0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
940 vizualizări13 pagini
Extraction of most metals and minerals is largely driven by mineralogical factors. Process mineralogy helps address such issues related to ore processing and metal extraction. Case studies covering gold, silver and base metals ores are provided.
Descriere originală:
Titlu original
Process Mineralogy and Application in Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy (Joe Zhou).pdf
Extraction of most metals and minerals is largely driven by mineralogical factors. Process mineralogy helps address such issues related to ore processing and metal extraction. Case studies covering gold, silver and base metals ores are provided.
Extraction of most metals and minerals is largely driven by mineralogical factors. Process mineralogy helps address such issues related to ore processing and metal extraction. Case studies covering gold, silver and base metals ores are provided.
Joe Zhou Mineralogy Ltd., Canada Joe.zhou.mineralogy@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The ultimate goal of a mineral processing project is to recover as much of the target mineral(s) as possible from the ore being treated to achieve the best economics. Selection of the mineral processing techniques and development of the flowsheet are the most important steps in achieving this goal. However, the recoveries of valuable minerals may be not satisfactory due to the complexity of the ore although the mineral processing plant is well designed and built. In fact, extraction of most metals and minerals is largely driven by mineralogical factors that often cause low recoveries, low grade, high reagent consumption and other processing issues. Mineralogical factors affecting ore processing and metal extraction may include mineral type, metal/element deportment, grain size, liberation and association, surface chemistry, and concentration and liberation characteristics of minerals detrimental to processing (e.g., cyanide- and oxygen-consuming minerals, organic carbon, clays, etc.). Process mineralogy helps address such issues related to ore processing and metal extraction. It is widely used as a predictive and trouble-shooting tool in mineral processing and extractive metallurgy, and provides useful information on process selection, flowsheet development, recovery improvement and reagent consumption optimization.
This paper presents an overview of process mineralogy and focuses on practical processing problems encountered in ore processing. It also provides a comparison of commonly used mineralogical techniques and methods for selecting the right tool for the problem. Case studies covering gold, silver and base metals ores are provided from a variety of processing options such as gravity separation, flotation, cyanidation and pre-oxidation.
Keywords: process mineralogy, mineral processing, extractive metallurgy, prediction, trouble-shooting
ITRODUCTIO
The minerals industry employs various processes to extract valuable metals and minerals from different ores. Commonly used processes include crushing, grinding, gravity concentration, flotation, leaching, magnetic and electrostatic separation, and refining. Fine grinding and oxidative pretreatment are also commonly used in processing of refractory ores. These processes can be used separately for different ores, but more often they are employed collectively in many processing projects.
Presented at the First International Metallurgical Meeting Peru 2012, October 26 th , 2012, Lima, Peru
2
Process selection is the most important step in a mineral processing project. Generally speaking, the factors affecting process selection of a project include geological, mineralogical, metallurgical, environmental, geographical, economical and political situations (Marsden and House, 2006). Among these factors, mineralogical and metallurgical factors have a direct impact on process selection as they determine the response of the ore to mineral processing techniques. In many metallic ores, the recoveries of metals and minerals of interest are often driven by mineralogical factors such as grain size, liberation, surface chemistry, association with other minerals, coating and rimming, presence of cyanicides, oxygen consumers, preg-robbers and clay minerals, and locking in other minerals as trace substitution. Among these mineralogical factors, liberation, grain size and association (locking in other minerals as fine-grained inclusions and/or trace substitution) are the most common factors affecting gold ore processing and metal extraction. Processing of PGE ores faces the same challenges as gold. Fine grain size and locking of PGM in sulphide and non- sulphide minerals often cause PGM losses. Presence of talc in some PGE ores (such as the Merensky reef and Stillwater Complex) can cause significant