Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AND DEVELOPMENT
AMBEDKAR
before
Columbia University,
New York
(America)
PATRIKA PUBLICATIONS
-*
ROAD, JULLUNDUR
INDIA
(PUNJAB)
Dr. B. R.
AMBEDKAR
OPEN UNIVERSITY
LIBRARY
HYDERABAD-500 033
Printed at
The Awami
Press
Dr. B. R.
LIBRARY
Call No.
.
Author:
Title
:
da
marked below.
i intend to handle. Subtler minds and abler pens than mine have been brought to the task of unravelling the
Subject
mysteries of Castes
the
but unfortunately
it
still
remains in
domain of
I
the
understood/'
am
a hoary institution like Caste, but I am not so pessimistic as to relegate it to the region of the unknowable, for I
believe
it
can bo known.
The
caste
problem
is
vast
it
one,
is
practically.
Practically,
an
a
for
It is
much wider
mischief,
will
India does exist, Hindus "as long as caste hardly or have with outsiders social intercourse any intermarry and if Hindus world migrate to other regions on earth, Indian
;
caste
would become
a great
world problem.
scholars
Theoretically,
it
has
defied
many
who have
selves, as a
the case,
labour of love, to dig into its origion. Such being cannot treat the problem in its entirety. Time,
space ard acumen, 1 am afraid, would ail fail me, if I to do otherwise than limit myself to phase of and spread of the caste it, namely the genesis, mechanism
attcmpi
will strictly observe this rule, and will dwell on system. extraneous matters only when it is necessary to clarify or
I
support a point in
my
thesis.
To proceed with
the subject.
Dravidians, Mongolians and Scythians. All these stocks of people came into India from various directions and with
various cultures, centuries ago,
in
a tribal
turn elbowed their entry into the country by fighting with their predecessors, and after a stomachful of it settled dovvn as peaceful neighbours. Through constant contact and mutual intercourse they evolved a common
state.
They
all in
culture
that superseded
their
distinctive
cultures.
Jk
may
be granted that there has not been a thorough amalgamation of the various stocks that make up the people of India,
and
in
to
the
boundaries of India
marked contrast in physique and even colour to the West, as does the South to the North. But amalgamation can never be the sole criterion of
the East presents a
Ethnically
all
the
unity
of culture that
Taking this for granted, I venture to say that there is no country that can rival the Indian Peninsula with respect to the unity of its culture. It has not only a geographic unity, but it has over and
above
all
a deeper and a
unity-thc
10
But it is because of this homogeneity that Caste becomes a problem so difficult to be explained. If ihc Hindu Society were a mere federation of mutually exclude units
the
would be simple enough. But Ca^te is a an of already homogeneous unit, and the explanaparcelling tion of the genesis of Caste is the explanation of this proees of parcelling.
matter
Before launching into our field of enquiry, it is better I will ourselves regarding the nature of a caste. of a the of few students best ca^te for therefore draw upon
it
:
to advise
their definition of
1.
authority, defi.ies
a caste
as
"a
close
corporation,
in
theory
at
any rate
rigorously hereditary : equipped with a certain traditional and independent organisation, including
a chief and a council, meeting on occasion in assemblies of more or less plenary authority and
joining together at certain festivals
:
bound together
by common
more relate occupations, which food and to particularly to marriage and to of and ceremonial questions pollution, ruling its members by the exercise of jurisdiction, the extent of which varies, but which succeds in making the
the authority of the community more felt by sanction of certain penalties and, above all, by final
irrevocable exclusion from the group."
2.
Mr. Nesfield
defines
a caste as
"a
class
of the
community which disowns any connection with any other class and can neither intermarry nor
eat nor drink
own
community.**
3.
According to Sir. H. Risley, "a caste may be defined as a collection of families or groups of families bearing a common name which usually
denotes or
claiming
is
ancestor, divine, professing the same professional, callings and are regarded by those who are competent to give an opinion
4.
common human or
from
mythical
to follow
as forming a single homogeneous community." Dr. Ketkar defines caste as "a social group having
two
characteristics
(*")
membership
is
confined to
those who are born of members and includes all persons so born () the members are forbidden by an inexorable social law to marry outside the
group."
To
is
of great
importance for
individually the
our purpose.
definitions
little:
much
and
or too
none
the
complete or correct by
point in the
lies
itself
all
have
missed
system.
central
mechanism of
the Caste
an and not as a group within, and with Yet definite relations to, the system of caste as a whole. collectively all of them are complementary to one another,
Their mistake
itself,
in trying to define
caste as
isolated unit by
emphasising what has been obscured in the other. By way of criticism, therefore, I will take only those points common to all Castes in each of the above
each
one
definitions
To
start
He draws
attention to the
be safely said that it is by no means a peculiarity of Caste as sifch. It usually originates in priestly ceremonialism and is a particular case of th^ general
it
may
Consequently its necessary connection with Caste may be completely denied without damaging the working of Caste. The "idea of pollution" has been attached to the institution of Caste, only because the Caste that enjoys the highest rank is the priestly Caste While
belief
in
purity.
we know
therefore
that
priest
We may
is
conclude
the
"idea of
pollution"
characteristic of Caste
flavour.
