I

Michael Nuccitelli Psy.D., C.F.C.

NYS Licensed Psychologist
iPredator
Ph: (347) 871-2416
Email: dr@techpredator.com
Website: www.iPredator.co
Blog: www.DarkPsychology.co

iPredator Bridge: iPredator Bridge is a theoretical tenet of iPredator representing the psychological,
perceptual & behavioral trajectory of people who use Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) to harm others. Similar to the iPredator, they are motivated by personal convictions, greed, power,
control, narcissism or psychopathology. Different from the iPredator, they have yet to fully engage in
criminal/deviant activities using ICT or use complex perceptual distortions to validate the harm they
cause. iPredator Bridge investigates why some people draw near to this nefarious and malevolent realm
and either proceed in their maladaptive trajectory or cease and desist. Hidden in cyberspace, and through
ICT, they contemplate the benefits and detriments, proceed, and then continue a path where their
cognitive and perceptual processes are focused upon directly or indirectly harming others. For those who
cross this proverbial bridge, they enter a world where their choices are increasingly governed by
criminal, deviant, immoral and maladaptive processes.

“The distinction between the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
 II

iPredator Bridge is a theoretical construct representing the exploration and study of people who
decide to use Information and Communications Technology (ICT) motivated by greed, power,
control, pathology or disdain for others. iPredator Bridge investigates why some people approach this
nefarious and malevolent realm, decide to proceed, and then continue along a trajectory where their
cognitive, affective, behavioral and perceptual actions harm others or societies.

The Information Age1 is a societal paradigm and period of time beginning in the last quarter of the 20th
century and presently thriving in the second decade of the 21st century. The Information Age is a stage
in societal and technological development similar to the Industrial Revolution2 (1750-1942,) The
Information Age represents the evolution, emergence, consumption of and reliance upon Information
and Communications Technology (ICT). In a mere four decades, ICT and its importance to humanity
have led many to surmise that the planet and its human inhabitants are amidst an Information
Revolution3. Mobile digital technology, telecommunications, social media and the abstract concept and
artificial universe of cyberspace are just a few examples of humanities newest frontiers to obtain,
exchange and disseminate information.

The planet is experiencing a shift from traditional industry, born and bred during the Industrial
Revolution, to an economy based on the creative and rapid manipulation of information. Just as the
Industrial Revolution greatly changed the lives of humanity, the Information Revolution is a societal
shift rapidly changing humanity’s social, economic and psychological conditions of the times. The
Information Revolution marks another major turning point in history, following the Industrial
Revolution and changing every aspect of daily life unlike ever before.

Information and Communications Technology4 (ICT) is an umbrella term used to define any electronic
or digital communication device or application used to obtain, exchange or disseminate information.
ICT stresses the role of unified communications and the integration of telecommunications, which
enable users to create, access, store, transmit, and manipulate information. ICT consists of all forms of
telecommunication, information technology, broadcast media, audio and video processing, transmission
and network based control and monitoring functions. ICT has rapidly become one of the basic building
blocks of modern society and will become increasingly important as the Information Age matures.
 III

Many industrialized nations now regard understanding ICT and mastering the basic skills and concepts
of ICT is vital and now considered part of the core of education, alongside reading, writing and
arithmetic. The importance of ICT to humanity lies upon a continuum of relevance ranging from
minimal impact to vital requirement regarding an ICT user's day to day activities. For some, ICT and the
Internet are nothing more than tools of convenience for conducting their responsibilities. For others,
their social, scholastic, business and/or financial affairs disclosed in cyberspace and through ICT are
crucial to their self-esteem, self-worth, success and perceptual world.

ICT has changed the way humanity interacts, exchanges and accesses information. Smartphones, mobile
devices and social media are the latest in a succession of advancements growing at a feverish pace. It is
often hard to fathom that the Internet, used by two billion plus people globally, only celebrated its 20th
birthday in 2011.