processing difficulties (Cole, 2002). In the UG-2 ore located in the Bushveld Complex, the PGM are finely disseminated with the average grain size being about 10 microns, so that grain size, liberation and association tend to dictate mineral floatability (Nel et al, 2004). The presence of PGE in pentlandite and other sulphide minerals as solid solution is another issue that causes processing difficulties. Compared to gold and PGE, silver mineralogy is more complex. In Pb-Zn-Ag ore, silver often occurs as inclusions in and attachment to primary lead and zinc minerals (commonly galena and sphalerite) and can be lost with these minerals during flotation. In silver ore containing significant amounts of pyrargyrite, proustite and stephanite, silver recovery by cyanidation can be very low because these minerals dissolve slowly in cyanide solution. Silver can also occur in other minerals as submicroscopic silver as well, making silver extraction more difficult (Zhou, 2010). Base metal ores are mainly processed by flotation. In processing of base metal ores, high content of pyrite, fine grain size of galena, intergrowth of chalcopyrite with sphalerite and presence of clay minerals can cause serious processing problems. Surface chemistry may affect extraction of base metals as well. In some base metal ores containing precious metals, precious metal-bearing minerals (such as electrum and kstelite) may misreport to zinc concentrate rather than copper concentrate because of the surface coating (Zhou et al., 2005). As high-grade nickel sulphide ores are being depleted and processing laterite ores continue to pose challenges, the future of nickel extraction lies in low- grade ultramafic ores. The main challenge in processing low-grade ultramafic ores is the presence of MgO-containing silicate minerals. The impact of MgO content on Ni recovery is very pronounced and high MgO requires the effective rejection of MgO containing minerals. A study conducted on fibrous minerals in ultramafic nickel sulphide ores indicated the significant depressing effect of MgO on pentlandite flotation. As the impact of fibrous minerals on slurry viscosity, grinding, and flotation becomes understood, nickel recovery will increase, making the mining and low-grade ultramafic deposits viable (Xu et al, 2012). In iron ore processing, elevated sulphur content of the concentrate is a common issue in some operations. To be able to reduce the sulphur content, the sulphide mineralogy including mineral speciation, grain size, liberation and association with iron minerals must be well understood and determined. This paper introduces the scope of process mineralogy and mineralogical factors that may affect mineral processing and extractive metallurgy of various ores, and discusses the application of process mineralogy through case studies. 3
OBJECTIVES AD ROLES OF PROCESS MIERALOGY
Process mineralogy is an inter-discipline in the fields of mineralogy and metallurgy. It uses the theories, principles, methods and tools of mineralogy to study all mineralogical characteristics of an ore and potential problems related to mineral processing and extractive metallurgy with prediction and trouble-shooting being two major objectives and roles. Process mineralogy provides useful information on process selection, flowsheet development, recovery improvement and reagent consumption optimization. The information acquired from a process mineralogical study can be used as a guide for a metallurgical testwork program for process design or optimization. The scope of a process mineralogy program may include but not limited to the following:
Prediction: 1. Response of a new ore to various processes and most likely processing options 2. Estimated recovery of valuable minerals and grade of concentrate 3. Potential mineralogical factors affecting ore processing and metal extraction
Trouble-shooting: 1. Deportment of valuable minerals in tailings and deleterious elements in concentrates 2. Cause for valuable losses and opportunity for recovery improvement 3. Cause for high reagent consumption and opportunity for reagent optimization
