Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sherman - 1932
Horton - 1933
Wisler & Brater - 1949 - the hydrograph of surface
runoff resulting from a relatively short, intense rain,
called a unit storm.
The runoff hydrograph may be made up of runoff that is
generated as flow through the soil (Black, 1990).
Duration
Lag Time
Time of Concentration
Rising Limb
Recession Limb (falling limb)
Peak Flow
Time to Peak (rise time)
Recession Curve
Separation
Base flow
Graphical Representation
Duration of
excess
precipitation.
Lag time
Time of
concentration
Base flow
Fitted Distributions
Geomorphologic
5
Unit Hydrograph
The hydrograph that results from 1-inch of excess
precipitation (or runoff) spread uniformly in space and time
over a watershed for a given duration.
The key points :
1-inch of EXCESS precipitation
Spread uniformly over space - evenly over the watershed
Uniformly in time - the excess rate is constant over the
time interval
There is a given duration
0.
00
0
0. 0
16
00
0.
32
0
0. 0
48
00
0.
64
0
0. 0
80
00
0.
96
0
1. 0
12
0
1. 0
28
00
1.
44
0
1. 0
60
00
1.
76
0
1. 0
92
00
2.
08
0
2. 0
24
00
2.
40
0
2. 0
56
0
2. 0
72
00
2.
88
0
3. 0
04
00
3.
20
0
3. 0
36
00
3.
52
0
3. 0
68
00
600.0000
500.0000
300.0000
Surface
Response
400.0000
Baseflow
200.0000
100.0000
0.0000
Total
Hydrograph
600.0000
500.0000
Surface
Response
400.0000
300.0000
Baseflow
200.0000
100.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.5000
1.0000
1.5000
2.0000
2.5000
3.0000
3.5000
4.0000
25000
0,8
0,7
20000
0,5
Flow (cfs)
15000
0,4
10000
0,3
Precipitation (inches)
0,6
0,2
5000
0,1
12
8
12
0
11
2
96
10
4
88
80
72
64
56
48
40
32
24
0
16
Time (hrs.)
10
Separation of Baseflow
... generally accepted that the inflection point on the recession limb
of a hydrograph is the result of a change in the controlling physical
processes of the excess precipitation flowing to the basin outlet.
In this example, baseflow is considered to be a straight line
connecting that point at which the hydrograph begins to rise rapidly
and the inflection point on the recession side of the hydrograph.
the inflection point may be found by plotting the hydrograph in semilog fashion with flow being plotted on the log scale and noting the time
at which the recession side fits a straight line.
11
Semi-log Plot
100000
10000
Flow (cfs)
1000
100
10
99
10
4
10
9
11
4
11
9
12
4
12
9
13
4
89
94
79
84
69
74
59
64
49
54
39
44
29
34
Time (hrs.)
12
20000
Flow (cfs)
15000
10000
5000
133
126
119
112
105
98
91
84
77
70
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
0
Time (hrs.)
13
Separate Baseflow
25000
20000
Flow (cfs)
15000
10000
5000
98
10
5
11
2
11
9
12
6
13
3
91
84
77
70
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
Time (hrs.)
14
Sample Calculations
In the present example (hourly time step), the flows are summed
and then multiplied by 3600 seconds to determine the volume of
runoff in cubic feet. If desired, this value may then be converted
to acre-feet by dividing by 43,560 square feet per acre.
The depth of direct runoff in feet is found by dividing the total
volume of excess precipitation (now in acre-feet) by the
watershed area (450 mi2 converted to 288,000 acres).
In this example, the volume of excess precipitation or direct
runoff for storm #1 was determined to be 39,692 acre-feet.
The depth of direct runoff is found to be 0.1378 feet after dividing
by the watershed area of 288,000 acres.
Finally, the depth of direct runoff in inches is 0.1378 x 12 = 1.65
inches.
15
16
Final UHG
25000
Storm #1 hydrograph
20000
Flow (cfs)
15000
Storm # 1 unit
hydrograph
10000
Storm #1
baseflow
5000
133
126
119
112
105
98
91
84
77
70
63
56
49
42
35
28
21
14
0
Time (hrs.)
17
0.7
Precipitation (inches)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hrs.)
19
Excess Precipitation
1
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Small amounts of
excess precipitation at
beginning and end may
be omitted.
