Purpose Statement ~ To make a recommendation on the importance of choosing the right service provider for elevator maintenance.
Problem Statement Elevator Brand & Specifications : Brand : Mitsubishi Lift No. : L1,L2,L3(BOMBA) Type : Hoisting Rope Model : CN-11S Car Ceiling Current service provider : TZF Elevator Service & Maintenance Sdn Bhd
~ Those are the reason & impact why the current elevator maintenance service provider have to be change to the original service provider for safety purposes.
1) Not competent and not experts with the elevator brand Didnt use an original parts Short lifespan Short term warranty Cost increased to change for a new parts Susceptible to damage Easily damaged 2) Have to wait for the right person to come and repair The technician can do servicing work only not repair They have to call the experts on the specific elevator brand if the elevator breakdown and it will take some time for them to arrive and some other cases takes several days which interfere the daily operations. 3) Irresponsible and no honesty We have spotted that some of the parts were missing Parts also been exchange They are also modified the parts but claims new to us 4) Unprofessional No call centre that manage the emergency calls. They give the technician number for in case of breakdown The emergency calls cannot be reached (Dialled the emergency number) and the excuse they gave is on the motorbike.
Scope of Report ~ The purpose statement ~ The problem statement ~ The recommendations options ~ Comparison & Contrast of the recommendations options ~ Conclusions
2 Improvement Recommendations Options First, use the original service provider which is Mitsubishi Elevator (M) Sdn Bhd not the 3 rd party service provider Second, monitor the service provider work by using a checklist and eye monitoring
Comparison & Contrast Chart Description Mitsubishi Service TZF Service Professional Reliability Cost Efficient Ability
Conclusions Descriptions Option 1 Option 2 Term
~ Based on the above, we conclude that Option 1 is more effective than Option 2 because it is more real and can be done effectively. By choosing option 2, there maybe a lot of problem will arise/occur that can threaten the safety of users.