Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2009
In this essay I will examine Prospero’s use of paternal power, more specifically in his
relationship to Miranda and Caliban. Linguistic power is central in these relationships, and there
exists a parallel between the relationship of Prospero and Miranda and the relationship between
Prospero and Caliban. I will look closely at linguistic power and the use of language, and
especially how Prospero uses this towards Miranda and Caliban. I will use the expression linguistic
power as Stephen Greenblatt has used it in his article “Learning to Curse: Aspects of Linguistic
Colonialism in the Sixteenth Century”, where language is presented as an essential tool when
In Scene 2 of Act 1 of The Tempest Prospero and Miranda speak of the twelve years that
have passed since he was the Duke of Milan. Prospero appears to have been a caring father, or as
he assures Miranda that she; “Art ignorant of what thou art” (14, Act 1, Scene 2), and that he has
taken full responsibility for her, as a proper father ought to do. On the other hand, Prospero has
apparently been cautious with giving Miranda information about her past. In response to
Miranda’s inquires concerning herself Prospero answers; “Stay, not yet” (14, Act 1, Scene 2). He
has had full control over her upbringing and has formed her into his image. He is to some extent in
control over her sexuality and her thoughts. “Obey, and be attentive” (15, Act 1, Scene 2), he
Miranda sympathizes with her father when Prospero explains his misery of being marooned
upon the island. The teenaged girl, in her naivety, fully believes what her father is telling her, as
children usually do - until they get new impulses from outsiders. Obviously she does not have any
choice since Prospero has taught her everything she knows. Perhaps Prospero has taught her too
much? The answer will nevertheless concern the importance of language, which I will examine in
1
Morten Oddvik, E-202 Marginalized Whiteness, 14.05.2009
this essay. I will look at how language works as a means of control and power in relation to
Prospero’s paternalism.
In his article Greenblatt coins the expression «linguistic colonialism» in terms of colonial
power claimed by the colonizer. It is a known fact that language is considered as a means of acting
out power, and in the case of Prospero’s power over Caliban it is essentially a question of
linguistic colonialism. As Miranda has been an unspoiled mind of a child, Caliban is viewed by
Prospero as a “tabula rasa” (17) in the words of Peter Martyr in Greenblatt’s essay. Prospero
assumes that Caliban is “ready to take the imprint of European civilization” (17), and that he has
the perfect right to take this colonial responsibility, sort of speak. This responsibility and right is
justified by the colonial view that indigenous people were “culturally naked” (17). Indigenous
people were far behind the glorious civilization of Europe, or as Martyr suggests; “Wild men live
beyond the pale of civilized life, outside all institutions, untouched by the long, slow development
of human culture” (22). In other words, the colonial powers saw it as a kind gesture to help these
`noble savages` to a higher civilization, or at least use them, in the utilitarian sense, in their image
of modern civilization. Since the “ruling class (was) obsessed with the symbolism of dress” (17)
and the indigenous people were regarded as “culturally naked” the colonizers, like Prospero,
claims his right to educate Caliban and teach him to be a good servant through teaching him ways
There is an interesting parallel between these two relationships I have described above,
which I already have presented. Interestingly, Greenblatt cites Terence Hawkes, who suggests that;
“A colonist acts essentially as a dramatist. He imposes the `shape` of his own culture, embodied in
2
Morten Oddvik, E-202 Marginalized Whiteness, 14.05.2009
his speech, on the new world, and makes that world recognizable, habitable, `natural`, able to
In the same way Prospero imposes his `shape` upon Miranda. His paternal power justifies
this, and nothing is more normal than parents raising their children in their image, but as there is a
lack of outside impulses, Prospero has all power in his hands until Miranda encounters new
people, like Ferdinand and Caliban. Prospero’s paternalism is seen in his relationship with Caliban
as well, this sense that he is inferior and does not know what is best for him. Prospero claims this
paternal responsibility as rightful due to his knowledge and wisdom. Like a dramatist he takes
command and “imposes” his scheme on all the people that are on the island, and by doing this he is
raises her within this dramatic image and tries to control her.
Miranda is an interesting character because she attains knowledge from her father, which I
argue that she uses in order to rebel against her father. Prospero wants to control her sexuality and
desire for Ferdinand. He wants to protect her in the traditional paternal sense, as he does when he
scolds Caliban for trying to rape his daughter. Miranda feels that Prospero interferes in the passage
where Miranda and Ferdinand first meet and start to develop an amorous interest in each other.
