The null hypothesis (H0) is a hypothesis which the researcher tries to disprove,

reject or nullify. The 'null' often refers to the common view of something, while
the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher really thinks is the cause of a
phenomenon. In statistical analysis we always frame our research proposal as
alternative hypothesis. Because if we design our proposal as null hypothesis and
find statistical significance, it might be a case of specific instance. In science we
cannot prove by example. But we can discard some phenomenon by counter
example. That is why if we do not have statistical evidence to discard the null
hypothesis we do not accept it; we simply fail to reject it. On the other hand if
we can reject the null hypothesis, we are producing evidence in support of
alternative hypothesis.
You assume the null and use it to calculate a p- value. A small p-value is a
contradiction to the assumption that the null is true. The p-value is based on the
assumption that the null hypothesis is true. Trying to prove the null using a pvalue is, therefore, trying to prove its true based on the assumption that its true.
But we cant prove the assumption that the null is true as we have already
assumed it. The idea of a hypothesis test is to assume the null is true, and then
use that assumption to build a contradiction against it being true.
No conclusion can be drawn if you fail to build a contradiction. Another way to
think of this is to remember that the p-value measures evidence against the null,
not for it. And therefore lack of evidence to reject the null does not imply
sufficient evidence to support it. Absence of evidence is not evidence of
absence