Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Department of Labor: 2000 00008

    Încărcat de

    USA_DepartmentOfLabor
    6 vizualizări2 pagini
    MAGGIE TAYLOR GRAY, EDWARD LOUIS MIENIE, Prosecuting Parties, v. DATAFORCE CORPORATION, Respondent. Parties stipulated into the record a settlement agreement, to which the Administrator did not object. This Decision and Order is substituted for the proposed order presented by the parties.

    Descriere originală:

    Drepturi de autor

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formate disponibile

    PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    MAGGIE TAYLOR GRAY, EDWARD LOUIS MIENIE, Prosecuting Parties, v. DATAFORCE CORPORATION, Respondent. Parties stipulated into the record a settlement agreement, to which the Administrator did not object. This Decision and Order is substituted for the proposed order presented by the parties.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    6 vizualizări2 pagini

    Department of Labor: 2000 00008

    Încărcat de

    USA_DepartmentOfLabor
    MAGGIE TAYLOR GRAY, EDWARD LOUIS MIENIE, Prosecuting Parties, v. DATAFORCE CORPORATION, Respondent. Parties stipulated into the record a settlement agreement, to which the Administrator did not object. This Decision and Order is substituted for the proposed order presented by the parties.

    Drepturi de autor:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    U.S.

    Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges


    Cincinnati, OH

    Date Issued: November 9, 2000

    Case No: 2000-LCA-8


    2000-LCA-11

    In the Matter Of

    MAGGIE TAYLOR GRAY,


    EDWARD LOUIS MIENIE,

    Prosecuting Parties,

    v.

    DATAFORCE CORPORATION,

    Respondent.

    DECISION AND ORDER

    The above-captioned matter was scheduled for hearing on November 1, 2000 at Miami,
    Florida. On that date, the parties stipulated into the record a settlement agreement, to which the
    Administrator, through counsel, did not object. The parties have since filed an Agreement of Consent
    Findings and Request for Order Disposing of the Whole Proceeding pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 18.9.
    This decision and order is substituted for the proposed order presented by the parties.

    Upon consideration of the specific terms of the settlement agreement and consent findings, it is
    determined that the terms of the settlement are fair and reasonable. As noted in the settlement
    agreement and consent findings, a copy of which is attached and made a part of this decision, the
    parties agree:

    1. the consent findings in this Decision and Order shall have the same force and effect as an
    order made after a full hearing;

    2. the entire record on which this decision is being issued is based on the Administrator's
    determination and the consent findings;

    3. the parties waive all further procedural steps before the Office of Administrative Law
    Judges; and,

    USDOL/OALJ REPORTER PAGE 1


    4. the parties waive any right to contest the validity of this Decision and Order which is being
    entered in accordance with the settlement agreement and consent findings.

    ORDER

    Upon consideration of the entire record, I find the provisions of the settlement agreement and
    consent findings should be accepted. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement
    agreement and consent findings is hereby approved and that it, together with this Decision and Order,
    shall constitute the final administrative order in these cases. See 20 C.F.R. § 655.85(a).

    DONALD W. MOSSER
    Administrative Law Judge

    USDOL/OALJ REPORTER PAGE 2

    S-ar putea să vă placă și