As of March 2012, data compiled from Nielsen Online, International Telecommunications Union and
GfK has led Internet World Stats5 to estimate there are 2, 267,233,742 people globally are Internet users
as of December 31, 2011. From 2000-2011, the number of Internet users has grown 528% and is just
.3% shy of including 1/3 of all human inhabitants walking the planet. Despite its already significant
impact, the pace of new-technology introductions and number of Internet users will continue to grow at
an accelerated rate with access to and the exchange of information being a priori. The Cisco Visual
Networking Index (VNI), an ongoing initiative to track and forecast the impact of visual networking
applications has projected an explosion in ICT and mobile device technology by 2016. Some of Cisco’s
VNI projections are as follows:

1. Annual global IP traffic will surpass the zettabyte6 threshold (1.3 zettabytes) by the end of 2016. In
2016, global IP traffic will reach 1.3 zettabytes per year or 110.3 exabytes per month.
2. Global IP traffic has increased eightfold over the past 5 years, and will increase threefold over the
next 5 years. Overall, IP traffic will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29% from 2011
to 2016.
3. In 2016, the gigabyte equivalent of all movies ever made will cross global IP networks every 3
minutes. Global IP networks will deliver 12.5 petabytes7 every 5 minutes in 2016.
4. The number of devices connected to IP networks will be nearly 3X as high as the global population in
2016. There will be nearly three networked devices per capita in 2016, up from over one networked
device per capita in 2011.
5. Traffic from wireless devices will exceed traffic from wired devices by 2014. In 2016, wired devices
will account for 39% of IP traffic, while Wi-Fi and mobile devices will account for 61% of IP traffic. In
2011, wired devices accounted for the majority of IP traffic at 55%. (Cisco Visual Networking Index:
Forecast and Methodology, 2011-2016)8

Although ICT benefits far outweigh detriments for society, humanity has been seduced by the notion
that more technology translates into a better quality of life. The concept of being "connected"
paradoxically makes humanity less connected to what is really happening globally. As ICT becomes
increasingly widespread, the fewer citizens know their neighbors and the more they engage with people
they are "connected" to in cyberspace and ICT. It seems that humanity is slowly separating from one
another, isolating themselves with their technology and disconnecting from human contact on both
literal and spiritual levels.
 IV

Prior to ICT, all methods of communication involved some form of identification and response
recognition skills using at least one of the five senses. Although deception, crime and immoral acts were
committed, they entailed far more creativity, design and planning than what is required using ICT and
cyberspace. Even during the early stages of human civilization, tribal communities would communicate
with each other over long distances using the proverbial “smoke signals.” Albeit primitive, as a form of
communication, these communities could to use their sense of sight to determine a general geographic
location of the sender and, if close enough, could use their sense of smell to determine the type of wood
being used to create the signals. Both of these methods were used to help them identify the sender and
extrapolate if the sender was friend or foe.

In cyberspace, our physical senses are relatively subdued as we exchange and/or verify information as
valid in isolation from the source. The "veil of anonymity" afforded to anyone using ICT offers
numerous benefits, but the detriments can far outweigh the assistances for the vulnerable or high-risk
target. Although the recipient of information in cyberspace can use their senses of sight and hearing, it is
still impossible to rely on that information to verify the identity of the sender or his/her intent behind the
information. Without having access to the five senses or being able to accurately determine the identity,
motivations or location of the sender, a human’s natural tools used in self-preservation and protection
are significantly hampered.

The Information Age has presented humanity with the tools and ability to exchange and disseminate
information at an accelerated speed. The downside of ICT is that humanity does not access, use or rely
upon their five senses9. From an evolutionary and instinctual standpoint, a human’s five senses serve to
help them interact with their environment, procreate and survive. In nature and in reality, a human could
not survive if they were stripped of all five senses. In addition to having five senses, all humanity has
engrained in their genetics the striving for self-preservation. Having this dynamic of self-preservation is
not exclusive to humans, but is wired in all living organisms. The will, urge and inherent traits of self-
preservation are universal. Without a living organism having these traits, their species would quickly
become extinct.

Whether it is ICT and cyberspace is still in its infancy, human ignorance, denial, technological
ineptitude or the proverbial “veil of anonymity” afforded to all ICT users, it seems plausible that for
many ICT users, their mechanisms used to activate their drives of self-preservation remains dormant
when involved with ICT and cyberspace.

