Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Identittskrise
Relevanzkrise
ABSTRACT
The Christian life of theologians, churches and human beings is faced more than
ever today with a double crisis: "the crisis of identity"(Identittskrise) and "the crisis
of relevance"(Relevanzkrise). There are tension and complement between these two
crises. Professor Jrgen Moltmann discussed the double crisis with the dialectical
method. This essay begins with the double crisis and then extends to the discussion of
the epistemology of God.
In Moltmann's view, Christian Faith should be back to Bible, back to Paul and
Luther's theology of cross. It should be identified with the Crucified Christ. The
epistemological principle of the theology of the cross can only be this dialectic
principle : the deity of God is revealed in the paradox of the cross. The dialectical
principle of "revelation in the opposite" does not replace the analogical principle of
"like is known only by like", but alone makes it possible. In so far as God is revealed
in his opposite, he can be known by the godless and those who are abandoned by God,
and it is this knowledge which brings them into correspondence with God.
The Christian church and Christian theology become relevant to the problems of
the modern world only when they reveal the hard core of their identity in the crucified
Christ and through it are called into question, together with the society in which they
live. This research of the theological dialectic of the cross in Jrgen Moltmann will
find out the reflection upon the cross leads to the clarification of what can be called
Christian identity and what can be called Christian relevance, in critical way with our
contemporaries.
ii
..............................................................................................................
1.1 ..................................................................................
1.2 ..................................................................................
1.3 .......................................................................................
1.4 ...............................................................................................
1.4.1 .......................................................................
1.4.2 ......................................................
10
1.5......................................................
13
1.5.1 ...............................................................................
13
1.5.2 ....................................................................................
15
1.5.3 ...................................................................
17
1.5.4 ....................................................................................
19
1.6 ........................................................................................................
22
................................................................................
25
2.1 ..................................................................................
25
2.1.1 ..........................................................................
25
2.1.2 ......................................................................
29
2.1.3 ......................................................................
32
2.1.4 ......................................................................
35
2.2 .................................................................................
36
2.2.1 ..............................................................................
36
2.2.2 ..........................................................................
37
2.2.3 ..............................................................................
39
iii
2.3 ............................................................
42
2.3.1 .....................................................
42
2.3.2 ..................................................................
42
2.3.3 ..................................................................
44
2.4 .............................................................................
45
2.5 ......................................................................................
48
.................................................................................................
50
3.1 .......................................................................................
50
3.1.1 ...........................................................................
50
3.1.2 ...........................................................................
52
3.1.2.1 .................................................................................
52
3.1.2.2 .................................................................................
53
3.2 ..........................................................................
56
3.3 ..........................................................................
59
3.4 .............................................................................
61
3.4.1 ..............................................................
62
3.4.2 ...................................................................
65
3.4.3 ..................................................................
69
3.4.3.1 ................................................................
69
3.4.3.2 ................................................................
70
3.4.3.2.1 ....................................................
70
3.4.3.2.2 .......................................
72
3.4.3.3 ................................................................
73
3.4.3.4 ...................................................
76
3.5 ........................................................................................................
79
.........................................................................................
82
iv
4.1 ..................................................................................
82
4.1.1 ........................................................................................
82
4.1.2 ........................................................................................
84
4.2 ................................................................
88
4.2.1 .............................................
88
4.2.2 ...............................................................................
90
4.2.3 ...........................................................
93
4.3 .......................................................................................
95
4.3.1 .......................................................................
96
4.3.2 ...........................................................................
98
4.3.3 ...........................................................................
100
4.3.4 ..................................................
101
4.4 .........................................................................
104
4.5 ........................................................
105
4.5.1 ............................
106
4.5.2 ............................
107
4.6 ........................................................................................................
111
..............................................................................................................
113
..........................................................................................................
119
1 ..............................................................................................
119
2 ....................................................................
121
3 .............................................................................