Mr. Nesfield
only in so far as Caste has a religious in his way dwells on the absence of
teristics.
messing with those outside the Caste as one of its characIn spite of the newness of the point we must
Nesfield has mistaken the effect for the cause.
unit
Members
within
it.
is not Consequently this absence of messing with outsiders due to positive prohibition, but is a natural result of Caste,
i. e.
exclusiveness.
No
doubt
this
due
to
exclusiveness,
a later growth. Sir H. Risley, makes no new point deserving of special attention. We now pass on to the definition of Dr. Ketkar who has done much for the elucidation of the subject. Not
only
is
brought a
critical
acuman and an open mind to bear on his study of Caste* His definition merits consideration, for he has defined Caste
to a system of Castes, and has concentrated his attention only on those characteristics which
in
its
relation
are
in
all
or derivative in character.
must, however, be of thought, lucid and clear as otherwise it is. He speaks of Prohibition of Intermarriage and Membership by Autogeny as the two characteristics of Caste. I submit
that these are
With
and not two different things as Dr. Ketker supposes them to be. If you prohibit inter-marriage the result is that you
limit
the
membership to those born within the group. Thus two are the obverse and the reverse sides of the same
This
evaluation of the various characteristics of
medal.
critical
Caste leave no doubt that prohibition, or rather tlu absence of intermarriage-endogamy, to be concise is the only one
that
can
be
called
the
essence
of Caste when
this
rightly
undertsood.
But
some
may
deny
on
abstract
anthropological grounds for there exist endoganiou> groups without giving rise to problem of Caste. In a general way this may be true, as endogamous societies, culturally
making their abode in localities nv^re or less removed, and having little to do with each other are a The negroes and ths whites and the physical reality. that go various tribal groups by name of American Indians in the United States may be cited as more or less
different,
view. support of this But we must not confuse matters, for in India the situation
appropriate
illustarations
in
is
different.
As pointed
out
before,
The
less fused into occupying one another and do possess cultural unity, which is the only criterion of a homogeneous population. Given this
have more or
homogcnity as a basis Caste becomes a problem altogether new in character and wholly absent in the situation constituted by the mere propinquity of endogamous, social
Caste in India means an artificial chopping population into fixed and definite units, each one prevented from fusing into another through the custom of endogamy. Tiius the conclusion is in evitable that
or tribal groups.
off the
Endogamy
is
the
only
characteristic
that
is
peculiar
to
8
caste,
and
if
we succeed
in
tained,
we
shall practically
the
mechanism of Caste.
It
not be quite easy for you to anticipate why I regard endogamy as a key to the mystery of the Caste system. Not to strain your imagination too much, I will
may
proceed to give you my reasons for it. It may not also be out of place to emphasize at this moment that no civilized society of to-day presents more
survivals
its
is and its tribal code, essentially primitive of the advance of time and civilization, inspite operates in all its pristine vigour even to-day, one of these primitive
religion
survivals,
to
is
v/hich
wish
particularly
attention
the
CUSTOM OF EXOGAMY.
of exogamy in the pimitive words is a fact to need any explanation. With the growth of history, however, exogamy has lost its efficacy, and excepting the nearest blood-kins, there is usually no social bar restricting
the field
of marriage. But regarding the peoples of India the law of exogamy is a positive injunction even to-day.
Indian
society
there
still
savours
;
of
the clan
this
system, even
are
no clans
and
law
of
of
matrimony which
for
it is
round
the
(blood-kins)
.S
not that
SAPINDAS
A GOT R AS
same
sacrilege.
Nothing is therefore more important for you to remember than the fact that endogamy is foreign to the The various GOT R AS of India are and people of India.
have
no exaggeration to say that with the exogamy is a creed and none dare infringe so so much that, inspite of the endogamy of the Castes it, within them exogamy is strictly observed and that there are more rigorous penalties for violating exogamy than are
for violating
endogamy.
the rule
You
with exogamy
consequently in final analysis creation of castes, so for as India is concerned, means the superposition of endogamy on exogamy. However, out in an originally exogamous population an easy working Caste) of of endogamy (which is equivalent to the creation consideration of the in the is is a grave problem, audit of means utilized for the preservation endogamy against
means
fusion.
the
exogamy
problem.
that
we may hope
to
find
the
solution
of our
means
affair.
But
this
is
not
an easy
to
\\ill
it
make
desires
itself
that
desires
endogamous.
groups
If a
group
make
itself
endogamous
against
avail,
intermarriage
especially
if
with outside
exogamy had
of endogamy, prior to the introduction been the rule in all matrimonial relations. in all groups lying in close a
amalgamate,
into
to be strongly
it
Caste formation,
10
le
to prevent marriages Nevertheless, this encircling 11 without creates problems from within which are not
Roughly speaking, in a normal up the two sexes are more or le^s evenly distributed, generally speaking there is an equality between those the same age. The quality is, however, never quite At the same time to the group lized in actual societies. into a caste the manitenance itself is desirous of making equality between the sexes becomes the ultimate goal, without it endogamy can no longer subsist. In other rds, if endogamy is to be preserved conjugal rights from
y
easy of
solution.
.t
have to be provided for, otherwise members of the driven out of the circle to take care of nip will be But in order that the rmselves in any way they can. for be from within, it is to ijugal rights provided numerical a to maintain equality solutely necessary
thin
tween the marriageable units of the two sexes within the nip desirous of making itself into a Caste. It is only rough the maintenance of such an equality that the cessary endogamy of the group can be kept intact, and a
ry large disparity is sure to
break
it.
one of repairing the disparity between the marriageunits of the two sexes within it. Left to nature, the
uch needed parity between the units can be realized only len a couple dies simultaneously. But this is a rare con tin-
The husband may die before the wife and create a who must be disposed of, else through interwoman, rplus in like arriage she will violate the endogamy of the group,
ncy.
11
whom
survive his wife and be surplus man, the group, while it may sympathise with him for the said beravement, has to dispose of, else he will marry outside the
surplus
man and
if
the
not finding suitable partners nside their prescribed circle (and left to themselves they canlot find any, for if the matter be not regulated there can only
>e just
he caste
;ress
s
enough parts to go round) very likely they will transthe boundary, marry outside and import offspring that
is
likely to
do with
SURPLUS
up
We
will
irsttake
>e
She can the case of the SURPLUS of to in so as two different preserve the disposed ways ndogamy of the caste.
First
:
funeral
pyre
of her deceased
This, however, is a rather an the of npracticable way solving problem of sex disparity,
it may not. Consequenthus be disposed of, cannot y every SURPLUS And icause it is an easy solution but a hard realization. the SURPLUS (widow), if not disposed of,
some
cases
it
may
work,
in
others
WOMAN
WOMAN
:
mains
nger.
group but in her very existence lies a double She may marry outside the Caste and violate endomy, or she may marry within the Caste and through comtition encroach upon the chances of marriage that must be
ierved for the potential
re
r
in the
a menace
in
any
case,
if
12
jest of her
The second remedy is to enforce widowhood on her Tor the life. So far as the objective results are concerned,
is
burning
enforcing widowhood.
Burning the
widow
eliminates
all
SURinside
PLUS
creates
WOMAN
no
is
fraught with.
problem
it is
of
remarriage
superior
humane
it
more
it fails
compulsory
is
widowhood
the
woman
increased.
But
this is
able
she
difficulty.
is
by no insuperin which
MAN
(widower)
is
much
of the
itself
difficult
than
that
SURPLUS WOMEN
into a Caste.
in a
group that
desires to
make
From
time immemorial
with
figure
woman
as
is
compared
a dominant
greater
in every
sexes has
prestige.
With
traditional
of
woman
all
or
economic.
Bat
most often above them you cannot accord the same kind
of treatment to a
surplus
man
as
woman
13
The project of burning him with his deceased wife is hazardous in two ways first of all it cannot be done he is a because man. simple Secondly, if done, a sturdy
:
soul
is
lost
to
the Caste.
solutions which can conveniently dispose of him. conveniently, because he is an asset to the group.
say
is to the group, endogamy is still more and must assure both these ends. the solution important, Under these circumstances she may be forced or 1 should say induced, after the manner of the widow, to remain a widower
Important as he
for the
rest
of his
life.
This solution
is
not altogether
difficult, for
some
own
and
its
joys
SURPLUS remains group as an active participator in group activities, he is a danger to the morals of the group. Looked at from different point of view celibacy, though easy in cases where it succeeds, is not so advantageous even then to the
in the
But, given hardly be expected to be realized. very likely to be the case, if the
human nature
as
it
this solution
can
On
as is
MAN
material prospects of the Caste. If he observes genuine celibacy and renounces the world, he would not be a menace
to the preservation of Caste endogamy or caste morals as he undoubtedly would be if he remained a secular person. But as an ascetic celibate he is as good as burned, so far
as the material well-being of his Caste is concerned. Caste, in order that it may be large enough to afford a
vigorous
communal
numerical strength.
life, must be maintained at a certain But to hope for this and to proclaim
14
celibacy
bleeding.
is
the
same as trying
to
cure
atrophy
by
Imposing celibacy on the surplus man in the group, It is in the therefore, fails both theoretically and practically. interest of the Caste to keep him as a grahastha (one who
raises a family), to use a Sanskrit
is
technical
term.
But the
to provide him with a wife from within the Caste. problem At the outset this is not possible, for the ruling ratio in a
caste has to be one
man to one woman and none can have two chances of marriage, for in a Caste thoroughly self-
enclosed there are always just enough marriageable women to go round for the marriageable men. Under these circumstances the surplus man can be provided with a wife only by recruiting a bride from the ranks of those not yet marriageable in order to
tie
him down
is
certainly
the best of the possible solutions in the case of the surplus man. By this, he is kept within the caste. By this means
numerical depletion through constant outflow is guarded against, and by this endogamy and morals are preserved.
It will
now be
erical
two sexes
conveniently main;
tained (1)
(2)
(3)
Burning the widow with her deceased husband Compulsory widowhood a milder form of burning
Imposing celibacy
girl
on the widower
(4)
Wedding him
Though, as I said above, and widow imposing celibacy on the widower are burning the of doubtful service to the group in its endeavour to preserve But means, as its endogamy, all of them operate as Means. What forces, when liberated or set in motion create an end.
to a
then
is
the
15
They
create
endogamy, according to our analysis of the various definitions of caste, are one and the same thing. Thus the existence of these means
these means.
is
This, in
in
my
opinion,
is
the general
a system of castes.
Let us
generalities
their
to the castes in
I
mechanism of a caste turn from these high Hindu Society and inquire into
now
mechanism.
pitfalls
many
tion.
in
in
of those
is
who
try to unfold
the
India to be sure
true
This
is
especially
where there
no authentic
for the
a folly
world
is
an
illusion.
may
true,
But institutions do
like
fossils
that
their
own
hisif
If this is
we
scrutinize
Hindus arrived at to meet the problems of the surplus man and surplus woman.
the solution
Complex though
lar uxrial
it
be in
its
Hindu
customs, namely
(0
widow on
is
not allow-
ed to remarry.
(in)
Girl marriage.
hankering after
16
Sannyasa (renunciation) on the part of the widower, but may in some cases be due purely to psychic disposition.
this-
So
far
of these customs
us
why
tell
A.K. Coomaraswamy,
in the British
Sati
Woman
Socio-
Review, Vol. VI, 1913) because it is a "proof of the perfect unity of body and soul" between husband and wife and of "devotion beyond the grave;" because it embodied
logical
is
well
is
expressed by
Umawhen
it is
woman's honour,
her
and
touching human cry, "I desire not paradise itself if thou are not satisfied with me !" Why compulsory widowhood is
honoured
sang
here to
know
of it, though there are a great many who adin honour of girl marriage is reported Dr. Ketkar be "A really faithful man or to as follows by woman ought not to feel affection for a woman or a man
in praise
it.
The eology
other than
purity
is
the
one with
for that
whom he
the
or she
is
united.
Such
fore marriage,
maiden could be considered pure if she feels love for a man other than one to whom she might be married. As she
does not
not
No
known
it is
to
whom
So
it
she
is
any man at
is
before marriage.
If she
does so,
a sin
know whom
been
awakened
in in her.
*Hence
girl
marriage.
This high flown and ingenious sophistry indicates these institutions were honoured, but does not teil us
they were practised.
why why
My
own
interpretation
is
that they
Jslightwere honoured because they were practised. Any in the 18th century of individualism rise with ly acquainted will appreciate
one
my
remark. At
;
all
times,
it
is
the
movement
it
that
is
most important
and
the philosophies
grow around
long afterwards to justify it and give it a moral support. In like manner I urge that the very fact that these customs were so highly eulogized proves that they needed eulogy for
their prevalence.
T
Regarding the question as to why they that submit arose, they were needed to create the structure of caste and the philosophies in honour of them were
intended to popularize them, or to gild the
say, for they
pill,
as
we might
sense of the unsophisticated that they needed a of sweetening. These customs are essentialy of deal great the nature of means though they are represented as ideals.
the moral
But
not blind us from understanding the results that flow from them. One might safely say that idealization
this should
of means
is
necessary and in
was
per-
haps motivated to endow them with greater efficacy. Calling a means an end does no harm, except that it disguises its
real
character
but
it
that of a
just as
means
You may
call
does not deprive it of its real nature, pass a law that ail cats are dogs
But you can no more the nature of means than change you can turn cats thereby into dogs consequently I am justified in holding that whethere regarded as ends or as means, Sati, enforced widowhood
you can
a means an end.
~"~
18
and girl marriage are customs that were primarily intended to solve the problem of the surplus man and surlus woman in a caste and to maintain its endogamy. Strict
endogamy
could not be preserved without these customs, while caste without endogamy is a fake.
Having
preservation
of Caste
in
India,
The question of origin is always an annoying question and in the study of Caste it is sadly neglected some have connived at it, while others have dodits genesis naturally arises.
;
are puzzled as to whether there could be such ged a thing as the origin of caste and suggest that "if we cannot control our fondness for the word 'origin,' we should better
it.
Some
viz. 'origins
of caste."
As
for myself I
do not
I
feel
have established before, endogamy is the only characteristic of Caste and when I say ORIGIN OF CASTE I mean
in a Society
so
was about to say vulgarized in poligreatly popularised tical orations is the greatest humbug. To say that individuals make up society is trivial ; society is always composed of It may be an exaggeration to assert the theory of classes. class-conflict, but the existence of definite classes in a society
is
fact.
Their basis
may
differ.
a member of a
class.
This
to this rule, and, society could not have been an exception If it not. we bear this was know we of fact, as a matter
19
would be very much facilitated, for we have only to determine what was the class that first made into caste, for class
and
it
only a
A CASTE
IS
AN ENCLOSED
CLASS.
The study of
the origin of caste
answer to the question what is the class that raised this 'enclosure' around itself ? The question may seem too inquisitorial, but it is pertinent, and an answer to this will serve us to elucidate the mystry of the growth and development of castes all over India. Unfortunately a direct answer to
this question
indirectly.
I
is
not within
my power.
can answer
it
only
said just
in question
it
To be
it
true to facts
is
connotes universality
all
of
their prevalence.
These customs in
their
strictness
are obtainable only in one caste, namely the Brahmans, who occupy the highest place in the social hierarchy of the
Hindu
castes
society
is
and as
their prevalence
in
is
Non-Brahman
neither strict nor
complete.
This important fact can serve as a basis of an important observation. If the prevalence of these customs in the non-Brahman Castes is derivative, as can be shown
very easily, when it needs no argument to prove what class the father of the institution of caste. Why the Brahman
is
itself into a caste is a different which be left as an employment for another may question, occassion. But the strict observance of these customs and the
-.social
class
ent
civilizations
superiority arrogated by the priestly class in all anciare sufficient to prove that they were the
20
originators of this
"unnatural institution"
founded
and
now come
my
question of the growth and spread of the caste system all How did the over India. The question 1 have to answer is institution of caste spread among the rest of the Non-Brah:
man
The question of
the spread
of the castes
me,
the question of genesis. And the main cause, as it seems to is that the two questions of spread and of origin are not
separated. This is because of the common belief among scholars that the caste system has either been imposed upon the
law-giver as a divine dispenhas grown according to some law nf social growth peculiar to the Indian people.
sation, or that
it
I first
country
(avatar)
propose to handle the law-giver of India. Every has its law-giver, who arises as an incarnation
in
Manu,
times of emergency to set right a sinning it the laws of justice and morality. the law-giver of India, if he did exist, was certainly
an audacious person. If the story that he gave the law of caste be created, then Manu must have been a dare-devil
fellow
that
accepted
his
dispensation
must be a
different
from
ths one
we
are
acquainted with.
was Given.
It
is
unimaginable that the law of caste hardly an exaggeration to s.iy that Manu
could not have outlived his law, for what is that class status of submit to be that can degraded to the
brutes by the pen of a man, and suffer him to raise another class to the pinnacle ? Unless he was a tyrant who
21
the all in it cannot population subjection be imagined that he could have been allowed to dispense his patronage in this grossly unjust manner, as may be easily seen by a mere glance at his "Institutes". I may seem hard for Mann, but I am sure my force is not strong
held
kill
is
his
ghost.
to,
He
and
lives,
I
like
a disembodied
yet live
appealed
am
afraid will
One
thing I
want to impress upon you is that Manu law of Caste and that he could not do so.
about
upholder of it but it, certainly he did the present order of Hindu
He was an
and
therefore philosphised
not ordain work His ended with the codification of existig caste Society. rules and the preaching of Caste dhanna. The spread and growth of the Caste system is too gigantic, a task to be achieved by the power or cunning of an individual or of
a
I
it
class. Similar in
argument is the theory that the Brahmans After what I have said regarding Manu,
thought and malicious in intent. The been guilty of many things, and I dare say they were, but the imposing of the caste system on the non-Brah;nan p3pulation was beyond their mettle.
incorrect
in
own
confines.
own
it
pattern
How
glorious
its
How
hard
One can
take
very
far.
;
seem to be
unnecessary
for.
There
is
can assure you that it is not uncalled a strong belief in the mind of orthodox Hindus
22
Hindu Society was somehow moulded into the frame work of the Caste System and that it is an organizathat
the tion consciously created
this belief exist, but
it
it
by the Shastras. Not only does being justified on the ground that
it is
and the Shastras cannot be wrong. I have urged so much on the adverse side of this attitude, not because the religious sanctity is grounded on scientific basis, nor to help those
reformers
who
it.
make
is
it
unmake
My aim
to
show the
falsity
Thus
in solving the
probably not
spread of Castes in India. Western scholars, much given to hero worship, have attempted
other explanations. The nuclei, round which have "formed'* the various castes in India, are according to them:
(1) occupation
(3)
;
(2)
the rise of
new
(4)
cross-breeding and
(5)
migration.
these nuclei
do not
in
peculair to
India. If they are not peculair to India, but are common to the world, why is it that that did not "form" caste on other
parts of this planet? Is it because those parts are holier than the land of the Vedas, or that the professors are
mistaken ?
am afraid
is
the truth.
Inspite of the
high
by the
based on one
23
close
they are nothing more than filling what Matthew Arnold means by 4t the grand name without the grand thing in it." Such are the various theories of caste advanced by Sir Denzil Ibbetson, Mr. To criticise them in Nesfield, Mr. Senart and Sir H. Risley.
illustrations
examination
a lump would be to say that they are a disguised form of of formal logic. To illustrate Mr.
:
was the "function and function only foundation upon which the whole system of Caste in Irdia was built up." But he may rightly be reminded that he does not very much advance our thought by making the
practically
amounts
to saying
that
very poor
are functional or occupational, which is a We have yet to know from Mr. discovery
!
Nesfield why is it that an occupational group turned into an occupational caste ? I would cheerfully have undertaken the task of dwelling on the theories of other ethnologists,
had
it
the
fact
that
Mr. Nesfield's
is
typical one.
Without
explain
the
in
stopping
caste
to
criticize
those
natural
theories
that
occuring
as
phenomenon
as
disintegration,
explained by Herbert Spencer in his formula of evolution, or as natural as "the structural differentiation within an
organism" to employ the phraseology of orthodox apologists, or as early attempt to test the laws of eugenics-as all belonging to the same class of fallacy which regards the
caste system as inevitable,
in anticipation of these laws on a helpless and humble population, I will now lay before you ray own vievv on the
24
subject.
We
the
shall
be well advised to
recall at
Hindu
society, in
common
and
the
with
other societies,
was
of classes
earliest
(2)
known
are the
priestly class:
the Kshatriya, or
:
(3)
the Vaisya,
and
(4) the
Sudra,
or
the
artisan
and
menial
class.
to be paid to
in
class
system,
which
was when
qualified, could change their class, and therefore classes did change their personnel. At some time in the history of the
itself
from the
of the body of people and through a closed-door policy became a caste by itself. The other classes being
subject
differentiation,
some
into large,
minute
groups. The Vaishya ?nd Sudra classes were the original inchoate plasm, which formed the sources of the numerous
castes
of to day.
could
As
easily lend
class
itself to very
have
differentiated
and
administrators.
This sub-division of a society is quite natural. But unnatural thing about these sub-divisions is that they the
have lost the open door character of the class system and have become self-enclosed units called castes. The question
were they compelled to close their doors and become endogamous or did they close them of their own accord ?
is
:
is
SOME
OTHER FOUND
IT
CLOSED
25
AGAINST THEM.
a psychological interpretation and the other is mechanistic, but they are complementary and both are necessary to explain the phenomena of casteis
The one
formation in
I
its entirety.
will
first
take
up
the psychological
in
interpretation.
is
:
to answer
this
connection
please,
Why
classes, if
you
industrial
become self-enclosed or endogumous ? My answer is because the Brahmans were so. Endogamy or the closed-door system, was a fashion in the Hindu
.Society,
had originated from the Brahman caste it was whole heartedly imitated by all the non Baahman in their turn, became endogasub-divisions or classes, who,
and as
it
"the infection of imitation' that caught all these sub-divisions on their onward march of differentia-
mous
castes.
It is
tion
castes.
The propensity to
need imitate is a deep-seated one in the human mind and formation the for not be deemed an inadequate explanation of the various castes in India. It'isj so deep seated that of Walter Bagehot argues that we must not think
imitation as voluntary, or even conscious.
it
On
the contrary
has
its
seat
mainly
far
in
whose notions, so
are hardly
felt
to exist, so far
from being consciously produced, from being conceived, before The main seat of the at the time.
is
our
belief,
us to believe that disposing us to believe this or disinclining nature. But as to the are among the obscurest parts of our
no doubt." *
This
26
propensity to imitate hasjbeen
study by Gabriel
imitation.
Tarde,
scientific
laws of
One of his
three laws
from
the higher to the lower or, to quote his own words, "Given the opportunity, a nobility will always and everywhere imitate its leaders, its kings or sovereigns, and the people likewise, given the opportunity, its nobility."** Another of Trade's laws of imitation is that the extent or intensity of
:
imitation varies inversely in proportion to distance, or in his own words "the thing that is most imitated is the most
superior one of those that are nearest. In fact, the influence of
the model's example as well as directly to
is
DISTANCE
understood
its
superiority.
Distance
is
here in its However distant in space sociological meaning. a stranger may be, he is close by, from this point of view, if
daily relations with him and if we have every facility to This satisfy our desire to imitate him. law of the imitation of the nearest, of the least distant, explains the gradual and consecutive character of the spread of an example that has been set the social
by
higher
ranks."* In order to prove my thesis-which really needs no proofthat some castes were formed by imitation, the best way, it seems to me, is to find out whether or not the vital condition
for the formation
Society.
The conditions
imitation,
according to this
That the source of imitation the group and (2) that there must be
(1)
relations'
among members of
ed. p. 21
group.
of Imitation, Tr.
ibid. p.
234
27
in
India there
is
little
a demi-god.
prestige
is
Brahman is a semi-god and very nearly He sets up a mode and moulds the rest. His
is
unquestionable and
and good.
Can such
being,
idolised
by Scriptures and
fall to project his
personality on the suppliant humanity ? Why, if the story be true, he is believed to bs the very end of creation. Such
but at worthy of more than mere imitation, enclosure, least of imitation; and if he lives in an endogamous Be should not the rest follow his example ? Frail humanity
a creature
is
!
it
it
embodied
succumbs.
house-maid,
is
cannot be otherwise.
Imitation
easy and
invention
is difficult.
Yet another way of demonstrating the play of imitation in the formation of castes is to understand the attitude of non-Brahman classes towards those customs which supported
the structure of caste in
of history,
it
became
nascent days until, in the course embedded in the Hindu mind and
its
day without any support for now it needs In but no prop belief-like a weed on the surface of a pond. in the Hindu a caste a way, but only in a way, the status of of Society varies directly with the extent of the observance
the customs of SATI, enforced widowhood, and girl marriage. But observance of these customs varies directly with the DISTANCE (I am using the word in the Tardian sense) that
Those castes that are nearest to the Brahmans have imitated all the three customs and insist on the strict observance thereof. Those that are less near have imitated enforced widowhood and girl marriage ; others, a
separates the caste.
little
and those
furthest
,28
off have imitated only the belief in the caste principle.
This
imperfects imitation. I dare say, is due partly to what Tarde calls 'distance' and partly to the barbarous character of
these customs.
This phenomenon
is
a complete illustration
that
is
process
no
in
doubt
India
the whole
process of
imitation
I
will
turn
of the higher by the lower. At this juncture back to support a former conclusion of
mine, which might have appeared to you as too sudden or unsupported. I said that the Brahman class first raised the structure of caste by the help of those three customs in
question.
My
was derivative.
After what
have
customs among the non-Brahman castes, as means or as ideals, though the imitaters have not been aware of it, they
exist
amsng th^m
as derivatives
and,
there
high enough to have served as a pattern for the rest. But in theocratic society, who could be the pattern but the servant
of
God
This completes the story of those that were weak enough Let us now see how others were closed
This
It
I call the
mechanistic
is
mechanistic because
of approach, as well as the of the subject has psychological one, to the explanation escaped my predecessors is entirely due to the fact that they have conceived Caste as a unit by itself and not as one within
inevitable.
That
this line
System of Caste.
The
result of this
oversight or lack of
29
sight has been very detrimental to the proper understanding of the subject matter and therefore its correct explanation. I will proceed to offer my own explanation by making one
remark which
It is this
:
urge you to bear constantly in mind. that caste in the singular number is an unI will
Castes exist only in the plural number. no such thing as A caste there are always castes. illustrate while To my meaning making themselves into a caste, the Brahmans, by virtue of this, created Non-Brahman caste or, to express it in my own way, while closing themreality.
There
is
T will clear in they closed others out. my point by taking another illustration. Take India as a whole with its various communities designated by the various creeds to
selves
wit,
the
Hindus,
Muham-
Parsis.
Now,
barring the
non-caste communi-
Again,
if
if
the
four enclose
themselves,
closed out,
Symbolically
group A
Now apply the same logic to the Hindu Society and you have another explanation of the 'fissiparious' character of caste, as a consequence of the virtue of self-duplication that
is
inherent
it.
Any
the ethical,
religious
and
likely to ba tolerated by ths Caste, and the recalcitrant members of a Caste are in danger of being thrown out of the Caste, and left to their own fate without having the alternative of bdng admitted into or absorbed by other castes. Caste rales are inexorable and they do not wait to make
30
nice distinctions between kinds of offence.
Innovation
may
kinds will suffer the same penalty. novel way of thinking will create a new Caste for the old ones will not tolerate it. The noxious thinker respectfully
all
called
Guru (Prophet) suffers the same fate as the sinners in The former creates a caste of the nature illegitimate love.
of a religious set and the latter a type of mixed caste. Castes have no mercy for a sinner who has the courage to violate
the code.
The penalty
It
is
is
is
a new
far
caste.
that
;
very quite willing to be humble members of some caste (higher by But preference) if they could be admitted within its fold.
from
it.
On
the contrary,
and
it
is
excommunicated to make
logic
in
The
it
of this obdurate
its
cir-
cumstance
that
is
merciless,
and
is
obedience to
force
find
cause others in enclosing, themselves have closed them out, with the result that new groups (formed on any basis
obnoxious to
the
caste
rules)
constantly being converted into castes This is told the second tale multiplicity.
summarise the main points of my thesis. In my opinion there have been several mistakes committed by the Students of Caste, which have misled them in their investigations. European Students of Caste have unduly emphasised the role of colour in the caste system. Themselves impregnated by colour prejudices, they very readily imagined
it
Now to
to
31
in the
Caste problem.
correct when he whether they belonged to (he socalled Aryan race, or the so-called Dravidian race, were Aryas." Whether a"tribe or a family was racially Aryan or
truth,
insists that "all the princes
from the
Dravidian was ^question which never troubled the people of India, until foreign scholars came in and began to draw the line. The colour of the skin had long ceased to be a matter of importance.
Again, they have mistaken mere descriptions
for explanation and fought over
theories of origin.
them as though they were There are occupational, religious, etc., castes it is true, but it is no means an explanation of the We have yet to find out why occupational origin of Caste.
this question has never even been ; but Lastly they have taken Caste very lightly as though a breath had made it, On the contrary, Caste, as I have explained it, is almost impossible to be sustained : for the
are tremendous.
It
is
true that
Caste
relies
on
belief,
needs to be
perpetuated and fortified. My study of the Caste problem involves four main points (1) That inspite of the composite make up of the Hindu population there is a deep cultural unity (2) That caste is a parcelling into bits of a larger cultural unit (3) That there was one caste to start with (4) That
:
classes
munication.
Peculiar interest attaches to the problem of Caste in India today ; as persistent attempts are being made to do away with this unnatural institution. Such attempts at reform,
32
however, have aroused a great deal of controversy regarding its origin, as to whether it is due to the conscious command
of a Supreme Authority, or
life
of a
who
its
is an unconscious growth in the under society peculiar circumstances. Those hold the latter view will, I hope, find some food for
human
in the
thought
Apart fiom
all
an
absorbits
ing
problem
and
interest
aroused
in
me
regarding
moved me
to put before
you some
not,
may be
supported.
in
am
how-
any way final, or presumptuous as to think them to a discussion of the contribution a more than anything
subject.
It
seems to
me
on
wrong lines, and the primary object of the paper is to indicate what I regard to be the right path of investigation, with
a view to arrive at a serviceable truth.
We
must, however,
guard against approaching the subject with a bias. Sentiment must be outlawed from the domain of science and things
shovld be judged from an objective standpoint. For myself I shall find as much pleasure in a positive destruction of my
own
idealogy,
as
in
which, notwithstanding
many
learned disquisitions
is
likely
I
To
conclude, while
am
can be shown
it
up.
English
Annihilation of Cast
L
]
Rs.
P.
5
/*
00
30
Gandhi
& Gandhinl\^\
Ace.
No
/O 2
00
50
2 Ranade, Gandhi & Jinnah^ * Mr. Gandhi & the EmancipatTSl?5Rfi?TJntouchablcs ' 2 * Castes in India : their Mechanism, Genesis and Development * The Rise and fall of Hindu woman * Thus Spoke Ambedkar Vol. I 5 (Selected Speeches-2nd Edition)
* *
50
75 50
00
Thus Spoke Ambedkar (Vol. II) Thus Spoke Ambedkar (Vol. Ill) Hindi
tew
ft
snriFf 5Tff
50
6
00
00
00
Punjabi * Dr. Ambedkar Jiwan Ate Mission (By L. R. Bailey) 10 * Ranade Gandhi Ate 2 Jinnah
Urdu
*Jat- Pat Ka Nash
41
Ranade, Gandhi Aur Jinnah For more books by and about Dr. B. R.
5 2
00 00
AMBEDKAR,
Subscribe to
BHEEM PATRIKA