Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

Remedial Law Civil Procedure Purpose of Rules Lorenza Ortega vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

. 125302, November 16, 1998 Jurisdiction Carolina Camaya, et al. vs. Bernardo Patulandong, G.R. No. 144915, February 23, 2004 Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, April 15, 1968 A. Kinds 1. Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter Jose Lam vs. Adriana Chua, G.R. No. 131286, March 18, 2004 2. Jurisdiction Over the Parties Marietta B. Ancheta vs. Rodolfo S. Ancheta, G.R. No. 145370, March 4, 2004 3. Jurisdiction Over the Res Melina P. Macahilig vs. Grace M. Magalit G.R. No. 141423 November 15, 2000 B Regional Trial Courts Adelfa S. Rivera, et al. vs. Fidela Del Rosario, et al., G.R. No. 144934, January 15, 2004 1. Civil Cases Sps Jorge and Yolanda Huguete vs. Sps Teofedo and Marites Embudo, G.R. No. 149554, July 1, 2003 2. Accion Reinvindicatoria Melecio Alcala, et al vs. Jovencio Villar, G.R. No.156063, November 18, 2003 C. Katarungang Pambarangay Section 398 to 421 Local Government Code of 1991 (R.A. No. 7160, October 10, 1991) Blardony v. Coscolluella, G.R. No. 70261, February 28, 1990 D. Summary Procedure Amendment of the Revised Rule on Summary Procedure, A.M. No. 02-11-09-SC, November 12, 2002 Rodrigo Q. Tugot vs. Mamerto Y. Coliflores, A.M. No. MTJ-00-1332, February 16, 2004 General Provisions Rule 1, Revised Rules of Court Patricia Natcher vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 133000, October 2, 2000 Civil Actions Pilar vda. De Manalo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 129242, January 16, 2001 A. Cause of Action Rule 2, Revised Rules of Court Equitable Phil. Commercial International Bank, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 143556, March 16, 2004 B. Nature of Action Ban Hua U. Flores vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 136769, September 17, 2002 C. Parties in Civil Actions Rule 3, Revised Rules of Court Province of Batangas vs. Alberto G. Romulo, et al., G.R. No. 152774, May 27, 2004 1. Real Parties in Interest Sui Man Hui Chan, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 147999, February 27, 2004 2. Indispensable Parties Teresita Villareal Manipor, et al. vs. Sps. Pablo and Antonia Ricafort, G.R. No. 150159, July 25, 2003 D. Venue of Actions Rule 4, Revised Rules of Court

Pilipino Telephone Corp. vs. Delfino Tecson, G.R. No. 156966, May 7, 2004 1. Real Actions Rebecca T. Cabutihan vs. Landcenter Construction & Development Corp., G.R. No 146594, June 10, 2002 2. Actions in Personam Fortunato Gomez, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 127692, March 10, 2004 Pleadings A. In General Rule 6, Revised Rules of Court BPI Leasing Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, et al, G.R. No. 127624, November 18, 2003 B. Formal Requirements Uy vs. Land Bank of the Philippines, G.R. No. 136100, July 24, 2000 C Parts of a Pleading Rule 7, Revised Rules of Court 1. Certification Against Non-Forum Shopping United Pulp and Paper vs. United pulp and Paper Chapter-Federation of Free Workers, G.R. No. 141117, March 25, 2004 2. Verification Vilma Hilda D. Villanueva-Fabella, et al. vs. Ralph S. Lee, et al., A.M. No MTJ-04-1518, January 15, 2004 D. Allegations in the Pleadings Rule 8, Revised Rules of Court Republic of the Phil. vs. Sandiganbayan, et al., G.R. No. 152154, July 15, 2003 E. Effect of Pleadings Rule 9, Revised Rules of Court Heirs of Juana Gaudiane vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119879, March 11, 2004 F. Liberal Construction Gerales v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 85909, February 9, 1993 G. Complaint 1. Definition Tantuico v. Republic, G.R. No. 89114, December 2, 1991 2. Allegations; General Rule Metropolitan v. Quilts, G.R. No. 91436, May 24, 1993 H. Answer 1. Genuineness of Document Donato v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 102603, January 18, 1993 2. Negative Pregnant PHILAMGEN v. Sweet Lines, G.R. No. 87434, August 5, 1992 3. Waiver of Defenses Director of Lands v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-47847, July 31, 1981 4 Specific Denial Republic of the Phil. vs. Josefina B. Vda. De Neri, et al., G.R. No. 139588, March 4, 2004 I. Counterclaim Mel V. Velarde vs. Lopez, Inc., G.R. No. 153886, January 14, 2004 1. Definition B.A. Finance v. Co, G.R. No. 105751, June 30, 1993 2. How Raised Javier v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 75379, March 31, 1989 3. Kinds of Counterclaims