Figure 1 is a good example of using mineralogy as a predictive tool. It illustrates some common forms and carriers of gold in different gold ores and indicates the impact of gold deportment on extractive metallurgy. The large gold grain in Figure 1(1) is coarse (approximately 600 x 1000 m) and completely liberated, and can be recovered by gravity, flotation or cyanidation. High gold recovery (>90%) is expected, and can generally be achieved when gold occurs as coarse grains like this one. However, gold leaching by cyanidation is a slow, diffusion-controlled reaction, and large gold particles can take many days to fully dissolve. Therefore, gold can be lost to tailings owing to insufficient residence time during cyanide leaching. To avoid gold losses, it is better recover the coarse gold by gravity prior to cyanide leaching. The gold grains in Figure 1(2) are medium-grained and entirely locked in pyrite, and are not recoverable by direct cyanidation. These gold grains can only be recovered by fine grinding followed by cyanidation, with or without flotation, or by pre-oxidation of the pyrite followed by cyanidation. Gold grains in Figure 1(3) are extremely fine, and locked in arsenopyrite. This type of gold may be recovered by ultra-fine grinding followed by cyanidation of the sulphide concentrate, although this is in fact seldom beneficial, as the gold grains are usually finer than the finest practical grind size that can be achieved in commercial mills. Therefore, the only alternative is to oxidize the arsenopyrite to liberate the gold, and then leach with cyanide. Gold in Figure 1(4) occurs as sub-microscopic gold in disseminated pyrite, making the gold extremely refractory. Pre-concentration of the gold in these types of ores by gravity or flotation is usually inefficient, and therefore, to recover gold in this type of ore, pre-oxidation processing (autoclaving, roasting and biological oxidation) of the whole ore may be required to liberate the gold and achieve high recovery efficiency. Based on the gold deportment shown in Figure 1 and other results, the mineralogist is able to balance the various types of gold in an ore and to comment on most likely processing options. 4
Figure 1: Gold deportment and impact on gold extractive metallurgy (1) Liberated coarse gold grain (Au, 6001000m); (2) gold grains (inside red circles) locked in pyrite (Py); (3) fine-grained gold particles (inside red circles) locked in arsenopyrite (Apy); (4) submicroscopic gold locked in fine-grained gold-bearing pyrite (yellowish white grains) that is disseminated in quartz (Q) (Zhou and Fleming, 2007)
Gravity concentration and flotation processes are very effective at recovering large and fully liberated gold grains, and are used in many gold plants. Gravity concentration is also an environmentally friendly process because it doesnt use chemicals, and should be considered when an ore contains certain amount of liberated gold. However, liberated gold can be lost from a gravity circuit if the grain size is small or if the gold grain is attached to a low density mineral. The majority of gravity equipment can only recover gold grains greater than 50m, and some equipment is effective at sizes down to about 10m (Marsden and House, 2006). A GRG (gravity- recoverable gold) study led by the late professor Andre Laplante proved that most gold particles recovered in commercial gravity recovery plants are coarser than 37 m. This is because gravity circuits are always installed in mills, and the flow to the gravity circuit is regulated by installing cyclones, with only the cyclone underflow reporting to the gravity equipment. GRG finer than 37m tends to report to the cyclone overflow much more readily than its coarser counterpart, and therefore by- passes the gravity equipment (Laplante and Stauton, 2005). In a typical gold deportment study, the mineralogist will determine the size distribution of all observed gold grains and the size distribution of liberated gold grains can be used in assisting the equipment selection and for predicting the gold recovery by various processes.
Figure 2 shows the size distribution of liberated gold in a copper-gold ore. Gold balance indicated that liberated gold in this ore accounts for approx. 65% of the head assay with a size range from <0.5m to >100m. This part of gold can be recovered by cyanidation, and also by flotation at slightly lower recovery. The recovery by gravity will be much lower than cyanidation and flotation (approx. 33%). Flotation is a common process that is used in many base metals and precious metals ore processing plants. It is very effective at recovering both liberated valuable and sulphide minerals over 10m. In flotation of gold ores, liberated gold grains less than 3 Au 1 2 4 More free-milling More refractory Liberated, coarse-grained Locked, medium-grained Locked, fine-grained Locked, submicroscopic Gravity, Flotation, Cyanidation Fine grinding Cyanidation Flotation & Preoxidation Flotation, Fine grinding Preoxidation & Cyanidation
Pre-oxidation & Cyanidation Flotation
Py Q Apy 5
10m can also be recovered by flotation, but the efficiency is much lower. In addition to unliberated gold, gold losses to gravity and flotation tailings include very fine liberated gold grains as well as coarse liberated gold grains whose surface is coated or rimmed by non-floatable material (e.g., iron oxides or hydroxides, silicates) and hydrophobic gold grains whose surface is coated with fine hydrocarbon or sulphurous material (Zhou, Jago and Martin, 2004; Marsden and House, 2006).
