Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Collection Network
The sewage collection network is to be designed to handle the projected range of flows
estimated over the design life of the project. Flows are estimated based on a combination
of factors such as population, rate of development, type of development and per capita
sewage generation rates. For current design projects in Dubai the design year is 2020. The
following sections describe the factors to be taken into account during system design.
1.1
Sewage Flows
Sewage flows are projected to vary through the design period (Year 2020). A constant
rate of increase in per capita flows is to be assumed. Flows will be a minimum of 220
lpcd and will increase to an ultimate flow of 280 lpcd as presented in Table 1.1.1.
DS96
KAME
DS96
KAME
Unit
Commercial Sources
Airport
Automobile service station
Bar
Department store
Hotel
Industrial building
(sanitary waste only)
Laundry (self-service)
Office
Restaurant
Shopping center
Institutional Sources
Hospital, medical
Hospital, mental
Prison
Rest home
School, day
With cafeteria, gym, and showers
With cafeteria only
Without cafeteria and gym
School, boarding
Flow (liters/unit-day)
Range
Typical
Passenger
Vehicle served
Employee
Customer
Employee
Toilet room
Employee
Guest
Employee
7-15
26-50
34-56
4-19
38-60
1500-2300
30-45
150-230
26-50
11
38
45
11
49.50
1900
38
180
38
Employee
Machine
Wash
Employee
Meal
Employee
Parking space
26 60
1500-2500
170-210
26-60
8-15
26-49
4-8
50
2100
190
49
11
38
8
Bed
Employee
Bed
Employee
Inmate
Employee
Resident
500-900
19-56
280-530
19-56
280-570
19-56
190-450
600
38
380
38
450
38
320
Student
Student
Student
Student
56-115
38-75
19-65
190-380
95
56
42
280
1.3
DS96
KAME
Table 1.3.1. Community Population for the Year 2015 and Holding Capacity
Community
Number
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
131
132
133
134
213
214
215
216
221-224
225
226
227
228
231
232
DS96
Year 2015
Population
10,693
7,988
5,412
2,706
10,305
15,457
36,988
11,836
5,320
9,038
23,462
69,846
8,165
20,000
25,000
9,576
12,065
0
9,460
8,683
19,690
3,096
13,316
8,288
28,945
164
105
13,382
3,249
8,648
11,301
15,638
Holding Capacity
Population
10,693
7,988
5,412
2,706
10,305
15,457
36,988
11,836
13,300
9,038
23,462
73,522
8,165
20,000
25,000
9,576
12,700
0
9,460
9,140
24,612
3,870
16,645
8,288
28,945
164
105
15,743
3,822
11,531
15,068
19,548
KAME
Table 1.3.1. Community Population for the Year 2015 and Holding Capacity (Contd.)
Community
Number
233
234
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
251
252
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
321
322
323
324
DS96
Year 2015
Population
12,850
10,232
18,400
3,582
4,592
4,871
22,400
0
0
6,400
16,194
0
14,957
17,931
13,155
114,791
14,063
956
0
0
0
0
54,576
34,192
7,638
26,020
29,742
42,812
46,495
11,949
4,766
15,698
18,032
0
Holding Capacity
Population
12,850
11,369
23,000
4,478
5,740
6,089
28,000
0
0
8,000
16,194
0
18,696
27,586
16,444
114,791
17,579
3,822
68
0
0
50
54,576
34,192
8,487
28,911
33,047
42,812
46,495
11,949
5,957
19,622
18,032
0
KAME
Table 1.3.1. Community Population for the Year 2015 and Holding Capacity (Contd.)
Community
Number
325
326-329
332
333
334
335
336
337
342
343
345-346
347-349
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
372
373
375
376
382
DS96
Year 2015
Population
2,734
27,200
21,421
20,000
26,500
57,060
59,584
2,766
9,646
15,794
348
155
15,251
10,289
18,330
3,885
8,940
6,015
15,876
0
13,587
9,244
131,832
0
12,956
5,040
0
0
10,731
12,965
10,749
11,976
16,800
Holding Capacity
Population
2,734
34,000
21,421
20,000
26,500
67,129
62,720
3,951
10,154
15,794
348
155
16,945
13,718
19,295
4,856
9,933
8,020
17,640
0
15,097
11,555
131,832
0
14,395
6,300
0
0
13,414
17,287
16,537
18,424
21,000
KAME
Table 1.3.1. Community Population for the Year 2015 and Holding Capacity (Contd.)
