JS 44C/SONY CIVIL COVER SHEET Rev. 12008 PLANTERS DEFENDANTS Jose Abadin, Nelson Thall, John Petrovitz and Christopher Marvel Entertainment, Inc., Marvel Enterprises, Inc., Marvel Belland, individually and derivatively on behalf of Stan Lee Characters 8.V., Stan Lee, Joan Lee, Joan C. Lee, isaac a ‘GREYS TR WANE, ADDRES, AND TELEPHONE HUMBER] AMAT HEIST vate Cart. an, rn Gas, 10 Wes 5h Stat Sut7C Nervous (Shobaer PLEASE SEE ATTACHED ‘Has this ora simitar case been previusyy fled in SDNY at any tine? No?["] Yes? [Z]_Judge Previously Assigned Paul A. Crotty. tyes, was this case Vol] invot Dismisses. NoL) ¥é if yes, give date_November 2007_ & Case No. _07 Civ. 2238 (PLACE AN fy LONE BOK ON) NATURE OF SUIT 4112 INSURANCE 310 ARELANE: 11982 PERSONAL RUURY- [1610 AGRICULTURE {1422 APPEAL (140 stave {]i® tltacr, 9 EE mOOUET |, Meee nee CEP GETrOOS ey ee cu4e MN fro RENEE, UM RRRSEOM gg cua Gageagme EST |S Sena ove FEB Se . rm Sat ace kee 1S Be Semana tne Sat ESE | morerrnams io aes EET oo Bie rmsomcrnorny (15D SENSE” ye corse Seer nig SE 128 BES peer SS Gace, MNS See rs TE BERR! IMT oe onetrmun, (feb Sat, (HES ae ae Skane kre xy enews EER. I Sens, (e ekemete, wexer vereransy |) ooccrcwaumy |! 11600 omen | ]610 SELECTIVE SERVICE : ee ere soon seme {Sen 0 ERTS jaw SeaseBAT Ste Seer 7° 5 PRS on Fi a eam = cove poe, HB Saas," Sa tov Hester HES | RR woes ive Se tore Seis SERBS cm SHER Ber core Seb 11g en ee a scronsugersaries Beery omens eee oar ws sag Bene Serio yas mine om SS vere canoe acess Te BE lie {iat vorag yee manons To 11781 EMPLRET Nc (ie sere ‘MiocaTION ACT a rcronry 118 fe saree ame 1 rau act 1 Benson |i eRe NY fa Seanecacst mourn (me eae Fra eBay se ah (08 Movement (i Pare ae Haq Torrsro uw Diaauies omen trees. Gries anaoraTion ie She hes cand cnt 1 Gre THs IS ACLASS ACTION 0 Yous LAI TIS CASES RELATED TOA CL CASE NOW PENDNGINS DY? heen reee 2 mooie DEMAND 5 omen JUDGE Paul A. Coty DOoKET NUMBER 07 Gv 2238 (Chock YES onli dmanded in comploint JURY DEMAND: YES ONO NOTE: Please svomit atthe time of fing an explanation of why cases are deemed relate,PURE AN ALYY ‘ORIGIN 4 ogni 2a. remoreston 113 nemansesion C14 rensseser C5 twrsireatom C16 mative: 17 appeat our C2b.tereves rom isgeene PLACE ANY NONE BOR ONLY] BASIS OF JURISDICTION TF DIVERSITY, INDICATE C1 us. puwnrier (12 US OgFENDANT [3 FEDERAL QUESTION —_[]4 DIVERSITY CITIZENSHIP BELOW. (US. NOT APARTY) (28 USC 1322, 1441) CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY) (lace an (Xin one box fr Pian and one box fr Defendant) CMuENorrmisstare —[]1 []1 eltweNoR suaseer oF A TIET1E —coPaRArea andpaniceaLetace (15 11 CIWEN OF ANOTHER STATE 112 [12 MGORPORAYED sePRNCIPALPLACE {14 (4 FOREIGN NATION ne ve PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) ‘SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, | HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: CCheckone: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED To: [] WHITE PLAINS (00 NOT check either box if this a PRISONER PETITION) MANHATTAN DATE Vi Ofonature oF array oF RECORD ‘ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT NO. SO [1] YES (OATE ADMITTED Mo, March, 1961 RECEIPT # ‘Morey Bar Cadet Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Cour. Magistrate Judge _ _ Is 0 Designated J. Michae! McMahon, Clerk of Court by _ Deputy Clerk, DATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (NEW YORK SOUTHERN),CAUSE OF ACTION: Stan Lee Media, Inc.'s shareholders are filing a class action derivative suit claiming, amongst other things, the wrongful misappropriation copyrights. This Court has jurisdiction over the copyright intringement claims pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976, , 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., the Lanham Act claims by virtue of 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), and all other claims by virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 1338(b) and pendent jurisdiction, WHY THE CASES ARE DEEMED RELATED: ‘The case before Judge Crotty is set forth at Allegation 64 of the Complaint. In that case, the corporation, SLMI’s action was dismissed pending renewal. The plaintiffs in this action are the shareholders of SLMI.