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hrs.)
20
Develop S-Curve
60000,00
50000,00
30000,00
20000,00
10000,00
120
114
108
96
102
90
84
78
72
66
60
54
48
42
36
30
24
18
12
0,00
0
Flow (cfs)
40000,00
Time (hrs.)
22
23
60000,00
50000,00
S-curves are
lagged by 1 hour
and the difference
is found.
1-hour unit
hydrograph resulting
from lagging Scurves and
multiplying the
difference by 6.
10000,00
8000,00
6000,00
40000,00
30000,00
Flow (cfs)
12000,00
20000,00
4000,00
10000,00
2000,00
0,00
0,00
Time (hrs.)
24
Shortcut Method
There does exist a shortcut method for changing the duration of the
unit hydrograph if the two durations are multiples of one another.
This is done by displacing the the unit hydrograph.
For example, if you had a two hour unit hydrograph and you
wanted to change it to a four hour unit hydrograph.
25
10
10
26
D is p la c e d U H G
10
10
10
11
12
27
D is p la c e d U H G
S um
10
14
12
10
14
10
11
12
28
D is p la c e d U H G
S um
4 h ou r U H G
10
14
12
10
14
4.5
10
11
0.5
12
29
Synthetic UHGs
Snyder
SCS
Time-area
IHABBS Implementation Plan :
NOHRSC Homepage
http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/
http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/98/html/uhg/index.html
31
Snyder
Since peak flow and time of peak flow are two of the most important
parameters characterizing a unit hydrograph, the Snyder method
employs factors defining these parameters, which are then used in
the synthesis of the unit graph (Snyder, 1938).
The parameters are Cp, the peak flow factor, and Ct, the lag factor.
The basic assumption in this method is that basins which have
similar physiographic characteristics are located in the same area
will have similar values of Ct and Cp.
Therefore, for ungaged basins, it is preferred that the basin be near
or similar to gaged basins for which these coefficients can be
determined.
32
Basic Relationships
t LAG Ct ( L Lca ) 0.3
tduration
t LAG
5.5
tbase 3
q peak
t LAG
8
640 AC p
t LAG
33
Final Shape
The final shape of the Snyder unit hydrograph is controlled
by the equations for width at 50% and 75% of the peak of
the UHG:
34
SCS
SCS Dimensionless UHG Features
1
Flow ratios
Cum. Mass
0.8
Q/Qpeak
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
T/Tpeak
3.5
4.5
35
Dimensionless Ratios
Time Ratios
(t/tp)
0
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.5
5.0
Discharge Ratios
(q/qp)
.000
.030
.100
.190
.310
.470
.660
.820
.930
.990
1.000
.990
.930
.860
.780
.680
.560
.460
.390
.330
.280
.207
.147
.107
.077
.055
.040
.029
.021
.015
.011
.005
.000
36
Triangular Representation
D
1.2
Tlag
1
0.8
Flow ratios
Q/Qpeak
Cum. Mass
Triangular
0.6
Point of
Inflection
Tc
0.4
0.2
0
0.0
Tp
1.0
2.0
Tb
3.0
4.0
5.0
T/Tpeak
37
Triangular Representation
T b 2.67 x T p
1.2
Tlag
1
Tr Tb - Tp 1.67 x Tp
0.8
Flow ratios
Q/Qpeak
Cum. Mass
Triangular
0.6
Point of
Inflection
Tc
Q=
qpT p
2
qpT r
2
qp
2
0.4
(T p +T r )
0.2
0
0.0
qp =
qp=
2Q
T p +T r
654.33 x 2 x A x Q
T p +T r
qp=
484 A Q
Tp
Tp
1.0
2.0
Tb
3.0
4.0
5.0
T/Tpeak
484 ?
qp=
484 A Q
Tp
Peaking Factor
575
484
400
300
200
100
Limb Ratio
(Recession to Rising)
1.25
1.67
2.25
3.33
5.5
12.0
39
D
+L
2
L = Lag time
L 0.6 * Tc
Tc D 1.7 T p
D
+ 0.6 T c = T p
2
D 0.133 Tc
40
Time of Concentration
Regression Eqs.
Segmental Approach
41
A Regression Equation
L0.8 (S 1) 0.7
Tlag
1900(%Slope) 0.5
42
Segmental Approach
More hydraulic in nature
The parameter being estimated is essentially the time of
concentration or longest travel time within the basin.