124
1.1
Theology1
1994 13-19
The Crucified GodThe Cross as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. London: SCM
Press, 1974, pp.1-6.
2
14p.2.
15P.3.
1
19p.6.
2
1.2
<
><>
IdentittskriseRelevanzkrise6
46p.25.
3
1.3
10
Corpus Christianum11
12
13
<()>148 1991 7
33 Theology Today, Tr. John Bowden, London: SCM Press, 1988.
10
11
<()>148 1991
7 33 Theology Today
12
<> 12
13
<()>148 33
6
14
14
15
1.4
1.4.1
..16
15
13p.1.
16
18, 21-23
8
17
18
19
20
21
22
17
<> 13
18
18-19
19
Jrgen Moltmann, The Future of Creation, London: SCM Press, 1979, p.47.
20
Jrgen Moltmann, Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian
Eschatology, Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993, pp.18-19.
21
22
46pp.25-26.
9
The
Heidelberg Disputation.23
Theologia gloriae 24
25
26
27
1.4.2
23
1518 4 26
Johannes von Staupitz
Alister E. McGrath, Luther's Theology of the Cross : Martin Luther's Theological
26
27
22-23p.7.
10
28
29
30
31
godlessness
godforsakenness32
28
29
30
1999 9
31
Richard Bauckham, The Theology of Jurgen Moltmann, Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995, pp.4-5.
32
, p.5.
11
33
Karl Barth, 1886-1968Rudolf Bultmann,
1884-1976Paul Tillich, 1886-1965
Political
Theology34Arne Rasmusson The Church as
Polis 35
36
37
38Dietrich Bonhoeffer,
1906-1945
Albert Camus, 1913-1960
Karl Rahner, 1904-1984
33
, Preface, p.1.
34
<>144 1991
2-3 45 Theology Today
35
Arne Rasmusson, The Church as Polis: From Political Theology to Theological Politics as
Exemplified by Jrgen Moltmann and Stanley Hauerwas, Indiana:Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1995,
p.11.
36
M. Douglas Meeks, Origins of the Theology of Hope, Phila.: Fortress Press, 1974, p.1.
37
38
40Gustavo Gutierrez,
1928-A Theology of Liberation--History, Politics, and Salvation
41
1.5
1.5.1
Ludwig Mller,
1883-c.1945 42
39
R. Stephen Haynes, Prospects for Post-holocaust Theology, Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991, p.109.
40
41
"Despite these critical observations, Moltmann's work is undoubtedly one of the most important in
contemporary theology. It offers a new approach to the theology of hope and has injected new life into the
reflection on various aspects of Christian existence. Among other things, it helps us overcome the
association between faith and fear of the future which Moltmann rightly considers characteristic of many
Christians." Gustavo Gutirrez, A Theology of Liberation--History, Politics, and Salvation.
NewYork: Orbis Books, 1973, p.218.
42
Ludwig Muller became a leading figure in the association of German Christians and was a supporter of the
13
Basel
43
44
Nazi Party. Muller openly expressed nationalistic and anti-semitic views as it was no surprise when in
1933 Adolf Hitler appointed him as the country's Reich Bishop of the Protestant Church. Muller
committed suicide at the end of the Second World War.
<http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERmullerL.htm>
43
Jrgen Moltmann, 'The Cross and Civil Religion' Religion and Political Society. New York: Happer &
Row Publishers, 1974, p.13.
