Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
circumstances, this would not be an ordinary procedure. The patient entered under his legal
name which was male, but was very adamant that his caregivers would refer to him by his female
name and would use Mrs. and not Mr.
The patient expressed his desire to have limited staff be involved in his care in order to
maintain his anonymity. The wife remained at his side, and had shared with me her decision to
stay with him. They would live together and provide two mothers to their son. His son appeared
to be in his own little world. He was seven years old, and was appropriate for his developmental
age. I was extremely worried about the patients son. I was worried how he would be affected by
this change in environment and situation. I believe this hindered my communication with the
patient.
The patients surgical procedure was uneventful. The patients recovery stay was fairly
routine, but did require a straight catheter insertion after the patient was unable to void. This
would mean part of the transformation would be exposed. He requested that his family be
present during this intervention. Was this appropriate, a young boy to be present during this
procedure? I did not think even in a normal circumstance this was appropriate, but under these
circumstances I thought it was even more inappropriate. I felt like the patient would be mad if I
suggested anything different, and would think that I didnt understand him. I chose not to speak
up. I feel like if I had established some open dialogue with the patient and allowed him to
express his needs, he would have been more open to my suggestions.
I provided this patient with your routine recovery care. Routine recovery care would consist
of vital signs per the routine, intravenous fluids, fluids by mouth, pain medication for comfort,
and observing for any signs and symptoms of any complications from the procedure. When the
patient became uncomfortable from the inability to void, I tried some additional measures to try
to avoid having to catheterize patient. I tried pushing oral fluids with caffeine and ambulating
the patient in room. The patient also tried sitting in the bathroom with the water running. There
were other interventions the staff could have offered such as ambulating in hallways, but the staff
was not afforded this opportunity in order to maintain the patients anonymity.
All of the
measures were unsuccessful, so we had to insert a catheter. The patient tried really hard to avoid
having a catheter. The patients anatomy had been altered, and he also needed to keep the
anatomy remaining in good health. The insult of a catheter could compromise the next surgery if
there was trauma to area.
The typical recovery for this type of surgery would be around an hour. This patient had
prolonged his stay to 6 hours, and way past the time my shift was over. In order to maintain his
continuity of care, I stayed past my shift. I was really ready for him to go home, and the
uncomfortable situation I had been placed in to be over. The longer he stayed, the more I felt
like I was failing him as a patient by calling him mister. The harder I tried, the more I was
failing. The patient had expressed his desire to be called by his feminine name, but I could sense
each time I failed, he was getting frustrated. I knew this would hinder further communication,
even though I felt he was trying to understand.
According to my values clarification, the first quality I had assessed was justice. I had
ranked this quality as very important to me. Justice is fairness to all and avoidance of
favoritism. All clients deserve fair access to quality healthcare. The concept of justice embodies
health equity and the fair distribution of resources (Nunnery, 2012, p. 228). Critically reflecting,
I do believe I used honesty, skill, knowledge, and family while I cared for this patient, but some
of the assumptions I had made about the patient lacked the quality of justice.
own of his own cultural beliefs, values, lifeways, biases, attitudes and prejudices
to avoid cultural blindness. (p. 53)
The client is also aware of their cultural beliefs but it may differ from the nurses beliefs. The
nurse should show genuine interest in the client and ask open ended questions and maintain an
active listener role. Professional knowledge will be given only if the client asks about such
knowledge (Fawcett, 2012, p. 53). This theory is very relevant in this situation. If I had applied
this theory to caring for this patient, I feel like I would have asked more open ended questions
and allowed him to express needs he may have had that could have facilitated the care he
received at the hospital as well as his needs at home. I would have allowed the patient to talk
about his struggles, and offered any help or resources in dealing with his current issues. I was
really focused on the task at hand, which was his physical process, and I dont feel like I was
focused on emotional or spiritual aspects at the time.
As I reflect back on that day and move forward practicing the knowledge I am obtaining, I
have realized that my professional values play a large role in how I care for patients and families.
I will continue to honestly evaluate on a regular basis my professional values and refer to my
nursing philosophy as a reminder of the commitment I have made to my patients.
7
References
2 points: Inadequate
Student demonstrates a
lack of awareness of
purpose and audience;
Unclear Focus;
Inappropriate tone.
4 points: Marginal
Student demonstrates
minimal awareness of
purpose and audience;
Marginal ability to provide a
clear focus; Borderline
ability to convey
appropriate tone.
6 points: Acceptable
Student demonstrates
acceptable awareness of
purpose and audience;
Somewhat clear focus;
indication of
understanding of
appropriate tone
8 points: Good
Student demonstrates
accurate awareness of
purpose and audience;
Mostly clear focus;
Satisfactory use of tone in
writing
10 points: Excellent
Student demonstrates
perceptive awareness of
purpose and audience;
Clarity of focus; Deep
understanding and ability to
create appropriate tone
POIN
9.5
Student provides no
explanation and
illustration of key ideas
demonstrated in
responses to paper
criteria; No attempt to
incorporate primary
concepts of the discipline
or to analyze and weigh
differing facts and ideas;
No synthesis of contentarea materials or facts
Student provides
explanation and
illustration of most key
ideas demonstrated in
responses to paper
criteria; Incorporation of
some primary concepts of
the discipline; Analysis of
differing facts and ideas
and an effort to
synthesize all materials,
although possibly
inconsistent
10
Organization
9.5
Style
Discipline-Based Written
Product
Language Conventions
10
COMMENTS:
Focus Element: 9.5
Content Element: 10
Organization Element: 9.5
Style/ELC: See comments related to APA errors and use of feel and contractions. I however see no major
patterns of problems with APA and/or ELC
POINTS EARNED = 46/50
GRADE = 96 = 38.5 total points Very interesting difficult case Patricia. Why do you think your DON asked for
you to be the patients nurse. I have an assumption but I would be interested in your thoughts. You will have
no problems with your writing in this program Patricia
NOTE: GRADE is determined by dividing points earned by 50 and multiplied by .40 For example:
Points Earned
50
45
40
35
30
Grade
100
90
80
70
60
Final Pts.
40
36
32
28
24
NOTE: Grades for papers that require revisions will be averaged. For example, a grade of 70 earned on 1 st paper and 80 on second paper would result
in a final grade of 75 x .40= 30 points.