Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Which will force no cautions with respect to Macros Which will allow you to "ENABLE" the Macros to run
IMPORTANT NOTE: This setting will be the default setting for ALL Spreadsheets Not resetting to a higher level can leave you vulnerable to Macro virus's with oth
with respect to Macros and allow all Macros with this spreadhseet to run. BLE" the Macros to run.
etting for ALL Spreadsheets that you open with EXCEL until changed. ble to Macro virus's with other spreadhseets!
PPAP
Production Part Approval Process
Cooper Part Number Revision Level
Submission Level
(Please Type 1-5)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Required Documents
Cooper PSW Required
Assigned to
Comments/Concerns/Questions
Part Submission Warrant (PSW) Design Records & Bubbled part print(s). Approved Engineering Change Documentation Customer Engineering Approvals
AR
AR
AR
AR
YES
Design FMEA,
AR
AR
AR
AR
Process FMEA
AR
Control Plan
AR
Can be Cooper supplied format or AIAG compliant format. Cooper GRR format or any statistical package format for gage R&R. Must be on Cooper Dimensional report format Industry Standard reports or test result formats designated by Cooper Industries. Process Capability Study using any statistical package or Cooper Capability Data Forms. Lab Scope and outside lab proof of accreditation.
AR
AR
YES
10
Dimensional Results
AR
11
Material, Performance Test Results Initial Process Study (Cpk) Capability Studies Qualified Laboratory Documentation Appearance Approval Report
AR
AR
12
AR
AR
YES
13
AR
14
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
15
AR
16
Master Samples
17
Checking aids
AR
18
AR
Packaging Form
AR
Inspection Plan
(ASC Suppliers only)
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
AR
Not required
AR
IF Applicable
Included
YES YES YES YES
YES YES YES YES
PPAP Requirements
Element Order
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Customer Name:
Street Address
Purchasing Representative
Purchasing Office
City
State
Zip
SOP Date
Does this part utilize Cooper owned tooling? Is it properly identified? Does this part contain any restricted substances or require IMDS submission?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Are plastic or polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? REASON FOR SUBMISSION Initial submission (New Parts and Part Number Changes) Engineering Change: New/Revised drawing or other specification Tooling: transfer, replacement (new), refurbishment, modified or additional Correction of Non-conformance or discrepancy Change to optional construction, material or component
Yes
No
New Supplier, New material or new source for existing material Change of supplier, material or non-equivalent materials/services New process or a change in production process or method Change of manufacturing location, sub-supplier or additional location Other - please specify
REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one) Level 1 - Warrant only submitted to the customer (Applied to non-critical parts and raw bulk material) Level 2 - Warrant with product samples amd limiting supporting data. (Applied to critical bulk product and simple changes) Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data. (Applied to new parts on Cooper programs) DEFAULT COOPER SUBMISSION LEVEL Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by Cooper.(Applied only with prior approval from Cooperspecial situations only!) Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location. (Applied to parts requiring onsite review ) SUBMISSION RESULTS The results for dimensional measurements YES material and functional tests NO appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all drawing and specification requirements: Is this a multicavity tool? DECLARATION YES NO
(If "NO" - Explanation Required in Explanation/comments section below ) Number of parts submitted by cavity/spindle
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, have been made to the applicable Production Part Approval Process Manual 4th Edition requirements. I further warrant these samples were produced with the specified materials on regular production tooling with no operations other then the regular production process. The data and samples were produced at the production rate of are noted below in the explanation/comments section. EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:
#parts
in
# hours
on
date
Job Title
Fax No.
Final Part Warrant Disposition: Approved Rejected Quality or Supplier Quality Date
Control Plan
Control Plan Number Part Number/ Latest Change (Rev) Level Core Team Key Contact / Phone Part Description Supplier Name Date (Orig.) Current Release Level Supplier Code Quality Department Approval Current Release Date Plant Location
CHARACTERISTICS PART / PROCESS NUMBER PROCESS NAME / MACHINE DEVICES / JIG / OPERATION TOOLS FOR DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURING SPECIAL CHAR. CLASS PRODUCT / PROCESS / SPECIFICATION / TOLERANCE
NO.
PRODUCT
PROCESS
SIZE
CONTROL METHOD
REACTION PLAN
Note: All part print CTQ's must be clearly identified on this control plan.
