(G.R. No. 71929 - December 4, 1990.) 192 SCRA 9 ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents PDF

1/24/2015 [G.R.No.71929:December4,1990.]192SCRA9ALITALIA,Petitioner,vs.INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURTandFELIPAE.
PABLO,Responden
ChanRobles VirtualLawLibrary
Like
Tweet
|chanrobles.com
Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1990 > December 1990 Decisions > [G.R. No. 71929 :
December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 9 ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and FELIPA E.
PABLO,Respondents.:
Search
FIRSTDIVISION
ChanRoblesOnLineBarReview
[G.R.No.71929:December4,1990.]
192SCRA9
ALITALIA,Petitioner,vs.INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURTandFELIPAE.
PABLO,Respondents.
DECISION
NARVASA,J.:
Dr.FelipaPabloanassociateprofessorintheUniversityofthePhilippines,1anda
researchgranteeofthePhilippineAtomicEnergyAgencywasinvitedtotakepartat
ameetingoftheDepartmentofResearchandIsotopesoftheJointFAOIAEADivision
ofAtomicEnergyinFoodandAgricultureoftheUnitedNationsinIspra,Italy.2She
was invited in view of her specialized knowledge in "foreign substances in food and
theagricultureenvironment."Sheacceptedtheinvitation,andwasthenscheduledby
the organizers, to read a paper on "The Fate of Radioactive Fusion Products
Contaminating Vegetable Crops." 3 The program announced that she would be the
secondspeakeronthefirstdayofthemeeting.4Tofulfillthisengagement,Dr.Pablo
bookedpassageonpetitionerairline,ALITALIA.
DebtKollectCompany,Inc.
She arrived in Milan on the day before the meeting in accordance with the itinerary
and time table set for her by ALITALIA. She was however told by the ALITALIA
personnel there at Milan that her luggage was "delayed inasmuch as the same . . .
(was) in one of the succeeding flights from Rome to Milan." 5 Her luggage consisted
oftwo(2)suitcases:onecontainedherclothingandotherpersonalitemstheother,
herscientificpapers,slidesandotherresearchmaterial.Buttheotherflightsarriving
fromRomedidnothaveherbaggageonboard.
Bythenfeelingdesperate,shewenttoRometotrytolocateherbagsherself.There,
sheinquiredabouthersuitcasesinthedomesticandinternationalairports,andfilled
out the forms prescribed by ALITALIA for people in her predicament. However, her
baggage could not be found. Completely distraught and discouraged, she returned to
ManilawithoutattendingthemeetinginIspra,Italy.
: n a d
Once back in Manila she demanded that ALITALIA make reparation for the damages
thussufferedbyher.ALITALIAofferedher"freeairlineticketstocompensateherfor
any alleged damages. . . ." She rejected the offer, and forthwith commenced the
action6whichhasgivenrisetothepresentappellateproceedings.
ChanRoblesIntellectualProperty
Division
Asitturnedout,Prof.Pablo'ssuitcaseswereinfactlocatedandforwardedtoIspra,7
Italy, but only on the day after her scheduled appearance and participation at the
U.N.meetingthere.8OfcourseDr.Pablowasnolongertheretoacceptdeliveryshe
wasalreadyonherwayhometoManila.Andforsomereasonorother,thesuitcases
werenotactuallyrestoredtoProf.PablobyALITALIAuntileleven(11)monthslater,
andfour(4)monthsafterinstitutionofheraction.9
Afterappropriateproceedingsandtrial,theCourtofFirstInstancerenderedjudgment
inDr.Pablo'sfavor:10
"(1) Ordering the defendant (ALITALIA) to pay . . . (her) the sum of TWENTY
THOUSAND PESOS (P20,000.00), Philippine Currency, by way of nominal
damages
(2) Ordering the defendant to pay . . . (her) the sum of FIVE THOUSAND
PESOS(P5,000.00),PhilippineCurrency,asandforattorney'sfees(and)
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1990decemberdecisions.php?id=15
1/18
1/24/2015 [G.R.No.71929:December4,1990.]192SCRA9ALITALIA,Petitioner,vs.INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURTandFELIPAE.PABLO,Responden
(3)Orderingthedefendanttopaythecostsofthesuit."
