I II III IV V Outstanding Excellent Average Poor Ineffective

Time:
Room:
CHORAL
Name of Ensemble:
School:
TONE
SCORE
Breath Mgmnt.
+
Focus +
Freedom +
Resonance +
INTONATION
SCORE
Chords +
Intervals +
Tonal Awareness
+
Unisons +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
II
III
IV
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
15
14
13
12
Proper tone production in all

ranges and dynamic levels
15
14
13
Pitch is well centered/Needed

adjustments made quickly
15
14
DICTION
SCORE
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Individual +
Ensemble +
NOTE ACCURACY
BALANCE
BLEND
OTHER
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
Appearance +
Stage Presence
+
Facial Expression
+
Posture +
TOTAL POINTS
10
11
13
11
11
Expressive use of the elements

of diction
Intonation problems evident

with some adjustments being
made
Inconsistent use of expressive

elements
Strong use of the elements of

diction with minor defects
Tone production is inconsistent
10
Consistent use of expressive

elements
10
Minor problems in certain

ranges &/or dynamic levels or
passages
12
10
Tone production is affected

in some ranges and dynamic
levels
12
Dynamics +
Phrasing +
Musical, sensitive, artistic use
Style + of style, phrasing & dynamics
Tempo +
Consonants +
Language +
Syllabic Stress
+
Vowels +
SMALL ENSEMBLE
Inconsistent application of the

elements of diction
Elements of proper tone

production are seldom present
Numerous problems evident

with little adjustment being
made
Minimal expression much of

the time
Proper tone production is not

evident
Undeveloped intonation with no

adjustments being made
Notes are performed with little

expression
Minimal application of the

elements of diction
Lack of articulation and

technical skills
Rhythms performed correctly
Nearly all rhythms performed

correctly
Inconsistent rhythmic accuracy
Minimal rhythmic accuracy
Lack of rhythmic accuracy
Notes performed correctly
Nearly all notes performed

correctly
Inconsistent note accuracy
Minimal note accuracy
Lack of note accucracy
Appropriate melodic and

harmonic balance within and
across ensemble
Minor defects in melodic/

across ensemble
Ensemble balance is
inconsistent
Frequent balance problems
Little evidence of appropriate

ensemble balance
Consistent blend in section and

across the ensemble
Minor defects in section and/or

ensemble blend
Inconsistent blend in section

and/or across the ensemble
Frequent blend problems in

section and/or across ensemble

section and
ensemble blend
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 37-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 21-36 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-20 Pts.
(Ineffective)

Signature of Adjudicator
*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.
VOCAL SOLO
Time: Room:
Name of Soloist:
School:
I
TONE
SCORE
Breath Mgmnt. +
Focus +
Freedom +
Resonance +
Posture +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics +
Phrasing +
Stylistic Accuracy +
INTONATION
SCORE
Intervals +
Pitch Adj. Skills +
Adequate Breath +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
Pitches +
Rhythm +
Tempo +
DICTION/LANGUAGE
SCORE
Consonants +
Language +
Syllabic/
Word Stress +
Vowels +
STAGE PRESENCE
SCORE
16
SCORE
15
14
16
15
14
13
12
10
Strong use of the diction

elements with minor defects
Outstanding
No Memory Lapses

correctly
11
-1
10
10
10
Expressive use of the

diction elements
11

ranges and/or dynamic
levels or passages
10
12
11
11
12
10

7
Inconsistent use of the

diction elements
6
-5
-6
Memory lapses affected performance
Undeveloped intonation with

no adjustments being made
1
Lack of note accuracy
1
Minimal use of the

diction elements
Ineffective use of diction

elements
Poor
-8
g
-7
Lacks expression most of

the time

4
Ineffective
Proper tone production is not

evident

with minimal adjustment
being made
4
Average
-4
Notes are performed with

minimal expression
Elements of proper tone

production are seldom
present
Poor
Intonation problems evident

with some adjustments being
made
-3
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
Excellent
-2
Tone production is
inconsistent
9
RATING
V 6-15 Pts.
(Ineffective)
IV
Average

elements
Pitch is well centered/

needed adjustments made
quickly
12
11
Tone production is affected

in some ranges and dynamic
levels
13
Musical, sensitive, artistic

use of dynamics, phrasing.
Stylistic accuracy
14
12
III 33-51 Pts

(Average)
IV 16-32 Pts
(Poor)
III
Excellent
13
Proper tone production in all

Appearance +
Facial Expression +
Poise +
MEMORIZATION
Outstanding
II
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 52-68 Pts
(Excellent)
1
Ineffective
-9
-10
-11
-12
Major memory lapses
TOTAL
COMMENTS:

