Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.07.005
PHPostharvest Technology
Separation Theory for Palm Kernel and Shell Mixture on a Spinning Disc
O.A. Koya
1
; M.O. Faborode
2
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria;
e-mail of corresponding author: afemikoya@yahoo.com
2
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria; e-mail: mfaborod@oauife.edu.ng
(Received 2 November 2005; accepted in revised form 19 July 2006; published online 1 September 2006)
The separation of palm kernel from the shell is an important process in the recovery of the kernel for use in
vegetable oil production. The inherent shortcoming of the fertiliser spinner spreader, resulting in non-uniform
distribution, has led to investigations into the possibility of its use in the separation of palm kernel from shell.
The differences in the physical properties of the kernel and shell provided the basis for separation. Models
describing the motion of the kernel and the shell on a spinning disc with vanes, feeding a segment at a time,
were developed, and comparisons between the predictions and experimental results were made.
Discharge angles obtained from the predictive models and from the experiment were in close agreement.
The experiment, however, indicated a mid-span, between the discharge angles for kernels and shells,
containing the mixture. The models reasonably predict approximate ranges of discharge angles for palm
kernels and shells on a spinning disc with specied diameter, friction coefcient and rotational speed.
r 2006 IAgrE. All rights reserved
Published by Elsevier Ltd
1. Introduction
In spite of the importance of perfect shell separation
from kernels for the process of industrial palm kernel oil
extraction, existing devices and separation methods have
limitations in solving the problem completely. The
greatest difculty is with kernels and shell particles of
comparable sizes, and this is where most existing
separators are defective.
The two most common industrial varieties of the oil
palm fruits in the extraction of palm kernels are the
Dura and Tenera, which are classied as thick-shelled
and thin-shelled fruits, respectively. However, the
densities of the kernel and shell for both fruit types
are close (Hartley, 1977; Opeke, 1997; Koya et al.,
2004), though, Badmus (1991) reported that future
breeding activities might lead to Tenera fruits with
thinner nutshells that will facilitate kernel and shell
separation. Large areas of existing oil palm plantations
(Faborode, 2004; Owolarafe et al., 2002) is a major
motivation for the renewed interest in the separation of
kernel from shell (Akubuo & Eje, 2002; Koya et al.,
2004).
Palm kernel and shell separators are of two types
based on the wet and the dry methods. The wet method
uses clay slurry, brine solution or a hydrocyclone, and
generally exploits the differences in the densities of the
kernel and the shell as the physical basis for separation
(Hartley, 1977; Henderson & Perry, 1980; Opeke, 1997).
However, the densities of the kernel and shell are very
close so that separation efciency depends upon the
quality and proper control of the specic gravity of the
solution used. In addition, the wet kernels must be
sterilised against moulds and dried for 1416 h in silos to
remove moisture picked up by the kernels. Therefore,
separation systems without moisture absorption will
result in savings in the energy used in re-drying the
kernels in the wet methods.
Dry separation methods include systems exploiting
the winnowing principle followed by handpicking,
reciprocating inclined plane, vibrating and reciprocating
screens, rotating screens, indented cylinders, and pneu-
matic conveying in a vertical tunnel. The traditional
hand picking method gives a high separation efciency
but it is time consuming, tedious, and of very low
capacity of about 60 kg h
1
(Akubuo & Eje, 2002).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1537-5110/$32.00 405 r 2006 IAgrE. All rights reserved
Published by Elsevier Ltd
Efciencies reported in respect of other mechanical
systems need considerable improvements (Hartley, 1977;
Akubuo & Eje, 2002; Badmus, 1991; Olie & Tjeng,
1974). Aerodynamic forces required in pneumatic
systems are quite unstable and uneven because the
densities of kernel and shell are close, while the shell
particles also have irregular shapes and are of varied
sizes. Generally, shell particles and kernels having
comparable sizes make screening and other proprietary
devices inefcient.
Having examined the shortcomings of existing sys-
tems, the possibility of adopting the centrifugal method,
hitherto used in fertiliser spreaders, was considered. This
in essence would imply exploiting what is considered a
disadvantage in fertiliser spreading, that is, the tendency
to unevenly spread and segregate materials (Patterson &
Reece, 1962; Inns & Reece, 1962; Brinseld & Hummel,
1975; Kasza et al., 1995; Aphale et al., 2003; Reumers
et al., 2003). The spinner spreader consists of a rotating
disc with vanes attached to the disc surface. Fertiliser
fed onto the spinner is thrown onto the ground after
colliding with the rotating vanes and moving radially
outwards to the periphery of the disc.
