INSTITUTO PROFESIONAL YTCNICO FERNANDO DE LESSEPS

Teacher.:Alexander quiner! ""# INDUSTRIAL AREA.

CO$E%ALUATION: Oral &re'enai!n'. () PTS
Crieria Below expected level(5pts) At expected level(3pts) Above expected level(1pts)
Inr!duci!n !*
!&ic
Topic introduced. Topic introduced clearly, and purpose of
talk was ade clear.
Topic introduced clearly and in an
interestin! way. "urpose of talk was ade
clear. #utline of points was !iven.
De+el!&,en !*
!&ic
$oe understandin! of topic s%own.
$oe links and connections ade
between ideas. "oints are usually
developed wit% iniu detail.
&nforation is usually relevant.
'ood understandin! of topic s%own. (inks
and connections between ideas ade
clear. &nforation was relevant and
expressed in own words. "oints were
developed wit% sufficient and appropriate
details.
A very !ood understandin! of t%e topic
s%own. (inks and connections between
ideas ade clear. &nforation was
relevant and well expressed in own
words. "oints were well)or!anised and
developed wit% sufficient and appropriate
details.
A-ili. ! en/a/e
and in+!l+e
audience
$oe eye contact was ade.
Tec%ni*ues used to en!a!e audience
were inial, or ainly ineffective.
An interestin! approac% taken to topic.
$peaker used tec%ni*ues suc% as visual
aids and props, anecdote, surprisin!
facts, direct audience participation.
$peaker onitored audience and adapts
presentation accordin!ly. An interestin! or
ori!inal approac% taken to t%e topic.
$peaker used tec%ni*ues suc% as visual
aids and props, anecdote, %uour,
surprisin! facts, direct audience
participation.
%!ca-ular.0
'enence
'rucure0
/ra,,ar
T%e vocabulary of t%e presentation was
ainly appropriate for t%e topic. T%e
presentation content was occasionally
!raatically correct.
T%e vocabulary of t%e presentation was
appropriate for t%e topic. $entence
structures were usually correct. T%e
presentation content was usually
!raatically correct.
T%e vocabulary of t%e presentation was
appropriate for t%e topic. A variety of
p%rases and sentence structures were
used. T%e presentation content was
!raatically correct.
Pr!nunciai!n
"ronunciation occasionally correct, but
often %esitant and inaccurate.
"ronunciation and intonation is usually
correct.
"ronunciation and intonation is correct
and confident.
111.educai!n.+ic./!+.au2lan/ua/e'!nline
U'e !* +i'ual
aid'
+o visual aids were used, #-
.isual aids were occasionally appropriate
and related to t%e spoken essa!e.
.isual aids supported t%e presentation
effectively. T%ey clarified and reinforced
t%e spoken essa!e.
.isual aids were carefully prepared and
supported t%e presentation effectively.
T%ey clarified and reinforced t%e spoken
essa!e. T%e aids added ipact and
interest to t%e presentation.
C!nclu'i!n !*
!&ic
An attept was ade to conclude t%e
presentation.
T%e presentation was sued up clearly. T%e presentation was sued up clearly
and effectively, wit% key points
ep%asised.
An'1erin/
que'i!n' *r!,
audience
+ot all *uestions could be answered.
/uestions answered wit% difficulty, and
little knowled!e of t%e topic was
deonstrated.
0ost *uestions answered.
Answers s%owed !ood knowled!e and
understandin! of t%e topic. (an!ua!e was
ainly correct.
/uestions answered wit% little difficulty.
.ery !ood knowled!e of t%e topic was
deonstrated. (an!ua!e was correct and
fluent.
111.educai!n.+ic./!+.au2lan/ua/e'!nline