Quintanilla v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 101747, September 24, 1997 a. Compulsory Lafarge Cement Phil., Inc. et al. vs. Continental Cement Corp., et al., G.R. No. 155173, November 23, 2004 b. Permissive Evangeline Alday vs. FGU Insurance Corp., G.R. No.138822, January 23, 2001 4. Remedies a. Failure to raise compulsory claim Visayan Packing v. Reparations, G.R. No. L-29673, November 12, 1987 b. Oversight, Inadvertence, Excusable Neglect B.A. Finance v. Co, G.R. No. 105751, June 30, 1993 J. Third/Fourth Party Complaint 1. Definition Go vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104609, June 30, 1993 2. Remedies Upon Denial De Dios v. Balagot, G.R. No. L-24103, August 10, 1967 K. Amended and Supplementary Pleadings Rule 10, Revised Rules of Court 1. In General Sps. Rodolfo and Imelda Caoili vs. CA, et al., G.R. No. 128325, September 14, 1999 2. Amendment Jovito Valenzuela, et al vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No 131175, August 28, 2001 a. as a Matter of Right Sec. 2, Rule 10 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure Edwin N. Tribiana vs. Lourdes M. Tribiana, G.R. No. 137359, September 13, 2004 b. as a Matter of Discretion Metropolitan Bank v. Presiding Judge, G.R. No. 89909, September 21, 1990 c. to Conform to Evidence OLaco v. Co Cho Chit, G.R. No. 58010, March 31, 1993 Phil. Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp. vs. Phil. Infrastructures, et al., G.R. No. 120384, January 13, 2004 L. Supplemental Pleadings Allen A. Macasaet, et al. vs. People of the Philippines, et al., G.R. No. 153747, February 23, 2005 M. Filing and Service of Pleadings, Judgments and Other Papers Rule 13, Revised Rules of Court Rafael Albano, et al. v. CA, G.R. 144708, August 10, 2001 SEcdtai 1. Service Dolores Fajardo vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 140356, March 20, 2001 a. Modes of Service Jimmy L. Barnes vs. Teresita C. Reyes, et al., G.R. No. 144533, September 23, 2003 b. Proof of Service Alfredo G. Boiser vs. Jose Y. Aguirre, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-04-1886, May 16, 2005 c. Priority of Service of Pleadings Gertrudes Teh vs. People of the Phil., G.R. No. 141180, January 11, 2005 2. Coverage Echaus v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 57343, July 23, 1990 3. Notice of Lis Pendens Lim v. Vera Cruz, GR No. 143646, April 4, 2001

Bill of Particulars Rule 12, Revised Rules of Court Alfredo T. Romualdez vs. Sandiganbayan., G.R. No. 152259, July 29, 2004 Summons Rule 14, Revised Rules of Court Filomena Domagas vs. Vivian Layno Jensen, G.R. No. 158407, January 17, 2005 A. In General NAWASA v. Secretary of Public Works, G.R. No. L-20928, March 31, 1966 B. Definition Fortunato Gomez, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 127692, March 10, 2004 C. On Whom 1. Juridical Entity Rebollido v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 81123, February 28, 1989 2. Resident Temporarily Out Venturanza v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 77760, December 11, 1987 D. Modes of Service Marietta B. Ancheta vs. Rodolfo S. Ancheta, G.R. No. 145370, March 4, 2004 1. Personal Cipriano M. Lazaro vs. Rural Bank of Francisco Balagtas (Bulacan), Inc., et al., G.R. No. 139895, August 15, 2003 2. Substituted Filomena Domagas vs. Vivian Layno Jensen, G.R. No. 158407, January 17, 2005 3. Extraterritorial Rosalino P. Acance, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 159699, March 16, 2005 E. Voluntary Appearance Florentino Gonzales, et al. vs. Balikatan Kilusang Bayan sa Pananalapi, Inc., G.R. No. 150859, March 28, 2005 Motions Rule 15, Revised Rules of Court Francisca L. Marquez vs. Simeon Baldoz, G.R. No. 143779, April 4, 2003 A. In General Remonte v. Bonto, G.R. No. L-19900, February 28, 1966 B. Contents Information Technology Foundation of the Phil., et al. vs. COMELEC, et al., G.R. No. 159139, June 15, 2005 1. Omnibus Motion PH Credit Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 109648, November 22, 2001 2. Notice of Hearing Vilma Hilda D. Villanueva-Fabella, et al. vs. Ralph S. Lee, et al., A.M. No MTJ-04-1518, January 15, 2004 3. Proof of Service Provident Int'l Resources v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119328, July 26, 1996 C. Hearing of Motions Orosa v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118696, September 3, 1996 D. Ex Parte Motions Primetown Property Group, Inc. vs. Lyndon D. Juntilla, et al., G.R. No. 157801, June 8, 2005 E. Motion to Dismiss Rule 16, Revised Rules of Court 1. In General