Information technology experts, sociologists and psychologists tend to describe ICT as beneficial tools
for humanity. Based on this writer’s investigative findings leading to the creation of iPredator and
iPredator Bridge, he defines this new dimension quite differently. Although the World Wide Web10,
Telecommunications11, Digital Technology12 and Mobile Device Technology13 are highly beneficial
tools and areas helpful to society, this writer recognizes tools have many different purposes. When
chosen for nefarious reasons, ICT are tools that become weapons. iPredators primarily use ICT as
weapons in their efforts to offend, dominate, harm or steal from others.

As ICT continues to expand at a feverish pace coupled with seemingly daily introductions of new
technology, ever-increasing obstacles will challenge humanity. Already, ICT users have been confronted
by the ever-increasing detriments of having incredible amounts of information, which can be obtained,
exchanged and spread at incredible speed. Another challenge, that includes the dark side of humanity, is
 V

the usage of ICT and cyberspace to harm others inflicting psychological, physical and/or societal
damage. The construct created by this writer that encapsulates these harmful typologies is as follows:

iPredator14: A child, adult or group who, directly or indirectly, engages in exploitation, victimization,
stalking, theft or disparagement of others using Information and Communications Technology (ICT.)
iPredators are driven by deviant fantasies, desires for power and control, retribution, religious
fanaticism, political reprisal, psychiatric illness, perceptual distortions, peer acceptance or personal and
financial gain. iPredators can be any age, either gender and not bound by economic status, race or
national heritage. iPredator is a global term used to distinguish anyone who engages in criminal, deviant
or abusive behaviors using Information and Communications Technology (ICT.) Whether the offender
is a cyberbully, cyberstalker, cyber harasser15, cyber criminal, online sexual predator, internet troll16 or
cyber terrorist, they fall within the scope of iPredator. The three criteria used to define an iPredator
include:

I. A self-awareness of causing harm to others, directly or indirectly, using ICT. II. The intermittent to
frequent usage of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) to obtain, exchange and deliver
harmful information. III. A general understanding of Cyberstealth used to engage in criminal or deviant
activities or to profile, identify, locate, stalk and engage a target.

Unlike human predators prior to the Information Age, iPredators rely on the multitude of benefits
offered by Information and Communications Technology (ICT.) These assistances include exchange of
information over long distances, rapidity of information exchanged and the seemingly infinite access to
data available. Malevolent in intent, iPredators rely on their capacity to deceive others using Information
and Communications Technology (ICT) in an abstract electronic universe.

iPredator Bridge: iPredator Bridge is a theoretical tenet of iPredator representing the psychological,
perceptual & behavioral trajectory of people who use Information and Communications Technology
(ICT) to harm others. Similar to the iPredator, they are motivated by personal convictions, greed, power,
control, narcissism17or psychopathology18. Different from the iPredator, they have yet to fully engage in
criminal/deviant activities using ICT or use complex perceptual distortions to validate the harm they
cause. iPredator Bridge investigates why some people draw near to this nefarious and malevolent realm
and either proceed in their maladaptive trajectory or cease and desist. Hidden in cyberspace, and through
ICT, they contemplate the benefits and detriments, proceed, and then continue a path where their
cognitive and perceptual processes are focused upon directly or indirectly harming others. For those who
cross this proverbial bridge, they enter a world where their choices are increasingly governed by
criminal, deviant, immoral and maladaptive processes.

Although it is assumed all humanity, has residing deep in their psyche, the potential & Dark
Psychology19 for behaving in harmful and malevolent ways they rarely or never activate, ICT and
cyberspace offers a direct connection and psychological route to the dark side. Just as ICT and
cyberspace is incredibly pro-social and beneficial to humanity, these same technological advancements
can lead humanity to diabolical and sinister endeavors. The iPredator Bridge is a symbolic
representation of the approach, route and initial crossing into the realm of the iPredator. In a rudimentary
and abstract way, it is posited that cyberspace, ICT and all future technological advancements, related to
information technology, is an extension of the mind and the instinctual drives of the collective brain to
 VI

replicate itself outside a human organism. Related to this postulate are the theoretical tenets of Carl Jung
(1875-1961) and his construct of the Collective Unconscious20.

