A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Coastal Bangladesh-A Case of Shrimp Aquaculure by M. Salequzzaman M. N. Uddin, M. A. Islam, M. A. Chowdhury
0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
21 vizualizări9 pagini
Titlu original
A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Coastal Bangladesh-A Case of Shrimp Aquaculure by M. Salequzzaman M. N. Uddin, M. a. Islam, M. a. Chowdhury
0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
21 vizualizări9 pagini
A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Coastal Bangladesh-A Case of Shrimp Aquaculure by M. Salequzzaman M. N. Uddin, M. A. Islam, M. A. Chowdhury
A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Coastal Bangladesh: A
Case of Shrimp Aquaculture
“'M, Salequzzaman, 'M. N. Uddin, 'M.A. Islam and 7M. A. Chowdhury
‘Environmental Science Discipline, Khulna University
*School of Environment, Resources and Development, Mail Box-159,
Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand
Abstract
This paper mainly focuses on sustainability aspects of agricultural system in Bangladesh and how this has to
fit in sustainable agriculture through presentation of the conceptual model of shrimp aquaculture in coastal
Bangladesh. The main concern regarding agriculture is to follow the principles of sustainability. It shows the
measures of agriculture sustainability by the economic and physical methods. It identifies the different
influencing factors towards agriculture sustainability. In case of shrimp aquaculture in coastal Bangladesh,
this paper sets three sustainability dimensions in relation with economic, social and ecology and it also
makes the quantification of the associated indicators regarding the sustainability dimensions. With this
regard, a conceptual model of sustainable shrimp aquaculture in coastal Bangladesh has been developed that
involves an environmental impact assessment with social and economic issues. Finally, it is said that the
sustainable agriculture should be followed by the renewable methods that enhance the resource base for
future generations.
Key Words: Agriculture, Sustainal
ility, Conceptual model, Coastal Bangladesh
Introduction
‘The economy of Bangladesh is primarily dependent on agriculture. About 84% of the total population live in
ural areas and are directly or indirectly engaged in a wide range of agricultural activities, such as
horticulture, rice cultivation, aquaculture, livestock, etc. (Muhammad, 2000). Agriculture sector plays ant
important role in the economy of the country accounting for 31.6% of total GDP in 1997-98 that comprises
crops, forests, fisheries and livestock. It generates 63.2% of total national employment, of which crop
sector's share is nearly 55% (BBS, 1998). Agricultural exports of primary products constituted 10.4% of
total exports of the country in 1997-98 (Muhammad, 2000) whereas it contributed about 3% to the economic
growth in the past decade (World Bank, 1997). Thus it plays the single largest contributor to income and
employment generation and a vital element in Bangladesh to achieve self-sufficiency in food production for
reducing rural poverty and faster sustainable economic development.
‘The main elements of present boom agricultural development in Bangladesh are the adoption of high
yielding varieties (HYV) of transplanted aman and the cultivation of summer boro in rotation with aman.
Both of this intensification is enabled by the rapid spread of groundwater irrigation, mainly in the form of
shallow tube wells or mini-submersible tube wells. In addition to the removal of fertilizer subsidies, the
government is trying to increase private sector involvement in the market for irrigation equipment. This
seems a positive response towards a boom production in agriculture development. However, a complete
different scenario has been seen in coastal Bangladesh where uncontrolled and unsustainable practices of
shrimp aquaculture have been practiced, instead of balanced agriculture production. But in the process of
shrimp aquaculture, recently there is an increase of land under irrigation, conversion of pond and
implementation of the crop diversification program (CDP) including aquaculture practice. All these factors
have promising results in the yield of agricultural production including maize, pulses, oilseeds, potatoes,
vegetables, livestock, and aquaculture. In all of these systems, the question is: are the benefits equal or not or
necessarily sustainable to local farmers or ecology or socially acceptable by the stakeholders? Sustainability
of high yields and environmental protection are of principal concerns towards natural resources management
along with the compromising the environmental degradation such as loss of productivity. Thus, this paper
mainly focuses on sustainability aspects of agricultural system in Bangladesh and how this has to fit in
sustainable agriculture through presentation of the conceptual model of shrimp aquaculture in coastal
Bangladesh.
Concept of Agricultural Sustainability
The idea of sustainability recalls the logic of practice, through which effects viewed as desirable are made to
happen rather than a concept built to explain reality. Different meanings have been associated with this
* Corresponding Author : Professor, Environmental Science Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208,
Bangladesh.A Conceptual Model of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Coastal Bangladesh
notion since the Brundtland Report introduced it to international public debate in 1987 (WCED, 1987).
‘According to AtKisson (1999) sustainability has developed on seven principles, such as:
1. Think long term: Sustainability is not just about next year or next decade, but about generational time-
scales.
2. Understand systems: Everything of natural system is linked together. The dynamics of systems include
feedback loops. The effect of one system influences the component of other system. It is very much difficult
to show in one picture.
3. Recognize limits: Once upon a time the human world was small and nature was big. Limits to physical
growth were extremely far away. But now the pressure of human population extends the limit of carrying
capacity in natural system. So, we must recognize the limit of any action to do.
4. Protect Nature: We depend on nature for life. We should not do any development works ignoring the
nature, We must protect it for our future generation.
5. Transform business-as-usual: Industrial activities do not follow the sustainability criteria those are
needed to follow. It acts just as business theme. As a result, it hampers the real sustainability. We should
Keep in mind that resources are limited. So, business will be run following the sustainability rules.
6. Practice fairness: Sustainability equals fairness over time. If we are truly fair to nature, to each other, and
to future generations, sustainability would happen automatically.
