Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fair Quality
19.0% (4)
2. Prior to students beginning an assignment, teachers supply students with exemplars of high quality work that meet the performance standard or level.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 4.8% (1) Good Quality 52.4% (11) High Quality 14.3% (3) Rating Average 2.76 Response Count 21 21 0
Fair Quality
28.6% (6)
Fair Quality
30.0% (6)
1 of 29
4. Students revise their work based on meaningful feedback until they meet or exceed the performance standard or level.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (5) Good Quality 20.0% (4) High Quality 5.0% (1) Rating Average 2.05 Response Count 20 20 1
Fair Quality
50.0% (10)
5. Standards provide a coherent vision for what students should know and be able to do.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 10.0% (2) Good Quality 45.0% (9) High Quality 15.0% (3) Rating Average 2.65 Response Count 20 20 1
Fair Quality
30.0% (6)
6. Students, teachers and families understand what students are learning and why.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 22.2% (4) Good Quality 27.8% (5) High Quality 5.6% (1) Rating Average 2.17 Response Count 18 18 3
Fair Quality
44.4% (8)
2 of 29
7. In any class and at any time, students can explain the importance of what they are learning.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (3) Good Quality 27.8% (5) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.11 Response Count 18 18 3
Fair Quality
55.6% (10)
Fair Quality
27.8% (5)
Fair Quality
38.9% (7)
3 of 29
10. Teachers make connections across the disciplines to reinforce important concepts and assist students in applying what they have learned to solve real-world problems.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 11.1% (2) Good Quality 16.7% (3) High Quality 11.1% (2) Rating Average 2.28 Response Count 18 18 3
Fair Quality
61.1% (11)
11. All teachers incorporate academic and informational literacy into their course work (i.e., reading, writing, note taking, researching, listening, and speaking).
Poor Quality Self-Rating 5.6% (1) Good Quality 38.9% (7) High Quality 5.6% (1) Rating Average 2.44 Response Count 18 18 3
Fair Quality
50.0% (9)
4 of 29
12. To reach students, all teachers draw from a common subset of instructional strategies and activities such as:
Poor Quality Direct instrution Cooperative learning Project-based learning Simulations Hands-on learning -- integrated technology Other 5.9% (1) 11.8% (2) 23.5% (4) 23.5% (4) Good Quality 70.6% (12) 47.1% (8) 29.4% (5) 29.4% (5) High Quality 5.9% (1) 0.0% (0) 5.9% (1) 5.9% (1) Rating Average 2.76 2.35 2.18 2.18 Response Count 17 17 17 17
Fair Quality
29.4% (5)
23.5% (4)
29.4% (5)
17.6% (3)
2.35
17
14.3% (1)
28.6% (2)
57.1% (4)
0.0% (0)
2.43
7 17 4
13. All teachers use common, frequent assessments to benchmark key concepts and the achievement of their students.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 18.8% (3) Good Quality 50.0% (8) High Quality 25.0% (4) Rating Average 2.81 Response Count 16 16 5
Fair Quality
6.3% (1)
5 of 29
14. Students learn how to assess their own and others' work against the performance standards, expectations, or levels.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 17.6% (3) Good Quality 29.4% (5) High Quality 5.9% (1) Rating Average 2.24 Response Count 17 17 4
Fair Quality
47.1% (8)
15. Students are provided more time to learn the content, concepts or skills if needed.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (4) Good Quality 43.8% (7) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.19 Response Count 16 16 5
Fair Quality
31.3% (5)
16. Flexible scheduling enables students to engage in academic interventions, extended projects, hands-on experiences, and inquiry-based learning.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 37.5% (6) Good Quality 18.8% (3) High Quality 6.3% (1) Rating Average 1.94 Response Count 16 16 5
Fair Quality
37.5% (6)
6 of 29
17. Teachers know what each student has learned and still needs to learn.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 0.0% (0) Good Quality 53.3% (8) High Quality 6.7% (1) Rating Average 2.67 Response Count 15 15 6
Fair Quality
40.0% (6)
18. Students have multiple opportunities to succeed and receive extra help as needed, such as:
Poor Quality co-teaching or collaborative resource model support and intervention classes before- and after-school tutoring homework centers other Good Quality High Quality Rating Average Response Count
Fair Quality
57.1% (8)
14.3% (2)
28.6% (4)
0.0% (0)
1.71
14
14 16 14 7 16 5
19. They collaborate in analyzing student achievement data and making decisions about rigorous curriculum, standards-based assessment practice, effective instructional methods, and evaluation of student work.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 33.3% (5) Good Quality 33.3% (5) High Quality 6.7% (1) Rating Average 2.13 Response Count 15 15 6
Fair Quality
26.7% (4)
7 of 29
20. The professional learning community employs coaching, mentoring, and peer observation as a means of continuous instructional improvement.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 35.7% (5) Good Quality 14.3% (2) High Quality 7.1% (1) Rating Average 1.93 Response Count 14 14 7
Fair Quality
42.9% (6)
21. Adults and students are grouped into smaller communities (i.e., teams, houses, academies) for enhanced teaching and learning.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 33.3% (4) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
22. These small learning communities are characterized by stable, close, and mutually respectful relationships.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 53.8% (7) Good Quality 7.7% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.54 Response Count 13 13 8
Fair Quality
38.5% (5)
8 of 29
23. Every student has a mentor, advisor, advocate, or other adult he/she trusts and stays in relationship with throughout the middle school experience.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 46.2% (6) Good Quality 15.4% (2) High Quality 7.7% (1) Rating Average 1.85 Response Count 13 13 8
Fair Quality
30.8% (4)
Fair Quality
38.5% (5)
25. Students with difficulties, and their families, can get help.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 15.4% (2) Good Quality 38.5% (5) High Quality 15.4% (2) Rating Average 2.54 Response Count 13 13 8
Fair Quality
30.8% (4)
9 of 29
26. The school houses a wide range of support - nurses, counselors, resource teachers to help students and families who need special assistance.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 23.1% (3) Good Quality 38.5% (5) High Quality 15.4% (2) Rating Average 2.46 Response Count 13 13 8
Fair Quality
23.1% (3)
27. The school staff members offer parent education activities involving families.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 38.5% (5) Good Quality 15.4% (2) High Quality 7.7% (1) Rating Average 1.92 Response Count 13 13 8
Fair Quality
