Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Nader Ale Ebrahim Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Email: aleebrahim@perdana.um.edu.my
Introduction
The search can be time consuming and sometimes tedious task. How can make it easier? How do deal with situations such as: I just join as new postgraduate students and I am not sure how to do a literature search I have been into research for sometimes now but I spend a lot of time to get the articles I want I am sure I have downloaded the article but I am not able to find it I wanted to write a new paper, how can I manage the references in the shortest possible time? I have many references, some for my old papers, and some for my current research. Sometimes, they are so many that I cant recall where I have kept them in my folders! .. I have written an article and I am not able to find a proper Journal "I want to increase the citation of my papers, how do I do?"
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Objectives
To reduce the search time by expanding the knowledge of researchers to more effectively use the "tools" that are available through the Net. To evaluate the types of literature that researchers will encounter. To convert the information on the search for a written document. Help researchers learn how to search and analyze the right journal to submit. To promote their publication for further citation.
Outline
Find literature associated with the topic. Search and analyze the literature. Evaluate the paper before reading. Cite literature properly. Make a summary table of reviewed papers. Avoid plagiarism. Write a journal article based on literature review.
Systematic review
Source: Adapted from Systematic Review Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Find it!
Manage it!
Use it!
Review it!
Understanding the lit reviews purpose Ensuring adequate coverage Writing purposefully Working on style and tone
Arguing your rationale Informing your work with theory Designing method
Source: O'Leary, Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage - Chapter Six
Virtual Teams
Virtual R&D teams and SMEs
R&D NPD
SMEs and Virtual Teams
SMEs
NPD and SMEs
Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review. [Review]. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(13), 15751590.
Review biases
Read outdated version of a paper/book Read without writing Read unlinked papers (detect as much of the relevant
literature as possible)
Effective searching
Developing a search strategy Searching the library catalogue Finding journal articles and papers Searching the Internet Other sources
Source: http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/myresearch/plan/searchstrategy.html
Keywords
Selecting keywords lead to get more citation. Web of Science
KeyWords Plus
Hi there! This issue, we are going to explain how KeyWords Plus broadens your search. KeyWords Plus is the result of our Thomson Reuters editorial expertise in Science. What our editors do is to review the titles of all references and highlight additional relevant but overlooked keywords that were not listed by the author or publisher. With KeyWords Plus, you can now uncover more papers that may not have appeared in your search due to changes in scientific keywords over time. Thanks and keep your feedback and questions coming! Smiles, Lim Khee Hiang Ph.D., Principal Consultant
2- Content Analysis:
Intended Audience Objective Reasoning Coverage Writing Style Evaluative Reviews
Source: PS, P., DE PRODUO, G. P. D. E. E., SISTEMAS, E. & FERREIRA, P. G. S. 2011. THE COMPREHENSION OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INDICATORS BY VIRTUAL TEAMS. Master of Science in Industrial and Systems Engineering.
In recent years we have witnessed an explosion in the production and availability of scholarly research results. This growth is reflected in the gradual expansion of journal coverage in the Web of Science. Journal coverage in Web of Science consists of three major indexes, namely the (Science Citation Index Expanded, the Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index. In addition, the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (formerly ISIProceedings) became an edition of Web of Science in October) 2008. In 2000 journal coverage in Web of Science totaled 8,684 titles. In 2005, Web of Science covered 9,467 journals, an increase of 9%. As of April 1, 2010 11,519 journals are covered in Web of Science, and increase of 22%.