44
"for us young Germans who began the study of theology after the war. 'Auschwits' became a turning point
in our thinking and acting. We became painfully aware that we must liveFor us Auschwitz did not
turn into a question abut the meaning of suffering, as it did for the Jews, but into a question about the
strength to live with such a burden of guilt and shame and sorrow." Stephen R. Haynes, Prospects for
In 1933 Niemller complained about the decision by Adolf Hitler to appoint Ludwig Muller, as the
country's Reich Bishop of the Protestant Church. With the support of Karl Barth, a professor of
theology at Bonn University, in May, 1934, a group of rebel pastors formed what became known as the
Confessional Church. <http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERniemoller.htm>
46
14
Otto
Weber, 1902-1966Ernst Wolf, 1902-1971 Hans-Joachim
Iwand, 1899-1999
47
1.5.2
Gttingen
48
47
48
Sren Aabye Kierkeggard,
1813-1855the qualitative
difference49
50
Kirchliche Dogmatik
51
52
53
49
50
51
52
53
Karl Barth 26
16
54
1.5.3
55
Protest Atheism56
Theism60
54
55
56
57
Theodor W. Adorno, Negative Dialektik, trans by E.B. Ashton, London: Routledge, 1973.
1993
58
59
60
17
Atheist61
62
Wholly
other
61
1990 427
62
63
64
1.5.4
63
297 p. 225.
64
294-295pp. 223-224.
19
65
66
Metaphysical rebellion
67
68
---69
65
66
291p. 220.
67
291p. 220.
68
333-334pp. 253-254.
69
291p. 220.
20
70
70
71
72
1.6
72
73
Critical
theory of God74
75
73
74
104-105pp.68-69.
75
24
2
2.1
1
2.1.1
Auschwitz2
3
Theodicy5
Auschwitz Cracow
31 Elie Wiesel 63
1
Jrgen Moltmann
1992 25-27
5
6
7<
>8
9
wFrancois Mauriac, 1885-1970Elie Wiesel,
1928- 10La nuit11
12
13
14
31 22 J.B.Metz<>Die Gotteskrise
Diagnosen zur Zeit Dsseldorf1994God for a Secular Society. p.16, note p.262.
31p.16.
10
,:Elie Wiesel1928 9 30
(Sighet) 1944
A-7713
11
12
"Talmud"
Elie Wiesel 53 1
13
"Cabbala"
Elie Wiesel 53 2
14
Elie Wiesel
17-18
27
15
16
17
18
15
66
16
128
17
18
19
2.1.2
19
46p.25.
29
Aristotle, 384-332B.C.
like is
only known by like.20like draws to like21
22
---Experiences in Theology
23
Empedocles,
c.500B.C.24
25
26eros
20
21
22
23
Jrgen Moltmann, Experiences in Theology: Ways and Forms of Christian Theology, Minneapolis :
Frotress Press, 2000.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
2.1.3
35
32
33
34
170p.139
35
1803
<---
>134 1990 4 39
32
Natural Theology 36
37
38
39
Theology Today
36
17-18 William
Paley 1743-1805
37
<--->
136 1990 6 40-41 Theology Today
38
39
46p.25.
33
40
41
42
40
23..
41
42
1-3
34
2.1.4
43
43
"One's own identity has to be recognized and set forth in what is different an alien"
47The Crucified God, p.26
35
2.2
The
axiom of likeness
44
anamnesis
45Platonic Principle
46
47
48
2.2.1
Epistemology episteme logos
knowledge
--
44
45
46
47p.26.
47
Empedocles c.500B.C.
Theophrast
48
49
---
Aristotelian axiom
5051
5253
2.2.2
54
Analogy of
49
50
51
52
Proportionality
55Louis Dupr
56
57
55
56
57
58
59
2.2.3
W. Werbeck 60
Dialectic principle of knowledge61
Hippocrates, c.460-380
B.C.62Contraria contrariis curantur63
58
59
48p.27.
60
61
62
Phaedrus 270A
Hippocratic oath
'not to harm but to help'
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards ed.
39
67
68
64
65
48
66
67
68
177pp.144-145.
40
69
70
Ernst Ksemann,1906-1998
71
72
73
69
70
71
72
49p.27.