Page 6 of 25
Page 7 of 25
Please indicate EITHER: 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed. Check One FMEA Number Prepared By FMEA Date (Orig.) FMEA Date
Item/ Function
Requirements
C S l E a V s s
Item Number
Current Product Controls Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Mechanisms O C C D R Recommended E P Action(s) T N Responsibility and Completion Date
Action Results S O D R E C E P V C T N
Prevention
Detection
Actions Taken
Page 8 of 25
Please indicate EITHER: 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed. Check One FMEA Number Prepared By FMEA Date (Orig.) FMEA Date
Item/ Function
Requirements
C S l E a V s s
Item Number
Current Product Controls Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Mechanisms O C C D R Recommended E P Action(s) T N Responsibility and Completion Date
Action Results S O D R E C E P V C T N
Prevention
Detection
Actions Taken
Page 9 of 25
Please indicate EITHER: 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed. Check One FMEA Number Prepared By FMEA Date (Orig.) FMEA Date
Process Number
Process/Step Function
Requirements
C S l E a V s s
Current Process Controls Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Mechanisms O C C D R Recommended E P Action(s) T N Responsibility and Completion Date
Action Results
Prevention
Detection
Actions Taken
S O D R E C E P V C T N
Page 10 of 25
Please indicate EITHER: 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed. Check One FMEA Number Prepared By FMEA Date (Orig.) FMEA Date
Process Number
Process/Step Function
Requirements
C S l E a V s s
Current Process Controls Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Mechanisms O C C D R Recommended E P Action(s) T N Responsibility and Completion Date
Action Results
Prevention
Detection
Actions Taken
S O D R E C E P V C T N
Date of Measurement:
Page #:
Supplier Signature Title
of
OK OKNI
Meets Requirements OK But Needs Improvement Does Not Meet Requirements Judgement Comments/Action Plan
Supplier Code:
NG
Measurement Method
REQUIREMENT: Target
ITEM #
Min
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Supplier Information
Supplier Name Supplier Number Supplier Location(s) Date of Request Cooper Purchasing Contact Supplier Contact Name Supplier Contact Phone # Supplier Contact Email
Date of Proposed FUTURE Change Description of Change (Please describe in detail the nature of the change)
This section is reserved for parts sourced through CES (Cooper Electric Shaghai)
CES Product?
Yes
No
Customer Information: (Please list additional part numbers on a separate sheet if necessary)
Customer Part Number(s) Affected Customer Location(s) Affected (city,state)
Type of Change
(Select One)
(Note:) You are required to notify and receive approval from Cooper for any of these types.
Designations in ( ) are the recommend PPAP Level submissions for this type of change
1. Change to construction, material or component (L3) 2. New, additional or modified tools (L3) 3. Upgrade or rearrangement of existing tools (L2) 4. Tooling, production or equipment transferred to different site (L3) 5. Change of supplier or non-equivalent materials/services (L3) 6. Product when tooling has been inactive for 12 months (L2)
7. Product/process changes on components of the product (L4) 8. Change in test or inspection method (L4) 9. Bulk Material: New source of raw material (L2) 10. Change in product appearance attributes (L2) 11. Change in production process or method (L4) 12. Change of Sub Supplier or material source (L3)
Reference: Section 3 Table 3.1 on Page 13 of AIAG PPAP 4th edition (May 2006) ALL Information Below is to be filled out by Cooper Industries.
Cooper Requirements (Plant Quality, Supplier Quality and Puchasing) Purchasing Timing Plan Received Yes No Quality or Supplier Quality PPAP Required? Yes Additional Requirements
No
Level
Due Date
Approval Signatures
Purchasing Representative Engineering Representative Quality Representative
Signature
Date
Mandatory Distribution: Plant Operations, Plant Quality, Purchasing, Supplier Quality and Engineering
XXXXX
Tool Location Facility Machine Station Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.
Complete Supplier Tooling Action Item List to ensure all items are completed.
TOOLING ACTION ITEMS Tooling Images Diagram or Strip Layout Tool Drawings Tool Cost Breakdown Design Cost Material Cost Labor Cost Tool Description Tool Dimensions Length Width Height Daylight Opening Weight Press Size Tool Material Tool Capacity Hourly Daily Annual Life Expectancy Comments Who What When Status
XXXXX
Tool Location Facility Machine Station Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.
Fig. 1
Top View
Fig. 2
Bottom View
Fig. 3
Left View
Fig. 4
Right View
XXXXX
Tool Location Facility Machine Station Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling. Fig. 6 Back View
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Example
XXXXX
Tool Location Facility Machine Station Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.
