Ideas The writer worked towards using different kinds of information to teach about the subject, but the reader may be left with questions.
The writers could present information in a way that is more understandable. Presented facts and opinions may be confusing for the reader.
The writer is developing the ability to convey factual information using details that made sense to the reader. Text features may have been over or underused.
The writer is developing the use of different kinds of information to teach about the subject. More inclusion of little essays, stories, or how-to-sections could help the reader learn about the subject.
The writer is developing the ability to make the information understandable to readers by summarizing background information or referring to earlier parts. Readers may have questions differentiating facts from the writers opinion.
The writer did make choices about how to convey information so that it made sense to the readers, however some parts needed more facts and details or could have been supported with more intentional text features.
The writer used different kinds of information to teach about the subject. Sometimes the writer included little essays, stories, or how-to-sections.
The writer worked to make the information understandable to readers. To do this, the writer may have referred to earlier parts of the text and summarized background information. The writer let readers know when he/she was discussing the facts and when he/she was offering his/her own thinking.
The writer not only made choices about which details and facts to include but also made choices about how to convey information so it would make sense to readers. The writer blended storytelling, summary, and other genres as needed and used text features. The writer used different kinds of compelling information to teach about the subject. The writer included little essays, stories, or how-to-sections in the writing that added interest and insight for the reader.
The writers made the information understandable by referring to earlier text and summarizing background information. The writer clearly distinguished facts from own thinking and offered interesting writing techniques to engage the reader.
The writer strategically included facts and details that not only made sense to the reader but also conveyed the information in a way that maintained the readers interest. The writer used a variety of writing techniques and text features to engage the reader.
Organization The writer wrote a beginning that informed the reader of the subject being presented, but the reader may need a clearer roadmap for the order of the presented information.
The writer used some transitional phrases to show sequence, but more deliberate or varied transitions would help the reader.
The writer wrote a beginning to explain the relevance of the topic and somewhat engaged the reader. The writer is beginning to let the reader know how the subject would be presented.
The writer used some words in each section that helped readers understand how one piece of information connected with others.
The writer wrote an introduction in which the writer helped readers get interested in and understand the subject. The writer let readers know the subtopics that would be developed later as well as the sequence.
When the writer wrote about results, using words and phrases such as consequently, as a result, and because of this. The transition words and phrases led the reader to new topics and the relationship between topics.
The writer wrote an introduction in which the writer interested readers, perhaps with a quote or significant fact. The writer may have included some personal ideas about the topic. The writer let readers know the subtopics that would develop later and how the text would unfold.
The writer used transition works to help the reader understand how different bits of information and different parts of the writing fit together, to help connect ideas, information, and examples and to compare, contrast, and imply relationships.
Information Rubric Grade 5 The writer is developing the ability to effectively group ideas together in sections and present ideas within sections effectively for the reader. Few or ineffective headings or subheadings were used.
The writer wrote an ending, but more could be included to move beyond a summary of stated facts. The writer included information that was mostly about the same thing in each section and may have used headings and subheadings.
The writer is working toward writing an ending that drew conclusions, asked questions, or suggested ways readers might respond.
The writer organized the writing into a sequence of separate sections. The writer used headings and subheadings to highlight the separated sections. The writer wrote each section according to an organizational plan shaped partly by the genre of the section.
The writer wrote a conclusion in which the main points were restated and offered a final thought or question for readers to consider.
The writer organized the ideas into coherent, logical settings with deliberate and effective headings and subheadings.
The writer wrote a conclusion stating the big picture and adding thought-provoking insights or implications for the reader to consider.
Voice The writer wrote for a reader, but the teaching tone may be inconsistent.
The writer is developing a consistent, inviting, teaching tone to help readers take in and understand the information.
The writer used a consistent, inviting, teaching tone to help readers take in and understand the information. The writer effectively and deliberately used a consistent, inviting, teaching tone that enabled readers take in and understand the information. Word Choice The writer used some vocabulary of the experts, but clearer or more sophisticated explanations of the key terms could be included.
The writer included some exact phrases, comparisons or images that would explain information and concepts, but they may not be developed or may be unintentional. The writer included some vocabulary of experts and explained most of the key terms well.
At times, the writer included the exact phrase, comparison or image that would explain information and concepts, but more could be included or revised to be clearer for the reader. The writer made deliberate word choices to have an effect on the readers. The writer used the vocabulary of experts and explained key terms.
The writer included the exact phrase, comparison or image that would explain information and concepts. The writer chose words carefully to explain the information and ideas and have an effect on the readers.
The writer incorporated content specific expert vocabulary and explained these terms carefully and succinctly to the reader.
Sentence Fluency The writer occasionally varied sentences, but the flow may be not be smooth or appropriate for the genres purpose and tone. Most of the time the writer varied the sentences to match the genres purpose and tone. The writer varied the sentences to match the genres purpose and tone. The writer effectively and deliberately varied the sentences to manage the tone of the piece. Conventions The writer inconsistently applied grade-level conventions: errors may obscure meaning. If there were no errors, the writer may have taken few risks.
The writer may need to use resources more often or more deliberately to spell unfamiliar words.
The writer applied grade-level conventions most of the time; errors may obscure meaning.
The writer occasionally used resources (peers, dictionary, and thesaurus) to spell unfamiliar words.
The writer demonstrated grade-level appropriate conventions; errors are minor and do not obscure meaning. Errors show risk beyond grade-level expectations.
The writer used resources to spell unfamiliar words (peers, dictionary, and thesaurus) to spell correctly and chose nuanced words.
The writer demonstrated above grade-level use of conventions. Errors show risk beyond grade-level expectations.
The writer used resources to spell unfamiliar words (peers, dictionary, and thesaurus) and to choose words with nuanced meanings.
Information Rubric Grade 5 The writers use of punctuation reflects minimal risks and is not yet contributing to the tone of the piece. Citations need revision. The writers punctuation reflects some risks and occasionally contributes to the tone of the piece. Citations are almost correct. The writer used correct capitalization and punctuation, including citations. Any errors in conventions show advanced use of language.
The writers use of punctuation is deliberate and conveys the meaning or builds tension in the piece. Any errors in conventions show advanced use of language.