Carolina P. Ramirez, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 133841, August 15, 2003 2. Grounds Bangko Silangan Development Bank vs. CA, GR No. 110480, June 29, 2001 Campaa General de Tabacos de Filipinas et al v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 130326 and G.R. 137868, November 29, 2001 a. Lack of Jurisdiction over the Subject Matter Gualberto Castro vs. Ricardo Gloria, G.R. No. 132174, August 20, 2001 b. Litis Pendentia Spouses Tirona vs Floro P. Alejo, G.R. No. 129313, October 10 2001 c. Res Judicata Malayang Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Balanced Food, et al. vs. Pinakamasarap Corp., et al., G.R. No. 139068, January 16, 2004 e. Prescription Felix Gochan and Sons Realty Corp., et al. vs. Heirs of Raymundo Baba, et al., G.R. No. 138945, August 19, 2003 f. Forum Shopping Equitable Phil. Commercial International Bank, et al vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 143556, March 16, 2004 g. Non-Joinder of Parties Teodoro B. Vesagas, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 142924, December 5, 2001 h. Lack of Legal Capacity to Sue Nemencio C. Evangelista, et al. vs. Carmelino M. Santiago, G.R. No. 157447, April 29, 2005 3. How Pleaded a. Period Sui Man Hui Chan, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 147999, February 27, 2004 b. Affirmative Defense Teodora A. Rioferio, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 129008, January 13, 2004 4. Hearing and Order Municipality of Bian v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 94733. February 17, 1993 Dismissal of Actions Rule 17, Revised Rules of Court A. In General Montejo v. Urotia, G.R. No. L-27187, July 22, 1971 B. By Plaintiff Development Bank of the Phil. vs. Pingol Land Transport System Co., et al., G.R. No. 145908, January 22, 2004 1. Through Choice Ma. Carminia Roxas v. CA, et al., G.R. 139337, August 15, 2001 2. Failure to Prosecute Producers Bank of the Phils. v. CA, GR No. 125468, October 9, 2000 C. Effect of Dismissal Baares II, et al vs. Balising, et al., G.R. No. 132624, March 13, 2000 Default A. In General Johanne J. Pea, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 126275, November 11, 2004 B. When Allowed 1. Failure to Answer Rosalino P. Acance, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 159699, March 16, 2005 2. Failure to Appear at Pre-Trial

Bayog v. Natino, G.R. No. 118691, July 5, 1996 C. Effect of Default Heirs of Eugenio Lopez, Sr. vs. Alfredo R. Enriquez, et al., G.R. No. 146262, January 21, 2005 D. Order of Default Datu Samad v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 88954, October 29, 1992 E. Procedure after Order of Default Five Star Bus v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 120496, July 17, 1996 F. Remedies 1. Liberality Gerales v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 85909, February 9, 1993 2. Modes Tan v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108634, July 17, 1997 Pre-trial Rule 18, Revised Rules of Court Criselda Leonardo, et al. vs. S.t. Best, Inc., G.R. No. 142066, February 6, 2004 A Pre-Trial Brief Johanne J. Pea, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 126275, November 11, 2004 B. Notice of Pre-Trial Mariano De Guia, et al. vs. Ciriaco De Guia, et al., G.R. No. 135384, April 4, 2001 Intervention Rule 19, Revised Rules of Court Demosthenes P. Agan, Jr., et al. vs. Phil. International Air Terminals Co., et al., G.R. No. 155001, January 21, 2004 A. Purpose Alberto G. Pinlac, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 91486, September 10, 2003 B. Requisites Nordic Asia Limited, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 111159, July 13, 2004 C. Who May Intervene Ernesto B. Francisco, Jr., et al. vs. House of Representatives, et al., G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003 California Bus Lines, Inc. vs. State Investment House, Inc., G.R. No. 147950, December 11, 2003 Calendar of Cases Rule 20, Revised Rules of Court American Ins. v. Republic, G.R. No. L-25476, November 15, 1967 Subpoena Rule 21, Revised Rules of Court Armando R. Canillas vs. Corazon V. Pelayo, A.M. No. P-02-1575, August 1, 2002 Computation of Time Rule 22, Revised Rules of Court Ma. Vilma S. Labad vs.University of Southeastern Phil. et al., G.R. No. 139665, August 9, 2001 Modes of Discovery A. Depositions Rules 23 and 24, Revised Rules of Court Jonathan Landoil International Co. vs. Sps. Suharto and Miriam Sangki Mangudadatu, G.R. No. 155010, August 16, 2004 B. Interrogatories to Parties Rule 25, Revised Rules of Court Republic of the Phil. vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 90478, November 21, 1991