Citation tracking
Citation indexes allows you to search the academic literature in ways that illuminate the progress of academic debate in your field. With a citation index, you can easily identify the most influential articles, and the leading academic authorities. You can track backwards (using lists of cited articles) and forwards (using lists of articles which cite a particular article). As a result, you can determine the position of academic debate at any time in the past
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Cited Reference Searching Traditional search Cited reference search 2004 2003 paper paper 1987 paper 1993 paper
1982 paper
1982 paper
1957 paper
1996 paper
2007
Cited References
Related Records
2004
2005
2000
1998
1993
Citing
2000
navigating Backward in time via Cited References Forward in time via Times Cited and through Related Records
1998 1994
Time
27
Paper/journal quality
Another guide to paper/journal quality is the general reputation of the association, society, or organization publishing the journal. Leading professional associations such as American Psychological Association (APA) or the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) publish a range of journals that are highly regarded.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Search Result
Subjects
Performance Effects
Research Methodologies
Source information
simplification of structure
involvement of partners
concurrent engineering
Project management
Case study(small n)
Supplier integration
product complexity
concurrent product
virtual production
Empirical(large n)
creative software (Clift, T.B et al 1996) (Griffin, A 1997) (Carter, 1997) (Hartley, J.et al 1997) (Athakorn et al 2001) (Xie, S. Q. et al 2002) (Kusar, J. et al. 2004) (Petersen. et al 2005) (Tan, C.L. 2006) (Roberts. et al 2006) (Zhou, Z. et al 2008) (Bashir, H, et al 2008) (Ahlemann, F. 2009) (Selvaraj,P.et al 2009) (Xia-Bao. et al 2009) (Lifang W. et al 2009) (Vinodh, et al 2009) (Hebert et al 2010) (Roemer, T. et al 2010)
pattern matching
Theory -Building
CAD technology
project strategy
E-collaboration
Math. Modeling
Process Model
team structure
setting buffers
manufacturing
quality control
procurement
organization
www-based
Experiment
Framework
techniques
Simulation
innovation
MOHAMMADJAFARI, M., AHMED, S., DAWAL, S. Z. M. & ZAYANDEHROODI, H. 2011(Article in press). The Importance of Project Management in SMEs for the Development of New Products through E-Collaboration. African Journal of Business Management.
pilot study
statistical
prototype
lead user
planning
process
product
Review
Quality
design
variety
speed
other
Time
cost
tool
FIXSON, S. 2007. Modularity and commonality research: past developments and future opportunities. Concurrent Engineering, 15, 85.
Keeping up-to-date
Keeping up-to-date
What is an alert service? Many journal databases and book publishers offer free alert services. These are an effective means of keeping track of the latest research. Alert services come in different forms. The most common include:
a search alert. This is a saved search which alerts you when a book or article that matches your search terms is published. a TOC (Table of Contents) alert. Such an alert notifies you when a new issue of a journal is published, and provides you with the issue's table of contents. a citation alert. This advises you when a new article cites a particular work. Most alert services are email-based. An increasing number are now offered as an RSS feed. If you are just beginning, you might like to try email alerts first. These are generally easier to create.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Keeping up-to-date
Alert services are an effective means of keeping track of the latest research.
Keeping up-to-date
Create a Google Alert Enter the topic you wish to monitor. Search terms: Type: How often: Email length: Your email:
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Example - 1
From: Google Scholar Alerts [mailto:scholaralertsnoreply@google.com] Sent: 2011/02/01 06:21 . Subject: Scholar Alert - [ Virtual Teams: A "Literature Review" + ebrahim ] Scholar Alert: [ Virtual Teams: A "Literature Review" + ebrahim ] [PDF] How to Conduct a Literature NA Ebrahim ... Page 10. Narrow the area of research 2011 Nader Ale Ebrahim SMEs NPD Virtual Teams R&D R&D and NPD SMEs and Virtual Teams R&D and Distributed Teams SMEs and R&D Focus of the literature Review SMEs, Virtual R&D teams and NPD NPD and Virtuality ... [PDF] Web Application User Interface Technologies M Pohja ... are 7 Page 28. Introduction discussed in the next section of this thesis. Finally, web servers may sup- port virtual hosting, content compression and other things that may help manage client-server communication. Application ... This Google Scholar Alert is brought to you by Google. Cancel alert List alerts
Doctoral dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science in Technology to be presented with due permission of the School of Science for public examination and debate in Auditorium T2 at the Aalto University School of Science (Espoo, Finland) on the 4th of February 2011 at 12 noon.
Example - 2
Document Citation Alert: 2 new results Document Citation Alert for: Ebrahim, N.A., Ahmed, S., Taha, Z. Innovation and R&D activities in virtual team (2009) European Journal of Scientific Research, 34 (3) pp. 297-307. Cited 2 times.
Access all new results in Scopus for this Document Citation Alert. In the table below, you can see the 2 new results for this Document Citation Alert. Results: 2 1. A collaborative model of engineering education for complex global environments Qiu, R.G., 2010, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, art. no. 5673356, pp. S3J1-S3J5. 2. University role in the development of future high-tech engineers Ilas, M., 2010, 2010 IEEE 16th International Symposium for Design and Technology of Electronics Packages, SIITME 2010, art. no. 5650869, pp. 327-330.
