A Correction Of Respected Dr. Zakir Naik.

In one of his videos Most Respected Zakir Naik was asked that if God is Omnipotent then He can become a man or can incarnate. A PART OF THIS VEDIO MAY BE SEEN ON YOU TUBE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0Vxmso5BuY&feature=plcp
In his reponce Respected Dr. Zakir said that God has Power to become a man or to speak lie , but the moment God become a man or speaks a lie God ceases to be God. We dispute on several issues on this respond. 1] IT IS OUT OF THE OMNIPOTENT OF GOD\ DEITY TO BEOME A MAN OR A WOMAN OR ANY OTHER THING SINCE IT IS SELF ABSURD FOR GOD \DEITY TO BECOME ANY THING THAT THE DEITY \GOD IS ETERNALLY NOT. IF GOD \ DEITY DOES THIS SELF ABSURD THE DEITY DOES CEASE TO BE DEITY. AN OTHER EXAMPLE IF DEITY BECOMES AN ANIMAL SAY A LION DEITY CEASES TO BE DEITY BUT TO BECOME ANY THING THAT THE DEITY IS ETERNALLY NOT IS NOT IN THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOD \DEITY SINCE THIS IS SELF ABSURD. 2] HOW EVER TO SPEAK A FALSE SENTENCE \STATEMENT IS IN THE OMNIPOTENCE OF THE SUPREME EXIXTENT NOUNLY ALL-H THE SELF NECESSARY EXISTENT. IF DEITY FOR SAKE OF SUPPOSITIONS SPEAKS A FALSE SENTENCE DEITY DOES NOT CEASE TO BE THE DEITY . THE REASON IS THAT BECOMING IS A DEFECT AND ALL DEFECTS ARE SELF ABSURD ON THE SELF NECESSRAY IN EXIXTENCE AND HIS ESSENTIAL ATTRIBUTES. ON THE CONTRARY A STATEMENT IS A SEPARATE EXISTENT AND IS SEPARATE FROM GOD\DEITY. RESPECTED DOCTOR SOME HOW OVER LOOKED THE DIFFRERENCE B/W M-H:A:L BIDH DHA:T AND M-H:A:L BIL GHAIR. FOR DETAIL DISCUSSIONS SEE OTHER ARTICLES BY AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMAAH. THE SUPPOSED OCCURRENCE OF SELF ABSURD SOME TIMES IMPLIETH THAT GOD CEASETH TO BE GOD. BUT THE SUPPOSED OCCURRENCE OF ABSURD WITH SEPARATE NEVER IMPLIETH SUCH A THING. MORE DISCUSSIONS SHALL SOON BE PRESENTED IN SHA: ALL-H. NOTE: TRINITARIANS AGREE WITH MUSLIMS THAT GOD CAN NOT BECOME ANY THING WHAT HE WAS NOT IN GENERAL. BUT THE MAKE ONLY ONE EXCEPTION , AND THIS IS OF A HUMAN BEING. BUT MUSLIMS DO NOT BELIEVE IN SUCH AN EXCEPTION. SUPPOSE THAT GOD IS NOT SOME THING SAY B IN ETERNITY. THIS MEANS THAT TO BE B IS A DEFECT. HAD IT NOT BEEN A DEFECT GOD MUST HAVE BEEN A B IN ETERNITY. SINCE GOD IS A SELF PERFECT BEING AND NOTHING BUT A SELF PERFECT BEING. IF GOD IS NOTSOE THING IN ETERNITY SAY GOD IS NOT B IN ETERNITY THEN B IS ATMOST A DEFECT AND AN IMPERFECTION OR ATLEAST NOT A PERFECTION. AS ANY THING THAT IS A DEFECT IS SELF ABSURD UPON GOD ANY THING THAT IS AN IMPERFECTIONS IS SELF ABSURD UPON GOD ITS MORE GERERALIZED CASE ANY THING THAT IS NOT A PERFECTION IS ALSO SELF ABSURD UPON THE SELF NECESSARY EXIXTENT. HOW EVERONE MUST SEE THAT ANY TJING THAT IS SEPARATE FROM SELF NECESSARY EXISTEN WA:JIN AL WUJU:D BIDH DHA:T IS MUKIN AL WUJU:D BIDH DHA:T, AND A DEFECT OR A NOT PERPECTION IS NOT SELF ABSURD UPON MUMKIN AL WUJU:D BDH DHA;T [ SELF POSSIBLE\SELFCONTINGENT IN EXISTENCE] . SIMILARLY IT IS SELF ABSURD FOR GOD\ DEITY TO FORGET. IT IS SELF EXCLUDED FROM HIS OMNIPOTENCE AND OMNI-INTENTION TO FORGET. SINCE TO FORGET IS A DEFECT , AND ALL DEFECTS ARE SELF ABSURD UPON THE SELF NECESSARY IN EXISTENCE ESSENCE NOUNLY ALLAH. HOW EVEN INJUSTIVE AND A FALSE STATEMENT ARE THE CASES OF DEFECT UPON SEPARATES FROM ALL-H . SEE OTHER ARTICLE FOR MORE DETAIL DISCUSSIONS. IT IS HOPED THAT RESPECTED DR. ZAKIR MAY SEE THE PROBLEM AND THINK AGAIN. NOTE. KHAIRABADIS BELIEVE THAT EVEN A FALSE STATEMENT IS SELF ABSURD AND OUT OF OMNIPOTENT OF GOD.

SEE THE WORKS OF FAZL AL HAQQ KHAIRABADI:1]IMTINA AN NAZIR 2] TAHQIQ AL FATWA. IT MAY BE NOTED THAT INTERPOLATION AND MANUPOLATION IN THE TEXTS OF MANUSCRIPTS OFABOVE MENTIONED TWO WORKS CAN NOT BE RULED OUT WITH CERTAINITY. HOW EVER IT IS A SEPARATE ISSUE AND SHALL BE DISCUSSED LATTER INSHA:ALL-H.