Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Concordia University Chicago College of Education

Teacher Candidate: Jared Gosse Subject: Religion Content Focus (Topic): Noah and the Flood Grade Level(s): 4th grade

Lesson Plan Design 2012


Date: 4-29-13 Course for which the Lesson is developed: Classroom Teacher: Jared Gosse Time allotted: 45min.

Standard(s)/Benchmark(s) to be met in the Lesson: (ILS, Common Core, or Professional Learning Standards) Each standard should correspond to one or more objective. Students will learn the Bible story from the Book of Genesis.

Learning Objective(s): What are the students expected to know and/or do in the lesson? Write out each specific objective to be met by students in the lesson. The students retell the Bible story Compare and Contrast their Faith to Noahs

Assessment Tool(s) and Procedures: What will provide evidence that students meet objectives? Every objective must be assessed.

Journal Venn Diagram

Procedures: List in sequence the actions taken by teacher and students throughout the lesson. A. Engage Students: (Diagnostic/Pre-Assessment may be included here.) Open in Prayer 5 minutes. B. Communicate the Purpose of the Lesson to Students (Objectives and Assessment): Explain a time they were tested and how scary it can be for faith to be tested. C. Instructional Sequence: 1. Act out story together. 5 minutes 2. Read the stories in groups. 5 minutes 3. Talk about what happens. 10 minutes. 4. Group talk about how you would feel in that situation and if they were ever tested. 10 minutes. 5. Answer any questions. 5 minutes. 6. End in Prayer. 5 minutes

D. Monitoring Student Engagement and Learning: (What will the teacher do to ensure student engagement?) Make sure each student gets involved in what the story is about. (Monitor group work) E. Closure: Purpose of the Lesson is clearly restated by students and/or teacher (Objectives and Assessment) Write down one thing they took from the lesson regarding their spiritual lives on an index card.

Implemented August 2012 Adapted from Leland Stanford Junior University (2012) ed-Teacher Performance Assessment; Tomlinson, C. (2004) How to differentiate in mixed ability classrooms; Worldclass Instructional Design and Assessment (2012) WIDA 2012 Amplified ELD Standards.

Concordia University Chicago College of Education


Instructional Materials: Bibles

Lesson Plan Design 2012


Lesson Plan Details

Use of Technology: None

Safety in the Physical Environment: None, the students will remain in their seats for the most part. Only getting up to act out the story.

List the Academic Language used in the Lesson Explain what a Venn diagram is.

Academic Language Explain how the Academic Language is scaffolded in the Lesson The students are using the Venn Diagram to write down similarities to their life and Noahs

Describe the Evidence that Students know and use Academic Language appropriately:

Assessment (Identify the type(s) of assessment used in this lesson and how it provides evidence that students will meet the objective(s). At least one type of assessment is required in a lesson plan.) Diagnostic (Pre-): Ask questions to see what the students know or dont know about the lesson. Formative: Observe what the students are doing Reflective: See what they have learned Summative: Discussion

Differentiating Instruction Identify the Element(s) of the Lesson that is Differentiated: Content Process Product Explain how it is Differentiated: Process: It is different because the way to learn the subject is different than normal. Identify the Student Characteristic that you will use to Differentiate: Student Readiness Explain how it is used to Differentiate: Student Interest: I will use this to see if the students are interested in this topic Student Interest Student Learning Profile

Implemented August 2012 Adapted from Leland Stanford Junior University (2012) ed-Teacher Performance Assessment; Tomlinson, C. (2004) How to differentiate in mixed ability classrooms; Worldclass Instructional Design and Assessment (2012) WIDA 2012 Amplified ELD Standards.

Concordia University Chicago College of Education

Lesson Plan Design 2012 Analyzing Teaching (Reflection):

If you could teach this lesson to the same group of students again, what are two or three things you would do differently to improve the learning of these students based on their varied developmental and academic needs and characteristics? Consider missed opportunities and other aspects of planning, instruction, and/or assessment.

Clearly state each change you would make.

Explain why and how you would change it.

Explain the difference it would make in student learning. Give evidence from your experience in teaching the lesson. It would allow students to be able to reflect more on themselves.

I would allow students to have more time to reflect on their own faith more and how it goes hand in hand with Noahs

I would give longer time in the lesson

Implemented August 2012 Adapted from Leland Stanford Junior University (2012) ed-Teacher Performance Assessment; Tomlinson, C. (2004) How to differentiate in mixed ability classrooms; Worldclass Instructional Design and Assessment (2012) WIDA 2012 Amplified ELD Standards.

S-ar putea să vă placă și