“The collective unconscious - so far as we can say anything about it at all - appears to consist of
mythological motifs or primordial images, for which reason the myths of all nations are its real
exponents. In fact, the whole of mythology could be taken as a sort of projection of the collective
unconscious... We can therefore study the collective unconscious in two ways, either in mythology or in
the analysis of the individual.” (Carl Jung - The Structure & Dynamics of the Psyche21)

Given that humanity is at the beginning of the Information Age, the motivating factors that lead some
people to cross over into engaging in asocial behaviors using ICT cannot be explained. The concept of
iPredator and iPredator Bridge construct assumes that ICT has unknown effects upon the mind and
influence some to engage in destructive and self-destructive patterns. The creation of ICT and
cyberspace is equivalent to the philosophical and psychological societal awe that was created when an
astronaut took his first step upon the moon. Just as Neil Armstrong (8/5/30 - 8/25/12) stepped into a new
celestial territory, humanity is doing the same here on Earth. This new territory is the abstract and
artificial electronic universe known as cyberspace.

Within this new region, and presently without explanation, many people enter cyberspace and access
ICT with their instinctual drive for self-preservation22 remaining dormant. Conversely, there are other
people who, either quickly or gradually, conclude that ICT and cyberspace offers an environment that
allows the pursuit of maladaptive and psychopathological goals undeterred by punishment. It is within
this process that the ICT user or groups of ICT users transcend into the world of iPredator. Once an
iPredator, the various typologies begin their search for those they deem as vulnerable, easily accosted
and not likely to mobilize the required forces leading to their apprehension and punishment.

Most iPredators seek to hide their identities, whereas others do not for reasons often rooted in the belief
that their identity being known by the victim benefits them by increasing their popularity or solidifying
peer acceptance. For a small segment of cyberbullies who meet criteria for iPredator, they relish in the
knowledge that others will know they are the aggressor and feel their aggressive endeavors using ICT
makes them more attractive to their peers. This example of cyberbullies is amongst other iPredator
typologies that choose to not hide or fabricate their identity.

This writer disagrees with those who view ICT and the realm of cyberspace as merely technological
tools used by criminal, psychopathological, narcissistic, deviant and lascivious people. Although this
writer is unable to clinically verify his assertions, given ICT and the Internet is new to human
civilization, he strongly subscribes to the notion that ICT and cyberspace have developed into a realm
leading to an entirely new breed of criminal, deviant, abuser and aggressor never experienced before in
the history of human civilization. The “veil of anonymity” afforded to all assailants if they choose, their
ability to develop counterfeit profiles, their technological knowledge base and the capacity to target
victims they have concluded are easy targets are but a few facets that differentiate the iPredator from
classic criminal, abuser and thief.

Given this writer’s strong belief that there are neurochemical, neuropsychological23, perceptual and
dissociative24 based changes occurring in all humans who access and interact with ICT and cyberspace,
the compilation of all these factors leads to both a new breed of assailant and victim. iPredator Bridge is
 VII

the connection between the dark aspects of the human mind, ICT, cyberspace and activation of direct or
indirect harm towards others. The victim or target of an iPredator may or may not have previously
engaged the iPredator Bridge construct themselves, and for that matter, may not even know that their
loved ones, peers, associates or new online contacts are posturing to become iPredators or actively
engaging in iPredator attacks.

Clearly, there is a plethora of contributing factors influencing people to become iPredators. There are
also a multitude of factors that influence some people to approach and cross the iPredator Bridge. And
unfortunately, there are a variety of constituents that influence some to be unwilling to institute the
necessary practices and safety measures to reduce their probability of becoming a target or victim. The
harsh reality is that the wonderful abstract universe of cyberspace and the ICT used to enter cyberspace
does not come with directions or blueprints on how to prevent being attacked, disparaged or harmed by
iPredators.