ALITALIAappealedtotheIntermediateAppellateCourtbutfailedtoobtainareversal
of the judgment. 11 Indeed, the Appellate Court not only affirmed the Trial Court's
decision but also increased the award of nominal damages payable by ALITALIA to
P40,000.00.12Thatincreaseitjustifiedasfollows:13
"Consideringthecircumstances,asfoundbytheTrialCourtandthenegligence
committed by defendant, the amount of P20,000.00 under present inflationary
conditionsasawarded...totheplaintiffasnominaldamages,istoolittleto
make up for the plaintiff's frustration and disappointment in not being able to
appear at said conference and for the embarrassment and humiliation she
suffered from the academic community for failure to carry out an official
mission for which she was singled out by the faculty to represent her
institutionandthecountry.Afterweighingcarefullyalltheconsiderations,the
amount awarded to the plaintiff for nominal damages and attorney's fees
shouldbeincreasedtothecostofherroundtripairfareoratthepresentrate
ofpesotothedollaratP40,000,00."
ALITALIA has appealed to this Court on Certiorari. Here, it seeks to make basically
thesamepointsittriedtomakebeforetheTrialCourtandtheIntermediateAppellate
Court,i.e.:
1) that the Warsaw Convention should have been applied to limit ALITALIA'S
liabilityand
2) that there is no warrant in fact or in law for the award to Dr. Pablo of
nominaldamagesandattorney'sfees.14
Inaddition,ALITALIApostulatesthatitwaserrorfortheIntermediateAppellateCourt
tohaverefusedtopassonalltheassignederrorsandinnotstatingthefactsandthe
lawonwhichitsdecisionisbased.15
UndertheWarsawConvention,16anaircarrierismadeliablefordamagesfor:
1) the death, wounding or other bodily injury of a passenger if the accident
causingittookplaceonboardtheaircraftorinthecourseofitsoperationsof
embarkingordisembarking17
2)thedestructionorlossof,ordamageto,anyregisteredluggageorgoods,if
theoccurrencecausingittookplaceduringthecarriagebyair"18and
3)delayinthetransportationbyairofpassengers,luggageorgoods.19
In these cases, it is provided in the Convention that the "action for damages,
however, founded, can only be brought subject to conditions and limits set out"
therein.20
The Convention also purports to limit the liability of the carriers in the following
manner:21
1.Inthecarriageofpassengerstheliabilityofthecarrierforeachpassenger
islimitedtothesumof250,000francs...Nevertheless,byspecialcontract,
thecarrierandthepassengermayagreetoahigherlimitofliability.
: n a d
2. a) In the carriage of registered baggage and of cargo, the liability of the

carrierislimitedtoasumof250francsperkilogramme,unlessthepassenger
orconsignorhasmade,atthetimewhenthepackagewashandedovertothe
carrier,aspecialdeclarationofinterestindeliveryatdestinationandhaspaid
a supplementary sum if the case so requires. In that case the carrier will be
liabletopayasumnotexceedingthedeclaredsum,unlessheprovesthatsum
isgreaterthantheactualvaluetotheconsignoratdelivery.
December1990Jurisprudence
[G.R. No. 32945 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T.
NASSER,Petitioner,vs.THECOURTOFAPPEALS,HON.
MALCOLM SARMIENTO, in his capacity as Presiding
Judge,CourtofFirstInstanceofPampanga,BranchI,
AURORA RIVERA CANLAS, PATERNO R. CANLAS, and
TOMAS CENTILLAS, Respondents. [G.R. No. 32946.
December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T. NASSER, Petitioner,
vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, PATERNO R. CANLAS,
AURORA RIVERACANLAS, TOMAS CENTILLAS and THE
CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAN ISIDRO, DAVAO ORIENTAL,
Respondents.
b)Inthecaseofloss,damageordelayofpartofregisteredbaggageorcargo,
orofanyobjectcontainedtherein,theweighttobetakenintoconsiderationin
determining the amount to which the carrier's liability is limited shall be only
the total weight of the package or packages concerned. Nevertheless, when
the loss, damage or delay of a part of the registered baggage or cargo, or of
anobjectcontainedtherein,affectsthevalueofotherpackagescoveredbythe
samebaggagecheckorthesameairwaybill,thetotalweightofsuchpackage
or packages shall also be taken into consideration in determining the limit of
liability.
[G.R. No. 39430 : December 3, 1990.] FRANCISCO

MANLAPAZ, DELFIN SANGCAP, DOMINGO SANGCAP,
PEDROCUNANAN,FAUSTODELAPENAandHONORATA
DELAPENA,Petitioners,vs.HON.COURTOFAPPEALS,
HON. JUDGE LORENZO R. MOSQUEDA, HON. JUDGE
VIRGILIOCANIVEL,TEODORORIVERA,PABLORIVERA,
RENATO
RIVERA
and
BONIFACIO
RIVERA,
Respondents.
