Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

The above invention was created by student #26 and is example of a student who met expectations.

This student has an excellent construction that shows his ability to manipulate and utilize shapes however he did not accurately label each shape he used. For example he used two circles but does not label the circles, he also writes he used two squares but there are three squares in his invention. For accuracy of shapes used, he received a three out of four points and on mathematical terminology and notation, he also received a three out of four points. I am sure if I sat down with him and asked him if he used circles, he would very easily be able to point out the circles in his invention. That is why constant communication is important in the classroom. His invention is very neat he used the shapes appropriately to create an invention. His Ashley Farrens, Geometry Unit, Spring 2014 Page 126

invention is so cleaver; he used trapezoids as fingers on the hand, which I thought, was such a wonderful idea. For shapes used and construction materials, he received a four out of four. Giving student #26 a 14/16 meaning, he meet expectations. Below is a rubric displaying the students score. Performance Rubric Student #26 3 2
Almost all shapes are recorded accurately. One or two errors. Most shape are recorded accurately. Two or more errors.

Category
Accuracy of Shapes Used (Content)

4
All math shapes are recorded accurately.

1
NO shapes are reported OR most are inaccurately reported. Three or more errors. There is little use, or a lot of inappropriate use, of terminology and notation.

Mathematical Terminology and Notation

Correct terminology and notation are always used, making it easy to understand what was done. Appropriate shapes were selected and creatively modified in ways that made them even better. Great care taken in construction process so that the structure is neat, and attractive.

Shapes Used

Construction Materials

Correct terminology and notation are usually used, making it fairly easy to understand what was done. Appropriate shapes were selected and there was an attempt at creative modification to make them even better. Construction was careful and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.

Correct terminology and notation are used, but it is sometimes not easy to understand what was done. Appropriate shapes were selected.

Inappropriate shapes were selected and contributed to a product that performed poorly. Construction appears careless or haphazard. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.

Construction accurately followed the plans, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.

Ashley Farrens, Geometry Unit, Spring 2014

Page 127