Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The Audio-Lingual Method (ALM) arose as a direct result of the need for foreign
language proficiency in listening and speaking skills during and after World War II. It is
closely tied to behaviorism, and thus made drilling, repetition, and habit-formation central
elements of instruction. Proponents of ALM felt that this emphasis on repetition necessitated
a corollary emphasis on accuracy, claiming that continual repetition of errors would lead to
the fixed acquisition of incorrect structures and non-standard pronunciation.
Now, we will compare and contrast between the Audio-Lingual Method and Communicative
Language Teaching on the basis of different issues related.
Objectives:
Audio-lingual method:
The development of oral proficiency in the language through carefully selected
vocabularies which form a general service list for the learner to use.
ii) To make students able to use the target language communicatively and
automatically without stopping to think.
Principles:
Principles of Audio-lingual method-
a) Language is speech and not writing. This implies that the emphasis is on correct
intonation.
Listening and speaking should be taught before reading and writing. It should be
realistic and situational from the start. The mastery of oral skills should precede
reading and writing which will act as reinforcements.
c) Language is a set of habit. Learning is controlled through behaviour.
d) It teaches the language not about the language.
Instructions are given in the target language.
f) Language forms occur within a context.
g) Students’ native language interferes as little as possible with the students’ attempts
to acquire the target language.
h) Teaching is directed to provide students with a native-speaker-like model.
i) Analogy provides a better foundation for language learning than analysis.
j) Errors are carefully avoided because they lead to the formation of bad habits.
k) Positive reinforcement helps the student to develop correct habits.
l) Students are encouraged to learn to respond to both verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
m) The teacher is regarded as an orchestra leader-conducting, guiding and controlling
the students’ behavior in the target language.
n) Learning a foreign language is treated on par with the native language learning.
o) A comparison between the native language and the target language is supposed to
help teachers to find the areas with which their students probably experience
difficulty: this is expected to help students to overcome the habit of the native
language.
p) Language is not seen separated from culture. Culture is the everyday behavior of
people who use the target language. One of the teachers’ responsibilities is to
present information about that culture in context.
q) Students are taken to be the imitators of the teacher’s model or the tapes.
r) The dialogue is the chief means of presenting vocabulary, structures and it is
learned through repetition and imitation.
s) Mimicry, memorization and pattern drills are the practice techniques that are
emphasized.
t) Most of the interaction is between the teacher and the learner and it is imitated by
the learner.
u) Listening and speaking are given priority in language teaching, and they precede
reading and writing.
v) Correct pronunciation, stress, rhythm and intonation are emphasized.
w) The meanings of the words are derived in a linguistic and cultural context and not
in isolation.
x) Audio-visual aids are used to assist the students’ ability to form new language
habits.
Principles of CLT-
a) Language as it is used in real context should be introduced.
b) Students should be able to figure out the speaker’s or writer’s intentions.
c) The target language is the vehicle for classroom communication.
d) One function may have many different linguistic forms.
e) Opportunities should be given to students to express their ideas and opinions.
f) Errors are seen as the natural outcome of the development of communication
skills.
g) Fluency is much more important than accuracy.
h) Creating situations to promote communication is one of the teacher’s
responsibilities.
i) The social context of the communicative events is essential in giving meaning to
the utterances.
j) The teacher acts as an advisor during communicative activity, a facilitator of
students’ learning, a manager of classroom activity, or a co-communicator.
k) When communicating, a speaker has a choice about what to say and how to say it.
l) Students should be given opportunities to develop strategies for interpreting
language as it is actually seen by native speakers.
m) Students are communicators and are actively engaged in negotiating meaning.
n) Language is used a great deal through communicative activities such as games,
role-play, problem solving.
0) Communicative activities have three features: information gap, choice and
feedback.
Teachers in communicative classrooms will find themselves talking less and listening more–
becoming active facilitators of their students’ learning (Larsen-Freeman, 1986). The teacher
sets up the exercise, but because the students’ performance is the goal, the teacher must step
back and observe, sometimes acting as referee or monitor. A classroom during a
communicative activity is far from quiet, however. The students do most of the speaking, and
frequently the scene of a classroom during a communicative exercise is active, with students
leaving their seats to complete a task.
CLT: Teachers help learners in any way that motivates them to work with the language.
ALM: The teacher controls the learners and prevents them from doing anything that conflict
with the theory.
CLT: Learners are expected to interact with other people, either in the flesh, through pair and
group work, or in their writings.
ALM: Learners are expected to interact with the language system, embodied in machines or
controlled materials.
CLT: The teacher cannot know exactly what language the learners will use.
ALM: The teacher is expected to specify the language that learners are to use.
CLT: The teachers assume a responsibility for determining and responding to learner’s
language need.
ALM: The teachers have no responsibility to determine learner’s language need.