3.Asregardsobjectsofwhichthepassengertakeschargehimselftheliability
ofthecarrierislimitedto5000francsperpassenger.
4. The limits prescribed . . shall not prevent the court from awarding, in
accordance with its own law, in addition, the whole or part of the court costs
and of the other expenses of litigation incurred by the plaintiff. The foregoing
provision shall not apply if the amount of the damages awarded, excluding
court costs and other expenses of the litigation, does not exceed the sum
which the carrier has offered in writing to the plaintiff within a period of six
months from the date of the occurrence causing the damage, or before the
commencementoftheaction,ifthatislater.
[G.R. No. 55466 : December 3, 1990.] MANILA

SURETY&FIDELITYCO.,INC.,Petitioner,vs.COURTOF
APPEALSandWILLIAMH.QUASHA,Respondents.
[G.R.No.78778:December3,1990.]191SCRA814
LEONIDA CORONADO, FELIX BUENO, MELANIA
RETIZOS, BERNARDINO BUENASEDA and JOVITA
MONTEFALCON, Petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF
APPEALSandJUANABUENOALBOVIAS,Respondents.
ANDRES E. DITAN, Petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ASIAWORLD RECRUITMENT, INC.,
AND/ORINTRACOSALESCORPORATION,Respondents.
BALTAZAR, PEDRO, URSULA, and DOMINGO, all
surnamed PANTIG, Petitioners, vs. VENANCIO
The Warsaw Convention however denies to the carrier availment "of the provisions
whichexcludeorlimithisliability,ifthedamageiscausedbyhiswilfulmisconductor
by such default on his part as, in accordance with the law of the court seized of the
case, is considered to be equivalent to wilful misconduct," or "if the damage is
(similarly) caused . . by any agent of the carrier acting within the scope of his
employment."22TheHagueProtocolamendedtheWarsawConventionbyremoving
theprovisionthatiftheairlinetookallnecessarystepstoavoidthedamage,itcould
2/18
exculpate itself completely, 23 and declaring the stated limits of liability not
applicable "if it is proved that the damage resulted from an act or omission of the
carrier, its servants or agents, done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and
withknowledgethatdamagewouldprobablyresult."Thesamedeletionwaseffected
by the Montreal Agreement of 1966, with the result that a passenger could recover
unlimiteddamagesuponproofofwilfulmisconduct.24
BALTAZAR,Respondent.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, vs.
ROMEOORTIZyBALLARES,AccusedAppellant.
[G.R. No. 84884 : December 3, 1990.] EULALIO M.
RUIZ and ILUMINADA RUIZ, Petitioners, vs. HON.
DOROTEO N. CANEBA, THE CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA
AND/OR HIS DEPUTIES, ZENAIDA SANGALANG and
ADOLFOCRUZ,Respondents.
TheConventiondoesnotthusoperateasanexclusiveenumerationoftheinstancesof
an airline's liability, or as an absolute limit of the extent of that liability. Such a
propositionisnotborneoutbythelanguageoftheConvention,asthisCourthasnow,
andatanearliertime,pointedout.25Moreover,slightreflectionreadilyleadstothe
conclusion that it should be deemed a limit of liability only in those cases where the
causeofthedeathorinjurytoperson,ordestruction,lossordamagetopropertyor
delayinitstransportisnotattributabletoorattendedbyanywilfulmisconduct,bad
faith, recklessness, or otherwise improper conduct on the part of any official or
employee for which the carrier is responsible, and there is otherwise no special or
extraordinary form of resulting injury. The Convention's provisions, in short, do not
"regulate or exclude liability for other breaches of contract by the carrier" 26 or
misconduct of its officers and employees, or for some particular or exceptional type
ofdamage.Otherwise,"anaircarrierwouldbeexemptfromanyliabilityfordamages
intheeventofitsabsoluterefusal,inbadfaith,tocomplywithacontractofcarriage,
whichisabsurd."27Normayitforamomentbesupposedthatifamemberofthe
aircraftcomplementshouldinflictsomephysicalinjuryonapassenger,ormaliciously
destroyordamagethelatter'sproperty,theConventionmightsuccessfullybepleaded
as the sole gauge to determine the carrier's liability to the passenger. Neither may
the Convention be invoked to justify the disregard of some extraordinary sort of
damageresultingtoapassengerandprecluderecoverythereforbeyondthelimitsset
by said Convention. It is in this sense that the Convention has been applied, or
ignored,dependingonthepeculiarfactspresentedbyeachcase.