Community
Number
383-389
392
393-399
411-415
416-417
421-425
597
598-599
611
612
613
614
615
616-617
621
622
S64
S65
671-673
S67
S68
624-625
Jebel Ali Village
Year 2015
Population
0
150,000
40,000
38,454
19,304
79,117
49,815
57,000
155
0
0
30,000
4,500
11,400
80,000
0
2,700
14,274
27,256
3,754
0
0
36,140
Holding Capacity
Population
0
150,000
40,000
49,300
22,711
87,908
62,269
57,000
155
0
0
30,000
6,000
19,000
80,000
0
2,700
57,096
45,426
15,015
0
0
36,140
DS96
KAME
used. The Engineer should use methods described in British Standard BS 8301 or, alternatively,
ensure that minimum gradients are observed for all pipes as detailed in Section 1.8.
1.5
Hydraulic Calculations
Sanitary sewer design in Dubai is based on the Colebrooke-White formula. This formula is to be
used to determine the actual hydraulic flow characteristics resulting from the design flows. The
Manning Equation may also be used under certain circumstances.
1.5.2
velocity (m/s)
ks
Manning Equation
Manning Equation may also be used when verification of results is required. All sewer
designs are to be modeled using the MOdel of Urban SEwers (MOUSE) as developed by
the Danish Hydraulic Institute. MOUSE calculations are based on the Manning Equation.
Therefore, the Manning Equation may be used until MOUSE is revised to incorporate the
Colebrooke-White formulation.
DS96
KAME
Where :
2/3 1/2
(1/n) R S
velocity (m/s)
Minimum (m/s)
Maximum (m/s)
Design (m/s)
Gravity line
0.6
2.5
0.75
Pressure line
1.0
3.0
1.5
Maximum d/D
Minimum d/D
0.75
0.50
0.85
0.50
d/D is the ratio of flow depth to (d) to nominal pipe diameter (D).
The design criteria for depth of flow in sewer lines are presented in Table 1.7.1. Sanitary sewers
should be checked for percentage full at all times.
DS96
KAME
1.8
Pipe Gradients
Pipe gradients, often the same as the hydraulic gradient, directly influence sewer pipe capacity.
In order to achieve the required minimum velocity in sewer lines, pipes should be designed by
observing the minimum gradients listed in Table 1.8.1.
200 mm
250 mm
315 mm
400 mm
500 mm
600 mm
700 mm
800 mm
900 mm
1000 mm
1100 mm
1200 mm and larger
1.9
Pipe Materials
The pipe material for sanitary sewer pipes should be selected based on local
environmental conditions such as the characteristics of wastes, possibility of septicity,
corrosion, soil characteristics, exceptionally heavy external loadings, abrasion and
similar problems.
Recommended pipe materials to be used in Dubai for sewer pipes are given in Table 1.9.1.
Standard specifications and details reflect the use of these materials. Specification of alternate
materials must be justified and approved.
DS96
10
KAME
Size Range
Service
Connections
Sewer Mains
Construction
Method
Up to 160mm O.D. Open Trench
Moling or HDD
200mm to 300mm
Open Trench
Non-Disruptive
(Trenchless)
Sewer Mains
Open Trench
Non-Disruptive
(Trenchless)
Preferred Material
PVC, MDPE or HDPE
PVC, HDPE or PET
UPVC or HDPE
UPVC, HDPE or GRP
Either encased in
Concrete or slip lined
Through carried pipe and
Grouted, VCP.
GRP
GRP encased in concrete
or suitably stiff GRP
alone, VCP
Poor
0.013
0.013
0.014
0.015
0.017
0.016
0.017
0.017
Colebrooke-White,
ks (mm)
Good
Normal Poor
0.3
0.6
1.5
0.3
0.6
1.5
0.09
0.15
0.30
0.15
0.3
0.6
0.15
0.3
0.6
0.15
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.6
1.5
0.15
0.3
0.6
11
KAME
The maximum depth to invert is based on maintaining a cost-effective and safe design. The
recommended maximum cover for Dubai sewer pipes is approximately 10 m. Depths with
cover greater than this should be investigated with pipe manufacturers to identify any special
requirements that may be necessary.
