Harris Chapter 2 The goal ofwriting is not the have the final word on a subject , to bring the discussion

to a close, but to push it forward, to say something new, something that seems to call for further work and talking (35-6) In conversation your opinion may differ or align it doesnt matter, you are presenting an idea. In debate you are definitely negating. The idea is getting passed around and changed a bit. The third reader is everybody else. Moves down the line, it never goes backwards, so the new person (third reader) gets a taste. Not writing for the author, writing for the people reading our response. Far more narcissistic. REPURPOSEING RECYCLING USING IT IN A NEW WAY FOR YOUR OWN USE YES YOU MUST AGREE

YES AND AND= ILLUSTRATING, AUTHORIZING, BORROWING, EXTENDING

I WANT A PARLOR IN MY HOUSE!!!!!!!

OR MAYBE OPEN A PARLOR HAHA QUOTE #7: Extending another text can be risky work. There is always the chance that youll go too far, misappropriate the ideas or phrasings of another writer. . . . But I also think it is precisely the willingness to take such chances, to rewrite the terms and ideas of others, to make them your own, that so often makes extending such a salient move in ambitious intellectual prose (51-2). Harris defines ambitious intellectual prose. You thought of something that is so different but so important and IMPORTANT TO SHARE. I cant do this best. Changing the realm. This si his idea of inflection, a turning point in which the writer takes a surprising and very alternative view on a text. Not extending the idea is not commenting, and not forwarding. If not extending, not adding, not writing, Selecting excerpting, commenting, inflecting