Figure 2: Prediction of gold recovery by common processes
In addition to being a predictive tool in process flowsheet development, process mineralogy also plays an important role in process optimization and plant operation, and is often used as a trouble-shooting tool by operating mines. Due to the complexity of the ore, the recoveries of valuable minerals may be not satisfactory although the processing flowsheet is well developed and implemented. In other words, minerals of interest can be lost to the tailings for mineralogical reasons. When recovery and concentrate grade drop or fluctuate, or acceptable recovery is achieved only with the use of significantly more reagents or more complex pretreatment processes, it usually indicates the change of feed mineralogy. Once this happens, a detailed mineralogical study program should be considered to find out what has caused the processing issue(s) and how to improve the plant performance. The information acquired from such a mineralogy program can be used as a guide for process optimization.
Figure 3 shows the distribution of gold in a cyanidation tail. The sample, assaying 8.3g/t Au and 92g/t Ag, originates from a bulk flotation concentrate subjected to regrinding to approximately 33 microns, followed by gravity concentration and 24 hour cyanide leaching of the gravity tailing. The leach residue was filtered and washed and then dried at low temperature for a complete gold and silver deportment study. The results showed that liberated gold in the sample was effectively recovered by gravity and subsequent cyanide leaching. The gold left in leach residue is all locked in other minerals as micron-size inclusions (0.5-13m) and submicroscopic gold with a total of 74% in pyrite, 7.5% in arsenopyrite and 18.5% in non-sulfide 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0-10 10-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100 100-120 D i s t r i b u t i o n
minerals. Visible gold inclusions (approx. 40%) locked in other minerals are not recoverable at current grinding fineness unless the sample is ground much finer. To extract submicroscopic gold (approx. 60%) locked in sulphide minerals, oxidative pretreatment is required to create a porous structure through which the cyanide leach solution can penetrate to reach the minute gold particles. The study also showed that the silver lost in the leach residue occurs mainly as liberated freibergite, acanthite and stephanite (up to 85m) with minor amounts of native silver and other silver minerals. It is understandable that those coarse and liberated silver minerals were not recovered by gravity due to their lower specific gravity, but why they did not dissolve during cyanide leaching? Mineralogical studies suggested that the concentration of cyanide in leach solution was too low for silver leaching although all liberated gold was dissolved to completion. The slow-leaching kinetics of silver minerals is considered to be another main cause for silver loss. Based on the mineralogical findings, the process was optimized by incorporating an oxidative pretreatment for gold extraction. High cyanide concentration and extended leach process has substantially improved the silver recovery.
Figure 3: Distribution of gold in a cyanidation tail
MIERALOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTIG MIERAL PROCESSIG
There are a number of mineralogical factors that may affect mineral processing and extractive metallurgy of various ores. Some common factors are listed in Table 1. Among these factors, liberation, grain size and association are the most important ones. The impact of these mineralogical factors on mineral processing and extractive metallurgy is discussed below. More information can be found in the reference (Zhou, Jago and Martin, 2004; Zhou and Fleming, 2007; Zhou, 2010; Zhou, 2011).
1. Liberation Most valuable minerals, if not liberated, will not be recovered by conventional processes, or it can be recovered only at low recovery and low concentrate grade. This makes liberation extremely important in many (if not all) mineral processing projects. Prior to the recovery process, valuable minerals need to be liberated from non- valuable minerals with those they are associated. Poor liberation will result in low recovery and grade for most valuable minerals. In the case of precious and base metal 7
ores (such as Au, Ag, PGM, Cu, Pb, Zn and Ni), encapsulation in sulphide and silicate minerals is a common and major cause for valuable mineral losses. In the UG- 2 ore, 25% of PGM were locked in silicates and finer grinding was required in a secondary milling step to increase the PGM recoveries (Nel et al., 2004). In gold mining industry, as the free-milling gold ores are being depleted and more refractory ores are discovered and processed, liberation becomes even more important in such a project. In addition to physical liberation (such as fine grinding and ultrafine grinding), several chemical liberation processes (such as pressure oxidation) have been developed and implemented. In processing of refractory gold ores, particularly the Carlin-type gold ores in Nevada, the sulphide host minerals must first be oxidized, to create a porous structure through which the cyanide leach solution can penetrate to reach the minute gold particles. This oxidation is traditionally achieved by roasting, autoclaving or bacterial oxidation.