[G.R. No. 87264 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO

DINGLASAN and FELICIDAD DINGLASAN, Petitioners,
vs. THE HON. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, Presiding
JudgeofBranch159,RegionalTrialCourt,Pasig,Metro
Manila, National Capital Judicial Region, The
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, and
CONCEPCIONT.TINIO,Respondents.
[G.R. No. 89545 : December 3, 1990.] SPOUSES
ROLANDO DOLORFINO and MONINA FULE, Petitioners,
vs.THEHON.COURTOFAPPEALS,SEVEROALCOSand
EFIGENIADELUNAALCOS,Respondents.
[UDKNo.9864:December3,1990.]RUFINAVDA.DE
TANGUB, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS,
PRESIDING JUDGE of the [CAR] RTC, Branch 4, Iligan
City, and SPOUSES DOMINGO and EUGENIA MARTIL,
Respondents.
[G.R. No. 58668 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1
SANTIAGO ESCARTE, JR., ERNESTO VILLANUEVA,
FELIXBERTOVILLANUEVA,andLOURDESVILLANUEVA,
Petitioners, vs. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE
PHILIPPINESandTEODOROMEDINA,Respondents.
ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
COURTandFELIPAE.PABLO,Respondents.
: c r a la w
In Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. I.A.C., 28 for example, the Warsaw
Conventionwasappliedasregardsthelimitationonthecarrier'sliability,therebeing
a simple loss of baggage without any otherwise improper conduct on the part of the
officials or employees of the airline or other special injury sustained by the
passenger.
192SCRA21CONSOLACIONVILLANUEVA,Petitioner,
vs. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, JESUS
BERNASandREMEDIOSQ.BERNAS,Respondents.
THEPEOPLEOFTHEPHILIPPINES,PlaintiffAppellee,vs.
MARIOTANDOYyLIM,DefendantAppellant.
On the other hand, the Warsaw Convention has invariably been held inapplicable, or
as not restrictive of the carrier's liability, where there was satisfactory evidence of
maliceorbadfaithattributabletoitsofficersandemployees.29Thus,anaircarrier
wassentencedtopaynotonlycompensatorybutalsomoralandexemplarydamages,
andattorney'sfees,forinstance,whereitsemployeesrudelyputapassengerholding
a firstclass ticket in the tourist or economy section, 30 or ousted a brown Asiatic
fromtheplanetogivehisseattoawhiteman,31 or gave the seat of a passenger
with a confirmed reservation to another, 32 or subjected a passenger to extremely
rude,evenbarbarictreatment,asbycallinghima"monkey."33

PEOPLE'SFINANCINGCORP.andENRIQUEV.ARCENAS,
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Sixteenth
Division), GAUDIOSO MANLIGUEZ and PURIFICACION
MANLIGUEZ,Respondents.
NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION, Petitioner,
vs. HONORABLE TEODORO P. REGINO, PRESIDING
JUDGE,REGIONALTRIALCOURT,BRANCH84,QUEZON
CITY and CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF AUSTRALIA
PHILIPPINESINC.,Respondents.
LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM,Respondent.
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents.
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
ANDREMEDIOSA.AMOR,Respondents.
Cordillera Regional Assembly Member ALEXANDER P.
ORDILLO, (Banaue), Ifugao Provincial Board Member
CORAZON MONTINIG, (Mayoyao), Former ViceMayor
MARTIN UDAN (Banaue), Municipal Councilors MARTIN
GANO, (Lagawe), and TEODORO HEWE, (Hingyon),
Barangay Councilman PEDRO W. DULAG (Lamut)
Aguinaldo residents SANDY B. CHANGIWAN, and
DONATO TIMAGO Lamut resident REY ANTONIO
Kiangan residents ORLANDO PUGUON, and REYNAND
DULDULAO Lagawe residents TOMAS KIMAYONG,
GREGORIO DANGO, GEORGE B. BAYWONG, and
VICENTELUNAGHingyonresidentsPABLOM.DULNUAN
andCONSTANCIOGANOMayoyaoresidentsPEDROM.
