Is the humanity of the Logos merely something foreign which has been assumed, or

, is it precisely that which comes into being when the Logos ex-presses himslef
into the non-divine?
The relation which exists between the two is more essential and more intimate. H
uman nature in general is a possible object of the creative knowledge and power
of God, because and insofar as the Logos is by nature the one whoe is "utterable
" (even into that which is not God); because he is the Father's Word, in which t
he Father can express himself, and, freely, empty himself into the npn-divine; b
ecuase, when this happens, that precisely is born which we call human nature.
Man is possible because the exteriorization of the Logos is possible.