Based on this writer’s research and extensive investigation leading to the creation of the iPredator
construct, he, his colleagues and many contributors have compiled a list of warning signs that may
suggest the person being queried is approaching the iPredator Bridge, in transit or has fully crossed to
the realm of iPredator. The list to follow has not been validated by clinical research, a governing body or
academic institution. It has been compiled and published to be a point of reference to educate and assist
anyone who is concerned that they, their children, business or community are in the presence of an
iPredator or someone in transit to becoming an iPredator.

Note: Responding “Yes, I Agree, True” to any of the statements does not confirm the person being
queried is an iPredator or close to becoming one. Responding with an affirmative response should be
noted and further investigation is recommended. The term “social networking site” applies to the
multitude of social media sites available online. As of 2012-2013, Facebook, Twitter, Linked In,
YouTube, Pinterst and Google + are the most popular for adults and MySpace, Foursquare, Tumblr,
Xanga & Facebook for teens. Please be mindful that iPredators use many forums in cyberspace and
numerous ICT tools to victimize their targets. The term “habitual” represents regular usage of ICT and
the Internet.
 VIII

As stated above, responding “Yes, I Agree, True” to any of the statements does not confirm the person is
an iPredator or close to becoming one. However, affirmative responses to five or more of the statements
are a strong indicator that the person being queried is either an iPredator, crossing the iPredator Bridge
or suffering from some psychological and/or perceptual dysfunction. Definitions of iPredator and
iPredator Bridge are illustrated at the base of this checklist. The acronym, ICT, is Information and
Communications Technology and represents an umbrella term consisting of all forms of
telecommunication, information technology, broadcast media, audio and video processing, transmission
and network based control and monitoring functions.

1. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and regularly interacts with a select
group of online contacts that he/she has never met in person.
2. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has developed private codes or
lingo, which is regularly communicated to a select group of followers.
3. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
information that they quickly delete for no apparent reason.
4. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
information that would be considered cryptic or jumbled in content.
5. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
information about other people’s offline activities that are innocuous or trivial in nature.
6. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed to publically
post information that excludes someone from being invited to a social activity.
7. The person has been confirmed to regularly post information about others in chat rooms, forums or
message boards that are trivial and have no social purpose or cause.
8. The person has been confirmed to maintain a blog or online public journal that has a central theme
with minimal social or creative cause merit.
9. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
images or videos about other people’s offline activities and lifestyle.
10. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
messages, images or videos of other people’s loved ones not known to the person (i.e. husband wife,
children, business, etc.).
11. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed to maintain
his/her identity completely private, yet seems to spend an inordinate amount of time online and/or using
their ICT.
12. The person maintains a public live journal, blog or website with a central theme not based in any
social cause, intellectual or creative endeavor.
13. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed posting
information about other people’s offline lives that are considered sensitive or private.
14. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed to
impersonate others and engage with others or post information using their felonious identity.
15. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been suspected of spending
more time online or using their ICT than with family, friends, loved ones or peers.
16. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed encouraging
online and offline contacts to invest time or money in unsubstantiated ventures.
 IX

17. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed
disseminating information that is felonious about their career, expertise or academic/professional
achievements.
18. The person is a habitual social networking site and/or ICT user and has been confirmed having
multiple usernames with different profile descriptions not explained by internet safety practices.
19. The person had been observed turning off, shutting down or closing their ICT when a person
unexpectedly approaches them.
20. The person has been confirmed to frequent websites or social networking sites that have been kept
secret, discouraged or forbade by loved ones or family members.
21. The person spends large amounts of time online and/or using their ICT in private without rational
reasons.
22. The person spends large amounts of time online and/or using their ICT researching what others have
posted about them or posting information about others.
23. The person has been observed or confirmed exaggerating online about erroneous events and events
not crucial to their livelihood.
24. The person has been suspected or confirmed to be obsessed with religious, political or philosophical
societal movements that they express online or using ICT.
25. The person has been suspected or confirmed to be obsessed with religious, political or philosophical
societal movements and spending time in chat rooms, reading and posting information in forums,
message boards and comments themed with their cause.
26. The person refuses or is hesitant to disclose or discuss their family, career or any offline information
leading to their accurate identification.
27. The person has been observed or confirmed using information technologies used to hide their
identity or obtain other peoples identity that has not been legally purchased or downloaded.
28. The person has been suspected or confirmed contacting others without any clear reason or obvious
connection.
29. The person has been suspected or confirmed contacting others multiple times a day.
30. The person has been observed or confirmed adding “buddies” or “friends” to their social networking
site lists, despite not knowing them.
31. The person has been suspected or confirmed encouraging others to move from public forums to
private connections such as email, instant messaging or texting.
32. The person has been observed or confirmed asking others, online or using ICT, for personal
information that has little merit for obtaining.
33. The person has been observed or confirmed sending online gifts, badges, likes or +1’s to others they
do not know at social networking sites.
34. The person has been observed or confirmed expressing, multiple times, how much they like or
despise a person, group or organization online or using ICT.
35. The person has been observed or confirmed changing their personal information to suit the situation
or person they are communicating with.
36. The person has been observed or confirmed knowing information about others, but unable or
hesitant to disclose how they obtained the information.
37. The person has been suspected or confirmed connecting with others online or using ICT across
several different platforms (i.e. Twitter, Skype, Email, etc.), despite not knowing their ICT patterns.
38. The person has been suspected or confirmed connecting with people’s family, friends or colleagues,
despite having no apparent connection to them.
 X

39. The person has been observed or confirmed sending or posting disparaging information about others
online or using ICT.
40. The person has been confirmed having more than 3 or more online relationships involving an
adversarial and/or negative outcome.
41. The person has been suspected or confirmed retaliating to negative information being spread about
them online or using ICT.
42. The person has been suspected or confirmed sending embarrassing and/or sensitive information to
other people’s mobile devices or phones.
43. The person has been suspected or confirmed engaging in "sexting" with others he/she does not know
or much younger or much older than they are.
44. The person has been suspected or confirmed engaging in sexual conversations with others they have
met online or using ICT.
45. The person has been suspected or confirmed intermittently spending money at online sex sites.
46. The person has been suspected or confirmed regularly responding to contacts from online strangers.
47. The person has been suspected or confirmed discussing violent, prejudicial or hate based topics
online or using ICT with online contacts or strangers.
48. The person has been suspected or confirmed regularly visiting and/or participating in anonymous
video or instant messaging chat room sites.
49. The person has been suspected or confirmed causing others to log out from chat rooms or instant
messaging communicating feeling uncomfortable.
50. The person has been observed or confirmed keeping up with news on mobile device security
vulnerabilities, despite not having those types of mobile devices.

iPredator's antisocial pursuits are fueled by their distorted perceptions of self- preservation. For many of
these miscreants, they believe they must victimize others in order to thrive, sometimes to survive, feel
socially accepted and often for a sense of accomplishment, right or vindication. Their motivations to
hurt others are not restrained by guilt or remorse, because they perceive their actions towards a victim is
deserved and the person should have expected it given their attitude, actions or ignorance. Perceiving
their actions in this way, predators justify the purpose of their behaviors allowing them to harm others
without feeling remorse.

Social science experts and educators have attempted to enlighten and warn the global community, but
their impact to date pales in comparison to the wrath and the inevitable growth of the iPredator threat
 XI

and the growing number of iPredator groups. This writer and his future proactive associates and
organizations will attempt to motivate society before iPredators become a common fixture in the fast
growing Internet global community. Cyberspace represents a new dimension and a new territory for
social exploration. Unfortunately, iPredators patiently wait in the shadows of this dimension with bated
breath.

As stated above and defined again here to reaffirm the importance of learning to identify others who
may be approaching may be approaching the realm of iPredator. iPredator Bridge is a theoretical tenet of
iPredator representing the exploration and study of people who adjudicate to use ICT to harm others
motivated by greed, power, control, narcissism or psychopathology. iPredator Bridge investigates why
some people draw near to this nefarious and malevolent realm hidden in cyberspace and through ICT,
contemplate the benefits and detriments, decide to proceed, and then continue a trajectory where their
cognitive, affective, behavioral and perceptual states are directly or indirectly harmful to others and
society. For those who cross this proverbial bridge, they enter a world where their choices are
increasingly governed by criminal, deviant, immoral and maladaptive processes.