POINTS

Time: Room:
PERCUSSION
Name of Ensemble:
School:
EXPRESSION
SCORE
SCORE
Playing Spot +
Stick/Mallet Sel. +
Tension +
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
Hand Position
+
Position of Instruments +
Rolls +
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Note/Rest Value +
Pulse +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
II
III
IV
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
16
15
14
BALANCE
12
11
Characteristic tone for

instruments and music
selection
12
11
Accurate technical skills

12
11
SCORE
Appropriate balance
STAGE PRESENCE
SCORE
Appearance +
Poise +
Posture +
10
Consistent use of
expressive elements
9
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
Consistent tone for

selection
Inconsistent tone for

selection
10
Some minor defects in

technical skills
9
10
Mostly accurate and

appropriate for music
selection and instruments
8
Inconsistent technical skills
Inconsistent rhythmic
accuracy
7
Inconsistent accuracy
and application for music
6
Minimal expression most of

the time
4
Development in all
areas needed
1
Lacks most technical skills
1
Lack of accuracy a
consistent problem
3

lack of expression
Minimal technical skills

4
Minimal characteristic
tone for instruments and
music selection is seldom
apparent
4
1
Development of all
areas needed
2
Minor defects in balance
Ensemble balance is
inconsistent
Little evidence of
appropriate ensemble
balance
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
5
Outstanding
11
Nearly all rhythms

performed correctly
11
10
12
10
Rhythms performed
correctly
12
13
10
Accurate and appropriate

for music selection and
instruments
Appl. of Rudiments +
Correct Pitch (Mallets) +
Intonation (Timpani) +
RATING
Dynamics +
Musical, sensitive, artistic,
Phrasing +
appropriate dynamics,
Style + phrasing,
style and tempo
Tempo +
TONE
ENSEMBLE
COMMENTS:

TOTAL POINTS
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 36-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 18-35 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-17 Pts.
(Ineffective)

PERCUSSION SOLO
Time: Room:
Name of Soloist:
School:
I
TONE
SCORE
Playing Spot +
Stick/Mallet Sel. +
Tension +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
II
Outstanding
16
15
Characteristic tone for

instrument and music
selection
16
15
SCORE
Hand Pos. (Right) +

Hand Pos. (Left) +
Position of Instrument +
Rolls +
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Note/Rest Value +
Pulse +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
Appl. of Rudiments +
Correct Pitch (Mallets) +
Intonation (Timpani) +
STAGE PRESENCE
14
14
13
13
13
Appearance +
Poise +
Posture +
12
11
12
11
10
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
10
Inconsistent technical skills
10
10
accuracy
9
Poor
8
Inconsistent tone for

selection
11
Some minor defects in

technical skills
Ineffective
5
Lacks characteristic tone

for instrument and music
selection
7

minimal expression
6
Development in all
areas needed
4

the time
3
Minimal technical skills
Lack of technical skills

6

3
Mostly accurate and

appropriate for music
selection and instrument
Inconsistent accuracy
and application for music
Lack of accuracy a
consistent problem
Development of all areas

needed
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
5
Outstanding
10
Consistent use of
expressive elements
11
IV
Average
11
Nearly all rhythms

performed correctly
Accurate and appropriate

for music selection and
instrument
SCORE
13
12
Rhythms performed
correctly
14
12
12
Accurate technical skills

14
13
Consistent tone for

selection
Dynamics +
Musical, sensitive, artistic,
Phrasing +
Style + phrasing,
style and tempo
Tempo +
TECHNIQUE
III
Excellent
14
RATING
COMMENTS:

____
TOTAL POINTS
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 37-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 21-36 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-20 Pts.
(Ineffective)

Time: Room:
STRING
Name of Ensemble:
School:
TONE
SCORE
Bow Stroke
+
Vibrato +
INTONATION
SCORE
Chords +
Octaves +
Unisons +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
II
III
IV
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
15
14
13
12
Focused, resonant in all ranges

and dynamics/vibrato enhances
tone
15
14
13
Well centered, needed

adjustments are made quickly
15
14
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Individual +
Ensemble +
NOTE ACCURACY
BALANCE
BLEND
OTHER
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
Appearance +
Stage Presence
+
Posture +
TOTAL POINTS
10
11
13
11
11
Accurate representation of
articulation and technical facility
Problems evident with some