C. Admission by Adverse Party Rule 26, Revised Rules of Court Concrete Aggregates Corp. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 117574, January 2, 1997 Trial A. Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery Rule 29, Revised Rules of Court Santiago v. Conde, G.R. No. L-11981, March 17, 1959 B. Trial Rule 30, Revised Rules of Court Republic of the Phil. vs. Josefina B. Vda. De Neri, et al., G.R. No. 139588, March 4, 2004 C. Consolidation of Cases Rule 31, Revised Rules of Court Luz E. Taganas, et al. vs. Meliton G. Emuslan, et al., G.R. No. 146980, September 2, 2003 D. Trial by Commissioner Rule 32, Revised Rules of Court Aljem's Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 122216, March 28, 2001 Judgments A. Judgment on the Pleadings Rule 34, Revised Rules of Court Asian Const. and Dev't. Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 160242, May 17, 2005 B. Summary Judgments Rule 35, Revised Rules of Court Wood Technology Corp., et al. vs. Equitable Banking Corp., G.R. No. 153867, February 17, 2005 C. Judgment on Demurrer to Evidence; Judgment, Final Orders and Entry Thereof Rules 33 and 36, Revised Rules of Court Sps. Numeriano and Carmelita Romero vs. Mercedes L. Tan, et al., G.R. No. 147570, February 27, 2004 D. New Trial or Reconsideration Rule 37, Revised Rules of Court Bienvenido P. Jaban, et al. vs. Alvin Garcia, et al., G.R. Nos. 138336-37, February 16, 2004 E. Relief from Judgment, Orders, or other Proceedings Rule 38, Revised Rules of Court Teresita Villareal Manipor, et al. vs. Sps. Pablo and Antonia Ricafort, G.R. No.150159, July 25, 2003 F. Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgments Rule 39, Revised Rules of Court King Integrated Security Services, Inc., et al. vs. Galos. Gatan, G.R. No. 143813, July 7, 2003 1. Final Judgment Miguel Argel vs. Herminia M. Pascua, A.M. No RTJ-94-1131, August 20, 2001 2. Execution Upon Judgments or Final Orders Virginia Avisado, et al. vs. Amor Rumbaua, G.R. No. 137306, March 12, 2001 3. Writ of Execution DBP vs. Union Bank of the Phil., G.R. No. 155838, January 13, 2004 Equatorial Realty Devt. Inc. vs. Sps. Desiderio & Edarlina Frogozo, et al.., G.R. No. 128563, March 25, 2004 a. Issuance, Form and Contents Paterno R. Plantilla vs. Rodrigo G. Baliwag, A.M. No. P-00-1446, June 6, 2001 b. Enforcement

2001 c. 4. a3. a. b. c. 4. a. b. 5.

Philippine Bank of Communications vs. Efren V. Cachero, A.M. No. P-00-1399, February 19, Accion Reinvindicatoria Teodora and Rodolfo Capacete vs. Venancia Baroro, et al., G.R. No. 154184, July 8, 2003 Discretionary Execution Rufino Valencia vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119118, February 19, 2001 Redemption Who May Redeem Restituto L. Castro vs. Carlos Bague, , A.M. No. P-99-1346, June 20, 2001 Time and Manner of Redemption Zacarias Cometa, et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et. al., G.R. No. 141855, February 6, 2001 Effect of Redemption Restituto L. Castro vs. Carlos Bague, , A.M. No. P-99-1346, June 20, 2001 Action for Enforcement of Foreign Judgment Processual Presumption Gil Miguel T. Puyat vs. Ron Zabarte, G.R. No. 141536, February 26, 2001 Forum Non Conveniens Gil Miguel T. Puyat vs. Ron Zabarte, G.R. No. 141536, February 26, 2001 Doctrine of Res Judicata vs. Conclusiveness of Judgment Heirs of Juana Gaudiane vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 119879, March 11, 2004

S-ar putea să vă placă și