1. Genealogy in the “Information Age”: History’s New Frontier:

http://www.ngsgenealogy.org/galleries/Ref_Researching/NGSQVol91Pg26077GenealogyHistory.pdf
2. Stories of USA: http://storiesofusa.com/industrial-revolution-inventions-timeline-1712-1942/
3. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_revolution
4. TechTerms: http://www.techterms.com/definition/ict
5. Internet World Stats: Internet World Stats
6. Webopedia: http://www.webopedia.com/index.php/TERM/Z/zettabyte.html
7. Webopedia: http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/P/petabyte.html
8. Cisco Visual Networking Index:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11-481360.pdf
9. Scientific Psychic: http://www.scientificpsychic.com/workbook/chapter2.htm
10. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_World_Wide_Web
11. WiseGeek: http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-telecommunications.htm#
12. Becta: http://www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/impact-digital-tech.pdf
13. Socialight: http://uberthings.com/mobile/intro_to_mobile.pdf
14. iPredator – A Global Internet Predator Theory: http://www.ipredator.co/ipredator/
15. Wired Safety: https://www.wiredsafety.org/
16. The Examiner: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jun/12/what-is-an-internet-troll
17. PsychCentral: http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/08/04/how-to-spot-a-narcissist/
18. Science Daily: http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/p/psychopathology.htm
19. Dark Psychology: http://www.ipredator.co/ipredator/dark-psychology/
20. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_unconscious
21. Carl Jung - The Structure & Dynamics of the Psyche: http://ebookee.org/The-Collected-Works-of-Carl-
Gustav-Jung_497985.html
22. Self-Preservation in Humans: http://public.wsu.edu/~taflinge/biology.html
23. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuropsychology
24. Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociation_(psychology)
 XII

iPredator was founded in September 2011 to provide educational and advisory products & services to consumers
and organizations on Cyber Bullying, Cyber Harassment, Cyber Stalking, Cyber Crime, Internet
Defamation, Cyber Terrorism, Online Sexual Predators and the new field they are developing termed, Information
and Communications Technology (ICT) Psychology. Created by a NYS licensed psychologist and certified
forensic consultant, Dr. Michael Nuccitelli, their goal is to reduce victimization, theft and disparagement from
online assailants. His partner and Chief ICT Investigator, Tina Church, is an Indiana licensed private investigator
and founder of the not for profit company, The Other Victims Advocacy (TOVA). Together, they have compiled
an addition to Dr. Nuccitelli’s Tech. Predator theory of iPredator, called iPredator Bridge.

In addition to assisting citizens, iPredator’s mission is to initiate a national educational & awareness campaign
with the help of private, state, and federal agencies. Dr. Nuccitelli can be reached at Dr@TechPredator.com.
iPredator Inc.’s criminal psychology & forensics blog can be viewed at www.DarkPsychology.co and their
website, www.iPredator.co, offers site visitors an enormous database on Cyber Criminal Psychology, Internet
Safety and iPredators. Although iPredator has joined a multitude of social networking sites, feel free to visit their
social sites planned to be their major information and announcement vehicles.

Facebook: The iPredator

Google +: The iPredator
Linked In: iPredator
Twitter: TheiPredator
YouTube: iPredator Team

For online users seeking Internet and cyber attack protection, feel free to read about iPredator’s innovative
advisory based membership service called, iPredator Protected. With the growth and expansion of social media,
Dr. Nuccitelli and iPredator offer a unique assessment service called the iPredator Facebook Safety Analysis. In
addition to offering advice, education and investigation, Dr. Nuccitelli has designed 13 checklists (IISC
Collection) that can be taken online and 26 checklists and inventories (IISC & IPI Collection) that can be
purchased. All of Dr. Nuccitelli’s checklists and inventories were designed for assessment, education and
prevention education (IISC & IPI Collection Overview.) To reach iPredator and Dr. Nuccitelli, feel free to call
them at (347) 871-2416 or via email at Dr@TechPredator.com .