Keeping up-to-date
In the table below, you can see the 2 new results for this Search Alert.
Results: 2
Document 1. Author(s) Date Source title African Journal of Business 2010 Management, 4 (11) pp. 2247-2257. African Journal of Business 2010 Management, 4 (11) pp. 2368-2379. Citations 0
Critical factors for new product developments Ebrahim, N.A., Ahmed, S., Taha, Z. in SMEs virtual team Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A
Ebrahim, N.A., Ahmed, S., Taha, Z.
Malaysian SMEs
Access all new results in Scopus for: AU-ID("Ebrahim, Nader Ale" 22974706300) AND (LIMIT-TO(AU-ID, "Ahmed, Shamsuddin" 35241743000)). If you would like to Maintain your Scopus Alerts, click on the link below: http://www.scopus.com/alert/form/MyAlerts.url. We hope that this information is useful to you. If you have questions about this or other features of Scopus, Please visit our Info site. Your previous alert for AU-ID("Ebrahim, Nader Ale" 22974706300) AND (LIMIT-TO(AU-ID, "Ahmed, Shamsuddin" 35241743000)) was sent on 4 Nov 2010
Note: Results from CSA Illumina are not included in this e-mail alert. Your results list on Scopus for this e-mail alert can contain not only newly published documents, but also newly added archive material with an earlier publication date.
This email has been sent to you by Scopus , a product of Elsevier B.V., Radarweg 29, 1043NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel.+31 20 485 3911. You are receiving this e -mail because you are a subscriber to a Search Alert from Scopus. Elsevier respects your privacy and does not disclose, rent or sell your personal information to any non -affiliated third parties without your consent, except as may be stated in the Scopus Online Privacy Policy . By using the Search Alert, you are agreeing to abide by the Scopus Terms and Conditions . If you would like to unsubscribe from future mailings regarding the Search Alert mentioned above, please login to Scopus and go to My Alerts to delete this alert from your profile. 2010 Scopus. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, or transfer of this message or its contents, in any medium, is strictly prohibited. SciVerse is a registered trademark of Elsevier Properties S.A., used under license. Scopus is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Delivery Job ID: 11259:009013825:11252:009588722
Web
This once a week Google Alert is brought to you by Google. Remove this alert. Create another alert. Manage your alerts.
Paraphrasing
Desktop search
Reference Management
EndNote
EndNote is an almost indispensible tool for the serious researcher. And best of all, its free to all UM postgraduates!
Export to EndNote
ScienceDirect (Elsevier) allows you to check your desired citations, then click on the Export Citations link
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
then you select which pieces of information you really want in your EndNote database, using the radio buttons, then click on the Export button to bring up the dialog box we have seen before to transfer the temporary file into EndNote
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Humanities International Index is a bit more convoluted; I conduct a search, then click on the first result from the search for more information
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Scanning through the icons at top, I spot the one that exports to Bibliographic Manager naturally, I click on it to move to the next step (watch for icons like this within indexes)
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Click on the correct radio button to select EndNote, and we next see the comforting and familiar dialog box that allows EndNote to ingest our citation
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Impact Factor
The most commonly used measure of journal quality is Impact Factor. This is a number which attempts to measure the impact of a journal in terms of its influence on the academic community. Impact Factors are published by Thomson-ISI
Cites in 2008 to Number of items 2007 = 144 2007 = 278 items published in: published in: 2006 = 280 2006 = 270 Sum: 424 Sum: 548
Calculation:
424 = 548
0.774
Impact Factor
Total Cites
Getting published
Objectives
To improve the quality of articles. To manage the submission procedure. To evaluate Journal measuring factors (like: Journal Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Cited Half Life, five Year Journal Impact Factor) before article submission. To search and analyze the right journal to submit. To identify journals to publish in or which journals are the best in a particular discipline. To write and submit journal articles using time-saving bibliographic management tools. To deal with the editor response To deal with the Publishing Process (How to Deal with Proofs)
Getting published
Why publish? Apart from the final thesis, you should also consider publishing your work as you go along. There are various reasons for this:
publications assist in final preparation of your thesis disseminating your knowledge and experience, it gives you an academic profile and raises the profile of your institution, research publications generate income for the University, publications enhance your CV and may help in gaining employment, and you may even become rich and famous - but don't count on it!
