Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

January 25, 2012 Special Deposit/Bailment/Debenture BOND Affidavit and Acknowledgement

BOND SECURITY NUMBERS (BC) 7057108791, RB-07631409-US Freedom of Information Act Demand RE: Account #5256 6981 2823 2737 To: Chase Card-member Service Corporation Chief Financial Officer and the company you represent (Bailees): Note that Robert son of Lee, of the family of Larson, of the land of Pangaea, of the
Household of Larson, the CEO/ Executor /Grantor/Beneficiary/Administrator and

S4,000,000.00

Bailor does hereby grant Brett Jones of THE LEGAL REDRESS COMMISSION limited power of Atty. To negotiate and set off the debt associated with this account, and or enforce the Bailment: note that this is in part a Special Deposit BOND, Bailment Bond, and must be treated as such. There are Legal as well as Lawful time constraints which may involve penalties, as well as other adverse consequences if this Instrument is mishandled. This Instrument is also to serve in part as a Freedom of Information act Request/Demand and federal law prohibits any attempt to circumvent or undermine the time constraints related to production of information related to Lawful request/demand. Further be it noted that none of the information contained herein relates to proprietary or legal privilege information and or product (presumption rebutted), and is never to be construed as such. Look up the legal definition for the terms if uncertain and or consult a legal student if necessary so as to avoid heaver liability)). On 12/25/11, Robert son of Lee, of the family of Larson, of the land of Pangaea, of the Household of Larson, the CEO/ Executor /Grantor/Beneficiary/Administrator and Bailor of this account several Lawful bill of exchange instruments to your offices with specific instructions to have the debt associated with SOCIAL SECURITY account number xxx-xx-3231, Bank card account # discharged as per the will of the Bailor and the following laws:

Fair debt collection Practices ACT (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq., 1978 Title VIII of the Consumer Credit Protection ACT of 1978 The Indentured Trust ACT of 1939 HJR 192, 112 Statutes at Large 48, and P.L. 73.10 of 1933 The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 The Fair Credit reporting Act Public Law No. 91-508 enacted in 1970

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

The Bankruptcy ACT of 1933 12 USC 411, P.L. 97-280 UCC 1-103, 1-308, 2-221, 2-104, 3-415-419, 3-500-510 Your company however chose to dishonor the lawful bills of exchange that were in compliance with the above laws, and did so without any indication as to the reasoning on your lack of good faith. Our client has asked us to intervene in this matter so as to give an understanding as to his intentions. Our client is fully aware that legal tender and may be utilized only for the payment of debt both private and public. Our client is also aware the declining dollar has the same value as a note dollar (Butler vs. Thompson 1877 U.S.). Where client is also further aware that he made discharge his Debt via a closed checking account, as a closed checking account may only be utilized for the set-off, discharge, and adjustment of debt.

References and Case law Blacks Law Dictionary 8th Edition (2004) closed account. An account that no further credits or debits may be added to but that remains open for adjustment or setoff.
So stated above so stated below, our client has done nothing unlawful, nor has your company accused him of doing anything unlawful. You sent correspondence stating that this account was closed as a result of information being reported on his credit file. We have obtained a copy of a credit file and have noted that there are no inquiries in the last 90 days, that there are no derogatory marks, and that his credit rating is over 700. In speaking with the representatives of the three credit bureaus they have informed us that they are unaware of any items on this credit report that could have led to your decision to close the account. We are of the belief as of this time that there can only have been in all two reasons for the termination of our clients account. 1. His ethnicity, race, religion, heritage, nationality, e.g. Your discriminatory intolerance, which violates each of the laws mentioned above.

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

We cant seem to think of any other reason. You see in the same household a payment was made on an account associated with your company in like manner, and for no apparent reason you shut down that account as well. So we were led to repeat our research and we have obtained a copy of a credit file for the other member of the household and have noted that there are no inquiries in the last 180 days, that there are no derogatory marks, and that her credit rating is over 720. In speaking with the representatives of the three credit bureaus they have informed us that they are unaware of any items on this credit report that could have led to your decision to close the account. We are of the belief as of this time that there could only have been 1 reason for the termination of our clients account. Her ethnicity, race, religion, heritage, nationality, e.g. Your discriminatory intolerance, which violates each of the laws mentioned above and quite a few more. Were willing to chalk this off to a misunderstanding, provided that you apply the VALUE amounts as indicated on the payment instruments to the accounts, and our clients have agreed to continue making payments to the accounts in a manner that does not include (close) checking accounts, an international money orders for the next six months, so that you can further research the process. Im authorized only to give you 15 calendar days to respond. If your offices should fail to respond within 15 calendar days from the receipt of this Bonded instrument, it will force us however regrettably to bring forth this information before the SEC, the better business bureau, the Chinese foreign relations delegation, the committee on international affairs, the American civil liberties union, and this states governors office constituents services officer and advise them of the circumstances and situation surrounding this deliberate attempt to discriminate against American Nationals. Please understand that this is not a route we wish to take, we have attempted to contact executive customer relations with chase member card services, to no avail. It is my hope that there can be an equitable agreement reached so as to avoid any further misunderstandings. Your actions have affected the credit rating, financial standing, of both clients