73
2.3
2.3.1
74
2.3.2
74
75
76
77
787980
81
82
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
2.3.3
83
84
85
86
83
84
"Thesis19That person does not deserve to be called a theologian who looks upon the invisible things of
God as though they were clearly perceptible in those things that have actually happenedor have been
made, created.Thesis20That person deserves to be called a theologian, however, who comprehends the
visible and manifest things of God through suffering and the cross." Martin Luther, "Heidelberg
Paul Althaus 48
86
21
44
87
2.4
88
89
87
88
20
89
115-116
45
90
91
92
93
Deus absconditus
90
91
92
37
93
21-23
46
Deus revelatus
94
95
96
97
94
95
96
Paul Althaus 56
97
philia98
the power of eros
99
agape
100
2.5
98
50p.28.
99
100
101
102
101
50p.28.
102
50-51p.28.
49
3.1
3.1.1
4
5
Jrgen Moltmann, The Power of the Powerless, London: SCM Press, 1983, p.113.
18
23
50
6
7
10
11
12
13
10
46
11
<>---
1998 87-92
12
10
2
13
22-24
51
14
15
1617
18
Christichkeit
19
3.1.2
3.1.2.1
20
14
15
16
17
17
18
64p.38.
19
64p.38.
20
17
52
21
22
23
3.1.2.2
21
18
22
25-31
23
24
25
26
27
24
Martin Luther, "Heidelberg Disputation" in Martin Luther's Basic Theological Writings , p.33.
108
25
26
27
54
28
29
30
31
32
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
3.2
33
108-109pp.70-71.
34
<>
1998 87
35
25
36
37
37
38
theologia crucistheologia gloriae
theologia gloriae39
40
41
42
43
44
38
19
20
39
40
41
Paul Althaus 51
42
1999 181
43
44
18-23:
58
opus
alienumopus proprium45
3.3
46
47
48
45
46
"Theologia crucis is not a single chapter in theology, but the key signature for all Christian theology."
109The Crucified God, p.72.
47
48
Alister E. McGrath49
Walther von Lwenich
50
51
52
49
50
Walther von Lwenich, Luther's Theology of The Cross, Minneapolis:Augsburg Publishing House, 1976,
pp.19-21.
51
52
Philosophia Crucis54
55
3.4
<>
56
53
Emil Brunner, The Mediator: a study of the central doctrine of the Christian Faith, Philadelphia:
Westminister Press, 1947, p.435.
54
55
56
57
58
3.4.1
Socrates, 470-399BC
Friedrich Gogarten,
1887-1967Rudolf Bultmann, 1884-197659
Plato, 428-348BC60G.W.F. Hegel,
1770-183161
57
72-83pp.45-53.
58
59
60
Karl Barth
325
61
Carl E. Braaten & Robert W. Jenson(ed.). A Map of Twentieth -Century Theology, Minneapolis:
Augsburg Fortress, 1995, p.39.
62
62
63
64
62
63
Johannes Climacus, Philosophical Fragments, Ed.S. Aa. Kierkeggard.New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press,
4th printing, 1971, Pp.56-59. 1994 76-78
64
1994 162-165
63
68
69
65
<>--- 86-87
66
1987 18
67
68
69
48p.27.
64
70
71
3.4.2
70
18
71
72
73
Kontingenz74
75
76
Crucified God
72
67p.41.
73
66p.40.
74
God, p.77,note 21
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
77
<> 87
78
79
34, 37
..
80
39
81
82
83
84
85
82
83
49
84
85
Jrgen Moltmann, The Trinity and the Kingdom : The Doctrine of God, Minneapolis: Fortress
Press,1993, pp.36-76. 446
68
86
87
88
89
3.4.3
3.4.3.1
86
20
87
12
88
20
89
90
91
90
70-72pp.43-44.
91
<>1997
175-183
70
3.4.3.2
3.4.3.2.1
92
92
4-6
71
93
94
3.4.3.2.2
95
96
97
93
94
139-151pp.98-102.
95
157p.114.
96
164p.119.
97
161-162p.117.
72
98
3.4.3.3
100
98
167-168pp.121-122.
99
100
<>1995.7 54-55
73
101
102
103
104
Ernst Bloch, 1885-1977105Prinzip Hoffnung
106
107
108
101
102
103
163-165pp.120-121.