Paper Structure
Title Affiliation Abstract Keywords Nomenclatures Introduction Materials and methods Results and Discussions Conclusions References
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Abstract
Abstract should not exceed 300 words (without reference).
Data bank Viewpoint (concise, to the point, and bring novel new insights on a
specific problem)
Review Letter
Example 1
1. Styles
BOGBusiness or Government style, the more traditional style CLEARClear Easy Reading, the more modern style
Example
BOG: It is anticipated that an annual training rate of 100 employees will be achieved by the time the program is fully operational.
CLEAR: When the program is operating at full capacity, we expect to train 100 people per year.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
2. Use We
We-sentence is a more-modern style, reads more interesting, and communicates with the reader more directly. We report We speculate We generated We measured
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
In this report, we define a mechanism for and discover distinct roles for We use assays to We demonstrate that We provide evidence that (Science)
Example 1 Bad: Twelve soil samples of 4 agricultural areas were investigated for, and the corelationships between were analyzed.
Good: We investigated 12 soil samples of 4 agricultural areas for , and analyzed the co-relationships between
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
If you want to learn only one technique to improve your writing substantially, you should learn to avoid using passive voice.
THERE is no where.
THIS/THAT could be anything.
IT is old style
1. Old style: It is likely that it will rain soon. Modern style: It will rain soon.
2. Old style: It should be borne in mind that the current research has imitations.
Modern style: The current research has limitations.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Also, and, again, further, furthermore First, then, second, next, lastly Soon, after, previously, meanwhile But, yet, still, instead, In short, in other words, Similarly, consequently, accordingly
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
2. Connection of clauses
1. Compound (and, but) 2. Cause/effect (as, because, for, so, ) 3. In between (semicolon) 4. Condition (if, whether, when) 5. Concession (Although, even if, whatever) 6. Result (so that)
Example 1
3. Parallelism
Verb
Incorrect: She swims, plays basketball, and was running bicycles. Correct: She swims, plays basketball, and runs bicycles.
Subject
Incorrect: The ignition was tested, an examination of the belts was carried out, and the levels of the lubricants were checked. Correct: The ignition was tested, the belts were examined, and the lubricant levels were checked.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Other parts
Not only, but also Bad: The plant is not only capable of growing on high-salt soils, but also accumulating concentrations of salts.
Good: The plant is not only capable of growing on high-salt soils, but also capable of accumulating concentrations of salts. Better: The plant is capable of not only growing on high-salt soils, but also accumulating concentrations of salts.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
4. Redundancy
Most-commonly seen problems in nonEnglish speaking writers Wording repetition Sentencing repetition Meaning repetition Wordy
Wording
1. Bad: These
differences grew smaller, and they finally faded out after a stimulation of 3 min.
Good:
These differences grew smaller and finally faded out after a stimulation of 3 min.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
(Cont.)
2. Bad: The result indicates that this assumption can be considered reasonable in some sense.
Meaning
1. Bad: A method to evaluate this effect, rather than to assume subjectively, was proposed. Good: A method to evaluate this effect was proposed.
2. Bad: As a rule, the temperature was generally adjusted to the room temperature.
Good: As a rule, the temperature was adjusted to the room temperature
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Selecting keywords
Using keywords
Using keywords is a vital part of abstract writing, because of the practice of retrieving information electronically: keywords act as the search term. Use keywords that are specific, and that reflect what is essential about the paper. Put yourself in the position of someone researching in your field: what would you look for? Consider also whether you can use any of the current "buzzwords".
Source: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1#2
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Paper submission
Cover letter
Research background, Innovation and significance of the research, Latest publications Relationship to prior publication
Cover letter
Dear Professor Katsuhiko Ariga, Good Day!
Enclosed is a paper, entitled " Small and Medium Enterprises; Virtual R&D (Research and Development) Teams and New Product Development: A Literature Review." Please accept it as a candidate for publication in the Advanced Science Letters Journal.
