Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MEM05 V10.1
Qualification:
EVENT 5
Date issued to
student
Assessment Date/Due
UNIT/S OF COMPETENCY
This tasks is designated a training task. You will be developing proficiency in the essential skills
and knowledge required for the following units
CODE
UNIT
MEM14004A
MEM18001C
MEM18002B
Selfmanagement
Teamwork
Initiative and
enterprise
Planning and
organisation
Learning
Problem
solving
Communication
Use of
Technology
Cross-cultural
understanding
Student Declaration
Date
Student Name:
The purpose and requirements of this task have been
clearly explained to me and I have received appropriate
information as to how to complete this task, along with
opportunities for RPL or Credit Transfer.
Student
Signature
Theory Tasks to be
completed
Practical Tasks to be
completed
WHS requirements
Context of and
specific
resources for
assessment
Additional site
specific
information
Signed by Teacher:
_____________________
Yes / No
Task / Procedure
Potential Hazards
Risk
Rating
See Over
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Safety Controls
Signed by Teacher:
_____________________
Yes / No
Date: __________________________
Accepted:
Task / Procedure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Yes / No
Signed by Teacher:
_____________________
Yes / No
Task / Procedure
Potential Hazards
Risk
Rating
See Over
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Safety Controls
Signed by Teacher:
_____________________
Yes / No
Date: __________________________
Accepted:
Task / Procedure
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Yes / No
3. Explain the feature of a hand file that makes it more useful than a flat file for filing up
to an edge.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________
4. Explain the difference between a bastard file and a second cut file. Give an example
of the use of each type.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________
9. The company produces 1,000 of the Scratch Gauge Sleeve component and delivers
them to the customer. The customer goes to install the Scratch Gauge Sleeve, and
finds that on all of them, one hole has been drilled the wrong size. Discuss what this
might mean for both the company producing the component, and for the customer.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________
10. Suggest how the company might change their manufacturing process to make sure
a similar problem does not occur in the future.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
RTO Assessment Task
Student Name
Assessor Name:
Unit of Competency
Discrete
Assessment
Holistic
Assessment
MEM14004A
MEM18001C
MEM18002B
RPL
Credit
Transfer
Assessor to complete and retain RTO RPL form, or copy of RTO transcript
Assessment Performance Criteria
Not Yet
Complete
Complete
Work ethic
Task Element
Assessment Outcome
Unit of Competency
Not Yet
Competent
Competent
MEM14004A
MEM18001C
MEM18002B
Assessor Declaration
Assessment
Date
Assessor Name:
As an assessor, I issue this determination on behalf of the
listed RTO in accordance with the requirements for
determination of competency, having observed and assessed
the required skills and knowledge of the listed units.
Assessor
Signature
Student Declaration
Assessment
Date
Student Name:
As a participant in this assessment task, I have discussed my
overall performance in this task with my assessor and agree
that this assessment outcome is a fair and valid reflection of
my performance in this task.
Student
Signature
Student Misadventure/Appeal
Assessment
Date
Student Name:
I do not feel that my performance in this task reflected my
ability and wish to file for misadventure for the following reason
I do not feel this assessment was fair or did not address my
needs as a student and wish to file an appeal against this
decision
Follow Up Actions
Yes
Student
Signature
Assessor
Signature
No