Table 1: Common mineralogical factors # Mineralogical Factors Associated Ores & Processes 1 Liberation/locking Various ores & processes 2 Grain size Various ores & processes 3 Association Various ores & processes 4 Coating & rimming Mainly flotation, also gravity and leaching 5 Surface chemistry Mainly flotation, also gravity and leaching 6 Cyanicides & oxygen consumers Mainly cyanide leaching 7 Preg-robbing Cyanide leaching of gold and silver ores 8 Refractoriness Mainly cyanide leaching, also gravity and flotation of precious metals ores 9 Slow-dissolving kinetics Cyanide leaching of gold and silver ores 10 Deleterious minerals/toxic elements (As, Hg, asbestos) Mainly leaching and flotation of base and precious metals ores, but can also affect other ore processing 11 Gangue mineralogy (clays, sulfide gangue and more) Flotation and leaching of base and precious metals ores, flotation and magnetic separation of iron ores, tailings disposal and more
2. Grain Size Grain size is one of the most important mineralogical factors that affect processing of many ores. For example, gold is mainly recovered from ores using gravity, flotation, cyanidation or a combination of these processes. Gold grain size can be a significant factor driving the efficiency of gold recovery processes. As discussed above, liberated gold can be recovered by gravity concentration but it can be lost from a gravity circuit if the grain size is fine. The majority of gravity equipment can only effectively recover gold grains greater than 50m. Fine gold, which is too small to be recovered by the installed equipment (Marsden and House, 2006): <500m: sluices <200m: jigs <50 to 100m: spirals <50m: shaking tables <20m: centrifugal concentrators (and down to about 10m in some cases) 8
As mentioned above, flotation is a common process that is used in many gold ore processing plants. It is very effective at recovering both liberated gold (which tends to be naturally floatable), and gold-bearing sulphide minerals. Mineralogical examinations conducted on metallurgical products have shown that gold grains over 10m can be effectively recovered by flotation. Gold grains less than 10m can also be recovered by flotation, but the efficiency is much lower. Gold losses to flotation tailings include very fine gold grains as well as coarse gold grains whose surface is coated or rimmed by non-floatable material (e.g., iron oxides or hydroxides, silicates) (Zhou, Jago and Martin, 2004; Marsden and House, 2006).
Cyanidation is the most efficient and widely applied process for extracting gold from various ores, and high recoveries (>80%) are usually expected and commonly achieved. The gold left in the leaching tailings is often encapsulated in sulphide, oxide and/or silicate minerals that are impervious to the cyanide leach solution. However, liberated gold can also be lost to cyanidation tailings. This generally occurs when some of the gold in the ore is too big or too slow-leaching to dissolve to completion in the time allocated to the leaching process. Studies have indicated that a spherical gold particle with a diameter of 44 m will take approximately 13 hours to dissolve under normal cyanide leach conditions, while particles with a diameter of 150 m will take 48 hours or more (Fleming, 1992). Generally, when an ore contains large liberated gold particles, the flowsheet will incorporate a gravity circuit to recover these particles, so it is not necessary to design for excessively long leach times. An average gold plant would have a 24 hours leach residence time (Fleming, 1998). Deschenes and his team at CANMET have made a breakthrough in extracting gold and silver in high-grade Au-Ag ores (Deschnes et al, 2009; Rajala and Deschnes, 2009; Deschnes and Fulton, 2011).
In the processing of base metal ores, grain size also has a significant impact. Galena, sphalerite and chalcopyrite are often associated with each other. Galena is often fine- grained and sphalerite is relatively coarse. Chalcopyrite often occurs as inclusions in sphalerite (so-called chalcopyrite disease) in addition to being discrete particles. To recover these minerals of interest, the Cu-Pb-Zn ore often needs to be ground to such a degree that these minerals are liberated from other minerals and also separated from each other. Both over-grinding and under-grinding may cause processing issues. To maximize the recovery of valuable minerals, grain size distribution of each mineral needs to be determined through a mineralogy program.