Packaging Form
Date Supplier Name Supplier Code Supplier Production Facility Packaging Contact Phone Number Fax Number E-Mail Address Part Number Print Revision Level Part Description HAZMAT? Supplier Responsibilities Completed? Packaging Design Packaging that prevents shipping and material handling defects Electronic storage of submitted Packaging Data Form Container
With Label Shown
Part
In Packaging Position
PACKAGE DATA
L (mm)
Wt (kg)
Quantities
Qty Parts per Container Container(s) per Layer on Pallet Later per Pallet Container(s) per Pallet Stacking Rule
In to MM
Lbs to Kg
Packaging Form
Date Supplier Name Supplier Code Supplier Production Facility Packaging Contact Phone Number Fax Number E-Mail Address Part Number Print Revision Level Part Description HAZMAT? Supplier Responsibilities Completed? Packaging Design Packaging that prevents shipping and material handling defects Electronic storage of submitted Packaging Data Form
Dunnage
In Container Position
Unit Load
Manufacturer
Material
Lead Time
RET/EXP
COMMENTS
PACKAGING MATERIALS
Part Name
Part No:
Expiration Date
Revision Initiated By
Interim Action
Due Date
Corrective Action(s)
# Action Item Responsible Party Due Date Status
Approval Signatures
Route To Manufacturing Engineer Manufacturing Purchasing Project Engineer Quality Approve Reject Signature Date
Approve
Reject
For use with testing gage systems meant to evaluate features or processes whose output measured numerically, and for which two to three operators are expected to conduct the evaluation. Rev. 11/1/07 Dave Olson Part Number: Supplier Name: Date Drawing Number: Supplier Address: Drawing Rev.: Supplier Contact Rev. Date: Drawing Location: PCA Supplier Name: GR&R Contact Part Feature: PCA Address: Feature Symbol: PCA Contact Other Information Calibration Date: Operator 1 Name 0 USL 0 LSL 0 Number of Trials: Number of Operators: Gage Type: Operator 2 Name Gage ID: Unit of Measure: Operator 3 Name
Operator 1 Operator 2 Part # 1st Trial 2nd Trial 3rd Trial Range 1st Trial 2nd Trial 3rd Trial 1 Error 2 Error 3 Error 4 Error 5 Error 6 Error 7 Error 8 Error 9 Error 10 Error * A minimum of six samples for each trial is required for these results to be valid
Range Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error
Range Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error Error
#VALUE!
Pass - Gage System is Useable Gage System is useable but marginal Fail - Gage System is Unstable
1
1.000 0.900
0.800
0.800
Operator X Values
0.700 0.600
Bar R
10
Sample Number
UCLr Bar-R Op1 Range Op2 Range Op3 Range
Part Number: Drawing Number: Drawing Rev.: Rev. Date: Drawing Location: Part Feature: Feature Symbol: Other Information
Limits
USL LSL Process Data LSL = USL = Mean =
PCA Summary
Potential Capability Ppku = Error in STDEV Ppkl = Error in STDEV Ppk = Error in STDEV Pp = Error in STDEV %Cr = Error in STDEV Max = 0.000 Min = 0.000 0.000 0.000 No Data 0.000
Test Data
Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Test
StDev =
Spec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0
Frequency
Distribution
0 0 0 0 0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Values
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
18
Part Number: Drawing Number: Drawing Rev.: Rev. Date: Drawing Location: Part Feature: Feature Symbol: Other Information
Process USL= LSL= Mean= StDevE= UCLx= LCLx= UCLR= Average Range 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Sample Value
0.8 1
PCA Summary Potential Capability Cp = Error in STDEV CpkL = Error in STDEV CpkU = Error in STDEV Cpk = 0.000 %Cr = Error in STDEV Max = Min =
Subgroup 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Test 5
Frequency
Histogram
Frequency
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
#VALUE! #VALUE!
Test Values
Averages Chart
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
13
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
Sample Number
X X-Bar LCLx UCLx
Control Chart
1 0.9 0.8 0.7
Range
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
Sample Number
Range R-Bar UCLr
49
49
0.000
Part Number: Drawing Number: Drawing Rev.: Rev. Date: Drawing Location: Part Feature: Feature Symbol: Other Information
USL LSL Process Data Subgroup Test Value 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Spec Range LSL= USL= Mean= StDev UCLX= LCLX= UCLR= 0 0 0 0
PCA Summary
Potential Capability Cp= CpkL= CpkU= Cpk= %Cr= Max= Min= 0.0000 0.0000 0
Distribution
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
0 0
Frequency
Test Values
1 1 1 1
Averages
Test Value
1
1
0 0 0 0 0 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29
X
33
37
X-Bar
41
45
49
Sample Number
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Range Chart
Range
13
17
Range UCL
21
25
Range Average
29
33
37
41
45
49
Sample
Revision History
Release A
Date Description September 18, 2008 Original Release Updated two issues 1. Unprotected Picture Cels on Tooling Form 2. Added mandatory Engineering Review to SCR's February 26, 2009