1.12 Pipe Sizes
The current standard for the minimum size of sewer mains is 200 mm. The minimum
pipe size recommended for house connections is 150 mm or 160 mm outside diameter.
Minimum Criteria
Vertical Clearance
30 cm Minimum.
If less than 30 cm, use concrete saddle.
Carry encasement to first joint on each side of crossing
Horizontal Clearance
3 m Minimum.
If in same trench, place other utility on separate bench on
undisturbed soil above sewer line
DS96
12
KAME
DS96
13
KAME
Access Shaft
Barrel
Safety Chains
Materials of Construction
Manhole Cover and Frame
Access Shaft
Top Slab
Barrel
Bottom Slab
Benching
Lining
Exterior Corrosion
Protection
Testing
100 meters for most sewers. 120 meters for large trunk sewers
(D> 1200mm). Limited by reach of sewer cleaning equipment.
Minimum 0.50 m width on at least one side of flow channel.
Ladder stops to be incorporated into surface.
Access by permanent steps or electric winch and tripod. Ladder
stops to be incorporated in benching for emergency access.
Rectangular Opening 0.60m by 0.60m minimum.
Double triangular leaves loosely bolted with 316 SS bolts and
nuts. Cover and frame to be machined and tagged to prevent
rocking. All covers and frames in roadways to be rated for
maximum vehicle loads.
Diameter 1.0m minimum
Length 2.5m maximum
Diameter 1.5m except as otherwise noted. Based on pipe
diameter plus minimum benching of 0.5 m one side.
Provide on all manholes with pipe diameter of 600 mm or
larger.
Ductile Iron with epoxy coating; plus GRP sealing plate
Mass concrete (No Reinforcement)
Reinforced Concrete
Mass Concrete (No Reinforcement)
Reinforced Concrete
Granolithic concrete base
GRP either hand lay-up or factory fabricated
Bituminous impregnated membrane with flexible fabric
Hydrostatic and Infiltration (as required)
Connection of branch sewers to trunk sewers should be made such that the soffit of the
smaller diameter branch pipe is at the same level as the trunk sewer pipe soffit. This rule
applies for all connections.
DS96
14
KAME
Max.
Base Slab
Thickness
Lower Wall
Shaft
Thickness
Thickness
Top Slab
Thickness
Thickness
Special
1000
N/A
<200
>1000
<1400
N/A
N/A
N/A
225
200
N/A
N/A
225
1200
N/A
200
>1400
<2600
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
225
N/A
N/A
250
1500
N/A
200 to 600
>2600
<3500
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
250
N/A
N/A
250
1500
1000
200 to 600
>3500
<5400
2100
600
2500
300
300
200
300
250
1800
1000
700 to 900
>3800
7700
2400
600
2500
350
350
200
300
250
2100
1000
1000 to1100
>4000
9000
2600
600
2500
400
350
200
300
250
2400
1000
>1200
>4000
9000
2600
600
2500
400
350
200
300
250
Notes: 1. Special manholes only acceptable under unusual circumstances discovered during construction and as advised by the Engineer.
2. Depth measured from Top of Manhole cover to outlet pipe Soffit.
3. Manholes Details outside these parameters shall be detailed separately or advised by the Engineer.
There are two types of sewage pump stations in the existing Dubai system. They are
submersible stations (for small to medium size facilities) and wet well-dry well for large
facilities. Both have advantages and disadvantages and the Engineer should determine
the appropriate configuration for each new pump station on a case-by-case basis.
The following sections present design guidelines for sewage pump stations. In general,
the same criteria apply to both types of pump stations unless specifically noted otherwise.
2.1 Pump Station Sizing
Sewage pump stations must be sized to handle a range of flows over the service life of the
station. Variable flow considerations are important in sizing the structure and selecting
pumps.