104
105
106
107
108
Utopische109
110
111
112
113
114
109
''
ou topon echei Utopische''
'''''
'---
422
110
424
111
Jrgen Moltmann, How I Have Changed: Reflections on Thirty years of theology, PA: Trinity Press
International, 1997, p.15.
112
429
113
13
114
115
116
3.4.3.4
115
"Why has Christian theology allowed hope to escape it, when this is very own, special theme?" Jrgen
Moltmann, Theology of Hope, p.9.
116
117
118
119
120
122
123
124
117
333p.252.
118
337p.255.
119
351p.265.
120
34
121
122
123
Octavius Winslow, "The Gift of God's Son, the Guarantee of All Other Blessing" ,No Condemnation in
Christ Jesus, Pennsylvania: Banner of Truth Trust, 1991,"Who delivered up Jesus to die? Not Judas, for
money; not Pilate, for fear; not the Jews, for envy- but the Father, for love!" John R.W. Stott
79
124
125
126
127
Immanent Trinity
128
Economic Trinity
126
127
128
W. Pannenberg<>
1999 181-182
78
129
130
3.5
131132
129
130
131
18-25
132
18
34
79
133
134
135136
137
138139
140
141142
133
12-18
134
6-8
135
23
136
3.1.2.2 52
137
10
138
139
140
7-8
141
23-24
142
1999 149
143
144
143
144
181
81
4.1
4.1.1
23
1999 17-18
99p.65.
82
5The Stoics,
308BC
6
7
99P.65, 53.
99-100P.65.
"mythical theology of poets", "political theology of the legislators", "natural theology of the philosophers"
100The Crucified God, p.65. 78, note 54.
10
11
12
1314
15
16
4.1.2
10
100p66.
11
100p.66.
12
13
14
15
16
17lovgo tou
Qeon18
lovgo tou
19
stanron;
20
21
22
17
18
101p. 67.
17
19
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 Richard
Bauckham27
28
Praxis
29
23
24
25
26
27
"The greatest achievement of Moltman's theology has been to open up hermeneutical structures for
relating biblical faith to the modern world." Arne Rasmusson, The Church as Polis, note 1, p.42.
28
29
30
Mediation31
32
33
34
30
31
32
18-21
33
34
35
4.2
36
37
4.2.1
Dialectic of Enlightenment38
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
39
40
41
2000 418
42
428
43
44
2001
106
89
45
46
4.2.2
47
48
4950
45
46
47
48
49
Elie Wiesel, NightLa nuit,Tran. Robert McAfee Brown, New York:Bantam Books, 1960.
Elie Wiesel 1986
50
Elie Wiesel 31
90
51
52
.
.53John R. W. Stott
54
Indwelling of God
55
56
51
54
55
"Shekinah"
56
57
58
60
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
4.2.3
64
---
65
61
62
63
64
65
"The two sides of oppression",'Mirror Images of Liberating' in Theology' Experience in Theology. pp.183188.
93
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
66
67
68
69
420p.330.
70
420-421pp.330-331.
71
421p.331.
72
421-422p.331.
94
73
74
75
4.3
76
73
422-423pp.331-332.
74
27
75
76
78
79
4.3.1
Der Stern der Erlsung
Shekinah
77
15
78
79
80
81
82
83
Theology of Divin
PathoAbraham J. Heschel, 1907-19728485
86
80
"God himself cuts himself off from himself, he gives himself away to his people, he suffers with their
sufferings, he goes with them into the misery of the foreign land, he wanders with their wanderingsGod
himself, in that he 'sells himself' to Israel - and what should be more natural for 'God our Father'! - and
suffers its fate with it, makes himself in need of redemption. In this way, in this suffering, the relationship
between God and the remnant points beyond itself." Moltmann, The Church in the Power of the
24-25
82
7-8
83
9[
]
84
Abraham J. Heschel
85
Abraham J. Heschel, The Prophets, New York: Harper Torch books, 1962.