Below are our responses to your submission requirements. 1. Title and the central theme of the article. Paper title: " Small and Medium Enterprises; Virtual R&D Teams and New Product Development: A Literature Review." This study reviews the concepts of new product development and distributed teams in small and medium enterprises. It proposes the state-of-the-art literature review in order to provide an overview on the structure and dynamics of R&D collaboration in SMEs. 2. Why the material is important in its field and why the material should be published in the Advanced Science Letters Journal? The necessity of having an effective virtual team network is rapidly growing alongside the implementation of information technology. Finding an appropriate virtual teams management has become increasingly important today's distributed environment. However, the conventional centralized architecture, which routinely requests the information by face to face meeting, is not sufficient to manage the growing requests for new product, especially in small and medium enterprises. Recently, a new phenomenon that uses virtual teams to assist the distributed R&D teams has emerged. The virtual teams reduce timeto-market, distribute SMEs risk in new product development, and improve SMEs operational performance. Given today's virtual teams demand over the SMEs, it is important for the Advanced Science Letters Journal readers to understand this new phenomenon and its benefits. This study gives a comprehensive literature review on different aspects of virtual R&D teams collected from the reputed publications. It is the first in the literature that reports the analysis of proceeding about the topic. We strongly believe the contribution of this study warrant its publication in the Advanced Science Letters Journal.
Acceptance Procedure
Acceptance Procedure
Editor-in-Chief tests the manuscript according to the several criteria of subject scope, style, apparent technical validity, topical importance, relationship to prior publication, conciseness, appropriate references, and length. Papers that vary widely from the prescribed archival style (those written as speeches, ill-defined manuscripts, progress reports or news releases, or those strongly flavoured with advertising) will not be considered for publication. Associate Editor (Editor) evaluates the paper according to the same criteria and, in most cases, has the paper sent to one or more reviewers in the field (usually two) for confidential review. The Associate Editor may, however, at his or her discretion, accept the paper without review, reject it giving explicit reason, or request that the author prepare it in a different format.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Similarity score
The similarity score indicates how similar this paper is to other papers, with values ranging from 0 (no similarities) to 100 (completely the same). High scores, e.g., above 30, may indicate that parts of the paper have been copied from elsewhere.
Example 1 (Text with references) Example 2 (Text without references) Example 3 (Text with references-Checked with Turnitin)
Reviewer
Compatibility with the journal topics Scientific level The clear answers to the questions: - What is the problem? - What is done by other people? - What the author did? - What is new? - What is the author contribution?
Organization of the paper: - problem statements, - application area, - research course, - methods used, - results, - further research, - interest in cooperation, - acknowledgements, - references Language: - spelling, - style, - grammar
Almost 90% of the journal follow these rules. so, you check yourself how your paper is before you send it out.
For Formatting Errors Describe the location and nature of the problem in the Proofreading Corrections box after typing in the title "FORMATTING" as follows...
3. FORMATTING The numbers in Table 3 are not aligned in the third column.
4. FORMATTING The paragraph that begins "This last topic..." is not indented.
Please kindly complete the following form and submit. Referee report received after ten days from the date shown above will not affect the decision of acceptance or rejection of the article. An average rating of 6 is required for the acceptance of the article.
Top of Form
1.
2.
1(Poor)
3.
6(Average) 7
10(Excellent)
Chances of free from potentially serious errors which may invalidate the results 1(Poor) 2 3 4 5 6(Average) 7 8 9 10(Excellent)
4.
5.
6.
Summary rating of the overall quality of the article 1(Poor) 2 3 4 5 6(Average) 7 8 9 10(Excellent)
7.