All sewage pump stations in Dubai should be designed to handle the projected peak
influent flow rate. The peak flow rate is determined by applying peaking factors to the
average flow by one of the following methods:
a)
b)
c)
The Dubai Peaking Factor (DPF) is most commonly used since it is readily available from
design calculations for the collection system. Alternatively, the Engineer may use an
average peaking factor based on either a flow monitoring program or an evaluation of
data of existing stations in similar catchments. All calculations should be validated with
DS96
16
KAME
the third method using MOUSE Model of Urban Sewers. MOUSE provides a more
accurate calculation of projected flows with time since it models the travel characteristics
throughout the catchment.
Table 2.1.1 is a summary of peaking factors for the main sewage pump stations in Dubai.
This information is provided only as an indication of how the different methods may vary.
Actual design peaking factors should be determined by the Engineer based on a complete
understanding of the catchment. This may vary significantly depending on the type of
development and size of catchment.
Table 2.1.1. Summary of Peaking Factors for Existing Main Pump Stations
Measured PF (1)
DPF (2)
1.49
1.87
1.43
1.54
1.92
1.40
1.52
1.99
1.53
1.57
1.88
1.30
1.42
1.50
1.42
Pump Station
Note
1.
2.
3.
MOUSE PF (3)
The capacity of the pump station should be greater than or equal to the estimated peak
sewage flow. Actual sizing of wetwells is left to the Engineer. Wet well sizing is a
function of the incoming flow, the control strategy for the station, the selected pumps and
the number of starts per hour permissible for the pumps. Since the latter is determined by
the pump manufacturer this can only be determined after pump selections are made.
Once this information is known, then the wetwell can be sized using the following
relationship:
Where
V
V
=
=
=
=
(q)/4
required capacity (m3)
minimum time in minutes of one pumping cycle
pump capacity, m3/min
Note the above equation is for a single pump or a single-speed control step for multiplespeed operation. It does not apply to variable-speed pumping.
DS96
17
KAME
Actual pump selection can only be made after a system head-capacity curve is developed
by the Engineer for the proposed installation. The following are to be considered.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
The final item is important since initial flows may be significantly lower than design year
flows. When this is the case, the selected pump should be in the mid-range of available
impeller sizes so that simple changes can be made to improve pump station capacity.
Note that all sewage pump stations should have a minimum of two (2 nos.) pumps. The
second pump is redundant in the event of a single pump failure.
2.3 Pump Station Structures
Structures should be designed to ensure a safe working environment for operation and
maintenance staff as well as maximizing performance and minimizing costs. The
following should be observed:
a)
Isolation Wet wells should be isolated from dry wells and/or superstructures
by impermeable walls. Ventilation systems should be independent.
b)
c)
Access Suitable and safe means of access must be provided to dry wells and
to wet wells.
DS96
18
KAME
d)
e)
f)
Wet well controls are typically of the encapsulated float-type; although more
sophisticated control may be considered. In all cases, control sensors should
be located away from the turbulence of incoming flow and pump suction.
New sewage pump stations should be designed and constructed based on the applicable
standards for Dubai. International principles should also be practiced. To enhance the
operability of the pump station the following provisions should be included:
a)
Supply and control circuits should allow for disconnection from outside the wet
well. Terminals and connectors should be protected from corrosion through
proper location and/or the use of water-tight seals. Separate strain relief is
required.
b)
c)
d)
Odor control systems should be provided for to ensure that noxious gases and odors are
in concentrations lower than the detection level. Control systems are typically included
for each sewage pump station.
DS96
19
KAME
Various types of odor control systems are available for sewage applications. These
include carbon filters, caustic scrubbers, ozonation and biofilters. Most existing facilities
in Dubai incorporate the use of carbon filters for small stations and caustic scrubbers for
main pump stations. The Engineer should review the requirements and technology
available at the time of design to provide an appropriate, cost-effective odor control
solution.
Note that most emphasis is placed on hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Present in sewage gas,
public complaints are quickly registered after detection. Current Dubai practice is to
control H2S concentrations at the discharge point to less than 1.0 ppm. In addition, no
H2S or other sewage related odors are permitted to be detectable at a distance of 1.0
meter from the discharge point.
Sewage rising mains are an important part of the overall collection and pumping system.
Proper design of the rising main can result in efficient, cost-effective operation.
Improper design can result in poor performance, frequent blockages and increased
operating and maintenance costs. The following sections details the design principles to
be adopted for Dubai systems.