86
"Pathos of God"
97
87in His
essence passible
no passible essence88
89
90
91
92
4.3.2
Abraham J. Heschel, "The Theology of Pathos," in The Prophets, Part II, New York: Harper Torchbooks,
1962, p.4.
88
89
90
"The most exalted idea applied to God is not infinite wisdom, infinite power, but infinite
concern."Abraham J. Heschel, The Prophets, p.21.
91
3:9
92
8-9
98
93
94
95
96
97
93
"Handing Over""tradere""paradidomi"
33
23
25
94
32
95
18
96
97
23
.
99
98
99
100
4.3.3
101
103
98
35-40
99
20
100
14
101
102
1969
103
"The Bible directs man to God's powerlessness and suffering; only the suffering God can help."
104
4.3.4
Hans Kng, 1928-
105
106
107
108
104
223
105
18 224
106
107
<> 98
108
102
101
109
110
109
Jrgen Moltmann, History and the Triune God: Contributions to Trinitarian Theology, tran. by J.Bowden,
NewYork:Crossroad, 1992, pp.122-124.
110
368
102
103
4.4
111
112
113
114
111
21
112
112
113
19-23
114
15
104
115
116
117
118
4.5
119
115
8-9
116
6-7
117
118
2.1.4 35-36
119
3.1.1 51-53
105
120
121
122
123
4.5.1
124
125
120
121
34
122
123
<> 25 10
124
125
304p.230.
106
126
127
128
129
4.5.2
126
127
128
32.
129
Orthodoxy
130
Orthopraxis131
132
130
27p.11.
131
27p.11.
132
454
108
133
134
<> dictum
OrthopraxisOrthodoxy
135
136
133
134
27-29pp. 11-13.
135
Jos Miguez Bonino, Doing Theology in a Revolutionary Stuation, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975, p.81.
Roger E. Olson
2002 707
136
<>145 1991
4 33 Theology Today
109
137
138
139
140
137
138
Jrgen Moltmann, 'The Diaconal Church in the Context of the Kingdom of God' in Hope for the
Church---Moltmann in dialogue with Practical Theology, Tennessee: Abingdon, 1979, p.36.
139
Jrgen Moltmann, History and the Triune God: Contributions to Ttrinitarian Theology, tran.J.Bowden,
Lodon: SCM,1991, p.166.
140
Jrgen Moltmann, 'The Life Signs of the Spirit in the Fellowship Community of Christ' in Hope for the
110
141
M.
Douglas Meeks142
143
F.E.D. Schleiermacher,
1768-1834
144
4.6
interpretation
142
143
M. Douglas Meeks, 'Moltmann's Contribution to Practical Theology' in Hope for the Church--Moltmann in dialogue with Practical Theology, p.61.
144
p.63.
111
transformationtransform
145
146
147
148
145
146
10
147
12
148
25-26
112
113
''
54 463
<>1985 87-101
114
115
116
SARS
2
SARS
117
118
1Volumes by Jrgen Moltmann
Experience of God. Phila.: Fortress Press, 1980.
Experience in Theology: Ways and Forms of Christian Theology. Minneapolis:
Fortress Press, 2000.
God for a Secular Society: The Public Relevance of Theology. Tr. Margaret Kohl,
London: SCM Press, 1999.
History and the Triune God: Contributions to Trinitarian Theology, Tr.
J.Bowden, New York: Crossroad, 1992.
How I Have Changed: Reflections on Thirty Years of Theology. PA.: Trinity Press
International, 1997.
The Church in the Power of the Spirit: A Contribution to Messianic Ecclesiology.
Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.
The Coming of God: Christian Eschatology. London: SCM, 1992.
The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of
Christian Theology. London: SCM, 1974.
The Future of Creation. London: SCM, 1979.
The Power of the Powerless. London: SCM Press, 1983.