3. Association Association is also an important mineralogical factor that may impact ore processing. In processing of copper-gold ores (such as porphyry Cu-Au ores), precious metals (Au and Ag) are often recovered into copper concentrate by flotation with or without gravity concentration. When gold is intimately associated with copper minerals, it will report to copper concentrate. However, if gold is associated with pyrite, iron oxide and silicate minerals, the recovery of gold might be lower. In some plants, a separate sulfide flotation circuit may be required to produce an Au-bearing sulfide concentrate. Gold with silicate is a common association in many ores. When gold is finely disseminated in silicates, the extraction can be challenging because the ore has to be ground finer to make the gold accessible to the cyanide solution. It has been found that a substantial amount of gold (up to 50%) in some ores can occur as tiny 9
Category Technique Technique Application MDL Qualitative/Semi-Quant OM Optical Microscopy Mineral ID & qualitative/semi-quant mineral analysis of bulk samples High (%) ADIS Automated Digital Image System High (%) XRD X-ray Diffracton High (%) SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy Mineral ID & qualitative/semi-quant elemental analysis of individual particles High (%) MLA Mineral Liberation Analyser Low (%) QEMSCAN Quantitative Evaluation of Materials by Scanning Electron Microscopy Low (%) EPMA Electron Probe Microanalysis Low (ppm) PIXE Proton-induced X-ray Emission Low (ppm) D-SIMS Dynamic Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Low (ppm-ppb) LAM-ICP-MS Laser Ablation Microprobe Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Low (ppm-ppb) Synchrotron Synchrotron Radiation Light Source Low (ppm-ppb) TOF-LIMS Time of Flight Laser Ion Mass Spectrometry Low (ppm) TOF-SIMS Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Low (ppm) XPS X-ray Photon Spectrometry Surface analysis of bulk material Low Surface Analysis Surface analysis of bulk material & individual particle Mineral ID & qualitative/semi-quant mineral analysis of bulk samples Semi-Quant Quantitative Quantitative mineral analysis of bulk samples and individual particles Quantitative Quantitaive elemental analysis of individual particles inclusions (a few microns) in quartz or other minerals, which makes gold extraction extremely difficult and uneconomic.
Same as the porphyry copper-gold ores, flotation is the principal process for recovering gold minerals and copper sulphides in iron copper gold (IOCG) ores. Gold in IOCG ores is mainly associated with copper sulphides and, to a lesser extent, iron oxide minerals (mainly as inclusions or submicroscopic gold in hematite). Liberated gold and gold associated with copper sulphides can be recovered by flotation into a copper concentrate and high gold recovery (over 80%) can be achieved. However, gold can be lost to flotation tails if it is fine-grained or if it is associated with hematite. To recover the fine-grained gold particles (often below 20 m) and gold that is associated (exposed) with hematite or other gangue, cyanide leaching may be considered. Gold locked in hematite or other gangue as tiny inclusions will not be recovered unless the ore is ground finer. Submicroscopic gold in hematite is not recoverable by conventional techniques. Precious metals associated with zinc minerals (mainly sphalerite) in Au-Ag ore and Cu-Pb-Zn-Au-Ag ore is another example of unfavourable association (Zhou, 2005).
Table 2 lists a number of techniques commonly used in process mineralogy. These techniques can be used separately, but a typical mineralogy program often uses a comprehensive mineralogical and analytical approach including several techniques. The advantage of using such a comprehensive approach is that a large sample can be studied to get better statistics and each mineralogical issue will be addressed properly using specific techniques.
It should be noted that each technique is designed for certain purposes and has its advantages & limitations. They should be selected wisely and used properly.
Table 2: Techniques commonly used in process mineralogy
10
APPLICATIO OF PROCESS MIERLOGY I MIERAL PROCESSIG AD EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY
Case 1: Process mineralogy of a refractory sulphide gold ore Gold in refractory sulphide gold ores is predominantly associated with sulphide minerals and occurs as both fine-grained gold particles and/or submicroscopic gold. Microscopic gold (visible gold) usually accounts only for an insignificant portion, with the majority of gold being contained in sulphides. To extract gold from refractory ores, the ore needs to be finely ground and pre-oxidation is required. Sulphide host minerals must first be oxidized to create a porous structure through which the cyanide leach solution can penetrate to reach the minute gold particles.