In general, the longest travel time corresponds to the longest
drainage path
The flow path is broken into segments with the flow in each segment
being represented by some type of flow regime.
The most common flow representations are overland, sheet, rill and
gully, and channel flow.
43
A Basic Approach
K
0.25
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.5
2.0
Flow Type
Small Tributary - Permanent or intermittent
streams which appear as solid or dashed
blue lines on USGS topographic maps.
Waterway - Any overland flow route which
is a well defined swale by elevation
contours, but is not a stream section as
defined above.
Sheet Flow - Any other overland flow path
which does not conform to the definition of
a waterway.
V kS
1
2
K
2.1
1.2
0.48
44
Triangular Shape
In general, it can be said that the triangular version will not cause or
introduce noticeable differences in the simulation of a storm event,
particularly when one is concerned with the peak flow.
For long term simulations, the triangular unit hydrograph does have
a potential impact, due to the shape of the recession limb.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HEC 1990) fits a Clark unit
hydrograph to match the peak flows estimated by the Snyder unit
hydrograph procedure.
It is also possible to fit a synthetic or mathematical function to the
peak flow and timing parameters of the desired unit hydrograph.
Aron and White (1982) fitted a gamma probability distribution using
peak flow and time to peak data.
45
1.0000
2.0000
3.0000
4.0000
5.0000
6.0000
46
Time-Area
47
Time-Area
100%
Q
Time
of conc.
% Area
Time
Time
48
Time-Area
49
Hypothetical Example
A 190 mi2 watershed is divided into 8 isochrones of travel time.
The linear reservoir routing coefficient, R, estimated as 5.5 hours.
A time interval of 2.0 hours will be used for the computations.
50
Rule of Thumb
R - The linear reservoir routing coefficient
can be estimated as approximately 0.75
times the time of concentration.
51
Basin Breakdown
Map
Area #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TOTAL
Bounding
Isochrones
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
Area
(mi2)
5
9
23
19
27
26
39
40
190
Cumulative
Area (mi2)
5
14
37
58
85
111
150
190
190
Cumulative
Time (hrs)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
52
Incremental Area
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
53
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Time (hrs)
54
for (0 Ti 0.5)
for (0.5 Ti 1.0)
55
Instantaneous UHG
IUH i cI i (1 c) IUH ( i 1)
2 t
2 R t
Computations
Time
(hrs)
(1)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
Inc.
Area
(mi2)
(2)
0
14
44
53
79
0
Inc.
Translated
Flow (cfs)
(3)
0
4,515
14,190
17,093
25,478
0
Inst.
UHG
(4)
0
1391
5333
8955
14043
9717
6724
4653
3220
2228
1542
1067
738
510
352
242
168
116
81
55
39
26
19
13
IUHG
Lagged 2
hours
(5)
0
1,391
5,333
8,955
14,043
9,717
6,724
4,653
3,220
2,228
1,542
1,067
738
510
352
242
168
116
81
55
39
26
19
13
2-hr
UHG
(cfs)
(6)
0
700
3,360
7,150
11,500
11,880
8,220
5,690
3,940
2,720
1,890
1,300
900
630
430
300
200
140
100
70
50
30
20
20
57
Incremental Areas
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
58
Incremental Flows
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1
59
Instantaneous UHG
16000
14000
Flow (cfs/inch)
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time (hrs)
60
Flow (cfs/inch)
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time (hrs)
61
Geomorphologic
Uses stream network topology and probability concepts
Law of Stream Numbers
range: 3-5
N 1
RB
N
L
RL
L 1
A
RA
A 1
62
1
2
2
2
3
63
Probability Concepts
Water travels through basin, making transitions from lower to
higher stream order
Travel times and transition probabilities can be approximated
using Strahler stream ordering scheme
Obtain a probability density function analogous to an
instantaneous unit hydrograph
Can ignore surface/subsurface travel times to get a channelbased GIUH
64
GIUH Equations
Channel-based, triangular instantaneous
unit hydrograph:
1.31 0.43
qp
RL V
LW
LW in km, V in
0.55
0.44L W R B
R L0.38
tp
V RA
m/s, qp in hr-1, tp in hrs
65