Sector Dividing Method in Enroute Radar Airspace With Unbalanced Traffic Distribution

Scientific Journal of Control Engineering
June 2013, Volume 3 Issue 3, PP.111-119
Sector Dividing Method in Enroute Radar

Airspace with Unbalanced Traffic Distribution
Zhijian Ye#, Linhang Meng, Wei Gao, Zengxian Geng, Qiu Xiang
Key Lab of Operation Programming and Safety Technology of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin
300300, China
#
Email: zjye@cauc.edu.cn
Abstract
In order to effectively meet the traffic demand changes in time and space, based on the multi-controller team, an adaptive airspace sector
boundaries dividing method was proposed.First,the target airspace was processed with grid.Statistics of average distribution of the
aircraft number for each grid, revised by adding the distribution coefficients of aircraft number which measure the (Air Traffic
Controller)ATC additional workload associating with coordinating, handover and resolve conflicts, alluding to each grid.the multi
Huolang backpack method was used to group grids.This method ensure that the aircraft count does not exceed the monitor alert
parameter(MAP).On this basis, rules which try to avoid increasing ATC workload was used to divide sector boundaries. Monitor alert
parameters taking a value which is much bigger than median ensure that the the foundation sectors have more adaptability and
security,as well controllers will not need additional training to adapt to changes in the sector range. The dynamic reaction logic control
designed effective monitoring could effectively monitor MAP in plan time.Test results show that the higher the frequency of the
dynamic response, the average number of aircraft in the sector of 15 minutes will be more closer MAP.
Keywords: Airspace Planning; Adaptive Sector Division; Security; Controller Workload; Monitor Alert Parameter; Dynamic
Reaction Logic Control
300300
15
(MHRD201014)ZXH2010B003;
61179042
- 111 http://www.sj-ce.org/
[1]
5 CellGeoSect
[2-4]FlightLevel [5]Graph
[6-8]SectorFlow
[9]FPA
[10-11]
2-3
1
10
g i i=12n
[ T0 T1 ] 24
1 routex (x=1,2k) N route x

2 Q route x = N route x /(T1 T0 ) /hr
3 vs lroutex /
N routex
N routex
i 1
t i=1,2 Q route
i
km hr l route x routex
d route x = Q route x / v s =(N route x

Q route x
ti /[(T
N route x
N route x
ti ) /[(T
T0 ) lroute x ]
T0 ) lroute x ] km
5 g i 15
fg i = lg i (0.25d route ) g i routex

x
lg i g i

15
10 15 50 10 [12-13] 800km/hr 0.8 10 45

35 =1+35/45
=1+10/45 =1+50/45 1
2
MAPMonitoring and Alerting Parameter 17
1997 [14] MAP=17 2
MAP=12
MAP=293
3
2 14 15
MAP=29 3
MAP
17 k k 2 K
n f g
K= i 1 i
*
Mj
(2)
M j (j=12k) M j
*
M j ( M j =MAP=17), j=12k;
(3)
1
30

20 50
1 2 0.8
800km/hr2 27km 30
2
block y ={( g i dis( crosspi g i ) 30) crossp i block l } y=1,2,3m;
(4)
2(TSP)