Figure 4 shows the gold-bearing arsenopyrite (4A) and pyrite (4B) in a sulphide gold ore. The ore is a highly refractory ore with only about 2% of gold being fine-grained "free gold" (not locked in sulphide grains), making gold extraction difficult because the gold is mainly locked inside the two main sulphide minerals arsenopyrite (75% Au) and arsenic-rich pyrite (23% Au). The ore is treated through grinding, flotation, pressure oxidation and carbon-in-leach circuits. Gold recovery is ~83%.
Figure 4: Gold in a refractory sulphide ore A: Micron-size gold inclusions in arsenopyrite (Apy); B: Submicroscopic gold-bearing pyrite (Py)
Case 2: Process mineralogy of a Pb-Zn-Ag ore In Pb-Zn-Ag ores, silver is often associated with sulfides and is recovered by flotation and concentrate smelting with or without leaching to recover the base metals as well as the silver values. As discussed above, a number of mineralogical factors, such as liberation, association, grain size, and rimming and coating, can impact flotation and leaching of silver minerals. In a Pb-Zn-Ag operation processing high-grade silver ore (~400g/t Ag), the silver recovery by flotation was approx. 85% for a number of years. The mill endeavors to recover additional silver to the lead concentrate and minimize the placement of silver to the zinc concentrate. To explore the opportunity for further silver recovery improvement, a silver deportment study was initiated to identify the cause for silver loss and to determine the possible recovery increase. The conclusions are listed below (Zhou, 2010). 1. Silver occurred mainly as freibergite ((Ag, Cu, Fe) 12 (Sb, As) 4 S 13 ), dyscrasite (Ag 3 Sb), pyrargyrite (Ag 3 SbS 3 ) with a moderate to minor amounts of acanthite (Ag 2 S), native silver and other minerals. B 51.9ppm Au Py 11
2. Silver also occurs in galena as inclusions and submicroscopic silver. 3. Lead Tail (Zinc Feed) contained 60 g/t Ag (accounting for ~14% of the head assay). Approximately 15% of the lost silver was liberated and associated with galena, and can be recovered in lead circuit without further grinding, which means the current silver recovery in lead circuit can be increased by 2%. 4. Zinc Tail (i.e. Final Tail) contained 48 g/t Ag (accounting for 12% of the head assay). Approximately 15% of the lost silver (with a maximum of 20%) was locked in galena, sphalerite and other sulphide minerals and was recoverable by flotation. This indicates that 2% of the silver lost in the Final Tail can be recovered in zinc circuit. 5. Theoretically, a total improvement of 4% recovery can be expected. 6. The main causes for silver loss are unfloated liberated galena and silver minerals and association of silver with sulphide gangue and non-sulphide gangue.
Figure 5 presents some lost silver minerals in the flotation tail. Liberated galena with dyscrasite inclusions (Figure 5-1) and minor amounts of liberated silver minerals (5-2) can be recovered in the lead circuit without finer grinding. The collector chemistry needs to be reviewed to maximize the recovery of these liberated silver minerals. To recover silver minerals and galena associated with non-sulphide gangue (5-3) and sulphide gangue (5-4), the ore needs to be ground finer to liberate the silver minerals. Composite particles shown in Figure 5-3 and 5-4 can be recovered into lead or zinc concentrate without finer grinding, but they will lower the concentrate grade.
Figure 5: Silver minerals lost in flotation tail 1: Liberated galena with dyscrasite inclusions (inside red circles); 2: Liberated dyscrasite grain (Dy); 3: Freibergite (Fr) associated with galena (Gn) and silicate (Si); 4: Dyscrasite (inside red circle) locked in arsenopyrite (Apy)
3 2 Dy 4 Apy 12
DISCUSSIO
The minerals industry is continuing its growth as the world economy keeps growing. A number of large projects are being developed and will be commissioned in the next few years. At the same time, the minerals industry is facing challenges in processing difficult ores with low grade and complex mineralogy. To help determine the mining method, extraction process requirements, and in particular, the performance and optimization of all processes involved, process mineralogy is becoming increasingly important in a mineral processing project. It includes ore characterization during pre- feasibility and feasibility study stages and subsequent periodic mineralogical analyses of feed, intermediate process streams and final products during plant operation. As a predictive and trouble-shooting tool, process mineralogy helps address all issues and problems related to mineral processing and extractive metallurgy and provides useful information on process selection, flowsheet development, recovery improvement and cost reduction.
