Sunteți pe pagina 1din 10

DISCIPLINE COURSE -1

SEMESTER -1
Paper: 101: GEOMORPHOLOGY
Unit 1: Geomorphology and Internal Structure of
the Earth
1.3: Isostasy
Lesson Developer:
Dr. Prabuddh Kr. Mishra
(Bhim Rao Ambedkar College)
University of Delhi, Delhi

Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi


The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
1

Table of Contents
1.3: Isostasy

1.3.1 Introduction
1.3.2 Discovery of the concept
1.3.3 The concept of Sit George Airy
1.3.4 The concept of Archdeacon Pratt
1.3.5 Conclusion
Summery
Glossary
References

Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi


The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
2

1.3.1 Introduction
Isostasy simply means a mechanical stability between the upstanding parts and the lowlying basins on a rotating earth. Isostasy has been derived from a German word isostasios
(meaning in equipoise in a state of balance). American geologist Dutton proposed the principle
of isostasy in the paper On Some of the Greater Problems of Physical Geology (1892). He was
the first person to propose and express his view to indicate the state of balance which he
thought must have exist between large upstanding areas of the earths surface, mountain
ranges, plateaus and contiguous lowlands, etc. According to Dutton, the upstanding parts of
the earths surface (mountains, plateaus, plains and ocean basins) must be compensated by
lighter rock materials from beneath so that the crustal reliefs should remain in mechanical
stability. According to J.A. Steers (1961) this doctrine states that whatever equilibrium exists
on the earths surface, equal mass must underlie equal surface area.Isostatic equilibrium is an
ideal state where the crust and mantle would settle into in absence of disturbing forces. The
waxing and waning of ice sheets, erosion, sedimentation, and extrusive volcanism are examples
of processes that perturb isostasy.
1.3.2 Discovery of the Concept
Though the concept of isostacy came much later in the mid 19 th century, however, its
concept grew out of gradual thinking in terms of gravitational attraction of giant mountainous
masses. Pierre Bouguer during his expedition of the Andes in 1735 found that the towering
volcanic peak of Chimborazo (one of the ranges of Andes) was not attracting the plumb line as
it should have done. He thus maintained that the gravitational attraction of Andes is much
smaller than that to be expected from the mass represented from these mountains. Similar
discrepancies were noted during the geodetic survey of the Indo-gangetic plain for the
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
3

determination of latitudes under the supervision of Sir George Everest, the then surveyor
general of India in 1859. The debate on the discrepancies of the gravitational deflections of the
plumb line and numerous discrepancies resulted into the postulation of the concept of isostacy.
There are two important hypothesis proposed to explain the concept of Isostasy by Sir George
Airy and Archdeacon Pratt. There are other concepts of Isostasy given by Hayford and Bowie
and their concepts were almost similar to Pratt.
Click on the link to watch the Video on Concept of Isostasy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9rN7qhUQZg

1.3.3 The concept of Sir George Airy (hypothesis proposed in 1855)


According to Airy, the inner parts of the mountains are not hollow; rather the excess
weight is compensated by the lighter materials below. According to him the crust of relatively
lighter material is floating in the substratum of dense material. Therefore, the continents which
are made of lighter sial are floating over the sub-stratum which is built of the denser sima.Thus,
Himalaya is also floating in the denser glassy magma. He suggested that the lighter sial of the
Himalaya is floating over the denser material of sima lying underneath. Not only this, but the
Himalaya is floating in the denser magma with their maximum portion sunk in magma in the
same way as a boat floats in water with its maximum parts sunk in the water.
This concept in fact involves the principle of floatation. For example, an iceberg floats
in water in such a way that for every one part to be above water-level nine parts has to be
below the water. If it is assumed the average density of the crust and substratum to be 2.67
and 3.00 respectively, then, for every one part of the crust to remain above the substratum,
nine parts of the crust must be in the substratum. In other words, law of floatation demands
that the ratio of freeboard to drought is 1 to 9. If the law of floatation is applied as stated
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
4

above, in the case of the concept of Airy, then we have to assume that for the 8,848 meters
height of the Himalaya, there must be a root, 9 times more in length than the height of the
Himalaya, the substratum. Thus, for 8,848 meters part of the Himalaya above, there must be
downward projection of lighter material beneath the mountain reaching the depth of roughly
80,000 meters.
Thus, according to Airy, Himalaya was exerting their real attraction force because their
existed a long root of lighter materials in the substratum which compensate the material above.
Based on the above observation Airy postulated that if the land column above the substratum
is larger, its greater part would be submerged in the substratum and if the land cover is lower,
its smaller part would be submerged in the substratum. A per Airy, the density of different
column does not change with depth, i.e., uniform density with varying depth (Fig.1).
He showed that the landmasses could be conceived as wooden flocks of different height
floating in water. These blocks are said to be in the state of hydrostatic balance or equilibrium.
Similarly, land masses of similar density of rocks, penetrate deep into the substratum in
proportion to their height. To prove the concept he took several pieces of copper of varying
length and put them in a basin full of mercury. These pieces of copper sunk upto varying depths
depending on their lengths. The longest block will float with greatest amount rising above the
level of mercury surface and the shortest block has upper surface lowest. With all block now
floating at rest, it is obvious that block rising highest also extends to grater depths.

Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi


The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
5

Fig.1 Airys Concept of Isostasy (Image Source: Wikipedia)


This concept of Airy also suffers from certain defects and errors. If we accept the Airys concept
of isostasy then, every upstanding part must have a root below with its height. That means
Himalayas have the root equivalent to 79,632 meters, which is not possible. It is wrong to
assume that Himalaya have a downward projection of lighter material beneath the mountain,
which will have such a great depth. Moreover, such a long root would melt due to very high
temperature prevailing at such great depth. Though there is an error on Airys concept the
geologists favour Airys explanation the most than others.
1.3.4 The concept of Archdeacon Pratt (hypothesis proposed in 1859)
According to Pratt the gravitational attraction of the Himalayas was less than the mass
represented by these mountains because they are made up of much lighter materials, i.e. rocks
of much lower density. According to Pratt, there is a level of compensation above which there is
a variation in the densities of different columns of land but there is no change in density below
that level. Thus, the central theme of the concept of Pratt on Isostasy may be expressed as
Uniform depth with varying densities. According to Pratt equal surface area must underlie
equal mass along the line of compensation. This statement may be explained with the help of
an example.
There are two coloumns A and B, along the line of compensation. Both the coloumns, A
& B, have equal surface area but there is difference in height (B is lower in height than A). Both
the coloumns must have equal mass along the line of compensation. So the density of coloumn
B is more than the density of Coloumn A so that weight of both the coloumns becomes equal
along the line of compensation. So Pratts concept of inverse relationship between the height of
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
6

different coloumns and their respective densities may be expressed in the following manner
bigger the coloumn, lesser the density and smaller the coloumn, greater the density. Hence
materials are less dense under mountains than under low plains and are most dense under
ocean floors. According to Pratt density varies only in the Lithosphere and barysphere. Thus as
per Pratt, different relief features are standing only because of the fact that their respective
mass is equal along the line of compensation of varying density (Fig.2).

Line of Compensation
Fig.2 Pratts concept of Isostasy (Image Source: Wikipedia, eps.mq.edu.au )
1.3.5 Conclusion
Bowie has opined that Pratt does not believe in the law of floatation as stated by Airy,
but if we look closely we will find, the glimpse of the law indirectly. Similarly, though Pratt does
not believe in the concept of root formation but close perpetual of his concept of isostasy,
does indicate glimpse of such idea. While making comparative analysisd between Airys and
Pratts concept, Bowie observed that fundamental difference between their concept is that
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
7

former postulated a uniform density with varying thickness and the latter one postulated a
uniform depth with varying density.

Fig. 3 Pratts Theory (left) and Airy's Theory (right). (source: large.stanford.edu )

Summary

The concept of Isostasy has been proposed by Clarence Edward Dutton.

Its historical evolution has been as old as in 1735, when Pierre Bouguer launched an
expedition on the Andes Mountain.

Later the discrepancies of the gravitational deflections of the plumb line (during the
survey of Andes and Himalayan Mountains) and numerous discrepancies resulted into
the postulation of the concept of isostasy.

Two major concepts of Isostasy have been given by Sir George Airy and Archdeacon
Pratt. The major difference between the two concepts were that former one postulated
a uniform density with varying thickness and the latter one postulated a uniform
depth with varying density.

Glossary
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
8

Isostasy
The state of balance/ equilibrium exists between large upstanding areas of the earths surface,
mountain ranges, plateaus and contiguous lowlands. A balance between lithosphere and
aesthenosphere.
Line of compensation
The concept has been given by Pratt and according to him there is a level of compensation
above which there is a variation in the densities of different columns of land but there is no
change in density below that level. According to him equal surface area must underlie equal
mass along the line of compensation.
References
Ollier, C.and Pain, C. (2000), The Origin of Mountains ,Routledge.
S. Singh (1998), Geomorphology, Prayag Pustak Bhawan, Allahabad.
Bloom, Arthur L., (2003) Geomorphology: A Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landforms.
First Indian Reprint. Delhi: Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd.
Chorley, Richard J., Schumm, Stanley A. and Sugden, David E., (1984) Geomorphology. London:
Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Engeln, O. D. von, Geomorphology. (1960) New York: The Macmillan Company.
Dayal, P. (1976), A Text Book of Geomorphology, Shukla Book Dept, Patna.
A.N. Strahler & A.R. Strahler (1978), Modern Physical Geography, John Wiley.
J.A. Steers, (1961). The Unstable Earth, Lyell Book Dept, Ludhiana.
Kale V. and Gupta, A. (2001) Elements of Geomorphology. Oxford University Press, Calcutta.
Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi
The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
9

Bharatdwaj,K. (2006). Physical Geography: Introduction to Earth.Discovery Publishing


House,Delhi.
Pan,S.A. - December 8, 2007The Theory of Isostasy, ( Submitted as coursework for Physics 210,
Stanford University, Fall 2007). Accessed on 26th August 2013
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2007/ph210/pan2/
Suggested Readings
Hugget, R. J. (2011) Fundamentals of Geomorphology, Routledge, Oxon.
Strahler, A. and Strahler, A. (2002) Physical Geography: Science and Systems of the
Human Environment, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Holmes, A and Holmes, D.L. (1978) Holmes Principles of Physical Geology, BAS Printers,
Hampshire.

Web Links

http://eps.mq.edu.au/courses/GEOS260/Lithosphere1.html

http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2007/ph210/pan2/

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isostasy.Airy%26Pratt.Scheme.png

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/174692/Clarence-Edward-Dutton

Institute of Lifelong Learning , University of Delhi


The above lesson has been checked for the plagiarism by the s/w used by the ILLL technical team.
10

S-ar putea să vă placă și