BAOANG, LEONARDO IGADNA, and MAXIMO IGADNA
and Banaue residents PUMAA CULHI, LATAYON
BUTTIG, MIGUEL PUMELBAN, ANDRES ORDILLO,
FEDERICO MARIANO, SANDY BINOMNGA, GABRIEL
LIMMANG, ROMEO TONGALI, RUBEN BAHATAN,
MHOMDYGABRIEL,andNADRESGHAMANG,Petitioners,
vs. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS The Honorable
FRANKLIN M. DRILON, Secretary of Justice Hon.
CATALINO MACARAIG, Executive Secretary The
Cabinet Officer for Regional Development Hon.
GUILLERMO CARAGUE, Secretary of Budget and
Management and Hon. ROSALINA S. CAJUCOM, OIC,
NationalTreasurer,Respondents.
EUFRACIO
D.
ROJAS,
PlaintiffAppellant,
vs.
CONSTANCIOB.MAGLANA,DefendantAppellee.
[G.R. No. 36827 : December 10, 1990.] THE
DIRECTOR OF FOREST ADMINISTRATION, THE
DIRECTOR OF LANDS and THE REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. HON. RAMON C.
Inthecaseatbar,nobadfaithorotherwiseimproperconductmaybeascribedtothe
employees of petitioner airline and Dr. Pablo's luggage was eventually returned to
her, belatedly, it is true, but without appreciable damage. The fact is, nevertheless,
that some special species of injury was caused to Dr. Pablo because petitioner
ALITALIAmisplacedherbaggageandfailedtodeliverittoheratthetimeappointed
a breach of its contract of carriage, to be sure with the result that she was
unable to read the paper and make the scientific presentation (consisting of slides,
autoradiograms or films, tables and tabulations) that she had painstakingly labored
over, at the prestigious international conference, to attend which she had traveled
hundreds of miles, to her chagrin and embarrassment and the disappointment and
annoyanceoftheorganizers.Shefelt,notunreasonably,thattheinvitationforherto
participate at the conference, extended by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Atomic
EnergyinFoodandAgricultureoftheUnitedNations,wasasingularhonornotonlyto
herself,buttotheUniversityofthePhilippinesandthecountryaswell,anopportunity
to make some sort of impression among her colleagues in that field of scientific
activity.Theopportunitytoclaimthishonorordistinctionwasirretrievablylosttoher
becauseofAlitalia'sbreachofitscontract.
Apartfromthis,therecanbenodoubtthatDr.Pablounderwentprofounddistressand
anxiety, which gradually turned to panic and finally despair, from the time she
learned that her suitcases were missing up to the time when, having gone to Rome,
shefinallyrealizedthatshewouldnolongerbeabletotakepartintheconference.As
sheherselfputit,she"wasreallyshockedanddistraughtandconfused."
Certainly, the compensation for the injury suffered by Dr. Pablo cannot under the
circumstancesberestrictedtothatprescribedbytheWarsawConventionfordelayin
thetransportofbaggage.
Sheisnot,ofcourse,entitledtobecompensatedforlossordamagetoherluggage.
Asalreadymentioned,herbaggagewasultimatelydeliveredtoherinManila,tardily
butsafely.Sheishoweverentitledtonominaldamageswhich,asthelawsays,is
adjudicatedinorderthatarightoftheplaintiff,whichhasbeenviolatedorinvadedby
the defendant, may be vindicated and recognized, and not for the purpose of
indemnifying the plaintiff for any loss suffered and this Court agrees that the
respondentCourtofAppealscorrectlysettheamountthereofatP40,000.00.Astothe
purely technical argument that the award to her of such nominal damages is
precluded by her omission to include a specific claim therefor in her complaint, it
suffices to draw attention to her general prayer, following her plea for moral and
exemplary damages and attorney's fees, "for such other and further just and
equitable relief in the premises," which certainly is broad enough to comprehend an
applicationaswellfornominaldamages.Besides,petitionershouldhaverealizedthat
3/18
FERNANDEZ, HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR., and
EMILIO A. GANCAYCO, ET AL., Respondents. [G.R. No.
56622:December10,1990.]THEDIRECTOROFLANDS
and THE DIRECTOR OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT,
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Ninth Division),
GREGORIO A. LEGASPI and VALENTINA CERVANIA,
Respondents. [G.R. No. 70076 : December 10, 1990.]
