University Studies 114C: Ways of Knowing in the Social Sciences
Jessica Pham October 26, 2011 Response Paper 5: Spencer and Steele
Prejudice can arise for all types of groups of people. It is not only towards race or gender that stereotypes is made. It can be from the characteristics such as the color of a persons hair, the sexual orientation of an individual, or even the type of car a person drives. According the Claude Steele and Steven Spencer, writers of Stereotype Threat and Womens Math Performance, stereotype threat is the experience of being in a situation where one faces judgment based on societal stereotypes about ones group (5). In their publication and along with my personal experience, social judgment of certain groups of people may prevent them from succeeding in the stereotypes that they are placed in. Steele and Spencer observed different groups of men and women to determine if the stereotype about women doing poor in math compared to men affected the females at all. Three studies were done with different experiments to confirm their idea that it does affect women. The first study showed that women did just as well as men in simple math but did far worse when it came to difficult levels of math. Study 2 examines if stereotype type is the reason for outcome of Study 1 with the difficult test. In the second study, a group of students were told that there was no gender difference with the results of the test and the other group was told the opposite. It turns out that, when the participants are told that gender difference will affect the results, women did dramatically worse than men. When participants are told that gender has not effect, women performed the same as men. Women in this second group are less concerned with gender differences and so they focus better. Study 3 examines the same study as Study 2 but with a less highly selected sample. The results are the same as Study 2. In conclusion, stereotype threat 2
against women limits their abilities but their performance can be improved when gender difference are not made. Being Asian, I always hear the stereotype that we are good only at math. Throughout elementary and middle school, I was in classrooms of primarily African Americans and Caucasians who constantly remind me that I have a natural talent of being proficient in math and good at nothing else. Because of the negative comments from others, I kept up with the stereotype and only did well in mathematics. Writing and reading on the other hand, were in no degree close to skills I had in math. I had trouble comprehending readings and writing essays were challenges. In my years in high school, I had observed that race does not affect a students capability in math. I have found classmates who are experts in the subject and are not Asians and I have also found Asians classmates who do well in English. When I realized that there were students who were good at writing, I had the motivation to try harder. The stereotype threat observed from my experience in the past no longer applied when I got to high school. Stereotype threat is certainly a problem in general education and definitely an issue in college education. In correspondence to my personal example, stereotypes at a young age can surely affect a students ability to perform in school. Those who are frequently told that their group act a certain way will eventually end up following the stereotype. As stated in the Steele and Spencer publication, when a stereotype about ones group indicts an important ability, ones performance comes under an extra pressure and this extra pressure may interfere with performance (6). The misjudgment would then grow larger and have a stronger impact. In agreement with Claude Steele and Steven Spencer, the idea that women do poorly in math than men do will encourage the idea that women are subordinate to men when it comes to higher 3
levels of math. This is the case with higher levels of math, such as those in college. Therefore, in both general and higher education, stereotype threat needs to be addressed. Stereotype threats are generated from society. They exist from groups of individuals promoting the misunderstanding about other groups of people. By preventing the spread of negative labels on people, those who are spoken about can fight against the stereotypes prescribed on them. It would be more profitable by endorsing the idea that people act as they do and do as they please from individual talent and choice because people would be counted as a single person and not as a whole. There are many ways in encouraging people to no longer speak of stereotypes. In my opinion, those who talk of people as groups and not individuals, do so to look down on others and when their stereotypes are true, they are pleased with themselves. By ignoring the false judgment of others, stereotypes would no longer have any meaning. Also, educating young people to avoid stereotyping others will also help reduce the amount of stereotype threats there are. Although there may be children whose parents are promoting stereotype, there are more parents who are against it. The challenges of removing stereotype threats require one step at a time.
Joanne R. Smith (Editor), S. Alexander Haslam (Editor) - Social Psychology - Revisiting The Classic Studies (2017, SAGE Publications LTD) - Libgen - Li