Rising mains should be sized to maintain velocities within an acceptable range for a
variety of flow conditions. Selection of a size requires an understanding of projected
flows for the service life of the system.
Section 1.6 included information regarding acceptable rising main velocities. The
minimum velocity permitted is 1.0 m/s; required to ensure the line is self-cleansing. The
maximum velocity acceptable for Dubai is 3.0 m/s. The preferred target velocity is
approximately 1.5 m/s.
DS96
20
KAME
Selection of a rising main size should be based on the velocity range above. For cases
where initial flows are significantly lower than future flows two or more rising mains
may be warranted. This is usually the case with regional pumping facilities. The
additional rising main also provides redundancy in the event of a line problem.
Note that the velocity range must be met on a daily basis, not necessarily each time the
pump station operates. Velocities should be checked for each pumping scenario;
especially when multiple pumps are in operation simultaneously. Minimum, average
and peak flow conditions should be considered before a final selection is made. No
rising main should be smaller than 200 mm diameter.
3.2 Head Losses
Once a rising main has been selected, the head loss resulting from the main can be
calculated. This will permit appropriate pump selections to be made, the HazenWilliams Equation is used in Dubai for this calculation as follow:
Where:
= flowrate (m3/s)
Note that the Engineer should check the design for a range of C values (100 to 140) to assess
how the effects of pipe wear will effect overall system performance.
Sewage rising mains in Dubai must be resistant to the corrosive effects of the local sewage
characteristics. Currently, uPVC is used for pipes less than or equal to 315mm diameter. Pipes
larger than 315mm diameter are GRP. The Engineer should review the specifications for pipe
and ensure that any special requirements are provided for. This includes chemical resistance,
depth of cover and pressure requirements.
DS96
21
KAME
The Engineer should include air valves and washouts on all rising mains as necessary to
improve performance and increase access for maintenance. In general, devices should be
installed at the following locations:
In addition, access chambers should also be considered when the length of rising main is
greater than 500 m between air valves and/or washouts. This practice provides access for
maintenance purposes.
Each device should be constructed within a special chamber to ensure easy access.
Connections to the pipes are to be included for flushing the lines and/or for dewatering.
Valves should also be provided to either side for isolation purposes.
The Engineer is required to conduct an analysis of transients in his designed system. This is
also referred to as surge analysis. Dubai Municipality has adapted the SURGE 5 program as
its preferred software analysis tool. SURGE 5 was developed and is maintained by the
University of Kentucky, USA.
SURGE 5 results should be used to optimize the system such that the potential effects of
transients (water hammer) are mitigated. Recommended devices should be included in the
design. During construction, a separate analysis will be required of the Contractor based on
actual materials and equipment supplied. Modifications may be required at that time.
DS96
22
KAME
The Dubai IDF curves have been based on the frequency analysis for extreme values
relationship:
i=
1
cTde
DS96
23
KAME
Table 4.1.1. Constants for Rainfall Equation For Various Return Periods
Return
c
e
Correlation
Period
Coefficient
(Year)
R2
5
0.0395
0.7100
0.996
10
0.0320
0.7011
0.997
15
0.0289
0.6976
0.997
25
0.0258
0.6941
0.998
50
0.0226
0.6904
0.998
100
0.0201
0.6876
0.998
Note: Constants correspond to i in mm/hr, Td in Hours.
24.00
7.62
6.12
5.86
5.48
5.21
4.83
4.62
4.35
4.18
3.97
3.70
3.30
2.61
2.37
2.06
1.56
The first design storm is 30 mm in 90 minutes and represents a return period of 5 years.
The 5-year storm is to be used for all local drainage facilities including local collectors,
inlets, pump stations, rising mains and outfalls.
The second storm is 116 mm in 24 hours and represents a return period of 50 years.
The 50-year storm is to be used for all regional drainage facilities including trunk
lines, detention ponds, regional pump stations, rising mains and outfalls.
DS96
24
KAME
Designs must account for the dynamics of the system by observing the variation in
rainfall intensity over the storm duration. This is to be accomplished by using the
MOUSE model for Dubai. Tables 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 present the intensities for the 5-year
and 50-year storms, respectively. Hyetographs for both storms are illustrated in Figure
4.1.2.