y (if M
*
+ block y < M j )(if M

M j = M
M
1
+ block y M j = M j 2
+ block y > M j )
= M j M j M j
*
3
2
a
b
c
e
2
f
g
( rset1 , rset2 , rsetk ) 3
[ T0 T1 ] 15
15
1 24 15
2 15 121729 [0,12][12,17][17
29] 15 15
3 15 [29, 29 ]
[15]
4
MAP=17
4 5
4 [ 23:00 23:00]
17 23:00-8:00 15 12 108:00-17:00 15
29 2417:00-23:00 15 17 15
[23:00-8:00] MAP 12
[8:00-17:00] 17 MAP 29 [17:00-23:00]
12 MAP 17 2 29
4 2 5
1,3,21,2,2,2
35
30
25
15
20
15
10
5
23
:0
00 0
:0
01 0
:0
02 0
:0
03 0
:0
04 0
:0
05 0
:0
06 0
:0
07 0
:0
08 0
:0
09 0
:0
10 0
:0
11 0
:0
12 0
:0
13 0
:0
14 0
:0
15 0
:0
16 0
:0
17 0
:0
18 0
:0
19 0
:0
20 0
:0
21 0
:0
22 0
:0
23 0
:0
0
4
18
16
14
12
15
10
8
6
4
2
23:00
22:00
21:00
20:00
19:00
18:00
17:00
16:00
15:00
14:00
13:00
12:00
11:00
10:00
09:00
08:00
07:00
06:00
05:00
04:00
03:00
02:00
01:00
00:00
23:00
4
6 N i 15
1.5-2.5 N i 17 N i
''
''
ee
2
1
2
3
4
5 60
f
MAP
f
MAP
Ni
/15min
Ni
WL
1.t
2.Ni
If Ni>=MAP
& t>=5min
1.5-2.5
Ni
f'
f'
7 2 24
3 8 2
15min 8 15min
MAP 240 212
11.6% 15min MAP
2 2 8
2 2 12
2 12 17
MAP
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
11
13
7
15
17
19
21
23
18
16
14
12
3
2
MAP
10
8
6
4
2
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
8 15min
FAA
MAP MAP
15
15 MAP MAP
MAP
REFERENCES
[1]
Arash Yousefi, Babak Khorrami, Girishkumar Sabhnani, Robert Hoffman, and Bert Hackney. Effectiveness of Dynamic Airspace
Configuration to Manage Airspace Capacity in Response to Highly Dynamic Changes in Traffic Demand and Weather Events(C).
10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference , Fort Worth, Texas, Sep. 2010
[2]
Sabhnani, G. R., Yousefi, A., and Mitchell, J. S. B. Flow Conforming Operational Airspace Sector Design(C). AIAA 2010-9377,
10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operation (ATIO) Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, Sep. 2010
[3]
Sabhnani, G. R. Geometric Algorithms for Dynamic Airspace Sectorization[D]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Dept., Stony
Brook University, Stony brook, New York, May 2009
[4]
Wong, G. L. Analysis of Different Cost Functions in the Geosect Airspace Partitioning Tool[C]. IEEE/AIAA 28th Digital Avionics
Systems Conference, Orlando, Florida, 2009
[5]
Leiden, K., Peters, S., and Quesada, S. Flight Level-based Dynamic Airspace Configuration[C]. AIAA 2009-7104, 9th AIAA
Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operation (ATIO) Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Sep. 2009
[6]
Li, J.,Wang, T.,Savai, M.,and Hwang,I. Graph-Based Algorithm for Dynamic Airspace Configuration[J]. Journal of Guidance,
Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2010, pp. 1082-1094
[7]
Li, J., Wang,T., Savai, M., and Hwang, I. A Spectral Clustering Based Algorithm for Dynamic Airspace Configuration[C]. AIAA
2009-7056, 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operation (ATIO) Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Sep.
2009
[8]
Xue, M. Airspace Sector Redesign Based on Voronoi Diagrams, Journal of Aerospace Computing[J]. Information and
Communication, Vol. 6, 2009, pp. 624, 634
[9]
Brinton, C., Leiden,K., and Hinkey,J. Airspace Sectorization by Dynamic Density[C]. AIAA 2009-7102, 9th AIAA Aviation
Technology, Integration, and Operation (ATIO) Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Sep. 2009
[10] Klein, A., Lucic, P., and Rodgers, M. Dynamic Airspace Allocation as a Function of Equipage, Traffic Density, and Weather:
Dynamic Airspace Units (DAU) Software Rulebase Enhancement[R]. NASA NRA report, Jan. 2011.
[11] A. Klein, M. D. Rodgers, and K. Hong. Dynamic FPAs: A new Method for Dynamic Airspace Configuration Air Traffic Integrated
Communications[C]. Proceedings of Navigation and Surveillance Conference, Bethesda, MD, 2008.
[12] O. V. Degtyarev, V. N. Minaenko, and M. O. Orekhov. Solution of Sectorization Problems for an Air Traffic Management Area. II.
Development of Sectorization Algorithms[J]. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2010, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp.
624642
[13] . [M]. , 2009
[14] Federal Aviation Administration. Staffing Standards Report: ARTCC Radar Sector Staffing Models[R]. FAA, December, 1997
[15] Federal Aviation Administration. Facility Operation and Administration[S]. Federal Aviation Admin. Order JO 7210.3V, 14 Feb.
2008, Chap. 17, Sec. 7
]
1
1972-
1977-
Email: lhmeng@cauc.edu.cn
Email: 1272304541@qq.com
Email: wgao@cauc.edu.cn
4
1971-
1976-
Email: zxgeng@cauc.edu.cn
5
Email: qxiang@cauc.edu.cn

Sector Dividing Method in Enroute Radar Airspace With Unbalanced Traffic Distribution

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Sector Dividing Method in Enroute Radar Airspace With Unbalanced Traffic Distribution

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Scientific Journal of Control Engineering

June 2013, Volume 3 Issue 3, PP.111-119

Sector Dividing Method in Enroute Radar

1 routex (x=1,2k) N route x

d route x = Q route x / v s =(N route x

fg i = lg i (0.25d route ) g i routex

10 15 50 10 [12-13] 800km/hr 0.8 10 45

block y ={( g i dis( crosspi g i ) 30) crossp i block l } y=1,2,3m;

+ block y < M j )(if M

( rset1 , rset2 , rsetk ) 3

S-ar putea să vă placă și