Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
/c)
Concrete 30000 2.48E+07 0.16 9.89E-06
Hdpe 20000 8.00E+05 0.42 3.59E-05
Column
4m 4m
)
Fig 3: Arrangement of bubbles in the slab
25mm
HU! 180mm
Buuule deck Iulliull Sclid porion
Fig 4: Simplifed bubble deck shell layers
V. RESULTS
_.
mm
Density
(kN/m
3
)
25
10.01
230mm
The deformations developed in the solid slab are
comparatively less than the bubble deck slab the variations are
ISBN: 978-81-909042-2-3 2012 IEEE
IEEE-Interational Conference On Advances In Engineering, Science And Management (lCAESM -2012) March 30, 31, 2012 387
shown in fg 5 whereas the stresses developed in the solid slab
are comparatively higher in case of solid slab the variations are
shown in fg 6. The moments developed in xx direction (MIl),
in y direction (M22), in xy direction (M12), the shear forces
developed in xz direction (V13), in yz direction (V23), the
maximum stresses that are developed in the slab (SMA), and
the defections (U3) are shown in table 6.
VI. CONCLUSION
The market of construction foors in the building industry
consists mainly of massive concrete foors, prefabricated
fligree slab foors and hollow core slab foors. This situation
has not changed for more than 20 years. But this innovative
slab construction technology is proven to be more effcient
than a traditional biaxial concrete slab in an offce foor
system. The fnite element models of the offce slabs created
for this study in SAP2000 verif the prior analysis and
experiments.
A.Bending stresses in the bubble deck slab are found to be
6.43% lesser than that of a solid slab.
B.Defection of Bubble deck is 5.88% more than the solid slab
as the stiffess is reduced due to the hollow portion
C. Shear resistance of bubble deck slab is 0.6 times the shear
resistance of the solid slab of same thickness. However
required resistance can be achieved by providing vertical
reinforcement.
D. Weight reduction is 35% compared to solid slab.
of the other foor systems, solving all problems caused
by their disadvantages in the same time. Besides that the new
foor system enhances the structural possibilities in
combination with an improved cost-effectiveness. Further on
the foor system gives a tremendous contribution to sustainable
development.
Solid stress Bubble stress
Fig 6: stresses in Solid slab Vs Bubble deck slab
Solid slab Bubble deck slab
Fig 5: Deformation of Solid slab Vs Bubble deck slab
This innovative slab system with considerable reduction in
self-weight and savings in materials combines all advantages
Table 6
Forces and stresses developed in the bubble and solid deck slabs
MIl (kN- M22 (kN- M12 (KN- SMA
U3
m) m) m)
V13 (kN) V23 (kN)
(kN/m
2
)
(m)
Solid slab -17.694 -17.694 -13.496 -340.047 -339.469 7473.20 -0.016
Bubble deck -16.623 -16.623 -11.65 -305.896 -305.434 6992.29 -0.017
slab
% difference 6.05% 6.05% 13.68% 10.29% 10.029% 6.43% 5.88%
RFERENCES
ISBN: 978-81-909042-2-3 2012 IEEE
IEEE-Interational Conference On Advances In Engineering, Science And Management (lCAESM -2012) March 30, 31, 2012 388
[I] Tina Lai "Structural behavior of bubble deck slab and their applications
to lightweight bridge decks" ,M.Tech thesis, MIT, 2009.
[2] Sergiu Cal in, Ciprian Asavoaie and N. Florea, "Issues for achieving an
experimental model" Bul. Inst. Polit. lai, t. LV (LIX), f 3, 2009.
[3] Martina Schnellenbach-Held and Karsten Pfefer,"Punching behavior of
biaxial hollow slabs" Cement and Concrete Composites, Volume 24,
Issue 6, Pages 551-556, December 2002.
[4] Sergiu Calin, Roxana Glntu and Gabriela Dascalu, "Summary of tests
and studies done abroad on the Bubble deck slab system", The Buletinul
Institutului Politehnic din lai, t. LV (LIX), f 3, 2009.
[5] Sergiu Calin and Ciprian Asavoaie, "Method for Bubble deck slab
concrete slab with gaps", The Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din lai,
LV (LTX), f 2,2009.
[6] Sergiu Cal in, C. Mugurel, G. Dascalu, C Asavoaie, "Computational
simulation for concrete slab with spherical gaps", Proceedings of The
8-th International Symposium, Concepts in Civil Engineering, Ed.
Societatii Academice "Matei-Teiu Botez", 2010, pp. 154-161.
[7] BubbleDeck voided Flat Slab Solutions- Technical Manual and
Documents, Version:5, Issue 1, BubbleDeck UK, White Lodge,
Wellington Road, St Saviour, JERSEY, C.1.,2008,Available:
www.BubbleDeck-UK.com.
[8] BubbleDeck Engineering Design & Properties Overview - Technical
Manual and Documents, Issue 3, BubbleDeck UK, White Lodge,
Wellington Road, St Saviour, JERSEY,C.1.,2007,Available:
www.BubbleDeck-UK.com.
[9] BubbleDeck Acoustic Tests and Reports, Issue:4,BubbleDeck UK,
White Lodge, Wellington Road, St Saviour, JERSEY,
C.T.,2006,Available: www.BubbleDeck-UK.com
[10] BubbleDeck Fire resistance Tests and Reports, Test Report
D3,BubbleDecak UK, White Lodge, Wellington Road, St Saviour,
JERSEY, C.1.,2002,Available: www.BubbleDeck-UK.com
P. Prabhu1eja,P.VijayKumar, S. Anusha, CH. Mounikaare fnal year
B.Tech students of KLUniversity. student members of Cafet Inn ova
Technical Society and American Society for Civil Engineers ( ASCE), had
given fve technical paper presentations at various collages during the year
2008 to 2011, have selected for Ultratech National level quiz, had given a
presentation at National seminar Conducted by UGC at Acharya Nagarjuna
University, organisers of an International conference Advances in Civil
Engineering 2011 held at KL University. P Prabhu Teja got third rank in the
YubaRatna conducted by Birla white Cement.
Dr. Purnachandra Saha got his PhD Degree fom TTT Bombay. The aea of
specialization is earthquake engineering and structural control. The title of the
thesis is "Seismic Control of Benchmark Cable Stayed bridge".He is member
of ASCE, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Cafet Innova
technical Society and Institution of Engineers (India).
Dr. Saha has worked in Multinational company (mainly design of power plant
and petrochemical structure before completing his doctoral degree.
ISBN: 978-81-909042-2-3 2012 IEEE