38.5% (5)
Fair Quality
16.7% (2)
33.3% (4)
33.3% (4)
16.7% (2)
2.50
12
10 of 29
29. Students talk about daily issues in their own lives, their community and their world.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.83 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
66.7% (8)
30. Students take action, make informed choices, work collaboratively, and learn to resolve conflicts.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.92 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
75.0% (9)
31. For example, students may read a historical novel for language arts and history and then study music from the same time period in music ideas.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 63.6% (7) Good Quality 9.1% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.45 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
27.3% (3)
11 of 29
32. Students can work on the same project in several different classes.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 83.3% (10) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.25 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
8.3% (1)
33. Teachers and counselors push students to challenge themselves and set high academic and career goals for their future.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 27.3% (3) Good Quality 27.3% (3) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.00 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
45.5% (5)
34. All students have a real say, or have legitimate representation, in what happens at school.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 27.3% (3) Good Quality 18.2% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.91 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
54.5% (6)
12 of 29
35. School staff members have an "open-door" policy to encourage student involvement and connection.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 33.3% (4) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.00 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
37. Parents are more than just volunteers or fund-raisers; they are meaningful involved in all aspects of the school.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 50.0% (6) Good Quality 0.0% (0) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.50 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
13 of 29
38. Parents are informed, included, and involved as partners and decision makers in their children's education.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 41.7% (5) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.67 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
39. Students take on projects to improve their school, commmunity, state, nation, and world.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 58.3% (7) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.50 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
40. Student cocurricular activities cover a wide range of interests- team sports, clubs, exploratory opportunities, service opportunities, and a rich program in the visual and performing arts.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 58.3% (7) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.58 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
14 of 29
41. Faculty and administrators are committed to helping each student produce proficient work.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 8.3% (1) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.50 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
42. Evidence of this commitment includes tutoring, mentoring, enrichment assignments, differentiated instruction, special adaptations, supplemental classes and other supports.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 41.7% (5) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.17 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
43. Accelerated, short-term interventions for students with similar needs are fluid and do no t become low-level or permanent tracks.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 41.7% (5) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
15 of 29
Fair Quality
27.3% (3)
45. Teachers differentiate instruction in order to give each student equal opportunity to comprehend the standards-based curriculum.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 8.3% (1) Good Quality 50.0% (6) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.58 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
46. The faculty is always seeking ways to improve programs, curriculum, and assessment to better meet the student needs.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 33.3% (4) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.17 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
16 of 29
47. All students use technology to do research and analyze data, read more than textbooks, and understand how to solve complex problems.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 58.3% (7) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 1.67 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
48. To the fullest extent possible, students with disabilities are in regular classrooms that are co-taught by special education professionals.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 27.3% (3) Good Quality 27.3% (3) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.00 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
45.5% (5)
49. All students have access to participate in interest-based classes, activities, or opportunities.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 58.3% (7) Good Quality 8.3% (1) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.50 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
17 of 29
50. The school values knowledge from the diverse cultures represented in the school, community, and our nation.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 50.0% (6) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.25 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
51. Materials in the media center represent all of the cultures of the students.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.50 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
52. Families often come and share their traditions and beliefs.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 58.3% (7) Good Quality 0.0% (0) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.42 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
18 of 29
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
56. Staff members do not use negative labels or discuss students in negative ways.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 50.0% (6) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 1.83 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
57. Every student has an adult advocate and supporter in the school.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 41.7% (5) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 1.92 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