Review Comments
Bottom of Form
Reviewer Guidelines
1. A general rule is "Don't spend more time reviewing the submission than the author spent writing it." If you find that a submission has so many problems that it would require a complete rewrite to save it, make a reasonable number of comments and reject the submission. 2. If you review a submission that is excessively similar to previously published submissions (or you have reason to believe that the submission has previously been published), please note this to Editor. 3. Editorial comments are helpful to authors. However, readability is a factor in a good submission. If the use of language is so poor that it makes reading difficult, please note this in your comments and reflect it in your ranking.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Reviewer comments
Reviewers Evaluation Report (Reject) Reject- does not comply with the aims and scope Reject with helpful comments-1 Reject with helpful comments-2 Reject with helpful comments-3 Requires Major Revision Moderate Revision
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Revised version
Step by step corrections (with minor modification) Step by step corrections base on reviewer's comments Compare the old and the new version of paper (with major modification) Response to the editorial issues
In recent years, we have witnessed an explosion in the production and availability of scholarly research results. This growth is reflected in the gradual expansion of journal coverage in the Web of Science. Journal coverage in Web of Science consists of three major indexes, namely the (Science Citation Index Expanded, the Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index. In addition, the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (formerly ISI Proceedings) became an edition of Web of Science in October) 2008. In 2000 journal coverage in Web of Science totaled 8,684 titles. In 2005, Web of Science covered 9,467 journals, an increase of 9%. As of April 1, 2010 11,519 journals are covered in Web of Science, and increase of 22%.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Impact Factor
The most commonly used measure of journal quality is Impact Factor. This is a number which attempts to measure the impact of a journal in terms of its influence on the academic community. Impact Factors are published by Thomson-ISI
Impact Factor
Total Cites
Journal Self Cites (JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY- IF= 1009) Total Cites 4923 Cites to Years Used in 322 Impact Factor Calculation Impact Factor 1.009 Self Cites 457 (9% of 4923) Self Cites to Years Used 66 (20% of 322) in Impact Factor Calculation Impact Factor without Self Cites 0.803
Number of references
Journal Source Data (JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY- IF= 1009) Citable items Articles Reviews Combined Other items Number in JCR year 2009 (A) Number of references (B) Ratio (B/A) 176 5200 29.5 6 839 139.8 182 6039 33.2 32 123.00 3.8
1.009 J OPER RES SOC EUR J OPER RES ALL OTHERS (354) COMPUT OPER RES INT SER OPER RES MAN COMPUT IND ENG INT J PROD ECON EXPERT SYST APPL STUD COMP INTELL INT J ADV MANUF TECH OMEGA-INT J 3.101 MANAGE S INT J PROD RES OPERAT RES COMP SCI LECT NOTES COMPUT SC INT J SYST SCI SPRING SER RELIAB EN APPL MATH MODEL I C WIREL COMM NETW ANN OPER RES CONTEMP SY
1.009 J OPER RES SOC EUR J OPER RES 2.227 MANAGE SCI 1.576 OPER RES COMPUT OPER RES LECT NOTES COMPUT SC INT J PROD ECON OPER RES QUART OMEGA-INT J 3.101 MANAGE S ANN OPER RES 0.838 INTERFACES INT J PROD RES NAV RES LOG 1.479 TRANSPORT SCI IIE TRANS MNGT SCI 0.806 J PROD ANAL 3.099 J MARKETING RES COMPUT IND ENG
Nader Ale Ebrahim PhD Candidate Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Email: aleebrahim@perdana.um.edu.my
Abstract
Abstract: Research needs to be explained clearly to others to colleagues, to educational bodies, and to the public by publications. There are various reasons for publication: Publications help in spreading your knowledge and experience, It gives you an academic profile and raises the profile of your institution, Research publications create income for the University, .. and Publications strengthen your CV. Publishing a high quality paper in scientific journals is a halfway of receiving citation in the future. The rest of the way is advertising and disseminating the publications by using the proper Research Tools. Familiarity with the tools allows the researcher to increase his/her h-index in the short time. H-index shows the academicians influences in the specified field of research. Therefore, a person with higher level of h-index has more high quality publications with high amount of citations. This presentation, covers the following topics: Why publish and increase h-index?, Definition of h-index and g-index, Importance of h-index, How to use Research Tools Mind Map, Paper title preparation, Selecting keywords, Select the proper journal, Advertise published article, and finally Trace published article citation. Keywords: h-index, Increase citations, Research tools
The scenarios
I have written an article, and I do not know how to select the title and keywords for receiving high citation? I have published a high quality paper, how can I receive high citation rate in the shortest possible time? "I want to increase the citation of my papers, how do I do?"
Motivations
Times Higher Education World University Rankings system Citations research influence (worth 32.5 per cent) UM Transformation Plan Von Zedtwitz (Ph.D. in Business Administration - 1999) h-index importance H-index comparisons Australian Research Repositories Online to the World Citation Workshops Directory of Open Access Repositories News CV (Curriculum Vitae)
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Objectives
To increase your paper visibility, accessibility, To improve the quality of the article title and keywords To evaluate Journal measuring factors (like: Journal Impact Factor, Immediacy Index, Cited Half Life, five Year Journal Impact Factor) before article submission. To search and analyze the right journal to submit. To identify journals to publish in or which journals are the best in a particular discipline. To disseminate the publications by using Research Tools in order to increase citation To trace the citation
NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Item Paper title keywords Proper journal Select best paper repository Networking Alert system
Check
Source: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/seo.asp
Selecting keywords
Optimize Title/Abstract
Step 1: Construct a clear, descriptive title In search engine terms, the title of your article is the most interesting element. The search engine assumes that the title contains all of the important words that define the topic of the piece and thus weights words appearing there most heavily. Step 2: Reiterate key phrases The next most important field is the text of the abstract itself. You should reiterate the key words or phrases from the title within the abstract itself.