Table 4.1.3. Local Drainage System Design Storm (5-Year Return Period)
Time (min)
0-30 min
Intensity (mm/hr)
16.2
Depth (mm)
8.1
18.7
8.1
26.8
30 min-60 min
37.5
60 min-90 min
6.2
3.1
29.9
Table 4.1.4 Regional Drainage System Design Storm (50-Year Return Period)
Time (hr)
0-.5 0.5-1.0 1.0-1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 24.0
Intensity (mm/hr)
14
66
24
10
5
2.17
Depth (mm)
7
33
12
5
20
39
Cumulative Depth(mm) 7
40
52
57
77
116
4.2
Runoff Coefficients
The runoff coefficients that are currently used during planning to evaluate runoff for
Dubai are 0.4 for urban areas and 0.1 for undeveloped areas. In Table 4.2.1, the runoff
coefficients for areas of various characteristics are given.
DS96
25
KAME
Coefficient
0.7 0.95
0.7 0.85
0.8 0.95
0.05 - 0.2
0.13 - 0.85
0.05 - 0.3
0.1 - 0.3
0.1 0.25
0.1 0.25
0.2 0.35
0.7 0.95
0.3 - 0.5
0.25 - 0.40
0.50 - 0.70
0.50 - 0.80
0.60 - 0.90
Note that for preliminary calculation of runoff, these coefficients are consistent with
those used with the Rational Method for estimating runoff.
The formula is
240 CIA
Where:
The Engineer may wish to use the Rational Method for preliminary sizing of
collection system components. However, design submittals must use the Dubai
MOUSE model to demonstrate the performance of the system. This is especially
important with respect to clear times as discussed in Section 4.3.
DS96
26
KAME
4.3
Clear Times
System clear time refers to the amount of time after a storm event ends which is required
to remove flood volumes from service areas. These times have been set to minimize
commercial impacts and to protect the public. Table 4.3.1 is a summary of
recommended clear times for different area classifications within Dubai.
6
4
4
6
6
4
2
0 (No surcharge)
Groundwater Flow
Drainage systems are to be designed to control groundwater in areas where water
levels are within 2 meters of the ground surface. However, the stormwater drainage
system is not sized on the basis of groundwater flows. Groundwater contributions in
Dubai vary from catchment to catchment since they are a function of the local
groundwater table elevation and ground permeability.
DS96
27
KAME
Drainage
Characteristics
Good Drainage
Poor
Drainage
Practically
Impervious
Groundwater flows are collected using slotted pipes. The opening size ranges
from 3mm to 4mm. Total percentage of opening should be identified by
individual pipe manufacturers to allow infiltration of volumes as specified in
British Standard BS 5911 : Part 114. These volumes are summarized in Table
4.4.2.
DS96
28
KAME
100
225
150
300
200
250
Should the Engineer decide to use deep well points to lower groundwater elevations
in lieu of land drains then a separate relationship applies.
Ro = Chk0.5
Q = k (H2-hw2) / (loge (Ro/rw))
Where : Ro =
C =
k =
Q =
H =
hw =
rw =
4.5
radius of influence, m
constant (as before, 3,000 assumed for
radial flow to pumped well)
permeability of soil (m/s)
total discharge from well (m3/s)
height of static water table (m)
height of water in well (m)
radius of the well (m)
Hydraulic Design
Hydraulic design of the Dubai Drainage System, like the sewerage system, is to be based
on the Colebrooke-White formula. The Manning Equation may also be used during
MOUSE modeling exercises. Refer to Section 1.5 for details of the two formulas. Note
that the drainage system is to be designed to operate under surcharge conditions in
accordance with the clear time philosophy.
DS96
29
KAME
4.6
Minimum (m/s)
Maximum (m/s)
Design (m/s)
Gravity line
0.75
2.5
0.75
Pressure line
1.0
3.0
1.0
4.7
Roughness Coefficient
The roughness coefficient is a measure of the variation and magnitude of
protuberances on the interior surface of the pipe. The roughness, therefore, is a
function of the pipe material, age and condition. Typical coefficients for the
various pipe materials are given in the Table 4.7.1. Dubai drainage designs should
be based on a ks = 0.6 (n=0.016) assuming asbestos-cement pipe.