19 of 29
58. Transportation, meals, childcare, and translation support are provided so all families of diverse cultures and languages can attend school events.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.17 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
Fair Quality
66.7% (8)
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
20 of 29
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
63. The staff members are a good match to the school's community.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.25 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
64. Students and parents are informed of school rules and know exactly what will and does happen if students break the rules.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 33.3% (4) Rating Average 2.83 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
16.7% (2)
Fair Quality
81.8% (9)
21 of 29
66. Staff members routinely analyze and act upon referral and suspension data to make sure that no one group of students is unfairly singled out by classroom and school staff.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 27.3% (3) Good Quality 18.2% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.91 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
54.5% (6)
67. The school's disciplinary referrals and suspension rate are low as a result of proactive interventions that keep students engaged, resilient, healthy, safe, and respectful of one another.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 27.3% (3) Good Quality 18.2% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.91 Response Count 11 11 10
Fair Quality
54.5% (6)
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
22 of 29
69. Shared, distributed, and sustained leadership propels the school forward and preserves its institutional memory and purpose.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.08 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
70. Everyone knows what the plan is and the vision is posted and evidenced by actions.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 41.7% (5) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
71. Lines of leadership for the school's improvement efforts are clear.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.25 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
72. The school leadership team has the responsibility to make things happen.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 58.3% (7) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.42 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
23 of 29
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
Fair Quality
18.2% (2)
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
24 of 29
77. Professional development is intensive, of high quality, ongoing, and relevant to middlegrades education.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 2.08 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
78. Teachers get professional support to improve instructional practice (i.e., classroom, visitations, peer coaching, demonstrative lessons, etc.)
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.17 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
79. Opportunities for learning increase knowledge and skills, challenge outmoded beliefs and practices, and provide support in the classroom.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 25.0% (3) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.92 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
25 of 29
80. There are deliberate vertical articulation and transition programs between feeder elementary schools and destination high schools.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 41.7% (5) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.92 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
81. The district supports (funding and time) its schools' participation in best practice networks, associations, learning communities, and professional development focused on middle grades improvement and achievement.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 50.0% (6) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 0.0% (0) Rating Average 1.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
82. School and district work collaboratively to bring coherence to curriculum, instruction, assessment, intervention, data collection, analysis, and accountability for student achievement.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.33 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
26 of 29
83. The school collects, analyzes, and uses data as a basis for making decisions.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 0.0% (0) Good Quality 50.0% (6) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.83 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
33.3% (4)
84. The administrators and faculty grapple with school-generated evaluation data to identify areas for more extensive and intensive improvement.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 0.0% (0) Good Quality 41.7% (5) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
85. The staff delineates benchmarks, and insists upon evidence and results.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 0.0% (0) Good Quality 41.7% (5) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.75 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
27 of 29
86. The school staff intentionally and explicitly reconsiders its vision and practices when data call them into question.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 8.3% (1) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.58 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
41.7% (5)
87. The faculty and administrators see barriers as challenges, not problems.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 16.7% (2) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.33 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
88. Principals insist on having teachers who promote young adolescents' intellectual, social, emotional, physical, and ethical growth.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 8.3% (1) Good Quality 33.3% (4) High Quality 33.3% (4) Rating Average 2.92 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
25.0% (3)
28 of 29
89. The administrators and teachers inform families and community members about the school's goals for student success and the students' responsibility for meeting those goals.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 0.0% (0) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 16.7% (2) Rating Average 2.58 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
58.3% (7)
90. The administrators and teachers engage all stakeholders in ongoing and reflective conversation, consensus building, and decision making about governance.
Poor Quality Self-Rating 16.7% (2) Good Quality 25.0% (3) High Quality 8.3% (1) Rating Average 2.25 Response Count 12 12 9
Fair Quality
50.0% (6)
29 of 29