Source: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/seo.asp
Well-Optimized Abstract:
Target a journal with a high impact factor, or, in fact, with any impact factor at all! Choose a new, rapidly growing field of research. Articles on hot topics tend to cite much more recent references than those in more traditional fields. Target journals in rapidly growing research fields because they tend to publish papers with a short time interval from submission to acceptance. Write research articles, technical notes and reviews. For the purposes of calculating citations, these are considered citable items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are non-citable items. Write reviews in addition to research papers. Reviews are more likely to be cited than original research papers. Write at length. Longer articles are cited more often.
Dont write as a member of a consortium. Its better to be one in a list of individual authors. Some evidence shows citations to articles written by consortia have been undercounted. Find quick publication Journals
Abstracted/indexed in
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
ABI/INFORM Association of Business Schools' (ABI) Academic Journal Quality Guide (www.the-abs.org.uk) Australian Business Deans' Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List Australian Research Council ERA Ranked Journal List Compendex Computer Abstracts International Database Current Contents / Engineering, Computing & Technology Current Contents / Social & Behavioural Sciences Emerald Management Reviews (EMR) INSPEC Abstracts International Abstracts in Operations Research OR/MS Index and Annual Comprehensive Index Science Citation Index Social Science Citation Index SCOPUS Zentralblatt MATH
Source: Journal of the Operational Research Society
Self Citation
Self-citation refers to a paper being submitted to a specific journal in which papers that have been published during the previous 2 years in that same journal are cited in the reference list. While self-citation of relevant papers is legitimate, excessive self-citation can indicate a manipulation. Thomson Reuters resource known as Web of Science, the company which now lists journal impact actors, considers self-citation to be acceptable up to a rate of 20%, anything over that is considered suspect (Diana Epstein, 2007).
Source: Diana Epstein, Impact factor manipulation, The Journal of the European Medical Writers Association, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2007 Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim Research
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim Source: Google Scholar & Peter Achterberg (1977)
12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0%
20 07 20 06 20 05 20 04 20 03 20 02 20 01 20 00 19 99 19 98
There are inherent differences between different fields with regards to citation behavior. For some fields such as Mathematics or Economics it takes longer to reach the peak of citation activity.
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Targeted advertising
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Adopted from 10 Ways to Increase Usage Box 2012 By:of yourAle Ebrahim Article Using Social Media and Citation Nader Published Research Tools
Researchers can:
gain greater visibility for their research achievements establish the channel for the dissemination of research outputs reduce the cost of preservation and dissemination of research outputs raise the citation rates of their articles
Source: What is an academic repository? Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Citation Competition
Always upload preprints of your papers either on the Los Alamos ArXiv or NEC Citeseer or both. This gives your papers visibility. When writing a paper, use the introduction to provide a motivating context. So it grabs the interest of the reader. When writing a paper the goal is for you to communicate ideas in the clearest way. The more people that can understand your paper, the more it will be cited. Keep track of all your international contacts by using the LinkedIn web utility.
Citation Competition
Take 50 photocopies of your best 1-2 papers to conferences, and leave them on the brochure desk as a handout. Maintain your publication list on your home page. Make an attractive homepage that is clear about what you are working on. Conference papers do not get ISI citation counts. So the trick is to ensure that after a conference you take that paper, correct it, extend it, and submit it to a journal. When your paper is finally published, individually email the pdf to selected collaborators and contacts that you have met at conferences etc.
Optimize citations
Put your article in an institutional or subject repository. Publicize yourself - link to your latest article in your email signature. Make your article more accessible Make your article more visible
Reading lists Department website or personal webpage Twitter and Facebook LinkedIn Join academic social networking sites CiteULike Email signature
Copyright issue
Your publication freely available Besides the bibliographic details, you can add the publication itself to UvADARE, in pdf or Word. Of course, you yourself decide whether you only want to archive it (in which case the electronic version is not accessible) or if you wish to give interested researchers and readers full access to the electronic publication. There are great advantages to making it worldwide available. Publications which are freely available are more often downloaded and cited. If your publisher does not give permission to give access to the definitive publisher's version/pdf, in many cases it is permitted to make the last author's version available (i.e. the version after peer review). This version has the same scientific content, but lacks the publisher's lay-out. More information can be found at SHERPA/RoMEO and the Open Access and Copyright site of UvA.