The Audio-Lingual method is based on the theory that language learning is a question
of habit formation. It has its origins in Skinner’s principles of behavior theory. Since learning
is thought to be a question of habit formation, errors are considered to be bad and to be
avoided.
To the behaviorist, the human being is an organism capable of wide repertoire of
behaviors. The occurrence of these behaviors is dependent on three crucial elements in
learning: a stimulus, which serves to elicit behavior; a response which serves to mark the
response as being appropriate) and encourages the repetition (or future (see Skinner 1957;
Brown1980).
Instructional materials:
In communicative language teaching, instructional materials have the primary role of
promoting communicative language use. In audio-lingual method, instructional materials
assist the teacher to develop language mastery in the learner.
Tape recorders and audiovisual equipment often have central roles in audio-lingual course. A
language laboratory may also be considered essential to provide the opportunity for further
drill work and to receive controlled error-free practice of basic structures. Three kinds of
material are currently used in CLT: text-based materials; task-based materials; and realia.
Techniques:
ALM demands more memorization of structure-based dialogs. Students memorize an opening
dialog using mimicry and applied role-playing. In CLT, dialogs, if used, center on
communicative functions and are not normally memorized. Communicative language
teaching makes use of real-life situations that necessitate communication. The teacher sets up
a situation that students are likely to encounter in real life. Unlike the audio-lingual method of
language teaching, which relies on repetition and drills, the communicative approach can
leave students in suspense as to the outcome of a class exercise, which will vary according to
their reactions and responses. The real-life simulations change from day to day. Students’
motivation to learn comes from their desire to communicate in meaningful ways about
meaningful topics.
One of the key principles of the Audio-Lingual method is that the language teacher
should provide students with a native-speaker-like model. By listening, students are expected
to be able to mimic the model. Based upon contrastive analyses, students are drilled in
pronunciation of words that are most dissimilar between the target language and the first
language. Grammar is not taught directly by rule memorization, but by examples. The
method presumes that second language learning is very much like first language learning.
A comparative study is attempted below between CLT and ALM in terms of techniques:
Syllabus Designing:
Communicative language teaching often uses a functional-notional syllabus. A notional-
functional syllabus is more a way of organizing a language learning curriculum than a
method or an approach to teaching. In a notional-functional syllabus, instruction is organized
not in terms of grammatical structure as had often been done with the ALM, but in terms of
“notions” and “functions.” In this model, a “notion” is a particular context in which people
communicate, and a “function” is a specific purpose for a speaker in a given context. As an
example, the “notion” or context shopping requires numerous language functions including
asking about prices or features of a product and bargaining. Similarly, the notion party would
require numerous functions like introductions and greetings and discussing interests and
hobbies. Proponents of the notional-functional syllabus claimed that it addressed the
deficiencies they found in the ALM by helping students develop their ability to effectively
communicate in a variety of real-life contexts. Yalden (1987) has classified a number of
communicative syllabus types.
The Language skills are taught in the order of listening, speaking, reading, and
writing. Listening is viewed largely as training in aural discrimination of sound patterns. The
language may be presented entirely orally at first; written representations are usually withheld
from the learners in early stage.
Learning Techniques and Activities:
Communicative language teaching uses almost any activity that engages learners in authentic
communication. Littlewood (1981) distinguishes between “functional communication
activities” and “social interaction activities” as major activity types in Communicative
language Teaching. Functional communication activities include such tasks as learners
comparing sets of pictures and noting similarities and differences; working out a likely
sequence of events in a set of pictures; discovering missing features in a map or picture; one
learner communicating behind a screen to another learner and giving instructions on how to
draw a picture or shape, or how to complete a map; following directions; and solving
problems from shared clues. Social interaction activities include conversation and discussion
sessions, dialogues and role plays, simulations, skits, improvisations, and debates.
Dialogues provide the means of contextualizing key structures and illustrate situations
in which structures might be used as well as some cultural aspects of the target language.
Dialogues are used for memorization. Correct pronunciation, stress, rhythm, and intonation
are emphasized.
In the late 1950s, the theoretical underpinnings of the Audio-lingual method were
questioned by linguists such as Noam Chomsky, who pointed out the limitations of structural
linguistics. The relevance of behaviorist psychology to language learning was also
questioned, most famously by Chomsky’s review of B.F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior in 1959.
The audio-lingual method was thus deprived of its scientific credibility and it was only a
matter of time before the effectiveness of the method itself was questioned.
In 1964, Wilga Rivers released a critique of the method in her book, “The
Psychologist and the Foreign Language Teacher.” Subsequent research by others, inspired by
her book, produced results which showed explicit grammatical instruction in the mother
language to be more productive. These developments, coupled with the emergence of
humanist pedagogy led to a rapid decline in the popularity of audiolingualism.