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

in a very volatile and unstable economy, which is not only unfortunate but unacceptable. Heres a bit of historical details for your records:

Transaction Details: Statement of account Three bill of exchange sent in the amount of : $3,700.00 / Three Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars (Payable on demand, for valuable concideration). Chase Account: The instructions were DO NOT ACH/DO NOT DEPOSIT Note / Dollar Bill: G 912921212 E Money Order # 2212 One Instrument was for the Value Amount of $4,000.00 All of the instruments were Payable on demand/for valuable consideration
This Presentment stands as a Bailment, Special Deposit, Debenture Bond, and a FOIA request, each and every one requires special attention under law. You are by law obligated under each to respond to each individually and collectively. Failure to respond accordingly in a lawful manner could result in legal consequences: which may or may not include a Lien on your commercial and financial obligations, properties and other liabilities.

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

Your offices are to apply these payments as instructed on the rear of each bill of exchange, per UCC and related USC titles and codes, you have the responsibility under Law to effectively set-off and discharged the associated debt in this matter, within 15 days of receipt of this Bailment, Debenture and special deposit Bond. This is formal notice to your office that by your receipt of the payable on demand order, BOND and instrument to set-off and discharge the debt associated with Account numbers in the amount located on check/Money Order/Bill of Exchange/Note and for valuable consideration, payable on demand, you are to and must lawfully set-off, adjust and discharged the associated debt (UCC 3-415). This accounting has been resolved, please reflect as much in the confirmation letter you are commanded to send, detailing a full audit of the account, all equitable as well as escrow accounts associated with these matters in any form and or fashion, Full and complete accounting and leger, and supplying the original receipt as required by law (UCC article 3) failure to do so will result in either administrative review, SEC Hearing, LIEN and or Law suit. A UCC Financial Statement is to be or has been filed in reference this matter, you have 15 Calendar days from the date of receipt of these Instruments to comply and furnish the information requested. If you have a cause for concern and or complaint it will in no manner forego your obligations as noted above. All grievances by the Bailee may only be handled and or processed through mediation, and such mediation must be scheduled and commence prior to the last hour of the 15 Calendar day deadline. The Bailor is under no such restriction but may proceed as indicated above. This is your Lawful Notice in compliance with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clause, and recognized by Common law and the Supreme Court of the United States!
"Due process requires, at a minimum, that an individual be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard prior to being subjected by force of law to a significant deprivation. . . . That the hearing required by due process is subject to waiver, and is not fixed in form does not affect its root requirement that an individual be given an opportunity for a hearing before he is deprived of any significant property interest. . . ." (Original italics; 401 US 378- 379) Randone v. Appellate Department, 1971, 5 C3d 536, 550.

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 "In the latter case [Mullane v. Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306] we said that the right to be heard has little reality or worth unless one is informed that the matter is pending and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest. 339 U.S. at 314" Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 339, 340

"There are other decisions to the effect that one may be deprived of property by summary administrative action taken before hearing when such action is essential to protect a vital governmental interest. See, e. g., Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., 339 U.S. 594 (1950); Fahey v. Mallonee, 332 U.S. 245 (1947); Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 (1944); North Amer. Cold Storage Co. v. City of Chicago, 211 U.S. 306 (1908)." Justice Black, in his dissenting opinion stated: "The Supreme Court of Wisconsin properly pointed out: The ability to place a lien upon a man's property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times.' 37 Wis. 2d, at 171, 154 N. W. 2d, at 264."
Blacks Law Dictionary 8th Edition (2004) closed account.An account that no further credits or debits may be added to but that remains open for adjustment or setoff. TITLE 12BANKS AND BANKING 12 USC 411 - Sec. 411. Issuance to reserve banks; nature of obligation; redemption Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank. Thompson v. Butler, 95 US 694 (1877), establishes that the law makes no legal distinction between the values of coin and paper money used as legal tender: "A coin dollar is worth no more for the purposes of tender in payment of an ordinary debt than a note dollar. The law has not made the note a standard of value any more than coin. It is true that in the market, as an article of merchandise, one is of greater value than the other; but as money, that is to say, as a medium of exchange, the law knows no difference between them."

Thank You for your prompt attention To this matter, any and all communication is to be mailed to the following address via USPS:

Payable to the United States of America WITHOUT RECOURSE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

Brett of the family of Jones/Administrator C/O Box 393 (Veguita New Mexico (87062-9999))

Further there is no law that allows any Human (self-aware or not) to exercise authority over another Human (self-aware or not), and as The Grantor/Bailor make the ultimate Presumption The Grantor/Bailor avows that The Grantor/Bailor am a self-aware conscience human being.

Any reference to the title Brett Jones in any variation, in any format, and or in any rendering is always to refer to the Estate and when used by the Administrator in the sentient/self-aware context is to be acknowledge by any and all as referring to the Administrator/Bailor, who represents the Title always in Special Appearance proper person/ExRel. And never inplace of the TITLE! The TITLE at no time represents the Sentient Man but the Sentient Man represents the TITLE.

THIS IS NOT A TREASURY ITEM XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX