Teacher Three Year Review Cycle

(Minnesota Statutes 122A.40 and 122.41)

Coordinates staff development and teacher evaluation

Individual Growth and Development Plan with iObservation including Student engagement

Participate in PLC

Aligned with MN Standards for Effective Practice (iObservation)

Individual Growth and Development Plan with iObservation including Student engagement Participate in PLC PLC writes and works on SMART goal using achievement data Includes Achievement Data Peer Review Evaluation

Year 1

PLC writes and works on SMART goal using achievement data

Includes Achievement Data Peer Review Evaluation

Year 2
Year 3

Individual Growth and Development Plan with iObservation including student engagement Participate in PLC PLC writes and works on SMART goal using achievement data

Summative Evaluation *iObservation by principal/Dir of Sp Services/ Other admin supervisor *35% Based on Achievement Data *Longitudinal data on student engagement (Teacher also has the option to present a portfolio)

Peer Review

Joint Agreement with school board and teachers union

Teacher saves components in iObservation Teacher tracks achievement using data in PLC Teacher takes the Self Assessment in iObservation

Individual Growth and Development Plan

Staff Development Time Provided

Teacher reviews goals/monitors progress/gets feedback from Peer Reviewer in PLC

Teacher writes a Professional Development Goal & Student Engagement Goal

Principal Reviews Goals

How Does This Process Fit for Special Education?

Evaluation process should match general education process as closely as possible Student achievement data used may vary depending on your job Who is the student when measuring achievement and engagement? How and when do we do peer review in a PLC with someone in a like job? How do we show we are accountable in our PLC time?