elements
Strong articulation and

technical performance with
minor defects
Focus and resonance are

inconsistent/vibrato inconsistent
10

elements
10

ranges or passages
12
10
Affected by range and

dynamics/vibrato usually
present
12
Dynamics +
Sensitive, artistic, appropriate
Phrasing +
style, tempo, phrasing &
Style +
dynamics
Tempo +
Articulation +
Bow Management +
Technical Facility
+
SMALL ENSEMBLE
Inconsistent articulation of
technical skills
Seldom focused or resonant/

limited use of vibrato

made
Minimal expression much of

the time
Not focused or resonant/little or

no vibrato
Undeveloped with no

expression
Minimal uniform articulation and

technical facility

technical skills

correctly

correctly

across ensemble

across ensemble
Ensemble balance is
inconsistent

ensemble balance
Consistent blend within sections

and across the ensemble

ensemble blend
Inconsistent blend within

sections and/or across the
ensemble
Frequent blend problems

within sections and/or across
ensemble

section and
ensemble blend
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 37-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 21-36 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-20 Pts.
(Ineffective)

Time: Room:
Name of Soloist:
School:
I
Outstanding
TONE
SCORE
Bow Placement +
Bow Stroke +
Vibrato +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics +
Phrasing +
Style +
Tempo +
INTONATION
SCORE
Accuracy +
Pitch Adj. Skills +
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
Bow Usage +
Inst.& Bow Hold +
LH Position +
Posture +
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Note/Rest Value +
Pulse +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
Finger Placement +
STAGE PRESENCE
SCORE
Appearance +
Poise +
Posture +
14
13
13
12
Sensitive, artistic,
phrasing, style and tempo
12
11

12
11
articulation and technical
skills
12
(Regional)
II
11
11
10
10

elements
10

ranges or passages
10

minor defects
10
performed
Rhythms performed correctly Nearly all rhythms
correctly
12
11
10
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
7

7
technical skills
7
accuracy
7
V
Ineffective
3
Seldom focused or resonant;

Limited use of vibrato
5

minimal expression
4

made
4
Minimal articulation and

technical skills
4

4
RATING
V 6-14 Pts.
(Ineffective)
Poor
6

inconsistent;
Vibrato inconsistent
8
III 34-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 15-33 Pts
(Poor)
IV
Average
9
Focus & resonance affected

by range and dynamics;
Vibrato usually present
11
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III
Excellent
12
Focused, resonant in all

ranges and dynamics;
Vibrato enhances tone
14
STRING SOLO
Not focused or resonant;

No vibrato
2

the time
1
1
technical skills
1
1

correctly
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
TOTAL
COMMENTS:

POINTS

STRING SOLO
Time: Room:
Name of Soloist:
School:
(State)
Outstanding
TONE
SCORE
Bow Placement +
Bow Stroke +
Vibrato +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics +
Phrasing +
Style +
Tempo +
INTONATION
SCORE
Accuracy +
Pitch Adj. Skills +
TECHNIQUE
SCORE
Bow Usage +
Inst.& Bow Hold +
LH Position +
Posture +
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Note/Rest Value +
Pulse +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
Finger Placement +
STAGE PRESENCE
14
14
13
12
12
11
10


ranges or passages
11
10
skills
12
10

minor defects
11
10
11
10
technical skills
7
accuracy
7
Ineffective

the time
1
Minimal articulation and

technical skills
4

made
4
Not focused or resonant;

No vibrato

technical skills
Seldom focused or resonant;

Limited use of vibrato

minimal expression

7
Poor
6
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
performed
correctly
12

inconsistent;
Vibrato inconsistent

elements
11
12
RATING
V 6-14 Pts.
(Ineffective)
IV
Average
10
Focus & resonance affected

by range and dynamics;
Vibrato usually present
Sensitive, artistic,
phrasing, style and tempo
1

correctly
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
SCORE
SCORE
11
III 34-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 15-33 Pts
(Poor)
III
Excellent
12
Focused, resonant in all

ranges and dynamics;
Vibrato enhances tone
Appearance +
Poise +
Posture +
MEMORIZATION
13
II
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
-1
No Memory Lapses
-2
-3
g
-4
-5
-6
Memory lapses affected performance
-7
-8
g
-9
-10
-11
-12
Major memory lapses
TOTAL
COMMENTS:

POINTS

Time: Room:
WIND
Name of Ensemble:
School:
TONE
SCORE
Breathing +
Breathing Apparatus +
INTONATION
SCORE
Chords +
Octaves +
Unisons +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
II
III
IV
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
15
14
13
12
Focused, resonant in all ranges

and dynamic levels
15
14
13

adjustments are made quickly
15
14
SCORE
Articulation +
Technical Facility
+
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
SCORE
Individual +
Ensemble +
NOTE ACCURACY
BALANCE
BLEND
OTHER
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
Appearance +
Stage Presence
+
Posture +
TOTAL POINTS
10
11
13
11
11


elements

minor defects

inconsistent
10

elements
articulation and technical facility
10

ranges &/or dynamic levels or
passages.
12
10

affected by range and dynamic
levels
12
Dynamics +
Musical, sensitive, artistic use
Phrasing +
phrasing &
Style + of style, tempo,
dynamics
Tempo +
TECHNIQUE
SMALL ENSEMBLE
technical skills
Seldom focused or resonant

made
Lacks expression much of the

time
Not focused or resonant
Undeveloped with no

expression
Minimal uniform articulation and

technical facility

technical skills

correctly

correctly

harmonic balance

harmonic balance
Ensemble balance is
inconsistent

ensemble balance
Consistent blend within sections

and across the ensemble

ensemble blend
Inconsistent blend within

sections and/or across the
ensemble
Frequent blend problems

within sections and/or across
ensemble

section and
ensemble blend
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 37-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 21-36 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-20 Pts.
(Ineffective)

Time: Room:
Name of Soloist:
School:
I
TONE
SCORE
Breathing +
Embouchure +
Posture +
EXPRESSION
SCORE
Dynamics +
Phrasing +
Style +
Tempo +
INTONATION
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
Note/Rest Value +
Pulse +
NOTE ACCURACY
SCORE
Correct Pitches +
Fingerings +
STAGE PRESENCE
Outstanding
13
12
Focused and resonant in all

14
13
12
Musical, sensitive, artistic

use of dynamics, phrasing,
style, & tempo
12
11
12
11
SCORE
Appearance +
Poise +
Posture +
12
11
10
11
10

elements
9

ranges and/or dynamic
levels or passages
10
11
Excellent
III

affected by range and
dynamic levels
10
skills
Articulation +
Fingering/Slide +
RHYTHMIC ACCURACY
II

Individual +
w/Accomp. +
TECHNIQUE
14
WIND INSTRUMENT SOLO

minor defects
10
performed
correctly
12
11
10
Average
7
IV
6

inconsistent
8
Inconsistent use of
expressive elements
7

7
Inconsistent application of
skills
7
accuracy
7
RATING
Poor
4
V
3
Seldom focused or resonant

5

the time
4

made
4
Minimal uniform articulation

and technical skills
4

4
Ineffective
Not focused or resonant

2

minimal expression
1
Undeveloped with no
1
technical skills
1
1

correctly
Outstanding
Excellent
Average
Poor
Ineffective
COMMENTS:

TOTAL POINTS
RATING TABLE:
I 69-80 Pts
(Outstanding)
II 53-68 Pts
(Excellent)
III 34-52 Pts

(Average)
IV 15-33 Pts
(Poor)
V 6-14 Pts.
(Ineffective)


I II III IV V Outstanding Excellent Average Poor Ineffective

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

I II III IV V Outstanding Excellent Average Poor Ineffective

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Time:

Proper tone production in all

Pitch is well centered/Needed

Expressive use of the elements

Intonation problems evident

Inconsistent use of expressive

Strong use of the elements of

Tone production is inconsistent

Consistent use of expressive

Minor problems in certain

Tone production is affected

Inconsistent application of the

Elements of proper tone

Numerous problems evident

Minimal expression much of

Proper tone production is not

Undeveloped intonation with no

Notes are performed with little

Minimal application of the

Lack of articulation and

Rhythms performed correctly

Nearly all rhythms performed

Inconsistent rhythmic accuracy

Minimal rhythmic accuracy

Lack of rhythmic accuracy

Notes performed correctly

Nearly all notes performed

Inconsistent note accuracy

Minimal note accuracy

Lack of note accucracy

Appropriate melodic and

Minor defects in melodic/

Frequent balance problems

Little evidence of appropriate

Consistent blend in section and

Minor defects in section and/or

Inconsistent blend in section

Frequent blend problems in

Little evidence of appropriate

III 37-52 Pts

*Please write constructive criticisms and helpful comments on the back.

Strong use of the diction

Nearly all notes performed

Expressive use of the

Minor problems in certain

Notes performed correctly

Inconsistent note accuracy

Inconsistent use of the

Memory lapses affected performance

Undeveloped intonation with

Minimal use of the

Ineffective use of diction

Lacks expression most of

Minimal note accuracy

Proper tone production is not

Numerous problems evident

Notes are performed with

Elements of proper tone

Intonation problems evident

Consistent use of expressive

Pitch is well centered/

Tone production is affected