Table 4.7.1. Typical Roughness Coefficients
Pipe Material
Mannings Coefficient,
Colebrooke-White,
n
ks (mm)
Good
Normal Poor
Good
Normal Poor
UPVC
0.009
0.010
0.012 0.3
0.6
1.5
GRP
0.009
0.010
0.012 0.3
0.6
1.5
Coated Cast Iron
0.012
0.013
0.014 0.09
0.15
0.30
Uncoated Cast Iron
0.013
0.014
0.015 0.15
0.3
0.6
Ductile Iron
0.015
0.016
0.017 0.15
0.3
0.6
Asbestos cement
0.013
0.015
0.016 0.15
0.3
0.6
Vitrified Clay
0.013
0.015
0.017 0.3
0.6
1.5
Concrete
0.012
0.014
0.017 0.15
0.3
0.6
DS96
30
KAME
4.8
Pipe Depths
Dubai Municipality drainage projects are designed on the basis of maintaining a
minimum cover depth of 1.2 m above the crown of the drainage pipe. This is to
provide protection from external loads. Pipes with a depth less than 1.2m above
the crown should be protected with concrete.
Maximum depths to invert during design should be on the basis of maintaining a
cost-effective and safe design. The recommended maximum cover for Dubai
drainage pipes is approximately 10m. Depths greater than this should be avoided
where practicable. If required, then the Engineer should determine whether or not
any additional provisions are required to protect the pipe from soil loads.
4.9
Material
uPVC
Asbestos-Cement
Comment
Mild sulphate resisting
The minimum pipe size permissible on drainage projects is 250 mm. One exception
is pipe used for land drains. The land drain minimum size is 160 mm. However,
slotted carrier pipes, serving as both land drain and carrier drain, must meet the
250mm minimum. Openings in land drains and slotted carrier pipes must meet the
requirements outlined in Section 4.4.
DS96
31
KAME
4.10
Utility Crossings
The basic design criteria to be used when a drainage line crosses or runs near to
another utility are the same as in the sewerage design criteria section. This
information is presented in Table 4.10.1
Table 4.10.1 Utility Crossing Guidelines
Parameter
4.11
Minimum Criteria
Vertical Clearance
30 cm minimum.
If less than 30 cm, use concrete saddle.
Carry encasement to first joint on each side of crossing
Horizontal Clearance
3 m minimum.
If in same trench, place other utility on separate bench
on undisturbed soil above sewer line
DS96
32
KAME
Benching
Access Shaft
Barrel
Safety Chains
Materials of Construction
Manhole Cover and Frame
Access Shaft
Top Slab
Barrel
Bottom Slab
Benching
Lining
Exterior Corrosion
Protection
Testing
DS96
33
KAME
Shaft
Shaft
dia.
Range
Diameter
Lower Min.
Upper Shaft
Max.
Min.
Max.
Upper
Wall
Shaft
Reducer
Top Slab
Slab
Thickness
Thickness
Thickness
1200
N/A
250
>1100
<2600
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
225
N/A
N/A
250
1500
N/A
250 to 600
>2600
<3500
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
250
N/A
N/A
250
1500
1000
250 to 600
>3500
<5400
2100
600
2500
300
300
200
300
250
1800
1000
700 to 900
>3800
7700
2400
600
2500
350
350
200
300
250
2100
1000
1000 to1100
4000
9000
2600
600
2500
400
350
200
300
250
2400
1000
>1200
4000
9000
2600
600
2500
400
350
200
300
250
Notes: 1. Manhole details outside these parameters to be detailed separately or advised by the Engineer.
2. Depth measured from Top of Manhole cover to outlet pipe soffit.
DS96
34
KAME
4.12
Inlet Gullies
Stormwater runoff is to be collected using one of two gully types. There are
curb inlet gullies and gutter gullies. Gully locations should be in accordance
with the following:
4.13
Soakaways
Soakaways may be used for disposal of collected stormwater runoff.
Typically, these should be used for roadways through undeveloped areas
where centralized drainage systems have not yet been installed. The
Engineer should design the soakaways based on site specific investigation.
Provisions for connection to future main drainage collectors should be
included in the design.