In the same way as Prospero regarded Caliban as a threat to Miranda with his sexuality, he
is afraid that Ferdinand poses a similar threat. Prospero is afraid of men’s desire for his daughter.
Prospero wants to be in full control of Miranda and her emotions and sexuality and both Caliban
and Ferdinand are threats to this paternal power. Again, Prospero justifies his use of magic to
3
Morten Oddvik, E-202 Marginalized Whiteness, 14.05.2009
control Ferdinand as part of his paternal power. Ferdinand may very well be a more attractive
partner for Miranda than Caliban, but Prospero want to be absolutely sure that he directs the
action. In the passage quoted above Miranda maturely sees how her father tries to control her.
Ferdinand is only the third man she has encountered in her life, after her own father and Caliban,
and she feels frustrated by Prospero’s almost obsessive paternal need for keeping her a delicate
creature. Prospero wants her to stay virginal and unspoiled until he sees it fit for her to enter a
relationship with Ferdinand. Caliban on the other hand poses only a threat to Miranda, as he
Prospero’s view, or constructed image. Greenblatt writes that the perception of the savage in the
Christian Middle Ages were that “the Wild Man (was) the distillation of the specifically Christian
institutions of civilized life: the securities of sex (as organized by the institutions of the family,
sustance (as provided by the political, social, and economic institutions), and salvation (as
Not until Act 2 of the play is Caliban seen in interaction with others than Prospero and
Miranda. Until the point where Caliban encounters Trinculo, Prospero has only victimized Caliban
within his constructed image of the hierarchical structure on the island. In the passages between
Trinculo and Caliban he displays sides of human features like abstract thinking and conversation.
“Language is, after all, one of the crucial ways of distinguishing between men and beasts” (23),
writes Greenblatt, and in this scene Caliban reveals human features of knowledge and language as
knowledgeable side of himself that humanizes him. He has considerable knowledge of the island,
4
Morten Oddvik, E-202 Marginalized Whiteness, 14.05.2009
of its fertility and its secrets. Additionally Caliban displays a cunning knowledge of how Stephano
Remember
First to possess his books, for without them
He`s but a sot, as I am, nor hath not
One spirit to command. They all do hate him
As rootedly as I. Burn but his books.
(Act 3, Scene 2)
Caliban reveals knowledge of how to get revenge on Prospero because he is familiar with
the linguistic colonialism that Prospero exercises on the island. Caliban is cunning and not as
inferior and savage as Prospero reckons since he knows that Prospero is relying his paternal power
upon his knowledge and magic of his books. Caliban is conscious of Prospero’s weak point.
Shakespeare portrays Caliban in another light than the image Prospero offers, where he is
only a beast without language. Ironically, Prospero himself has taught Caliban language, a
language that is not his, and because of this he now knows how to conspire against him.
Consequently, Caliban knows more about “the island” than Prospero does, and since Caliban knew
freedom prior to Prospero colonized the island he should know language, his language. As
Greenblatt suggests; “In the poisoned relationship between master and slave, Caliban can only
curse, but we know that Caliban`s consciousness is not simply a warped negation of Prospero’s”
(31). In the same fashion we can consider Miranda in the same way. She is presented in another
light when she interacts with Ferdinand, where she displays sides of individualism and affection
towards another man than her father, features not encouraged by Prospero. This could also be
viewed as evidence of her awareness of her father’s obsessive paternalism, as shown in her
5
Morten Oddvik, E-202 Marginalized Whiteness, 14.05.2009
The parallel between the paternal powers Prospero exercises in his relation to his daughter
and his slave is an example of the abuse of power. Conclusively, Prospero`s image, in which he has
tried to create and maintain is in essence an attempt to contain both Miranda and Caliban in his
grip of power. This construction is threatened by Miranda and Caliban’s consciousness of its very
existence. As Greenblatt writes, “(...) reality for each society is constructed to a significant degree
out of the specific qualities of its language and symbols. Discard the particular words and you
have discarded the particular men” (32). This is what Prospero has done, but throughout the play
there are signs of awareness in both of the characters of Miranda and Caliban.
Works cited:
Shakespeare, William. The Tempest in The Tempest A Case Study, Eds. Graff, Gerald and James