difference How will it affect the cavity preparation

1-bulbous in shape(narrow occlussal table) duw to

convergence of walls
Width of isthmus portion in class II is half
intercuspal distance
2- uniform thickness of enamel Shallower cavity(1.5mm) just 0.5 below DEJ+1mm
in enamel(thats y we use 330 bur)
3-pulp horns are higher and pulp chamber is wider Concave pulpal floor in class I to avoid pulp
exposure
4-enamel rods are sloped occlussaly No need for beveling the gingival seat in class II
5-constricted neck Placing gingival seat just below contact area
6- cervical bulge mesialy Use the T-band in class II instead of tofflimier
matrix