Theoretical and experimental studies of particle
trajectories on and off the spinner spreader have been
widely investigated (Aphale et al., 2003; Reumers et al.,
2003; Patterson & Reece, 1962). Patterson and Reece
(1962) and Aphale et al. (2003) analysed the motion of
fertiliser particles on rotary spreaders and showed that,
particle trajectories depended on particle shape, and
coefcient of friction on the disc. Brinseld and
Hummel (1975) observed, among other things, an
increase in discharge velocity and dispatch angle as the
coefcient of friction increased. However, in the
separation of palm kernel from the shell, the product
will be collected on leaving the disc, hence, particle
motion from the feed position to the edge of the
spinning disc becomes relevant. Shell particles, though
irregular in shape, are mostly at or dish-shaped,
while whole kernels are ellipsoidal or nearly spherical
(Akubuo & Eje, 2002; Koya & Faborode, 2005).
The work reported here formulates appropriate
relations governing the differential dispatch of kernel
and shell from a spinning disc, when both are fed from
the same point. Experiments to validate the theoretical
proposition resulted in the development of a schema for
the design of centrifugal separator, which holds great
promise.
2. Theoretical analysis
The motion of particles on a rotating disc was
analysed, treating the mixture (kernel and shell) as
aggregate of disconnected particles with no interaction
between them. Each particle was assumed to be in
contact with the disc at all times. It was assumed that
the motion of each constituent (kernel or shell) is
represented by the motion of a proprietary single
particle. It was also assumed that the particles were
fed onto to the disc without impact, such that bouncing
does not occur.
The problem, therefore, is to consider a particle
dropping onto a rotating disc at near the centre of the
disc and to describe its motion on the disc. The disc is
turning with constant angular velocity. The discharge
angle, dened as the displacement through which the
disc turns before the particle drops off, depends on
the time upon which the particle remains on the disc.
The principal factors, which control the motion of the
particle, are its coefcient of friction relative to the disc
and the vane, and its shape. Where the disc and the vane
are made of the same materials, the coefcients of
friction on both surfaces will have the same value. The
shape of the particle will decide if it will slide or roll. The
analysis is presented for both pure sliding (to approx-
imate the motion of at shell particles) and pure rolling
(approximating the motion of the spherical kernels).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Notation
A, B, C,
D
constants of integration
a,b boundary conditions radial distances at
time t is zero, L
F force applied to the rolling particle by the
vane, MLT
2
g gravitational acceleration, LT
2
I mass moment of inertial, ML
2
M,N characteristic roots of differential equation
m mass of particle, M
n particle radius, L
R disc radius, L
r radial distance of particle from the centre of
the disc, L
t time, T
a angular displacement of particle, dimen-
sionless
m friction coefcient between the particle and
the disc/vane, dimensionless
f discharge angle, dimensionless
o angular velocity of the disc, T
1
O.A. KOYA; M.O. FABORODE 406
2.1. Pure sliding
Applying Newtons second law, the motion of a
particle on a rotating disc with a vane, considering
frictional forces generated by its Coriolis and particle
weight, is as follows:
d
2
r
dt
2
2mo
dr
dt
o
2
r mg (1)
where: r is the radial distance of the particle from the
centre of the disc; dr/dt is the radial velocity of
particle at distance r; d
2
r/dt
2
is the radial acceleration
of particle at distance r; m is the coefcient of
friction between the particle and the disc/vane; and o
is the angular velocity of the disc; and g is the
gravitational acceleration. Solving this differential
equation
r
mg
o
2
Ae
oMt
Be
oNt
(2)
where: A and B are constants of integration; and M and
N are characteristic roots given by
M
m
2
1
m (3)
N
m
2
1
m (4)
Hence, for all real values of m, M and N are positive.
From Eqn (2),
dr
dt
AoMe
oMt
BoNe
oNt
(5)
d
2
r
dt
2
Ao
2
M
2
e
oMt
Bo
2
N
2
e
oNt
(6)
Comparing Eqns (2) and (6) d
2
r=dt
2
is zero or
negative if romg/o
2
.
Consequently, for the particle to slide radially on the
disc, i.e., d
2
r=dt
2
40 then, romg=o
2
is required.