Source: Digital Academic Repository of the University of Amsterdam
Advertising
ResearcherID Wikipedia Web Site Mindmeister SSRN getCITED Academica ResearchGate The Berkeley Electronic Press
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Advertising
MPRA HAL Malaysian Expert CiteULike PublicationsList Academic Research Microsoft WiKi Methodspace Ecademy Best Virtual R&D Tools Box 2012 Papers Teams By: Nader Ale Ebrahim Research
The following text retrieved on 23rd April 2011 from the free encyclopedia Wikipedia (available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_team). A virtual team (also known as a geographically dispersed team or GDT) is a group of individuals who work across time, space and organizational boundaries with links strengthened by webs of communication technology. Powell, Piccoli and Ives define virtual teams in their literature review article "as groups of geographically, organizationally and/or time dispersed workers brought together by information and telecommunication technologies to accomplish one or more organizational tasks."[1] Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S. & Taha, Z. in their recent (2009) literature review paper, added two key issues to definition of a virtual team as small temporary groups of geographically, organizationally and/ or time dispersed knowledge workers who coordinate their work predominantly with electronic information and communication technologies in order to accomplish one or more organization tasks[2]
See the list of Nader Ale Ebrahims publications in the references section
Research Tools Box 2012 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
Source: SSRN eLibrary Search Results ORG: Contemporary Organizational Structures (Topic)
Document Publishing
Scribd.com Docstoc.com Issuu.com
Recently, a report published in the CSTD (Commission on Science and Technology for Development) 2011-2012 intersessional panel which hold on 13-15 December 2011, Manila, Philippines. In this report the paper Ale Ebrahim, N., S. Ahmed and Z. Taha (2009). "Virtual R&D Teams in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Literature Review " Scientific Research and Essays , is one of the references.
On 01/23/12 8:03 AM, Phil Montero wrote: -------------------Nader - Thanks for connecting with me! I see we share several groups all having to do with virtual teams. What is your experience or interest in virtual teamwork?
On January 23, 2012 7:00 AM, Nader Ale Ebrahim wrote: -------------------I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
Social Network
Professor T. Ramayah
Publishing a book
Record Citation
KNOWN CITATIONS Mind Map
Links
Useful Links
Thomsonscientific.webex.com une.edu.au/library/eskillsplus adt.caul.edu.au
Thank you!
Nader Ale Ebrahim Department of Engineering Design and Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Email: aleebrahim@perdana.um.edu.my
References
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Research Tools, Nader Ale Ebrahim, Apr. 2010 Journal Citation Reports, Thomson Reuters 2009 The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis / Anne-Wil Harzing. , September 2010 Leary, Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage Chapter Six Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S., & Taha, Z. (2009). Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review. [Review]. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(13), 15751590. Journal Citation Reports - Science - Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Knowledge ALE EBRAHIM, N., ABDUL RASHID, S. H., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2011. The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 10, 109-114. EBRAHIM, N. A., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2010. SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5, 916-930. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2009. Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process. African Journal of Marketing Management, 1, 211-219. ALE EBRAHIM, N., ABDUL RASHID, S. H., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2011. The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 10, 109-114. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S., ABDUL RASHID, S. H. & TAHA, Z. 2012. Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5, 9-14. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S., ABDUL RASHID, S. H., TAHA, Z. & WAZED, M. A. 2012. Virtual Collaborative R&D Teams in Malaysia Manufacturing SMEs. Advanced Materials Research, 433-440, 1653-1659. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2009. Modified Stage-Gate: A Conceptual Model of Virtual Product Development Process. African Journal of Marketing Management, 1, 211-219. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2009. Virtual R & D teams in small and medium enterprises: A literature review. Scientific Research and Essay, 4, 15751590. ALE EBRAHIM, N., AHMED, S. & TAHA, Z. 2010. SMEs; Virtual research and development (R&D) teams and new product development: A literature review International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5, 916930.
10.
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.