7. Embrace creativity: Sustainability compensates enormous changes that humanity makes, it_means
cimbracing what the creative imperative. We have to be inventive and creative.
Sustainable agricultural systems are an essential foundation for rural development in most of the world.
Sustainability requires that systems should be environmentally sound, financially and economically feasible,
and socially acceptable. Again, these are characterized as those that can indefinitely meet demands for food
and fiber at socially acceptable economic and gnvironmental costs (Diebel et al., 1993).
‘Methodology of Assessing Sustainability of Agriculture in Bangladesh
‘There are two measures of sustainability to be considered: the economic and the physical. One measure has
devoted considerable efforts to development of economic measures, while another provides an insight into
determination of the physical as related to the soil resource used in agriculture (Francis ef al., 1997). An
‘economic measurement of sustainability is difficult, as there are several viewpoints to consider. It is stated
that two general views prevail concerning sustainability in agriculture, one by consumers and another is by
producers. Consumers view sustainability refers its capacity to provide an abundance of quality food.
Producers view sustainability refers as an income generating activity with economic and social value. The
‘concern they have is the maintaining a net return from the sale of agricultural products. In economic terms,
Consumers assess sustainability in terms of maintaining a level of consumer surplus in the consumption of
food over time. On the other hand, in economic terms, producers regard sustainability as the maintenance of
‘a producer surplus or economic rent (return to factors used in production) over time. This dichotomy of
interest provides a basis of conflict and attracts attention to the difficulty experienced when trying to
measure sustainability. From the consumer's standpoint, security of the food supply is the upper most
particularly among those who have previously experienced shortages or indeed famine. Measurement of the
‘value of food security becomes almost impossible. Time preference becomes a complicating factor as does
trying to aggregate the preferences of individuals. The attempt to measure sustainability in terms of food
security should be abandoned (Chowdhury et al., 2005).
Therefore it is a generalized argument that sustainability may be measured in terms of the flow of income
from agricultural production. Because the society regards that the sustainability is means of all the costs and
benefits of production. Particular issues that are raised when measuring sustainability are the discount rate;
private versus social costs (negative externalities); non-market benefits (positive externalities); econom
flexibility; and incomelrisk preferences. In addition to maintaining a producer surplus is the need to sustain
farm families. Furthermore, sustainability must be measured taking into account uncertainty. Therefore, the
clasticity of supply (the change in output relative to a change in price) may be a relevant indicator of
sustainability. Output in response to price changes is impacted by technologies and available inputs.
Factors Influencing the Sustainable Agriculture in Bangladesh
Many factors influence the sustainability of agricultural systems, but institutional support systems and
technologies are particularly important. Scientists, producers, researchers and non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) have increasingly sought to identify, validate and implement practical farming
technologies and methods which mect the sustainability criteria. This has been especially true in developing
countries like Bangladesh where chronic rural poverty is often closely linked to a rapidly degrading resource
base, In this sense, enhancing the sustainability and productivity of agricultural systems are the key to
93Salequzzaman et al.
conservation of natural resources and to reduction of rural poverty in coastal Bangladesh (Salequzzaman,
2001).
Modern technologies such as improved varieties and chemical inputs have helped spur yields among some
farmers, but these do not prevent erosion nor do many-armers possess the financial resources to use them.
With increasing population and decreasing availability of new land to exploit, maintaining adequate fallows
has become increasingly difficult and continuous cropping has become common place. This has resulted in a
vicious cycle of soil degradation, crop yield dectines, further pressure on available lands to generate required
food supplies, and often, migration out of agriculture. In addition, it is said that any low-cost innovations,
not requiring large capital investments and relatively easy to implement, can help poor farm households
become more productive by improving fallow management and increasing yields (Hussain, 2001).
Sustainability Assessment of Coastal Shrimp Aquaculture in Bangladesh
The study has identified a set of indicators for shrimp aquaculture sustainability in coastal Bangladesh.
‘These indicators are divided into three sustainability dimensions: economic, social and ecological. These
indicators are selected through the analysis of relative availability of data representing the indicators,
sensitivity (0 stress on the system, existence of threshold value and guidelines, productivity, imegratability
and known response to disturbances, anthropogenic stresses, and change over time (Salequzzaman, 2001).
However the criteria such as the continuity of supply and quality inputs (eg. feed, seed etc), the social,
environmental, and economic costs of providing the inputs (eg. depletion of resources), the long term
continuity (sustainability) of production, financial viability, social acceptance and impact, environmental
impact and efficiency of conversion of resources into outputs have been considered to assess the
sustainability the coastal shrimp aquaculture (Fig 1).
BOD, Total Kjeldhal Nitrogen
(TKN)
‘Ammonia N, Nitite N, Nitrate N
Pond water 17) Total P, Soluble Reactive P (SRP)
and effluent ‘Organic Matter, Salinity
quality
“Texture, pl,
Ecological/ Total N, Total P, Organic Matter
environmental |) [Soit quality _[~ L_ Ekectical conductivity
subsystem
indicators ete pe
iodivesit
Degradation eporee
of natural ‘Education and research oa
= roseneor ay
g
ef [produc | Yet
Se Inpat-output efficiency
Frepeabally Cost-bencit ratio
a
2
indicators
Contnaton of roucon
cout Conlon of ecm
Key stakeholders of shrimp
farming
Stakeholders’ Stakeholders’ pereption
attitudes ‘Technical knowledge
Ecological/conservation
knowledge
Socio-
cultural Employment
subsystem and equity Employment opportunity
Per capita income
indicators
Organization
al structure Equality in income distribution
Equal access to resources
Fig 1: Selected indicators for assessing sustainability of shrimp aquaculture in Bangladesh.
94