Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
5/17/12
Student-Centered Learning vs. the Master-Apprentice model: some questions from the music teacher
OK, so the trend in education is away from sage on the stage, towards student-centered learning. I get that: given that almost every student in the classroom now has access to a world of information and other resources, I can no longer pretend I am the fount of all knowledge (as if!). So we are rightly moving to a pedagogy in which students share the direction-setting of the class, and take a greater degree of control over their own learning journeys. Thats exciting, and promises all kinds of meaningful learning experiences. I will get to work alongside students, guiding them along the way, helping them learn from mistakes and blind alleys theyve taken, and (hopefully) instilling a sense of wonder at learning in the process. Students will be more engaged in learning, as they pursue subjects of interest, in ways which make sense to them, and express their learning in ways which suit their strengths as learners. But I have one quibble, and it comes from my experience and the pedagogy I have inherited as a music teacher: how does this mesh with the Master-Apprentice model of learning thats been used for centuries in the Arts? Traditionally, the way to learn how to play an instrument, or paint, or sculpt, or dance, or whatever, has been to find a master in the craft whom you admire, and beg them to teach you. If you are lucky, youll live near someone truly great, who is not only a true master, but a gifted teacher as well. They will often lead you through a rigorous and often bewildering course of instruction designed to shed poor techniques and misconceptions and build a solid foundation for true mastery of your craft. Along the way, your perception of what is good in your craft develops, and your selfawareness and self-criticism as an artist matures. Its a process which is intensive, long, and risky, and its how the greats in these fields have learned and taught for years. How does this fit with a model in which the student shares the wheel with the teacher in setting the direction of learning? How effective will learning be in the new paradigm compared to the old? What about students who pursue their craft at higher levels, where they are less likely to find this new model: will students who have been brought up in a student-centered model be able to acknowledge the authority that comes with their teachers mastery of their craft, and willingly hand over control of their learning? There is a central question behind all this, one that applies to all subject areas, and not just the Arts: can you learn without paying heed to the experts? If learning is simply gathering information, sure hand the kids iPhones, and let them loose! But I think learning also involves understanding that information sorting, classifying, synthesizing, assimilating and applying it. How will that happen in a studentcentered classroom, and especially in skillbased fields such as the Arts? - Andrew
6/4/12
5. How will you assess your success in learning this? Some students have already changed their topics. Thats OK; a nights reflection convinced one student that learning how the cultures of the world live their lives was a little ambitious for a two-week project (he literally meant ALL the worlds cultures!), and some others have made similar choices. It will be interesting to see at what point I say stick with the plan Some students have already asked me to teach them, especially those who want to learn new musical instruments (yes, Im the music teacher as well as their homeroom teacher). I guess old habits die hard! Ive encouraged them to a) find other ways to learn that dont involve me teaching them, and b) if they really get stuck, to come to me only with very specific questions. I wont show them how to play the bass, but if they ask me which note is wrong in a riff theyre learning, Ill tell them that. Im also doing some learning. Ive told the class Im going to learn the play the drums. I can play a very simple rock pattern (and I mean REALLY simple), but Id like to be able to actually use my left foot (the drummers out there will get now what I mean by simple). So Im going to work on that while theyre learning their things, and in two weeks, Ill show them how much Ive learnt. (Gulp. Pressures on!). Watch this space for progress updates! - Andrew
6/7/12
The story so far Ive started a project with my grade 7 homeroom class based on some of the principles of Student-Centered Learning. I began by asking them, What do you want to learn? Some interesting developments today. As you know, Im the music teacher, and my classs home room is the music room. Theyre surrounded by pictures of instruments & fingering charts on the walls, and shelves of instruments. Should I be surprised that about half the class has changed their topic to I want to learn how to play trumpet/clarinet/flute? Even students who have shown at best moderate interest in music class have jumped on this bandwagon. Why is this? Some theories, which I might explore in the reflection stage of the project: peer group pressure: my friends doing this, so I do the same as them, Ill be able to do it with them (and have lots of fun social time) proximity: this is what they see when theyre gazing into space thinking, What will I do this project on? I am such an amazing music teacher that they all want to learn so much more music. OK, thats not it, but its nice to entertain the thought!
