about feelings of discomfort. It is important to remember that learning takes place one building block at a time and this course was no different. As I progressed onto the assessment design I was reminded that Common Core Assessment was already a part of my curriculum, but I was not using it to its full potential. In designing the assessment with my team, I realized that the goal wasnt to just finish the test with the correct answers, but to achieve mastery with an intelligent dialogue along with way. Out team designed an assessment piece that built upon the knowledge of the previous gradespan. Each component took a story problem and then extended the questions to different achievement levels across the gradespans. In hindsight, I should have used each assessment piece across the grade levels to dialogue with the Algebra 1 students that I interacted with. I would have liked to see how they would have solved each problem, step by step. For the error analysis piece(Bamberger,Oberdorf,Schultz-Ferrell,2010), I chose the concept of addition and subtraction and how they relate to one another. A common error that my First Graders have had in the past is that they do not understand the concept of inverse operation. I used this as a focus to help them overcome this obstacle. The Common Core Math Curriculum is new to me this year and I am still learning all the elements. I did note that the teachers manual has a section on error intervention for each lesson. Although emphasizing inverse operations was important, I also should have used the curriculums intervention strategies too. It suggested that if students reversed the order of a number sentence, ask them what would they find if they added the numbers together, and then have them draw a comparison picture to solve the problem. I also think that I should refer to the error intervention each day as I begin the new lesson. In the future my goal should be mastery of each concept as opposed to filling out each blank. In evaluating the assessment given for the addition/subtraction topic, the performance assessment portion had several steps to it. A few of the teachers from Sierra Middle School came over to teach the K-3 grades for their assignment. I had them use the same assessment and it was interesting to see their perspective on it. Even though it was a paper assessment, one of the instructors used actual blocks for the question. The use of blocks enhanced the students understanding. Although I use manipulatives regularly, I dont normally use them on assessments. Another personal goal would be to work the performance task assessments prior to administering the test so that I can see what possible errors might occur and help present it in a meaningful way. An additional piece of helpful information was from the assessment data assignment. As I examined the information, I noticed that the majority of my parents educational level was in the middle range, meaning they have some college education. This was also true on the district level. I tend to focus my instruction to the students in the middle range as I have 30 children. Targeting instruction for each level is a challenge. Another goal for me will be to design instruction to reach the lower and upper level students through small groups. My students are already grouped according to abilities for their reading levels and I hope to use this to their advantage for the math groups too. In conclusion, as I examine learning trajectories (Confrey, Maloney,Nguyen,2011)for elementary grades, I am reminded of the importance of foundational skills. Before students can progress onto the next math concept, they must have an understanding of the skill needed to progress to the next level. Although I literally use building blocks in my classroom at times, the necessity of using building blocks in my instruction should always be in the forefront of my mind. I always want to remember that my students need those basic skills in order to be successful in their own mathematical practice.