4.14
Outfalls
The design of outfalls is specialized and can not be generalized to address
every project. Outfalls may be located in either the Dubai Creek, the Arabian
Gulf or a detention pond. Outfall locations near public beaches or private
hotels should be avoided where possible. Outfalls should not be located in
area where the resident biological life will be disrupted to the point where its
survival is threatened.
4.15
Detention Ponds
Detention Ponds are regional facilities and should be based on a 50-year
return period. The following sizing criteria should be used.
DS96
35
KAME
116 mm
50 year
2 (two)
30 mm
70 mm
5 days
2-3 weeks
Note that the emptying time for the upper level is approximate. Actual
emptying time may vary depending on outlet sizing based on the lower level
emptying time. All ponds must meet this criteria for a given storm event.
Therefore, upstream ponds must be cleared more quickly.
DS96
36
KAME
5.1
All drainage pump stations in Dubai should be designed to handle the projected
runoff for its catchment; both local and regional where appropriate. In many
cases, a pump station may be larger in order to ensure that clear times for
upstream detention ponds are met. The Engineer should ensure appropriate
sizing for such pump stations; even when the upstream ponds are not within the
immediate project area.
Where
V
V
=
=
=
=
q/4
required capacity (m3)
minimum time in minutes of one pumping cycle
pump capacity, m3/min
Note the above equation is for a single pump or a single-speed control step for
multiple-speed operation. It does not apply to variable-speed pumping.
DS96
37
KAME
5.2
Pump Selection
Typically, stormwater drainage pump stations are not considered to go through
the multiple start-stop cycles experienced in sewage pump stations. However,
when the drainage pump station is also used for dewatering, such sizing can
become important.
Actual pump selection can only be made after a system head-capacity curve is
developed by the Engineer for the proposed installation. The following are to be
considered.
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
The final item is important to ensure flexibility in the system. The potential to
upgrade capacities means that there will be opportunity to accept runoff from
adjacent catchments on either a long-or short-term basis. Of course, should
design constraints such as design storm or clear time become more restrictive in
the future, flexibility would also make it easier to comply with new
requirements.
38
KAME
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
New drainage pump stations should be designed and constructed based on the
applicable standards for Dubai. International principles should also be practiced.
To enhance the operability of the pump station the following provisions should
be included:
a)
DS96
39
KAME
c)
d)
Drainage rising mains are an important part of the overall collection and
pumping system. Proper design of the rising main can result in efficient, costeffective operation. Improper design can result in poor performance, frequent
blockages and increased operating and maintenance costs. The following
sections detail the design principles to be adopted for Dubai systems.
DS96
40
KAME
more rising mains may be warranted. This could be the case with regional
pumping facilities where some portion of the catchment will not be developed
for several years. The additional rising main also provides redundancy in the
event of a line problem.
Note that the velocity range must be met on a daily basis, not necessarily each
time the pump station operates. Velocities should be checked for each pumping
scenario; especially in the case of dry weather season groundwater control. No
rising main should be smaller than 200 mm diameter.
6.2 Head Losses
Once a rising main has been selected, the head loss resulting from the main can
be calculated. This will permit appropriate pump selections to be made, the
Hazen-Williams Equation is used in Dubai for this calculation as follow:
Where:
= flowrate (m3/s)
Note that the Engineer should check the design for a range of C values (100 to
140) to assess how the effects of pipe wear will effect overall system
performance.
Drainage rising mains in Dubai must be resistant to the corrosive effects of the
local drainage characteristics. Currently, uPVC is used for pipes less than or
equal to 315mm diameter. Pipes larger than 315mm diameter are asbestoscement. The Engineer should review the specifications for pipe and ensure that
DS96
41
KAME
any special requirements are provided for. This includes chemical resistance,
depth of cover and pressure requirements.
The Engineer should include air valves and washouts on all rising mains as
necessary to improve performance and increase access for maintenance. In
general, devices should be installed at the following locations:
SURGE 5 results should be used to optimize the system such that the potential
effects of transients (water hammer) are mitigated. Recommended devices
should be included in the design. During construction, a separate analysis will
DS96
42
KAME
Mf/ma/drainage-Design-Cr19-10.doc
DS96
43
KAME