One really interesting observation is that most of the students learning instruments have, as a very first step, gone to someone in the class who plays that instrument, and said, Teach me! So I have students teaching each other, and directing their own learning all at the same time. Some of them are doing both (teaching one instrument and learning another) at the same time. Very cool (and they seem to be having fun, and staying on task), but this isnt how I thought it would look. I wonder if they are so trained in the traditional model of education that they need to have someone teach them, or if learning a skill like playing an instrument does actually work best with a teacher rather than in a vaccuum. I guess this connects back to my very first post about the master-apprentice model of learning traditionally employed in the arts. I also am fighting the very strong temptation to step in and teach, especially when I see (and hear) them doing it WRONG! Ive set myself limits: I will only step in if I need to address safety concerns or possible damage to an instrument. All other questions (because they are already asking me questions) I will answer with, How do you think you could learn that? Last thought: I havent started learning how to play the drums yet. Better get moving if Im going to play for the class in two weeks! - Andrew
6/13/12
6/15/12
6/28/12
The story so far Ive started a project with my grade 7 homeroom class based on some of the principles of Student-Centered Learning. I began by asking them, What do you want to learn? So, the year (and the project) is done. This week, I conferenced with students individually. I asked them to show me what they had learned, and then chatted about the process and their experience of studentdriven learning. Several comments came up again and again: 1. It was fun: fun to choose what to learn, fun to learn something Ive wanted to learn for a while, fun to work with other students, fun to have a bit more freedom in the classroom. 2. It was challenging not having someone tell them what to do or what was right or wrong, and having to work that out for themselves. 3. It was too short: two weeks is not enough to really learn something well. The students assessed their own learning, and were generally right on the money; if anything, they judged themselves too harshly. Most were quite proud of what they had accomplished in such a short space of time. Several observations to wrap up this experiment: 1. This is an exciting approach to learning. It really motivates students to be able to direct their own learning; the students were more excited about this than many of the activities theyve worked on during the year. It also began, even in this short time, to promote initiative: several students took quite innovative steps in their learning, and went in directions that came entirely from them. 2. Its an eye-opening approach to teaching. It helped me reflect on my role in the learning process. Taking a step back and letting the students get on with their own learning was quite refreshing: I could then spend my time observing and commenting on their individual progress, rather than addressing the whole class. I think I had more teachable moments in those two weeks than in any other two weeks all year. 3. Its time-consuming. Two weeks is not nearly enough to make this a rewarding and meaningful learning experience for everyone in the class. Many students hit significant roadblocks; many changed topics partway through; some used the relaxed, non-directed nature of the classes to take, shall we say, a more relaxed approach to learning than I had hoped for. This is a project which could be extended over 10 weeks, or even a year. Would I do it again? Yes, in a heartbeat.
6/28/12
1. Give the students one section of the Math curriculum for example, Measurement of TwoDimensional figures (in grade 7, that includes using measurement in real life, devising the formulas for finding the area of parallelograms and trapezoids, and using those formulas to solve problems about area). Help them understand the language of the expectations. 2. Get them to choose (in groups of 2-3) one or two expectations. Their task then is to learn that information or skill, and then teach it to the rest of the class. How they learn it and how they teach it are up to them (this idea is taken from the blog of a Grade 6 teacher from Chicago, Josh Stumpenhorst. Visit http://stumpteacher.blogspot.ca/2011/03/student-driven-learning.html). This is much more restricted than my experiment this year, but this is deliberate: I want to ease them into the freedom of student-driven learning gradually. 3. Spend some time early in the year helping students discover and explore their own learning styles, so they know their strengths and weaknesses as learners. 4. Discuss how to gather information (from multiple and varied sources), and how to master skills; help students see these as two separate learning activities, and discuss the differences in each approach. 5. Explore different presentation formats. 6. After this initial project is done, begin a new project which will run for the whole term (10 weeks) or even the whole year. In this project, students choose what they are going to learn. It can be anything (within limits of appropriateness and feasibility). They then plan how they are going to learn it, and how they are going to show that they have learnt it. 7. Students keep a Learning Project Journal, recording the steps they are taking, including failures and mistakes. Emphasize that mistakes are a vital part of learning! 8. Work with students to scaffold the task. Set weekly checks with each student; go over the weeks entries in the Journal. 9. Hold a Presentation Day invite parents, administration, whoever the students want to come. 10. Throughout the process, create and exploit meta-moments when students reflect on how they learn. Apply this thinking to other subject areas as much as possible. 11. Throughout the process, reflect and keep notes on what works and what doesnt work so well, and refine the process for the following year. Im excited about this! I hope my students next year will begin to take control of their own learning in ways that I cant even foresee. Thanks for following my brief SCL experiment, and happy educating. - Andrew