REYNALDAESPEJO,BENITAGARLITOSandENRIQUETA
OXCIANO, Petitioners, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
COURT, HON. ANTONIO M. BELEN, as Judge of the
Regional Trial Court of Lingayen, Pangasinan Branch
XXXVIIIandASTERIOSAURA,Respondents.
MELVINGIRONySANTOS,AccusedAppellant.
RUBENDELFIN,BENITODOLOSA,CORNELIOAGUILAR,
ANASTACIO GORDOLA, CESAR PANALIGAN, LUIS
VIESCA,VICENTEGUADAMOR,JUANCAGATIN,SIMEON
CHICA, REYNALDO CINCO, WILFREDO IPAS, SIMEON
TAGAYONA,FLORENCIOSINAMBAN,FERMINIODIEGO,
POLICARPIO DILE, EDDIE DE CASTRO, AQUILINO
CABILITASAN, CRISOGONO CANTERO, GUALBERTO
REBUSTER,
RODOLFO
GATCHALIAN,
ANGELITO
DOMINGO, FERNANDO JOVER, RAFAEL SALCEDO,
SIMON DIANA, BENJAMIN GONZALES, JR., BENIGNO
ROJA, DEMETRIO SIMEON, JOSE TELAN, HILARIO
VILLANUEVA, NICK FRANCISCO, PACIFICO DALIPE,
EUPEMIO DALITE, ARTEMIO DE CASTRO, ISABELO
RASTICA, ANECITO RASTICA, LAMBERTO NIETO,
ESMERALDO TATEL, PASCUAL BATOCTOY, ESMENIO
PATRICIO, ARMANDO DE GUZMAN, JESUS MALLARI,
JOSE MALLARI, SULPICIO MALLARI, GENEROSO COS,
AGAPITO ESPINOSA, VIRGILIO SEVAES, RICARDO
MANZAN, OSCAR BENSOL, PABLO DIAGSAY, EMILIO
DIAGSAY, PAULINO COMETA, MATERO COREA,
BENJAMIN LACANARIA, GAUDY TIU, JOVENCIO
AGUILAR, ROMULO POSADA, RICARDO POSIC,
ALFONSO SALGADO, RICARDO TAGANAP, ARMANDO
RAMIREZ, FELIPE RAMIRES, EDELBERTO BERNARDO,
PONCIANO MONTILLA, JUAN MONTILLA, IGNACIO
PANCHITO, JEORGE SERRAN, VICTOR IGNIS, LUCAS
IGAT, BARTOLOME MAGDAEL, AUGUSTO ROSALINAS,
RAFAEL SOCITO, JORGE CO, LUCINO WAGAN, CELSO
BARADA, WINSTON DIENZO, PAULINO SANCHEZ,
ELESEO SANCHES, CONRADO SANCHES, GENEROSO
ANTONIO, AGUSTIN LOPEZ, RUDY SOCITO, SEGUNDO
SOCITO, JOAQUIN PARAS, DOMINADOR BUTAHON,
GERMOGENES GINGCO, HONORIO DETOITO, ELIGIO
MENDOZA, RUBEN QUITORIANO, LEON DELA CRUZ,
PACITOSALES,ANTONIOCEMANES,IRENEOLUBUGIN,
FORTUNATO MATO, ROMEO MERIC, ALBERTO GALLO,
MELCHOR SALGADO, SIMEON QUIJANO, ANTONIO
CARAAN, CARLITO GUZMAN, ALBERTO SALMON,
FELIMON TAN, FERNANDO FAUSTINO, CONRADO
DAVID, REYNALDO NOLASCO, ANTONIO NIETO, JAIME
CAMACHO, ALBERTO PANGLAO, ROSAURO GANAC,
ALFREDO ARCABIO, PEDRO MANASALA, VICENTE
BELARMINO,ROMULOSIOCO,SEVERINOATIENZA,JR.,
RUFO ABALOS, JESUS POSADA, ALBINO BACARRO,
ERNESTO DAJAY, WILFREDO VILLALON, CELESTINO
BACARRO, MANUEL TOLENTINO, ERNESTO ANTONIO,
OSCAR
ABUNDIO,
ZOSIMO
IJARES,
RUBEN
ARISTORENAS,GAUDENCIOCASTILLO,DOMINGODELA
TORRE, DANILO RONCADA, RAFEL PUPA, ALFONSO
SAPINORO, LUISITO JACRIQUE, MARCELINO BESA,
ANSELMO DATELES, ALBERTO PALCULAN, BIENVENIDO
FUENSALIDA AND JOSE ORZAL, Petitioners, vs. THE
HON. AMADO G. INCIONG in his capacity as Deputy
Minister of Labor NLRC Commissioners DIEGO
ATIENZA, CLETO VILLATUYA and GERONIMO QUADRA
ATLANTIC
CONTAINER
CORPORATION
INLAND
INDUSTRIES, INC., LAZARO ARRIOLA, BIENVENIDO
KATALBAS,AURORAJEREZA,GOSHIDEYULOANDPAZ
YULOANDROBERTOJACINTO,Respondents.