Therefore, taking as initial conditions: r a where,
a4mg=o
2
; an dr/dt 0, when t 0:
A
a
mg
o
2
N
M
1
N
M
(7)
and
B
a
mg
o
2
1
N
M
(8)
So that
A B
N
M
(9)
Identical solutions have been obtained by other
researchers such as Patterson and Reece (1962), and
Aphale et al. (2003).
Following from Eqns (7) and (8), Eqn (2) becomes
r
mg
o
2
B
N
M
e
oMt
e
oNt
(10)
If the particle slides progressively, and without
impact, from the feed position to the edge of a disc,
with radius R, rotating with a constant angular velocity
o, the discharge angle f can be estimated from the
following:
N
M
e
f
M
e
f
R
mg
o
2
B
(11)
2.2. Pure rolling
Rolling without slipping will occur when the angular
velocity of the particle matches its radial velocity, so
that:
dr
dt
n
da
dt
(12)
where n is the particle radius and a is the angular
displacement.
If F is the force causing the rotation of the particle
about its centroid, then
Fn I
d
2
a
dt
2
(13)
where I is the mass moment of inertia.
Assuming a solid, spherical particle (I 2/5 mn
2
),
resulting in
F
2
5
m
d
2
r
dt
2
(14)
where m is the main of the particle.
Applying Newtons law of motion and assuming that
F is less than the limiting frictional force mmg then
m
d
2
r
dt
2
o
2
r
F mmg (15)
or
d
2
r
dt
2
5
7
o
2
r mg
Solving Eqn (16)
r
7
5
mg
o
2
Ce
5=7
ot De
5=7
ot (16)
where C and D are constants of integration.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
SEPARATION THEORY FOR PALM KERNEL AND SHELL MIXTURE 407
Applying boundary conditions
R b where b4
7
5
mg=o
2
and dr/dt 0, when t 0
we obtain
r
5
7
mg
o
2
b
5
7
mg
o
2
cos h
5
7
ot (17)
which is identical to the equation derived by Patterson
and Reece (1962) and Aphale et al. (2003).
Consequently, for a disc with radius R turning at a
constant angular velocity o, the angular displacement f
can then be written as
f
7
5
cos h
1
R
7
5
mg
o
2
b
7
5
mg
o
2
(18)
2.3. Application of the theory to separation of kernel and
shell
From the foregoing theory, important parameters
required in predicting the motion of a particle on a
spinning disc are its shape, radial distance from centre to
the location where the particle is fed, and the radius of
the spinning disc. The separation will be feasible if there
are signicant differences in the discharge angles for the
kernels and the shells.
Separation was considered based on the premise that
the kernel slides on the disc and rolls on the vane while
the shell slides all the way. Therefore, a comparison of
Eqns (2) and (17) will describe their relative motion and,
the possibility of separating kernel from shell using this
concept (Koya, 2004). However, agricultural products
are usually not perfectly spherical or at, so that the
actual motion of the kernel and shell may differ from
what is obtained in the theory, thus, requiring experi-
mental verication.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Physical properties of palm kernel and shell
The Dura variety of the oil palm, characterised as
having thick-shelled fruits, was chosen for study. Values
of the required properties of the kernel and shell, shown
in Tables 1 and 2, were taken from Koya (2004) and
Koya et al. (2004). Some of the parameters were also
reported by Akubuo and Eje (2002) for a mixture of
palm nut varieties.
Half of the geometric mean diameter provided an
estimate for the particle radius n in Eqn (12). Static
coefcients of friction were reported (Table 1) but the
models developed require dynamic coefcient of fric-
tion; consequently, predictions based on the models
will result in larger discharge angles than expected
in practice. As an approximation, therefore, the
lower limits of the ranges of observed static coefcients
were substituted in the equations. The highest coef-
cients of friction as well as, where the largest
difference between the values for kernel and shell were
observed was on the jute bre. The friction coefcients
were, therefore, taken as 068 for kernel, and 095
for shell.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 1
Size-related properties of kernels (Dura variety) relevant in product separation
Property Measurements for kernels on size, mm
10 14 20 25
Size distribution, % retained 25 738 220 14
Axial dimensions, mm 530 (188)
Numbers in parentheses are the standard deviations. Sphericity is the ratio of geometric mean diameters to the major diameter. Source: Koya
(2004).
Table 2
Friction coefcient of kernel and shell (Dura variety)
Structural surface Friction coefcient
Kernel Shell
Galvanised sheet metal 039 (001)
038 (001)
Plywood 051 (001) 052 (001)
Jute bre (new) 068 (001) 095 (001)