between God and man was something special. Man was created for a purpose, and that purpose was tied to that special relationship.
After God formed man out of the dust of the ground, he caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam. And he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
[4] Since Eve was made from Adam’s flesh, it is reasonable to assume that the DNA of Eve was identical to that of Adam in every respect but one: Eve did not have a Y chromosome.
Contained within the DNA of Adam and Eve was all of the variation necessary to produce the diversity seen within today’s population. This included the entire collection of both dominant and recessive genes. Additional genes, such as that causing the blood type O, would come into being later, but these were simply mutations of the original genes, which, as in in the case mentioned here, actually result in a loss of function. Mutations resulting in a gain of function have never been observed.
Although Adam and Eve were created perfect with perfect DNA, they were not exempt from the possibility of death. God placed Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, where both the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil were located. Adam was given instructions concerning the trees of the garden: And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
[5] If they believed God, they would obey and live.
In Genesis 3, we read about the temptation brought before Adam and Eve by Satan, who appeared in the form of a talking serpent. Eve, being deceived, ate of the fruit and gave of it to Adam, who also ate of it. Immediately their eyes were opened, and for the first time they experienced the feelings of guilt and shame. These same feelings have plagued man since that day.
In this book I will show that the descendants of Adam and Eve through Noah, his sons, and their wives can be shown to account for all the variations which can be found in today’s population. Based upon this evidence, it is clear that the story of the flood and the Tower of Babel are indeed true. This being the case, it is reasonable to assume that the creation story of Adam and Eve is also true. Adam and Eve did exist! The whole story of human sin and redemption stands!
[1] Coyne, Dr. Jerry A. (June 2, 2011). Adam and Eve: the ultimate standoff between science and faith (and a contest!) [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/adam-and-eve-the-ultimate-standoff-between-science-and-faith-and-a-contest/.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Genesis 2:7.
[4] Genesis 2:21-22.
[5] Genesis 2:16-17.
Chapter 1: The Tools of DNA Testing
When I first enrolled in a local junior college to study engineering way back in 1985, the use of computers in some fields was already quite extensive. Personal computers were still a relatively new concept, and there were fewer apps
in existence. Most available apps were either business or research oriented. The field was wide open and there was a lot of money to be made for someone. I had taken a couple of computer classes in high school and was fascinated enough with computers that I enrolled in an occasional programing class. After two years, I walked into the advisors’ office and said I would like to change my major to computer science. He looked through the catalog and compared what I had already taken to the requirements and said I only needed to take Computer Fundamentals,
Economics II,
and Typing
to graduate with an associate’s degree in computer science. Two of those courses were available in the upcoming summer quarter, but the computer course would not be available till the fall. Since I had already completed all of the advanced programming courses offered, the teacher suggested substituting a class called Micro Applications
for the fundamentals course. I was allowed to go ahead and march in the graduation ceremony, and received my diploma at the end of the summer session.
Although I never used my programming abilities in an official capacity related to my employment, I never forgot what I learned about computer languages. Flow charting and the phrase Garbage in, garbage out
are tools that are useful in more fields than just computer science. I studied multiple languages, such as Fortran (Formula Translation), RPG III (Report program generator), and COBOL (common business-oriented language), all of which required compiling before running the program. It was during the compilation process that the garbage within a program, if there was any, was usually discovered. A long report of errors would be generated which could easily ruin a programmer’s day, especially if he or she had spent hours in the lab writing and keying the program, only to discover it did not work. At this point, I would simply look for the syntax errors, which I would correct and then recompile the program, only