SPOUSES TEOFILO ERCILLO and TERESITA ERCILLO,
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and SPOUSES
LUTGARDA CIFRA and BENJAMIN CIFRA, SR.,
represented by their son and attorneyinfact,
BENJAMIN CIFRA, JR., and HON. JOSE P. CASTRO,
Respondents.
ERNESTO DICHOSO, Petitioner, vs. The HONORABLE
COURT OF APPEALS and TEODOLFO RAMOS,
Respondents.
FILIPINAS MILLS, INC., BUENAVENTURA TAN and
VIRGINIA DUMLAOTAN, Petitioners, vs. HON.
ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, in his capacity as Presiding
Judge of the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch
II,ASSOCIATEDCITIZENSBANKandOSCARV.ATAYDE,
inhiscapacityastheDeputySheriffoftheCFIManila,
BranchII,Respondents.
[G.R.No.6986365:December10,1990.]192SCRA
183 LINO BROCKA, BENJAMIN CERVANTES, COSME
GARCIA, RODOLFO SANTOS, VALENTINO SALIPSIP,
RICARDO VEGA, ERIC MARIANO, JOSE EMMANUEL
OYALES, RONNIE MATTA, ALFREDO VIAJE, RUBEN
EUGENIO, REYNALDO ORTIZ, ORLANDO ORTIZ, NOEL
REYES, EDUARDO IMPERIAL, NESTOR SARMIENTO,
FRANCO PALISOC, VIRGILIO DE GUZMAN, ALBERTO
REYES, JESSIE PINILI, ROMULO AUGUIS, DOMINADOR
RESURRECION III, RONNIE LAYGO, ROSAURO ROQUE,
CLARENCE SORIANO, OCTAVO DEPAWA, CARLITO LA
the explicit assertion, and proof, that Dr. Pablo's right had been violated or invaded
by it absent any claim for actual or compensatory damages, the prayer thereof
havingbeenvoluntarilydeletedbyDr.Pablouponthereturntoherofherbaggage
necessarilyraisedtheissueofnominaldamages.
: r d
ThisCourtalsoagreesthatrespondentCourtofAppealscorrectlyawardedattorney's
fees to Dr. Pablo, and the amount of P5,000.00 set by it is reasonable in the
premises. The law authorizes recovery of attorney's fees inter alia where, as here,
"the defendant's act or omission has compelled the plaintiff to litigate with third
personsortoincurexpensestoprotecthisinterest,"34or"wherethecourtdeemsit
justandequitable."35
WHEREFORE, no error being perceived in the challenged decision of the Court of
Appeals, it appearing on the contrary to be entirely in accord with the facts and the
law,saiddecisionisherebyAFFIRMED,withcostsagainstthepetitioner.
SOORDERED.
Cruz,Gancayco,GrioAquinoandMedialdea,JJ.,concur.
Endnotes
1.TeachingsuchnaturalsciencesubjectsasBotany,BiologyandPlantPhysiology.
2.Rollo,p.36.
3.Ibid,referencebeingmadetoExhs."A2a"and"A2b".
4.ThiswasonNovember6,1972.
5.Rollo,p.88.
6.OnJune7,1973(Rollo,p.90).
7.SpecificallytotheHotelEuropa,asindicatedbyProf.Pablo(Rollo,pp.8889).
8. Rollo, p. 89. The baggage arrived on Nov. 7, 1972 but by that time, Prof Pablo had
alreadyleftRomeforHongkong.
9.DeliveryappearstohavebeeneffectedonOctober17,1973(Rollo,p.136).
10.Rollo,p.43:RecordonAppeal,pp.6162.ThedecisionwaswrittenbyJudgeRicardoD.
GalanoandisdatedFebruary2,1975.
11.ItsappealwasdocketedasACG.R.CVNo.59501.
