Structure in 5’s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design Henry Mintzberg, Management Science, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Mar., 1980), 322-341. Stable URL: butp//links jstor.org/sici?sic!=0025-1909% 28 198003%2926%3A3%3C322%3,ASISASO%3E2,0,CO%3B2-%23 Management Science is currently published by INFORMS. ‘Your use of the ISTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at hhup:/www.jstororg/about/terms.hml. JSTOR’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use ofthis work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at hup:/www jstor.org/journals/informs.huml, Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the sereen or printed page of such transmission, STOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals, For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support @jstor.org. bupslwww jstor.org/ ‘Thu Jan 27 00:51:46 2005STRUCTURE IN 5’S: A SYNTHESIS OF THE RESEARCH ON ORGANIZATION DESIGN* HENRY MINTZBERG} ‘The elements of organizational structuring—which show a curious tendency to appear in ‘ive'e—euggest a typology of five basic configurations: Simple Strctue, Machine Buresi- ‘racy, Professional Bureaucracy, Divisionalized Form, and Adhocr2c. ‘The elements include (1) ive basic parts of the organization—the operating cor, strategic apes, middle line, technostrcture, and support staff; @) five basic mechanisms of coor “Elfect of Competition on the Structure of Top Management Contol” Acad. Management J. (1973), pp. 481-495 "Mass Output Orientation of Operations Technology and Organizational Stucture.” Admin Sek. Quart. (1978), pp. 74-97, The Design of Organizations, arcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977 Kowmotiy, J. R, “Organizational Size and the Structuraist Perspective: A Review, Critique, and Proposal Admin. Set Quart. (1976), pp. 871-897 KLATZKy, 8. P, "Relationship of Organizational Ste to Complexity and Coordination,” Admin. Se ‘Quare. (1970 pp. 428-438. Lawrence, P. Bax LoRsci, J. W, Organization and Emsironment, Irwin, Homewood, Ul, 1967. Ovcat, W. G. AND Dowuinc, J.B, “Defining the Span of Control" Admin. Sc. Quart. (1974). pp. 357-365 Prawns, J. M, “The Relevance ofthe Strctural-Contingency Model for Organizational Eifective- ness" Admin. Se. Quart (1975), pp. 393-410, Pranow, C, Organtatinal Analyus! A Sociological Review, Wadsworth, Belmont, Cai, 1970,4s, #. 4 », si 2 3 sa 58 6. 3. 58 BOR B KBR STRUCTURE IN S'S 341 Presow, C, “Is Business Really Changing.” Organizational Dynamics (Summer 1974, pp. 31-44. Drerren, J. av Lenuimics, H. “The Effect of Competition on Some Dimensions of Organizational Structure” Social Forces (1973-14), pp. 268-279. Poxoy, LR, “Elfecs of Sie, Complesity, and Ownership on Administeative Intensity." Admin. Sei ‘Quart. (1969), pp. 47-60. Pucit, D. S, Hickson, D. J, Hivines, C, R. AND Turin, C, “Dimensions of Organization Structure," Admin. Set Quay (1968), pp. 65-108. ‘Sei. Quart (196), pp. , ‘axp Tunwn, C, "The Context of Organization Structures” Admin Sl. Quart (1969), pp. 91-114 Remax, B.C, “On the Dimensions of Bureaucratic Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal ‘Sel. Quart (1973), pp. 462-76, Rormusorncen, FJ. AND Dickson, W. J, Management and the Worker: An Aecount of a Rescarch Program Conducted by the Western Elecric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1939 RUMELT, R. Py Sirategy, Sirctre, and Economie Performance, Division of Research, Graduate School ‘of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1974, Stwutt, Y. axb MaNMiEny, B. F, “A Multidimensional Approach Toward a Typology of Bureau ‘eracy." Admin. Sei. Quart. (1970), pp. 216-228. Scorr, B. R., Stage of Coporete Development, Part 1, Working Paper, Harvard Business School, 14371-294; BPI, 1971 Seca, M,, “Organization and Environment: A Typology of Adaptability and Structure,” Public ‘Adin. Rex (1914), pp. 212-220 SON, H. A, Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed, Macmillan, New York, 1957. Smovtt, L.'S, Seminars on Organizations, Volume Hl, Number 1, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Autumn, 1975 Sranauck, N. H., “Organizational Growth and Development,” in J. G, March (ed), Handbook of Organzaions, Rand MeNally 1968, Chapter 11. Srivencounr, A. L, “Social Structure and Organizations” in J. G. March (ed), Handbook of Organizations, Rand MeNally, 1968, Chapter 4 ‘Stovronp, J. M. AND WELLS, LT. Jn, Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization ofthe Firm ‘and Ownership ofthe Subsidiaries, Basic Books, New York, 1972 ‘Twowrsox, J.D, Orgonizatons in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967 Uby, § HL, Organization of Work, HRAF Press, New Haven, Conn, 1959. Uny, 5. J, Jn "The Comparative Analysis of Organization,” tn J. G. March (ed), HandBook of Organizations, Rand MeNally, 1965, Chapter 16 Vav'be Vin, A. H,, "A Framework for Organizational Assessment,” Acad. Management Rev. (1976), pp. 64-78 Wiivre, W. F, Orgonizatona Behavior: Theory and Application, Irwin-Dorsey, 1969 WooowARn, J, Industrial Organzation: Theory and Pracice, Oxford Univ. Press, 1965. ‘Wnictey, L, Diversification and Diixonal Autonomy, D. B.A. thesis, Harvard Business School, 1970, * Admin.