ACKOWLEDGEMETS
The author wishes to acknowledge the conference organizers for opportunity to present this paper at the First International Metallurgical Meeting Peru 2012. Mining companies that have contributed indirectly to this paper by providing projects and financial support are also acknowledged.
REFERECES
Cole, S., A review of PGM metallurgy highlighting recent process innovations. In: Proc 34 th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors. CMP, Ottawa, 2002, pp 445-467.
Deschnes, G., Rajala, J., Guo, H., Fulton, M. and Mortazavi, S., Leaching of Gold and Silver from Kupol Samples: Part I: Preliminary Investigation. In: Proc 41 st
Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, CMP, Ottawa, Canada, 2009, 409- 426.
Deschnes, G. and Fulton, M., The CELP Technology for Leaching Gold and Silver from High Grdae Ores: Preliminary Investigation for Two New Potential Applications. In: Proc 43 rd Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, CMP, Ottawa, Canada, 2011, 467-476.
Fleming, C.A., 1998. Cyanidation of gold and silver, in Gold Symposium, pp 1-49 (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology: Melbourne).
Laplante, A.R. and Staunton, W.P. 2005 Gravity recovery of gold An overview of recent developments. Treatment of Gold Ores, First International Symposium, 44 th
Annual Conference of Metallurgists of CIM, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (edited by G. Deschenes, D. Hodouin and L. Lorenzen), pp 49-63. 13
Marsden, J. and House, I. 2006. The chemistry of gold extraction, second edition (ed: E Horwood), pp 651 (The Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Inc: Littleton).
Nel, E., Theron, J., Martin, C. and Raabe, H., 2004. PGM ore processing at Impalas UG-2 concentrator in Rustenburg, South Africa. In: Proceedings 36 th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, pp 121-139.
Rajala, J. and Deschnes, G., Extraction of Gold and Silver at the Kupol Mill using CELP. In: World Gold 2009, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2009, 35-42.
Xu, M., Dai, Z., Dong, J., Ford, F., and Lee, A. W., 2012: Fibrous minerals in ultramafic nickel sulphide ores. CIM Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012, 1-8.
Zhou, J., Jago, B. and Martin, C., 2004. Establishing the process mineralogy of gold ores. In: Proceedings 36 th Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, pp 199- 226.
Zhou, J., Martin, C., Blatter, P., Boss, P.-A. and Robitaille, 2005. The process mineralogy of precious metals in LaRonde flotation products and its effect on process optimization. In: Proceedings Treatment of Gold Ores, First International Symposium, 44 th Annual Conference of Metallurgists of CIM, Calgary, (eds: G Deschenes, D Hodouin and L Lorenzen), pp 93-109.
Zhou, J. and Fleming, C.A., 2007. Gold in tailings mineralogical characterisation and metallurgical applications. In: Proceedings World Gold 2007. Cairns, (eds: J Avraamides, G Deschnes and D Tucker), pp. 311-317.
Zhou, J., 2010. Process mineralogy of silver ores and applications in flowsheet design and plant optimization. In: Proceedings of the 42 nd Annual Meeting of Canadian Mineral Processors, CMP, Ottawa, Canada, 2010, 143-161.
Zhou, J., The mineralogy and predictive metallurgy of major types of gold ores. In: World Gold 2011, Proceedings of the 50 th Annual Conference of Metallurgists of CIM, Montreal, QC, Canada, 1-15.
Aluminum Analysis ReportGlient: Here is a concise, SEO-optimized title for the document:TITLE IGAS Research Reports Aluminum Alloy Purity and Properties