The Trinity and the Kingdom : The Doctrine of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press,
1993.
The Way of Jesus Christ: Christology in Messianic Dimensions. London: SCM,
1990.
Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian
Eschatology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.
Theology Today. Tr. John Bowden, London: SCM Press, 1988.
119
'The Cross and Civil Religion' in Religion and Political Society. New York:
Happer & Row Publishers, 1974, p.13.
'Political Theology and Theology of Liberation' in Liberating The Future: God,
Mommon, and Theology. Joerg Rieger (ed.) MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1998.
'The Diaconal Church in the Context of the Kingdom of God' in Hope for the
Church---Moltmann in Dialogue with Practical Theology. Tennessee:
Abingdon, 1979, p.36.
1991
1992
1999
1984
1994
1994
1999
1998
<--->
134 1990 4 39 Theology Today
<--->
136 1990 6 40-41 Theology Today
<()> 144 1991
2-3 45 Theology Today
<()> 145 1991
4 33 Theology Today
<()> 148 1991
7 33 Theology Today
<>1985
<>1985
<>
120
1985
<>1989.9/10
<>
1991
<>
1991
<>
1991 1774-1796
<20 >1994
<>
1999 215-237
<>
2000 153-165
<>
1999-10-18
<>
http://www.cef.org.tw:50003/public/cm/cm02/2002/0202-4.htm2002
1998
Haynes, Stephen R., 'Jrgen Moltmann: Toward a Common Hope.' in Prospects
ForPost-Holocaust Theology, Georgia: The American Academy of
Religion, 1991.
Olson, Roger. 'Trinity and Eschatology: The Historical Being of God in Jrgen
Moltmann and Wolfhart Pannenberg' in Scottish Journal of Theology
Vol.36,pp. 213-327.
Rasmusson, Arne. The Church as Polis: From Political Theology to Theological
Politics as Exemplified by Jrgen Moltmann and Stanley Hauerwas.
Indiana: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1995.
2002
<>
1992/14 39-49
<----->
1996 111-134
<>2002
173-189
--------<>
2001 125-144
--------<>
2000/6 125-137
<----->
2000/6 112-120
--------< >
2000/160 54-63
--------<>2001/167 28-43
--------<>
122
2000/159 73-93
--------1998
<>
1998
2000.11/12
1999/4
--------2000/9
--------<>1996
186-200
--------<>
2000 125-135
--------<>1997
113-123
--------<>
2001/6 75-93
--------<
>2002/7 119-146
Tang, Siu-Kwong, Gods History in the Theology of Jurgen Moltmann, Ph.D.
thesis, University of St. Andrews, 1994, Berne: Peter Lang,1996.
<>
1997 185-193
<>1989,1/2, 7-9
<>1999-71\ 53-63
123
124
1989
Jay, Martin 1923-1950
1996
--------2000
--------1963
--------1994
--------1969
Kng, Hans
1995
Lamb, Matthew L.. History, Method and Theology. Montana: Scholars Press,
1978.
Loewenich, Walther von. Luther's Theology of The Cross. Minneapolis:
Augsburg Publishing House, 1976.
Luther,Martin. Works, volume 31, edited by Harold J. Grimm, Philadelphia:
Fortress Press, 1955-1986.
Luther, Martin. Martin Luther's Basic Theological Writings. Ed. Timothy F. Lull.
Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989.
Macquarrie,John
1998
Malantschuk. Gregor. Kierkegaards Thought. USA:Princeton Universtiy Press,
1968.
McCormack, Bruce L.. Karl Barths Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology.
NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1995.
McGrath, Alister E.. Luther's Theilogy of The Cross: Martin Luther's
Theological Breakthrough. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1985.
McGrath, Alister E.
1998
126
1996
127
1998
1973
2001
2001
2001
1987
---------
1994
2000
-----------
1998
2000
1999
1990
<> 15 2001/4 19-31
2000
-----
1990
2000
20 1991
128