12.Rollo,pp.3539.ThedecisionwaswrittenfortheSecondCivilCasesDivisionbyCampos,
Jr,J.,withwhomconcurredPascual,CamilonandJurado,JJ.
13.Id.,pp.3839.
14.Id.,pp.9192.
15.Id.,p.91.
16. Full title: "Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International
Carriage by Air signed at Warsaw, October 12, 1929" (League of Nations Treaty
Series),comingintoforceonFeb.13,1933,adheredtobytheRepublicofthePhilippines
onNov.9,1950withreservationthePhilippinesdepositedtheInstrumentofAdherence
withthePolishGovernmentonNov.9,1950andtheConventionenteredintoforcefor
thePhilippinesonFeb.7,1951(PhilippineTreatiesIndex[19461982]citing137League
ofNationsTreatiesSeries11).TheWarsawConventionwasamendedby(1)theHague
ProtocolonSeptember28,1955(Id.,andUnitedNations,TreatySeries,Vol.261,p.423
andVol.266,p.444),enteringintoforceforthePhilippinesonFebruary28,1967(2)
the Montreal Agreement in 1966, of which the Philippine Airlines and Alitalia are
signatories (3) the Guatemala Protocol in 1971 (apparently not adhered to by IATA
members)and(4)theMontrealProtocols(Numbered3and4)(1975)(alsoapparently
noteffectiveamongIATAmembers).
17.ART.17.
18. ART. 18 (par. 1), "transportation by air" being defined as "the period during which the
baggage or goods are in charge of the carrier whether in an airport or on board an
aircraft,or,inthecaseofalandingoutsideanairport,inanyplacewhatever,"butnot
where said baggage or goods are transported by land, sea or river outside an airport
unlessitbein"theperformanceofacontractfortransportationbyairforthepurposeof
loading,deliveryortransshipment(pars.2and3,ART.18).
19.ART.19.
20. ART. 24, which also states that with regard to Article 17, the application of the rule is
"without prejudice to the questions as to who are the persons who have the right to
bringsuitandwhataretheirrespectiverights."
21.ART.22,asamendedbytheHagueProtocol,supratheMontrealAgreementof1966set
the limitation of damages at $75,000 per passenger the Guatemala Protocol, 1971,
boosted the limit to $100,000 per passenger, liability for baggage was increased to
$1,000,andtherighttobringsuitwasexpanded.
22.ART.25.
23.ART.20(1)."Thecarrierisnotliableifheprovesthatheandhisagentshavetakenall
necessary measures to avoid the damage or that it was impossible for him or them to
takesuchmeasures."
24. Lisi v. AlitaliaLinee Aeree Italiane, 370 F 2d 508 [2nd Cir. 1966] aff'd 390 US 455
[1968],rehearingdenied397US939[1968]andEganv.KallsmanInstrumentCorp.,
21NY2d160,287NYS2d14[1967]CERT.DENIED390US1039[1968].
25.NorthwestAirlines,Inc.v.Cuenca,14SCRA1065(1965)whichinteraliastatesthatthe
4/18
Convention "merely declares the carrier liable for damages in the enumerated cases, if
theconditionsthereinspecifiedarepresent.".
TORRE,SEVERNOILANO,JR.,DOMINGOCAJIPE,ALAN
ALEGRE, RAMON MARTINEZ, MA. GILDA HERNANDEZ,
EDNAP.VILLANUEVA,DOLLYS.CANU,MELQUIADESC.
ATIENZA, ELIGIO P. VERA CRUZ, ROGER C. BAGAN,
ABUNDIO M. CALISTE, Petitioners, vs. JUAN PONCE
ENRILE, MAJ. GENERAL FIDEL V. RAMOS, BRIG.
GENERALPEDROBALBANERO,COL.ABAD,COL.DAWIS,
SERGIO APOSTOL, P/LT, RODOLFO M. GARCIA and
JUDGERICARDOTENSUAN,Respondents.
26.Id.
27.Id.
28.164SCRA268,citingOngYiuv.C.A.91SCRA223SEEBurnettv.TransWorldAirlines,
Inc. (DC NM), 368 F. Supp. 1152 holding that the airline was not responsible to its
passengers for mere mental anguish sustained as a result of the hijacking, in the
absenceofphysicalinjuries.
COMMERCIAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs.
COMMISSIONERS, SECOND DIVISION, NATIONAL
LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, and PEDRO UMLAS,
Respondents.
29.SEEKLMRoyalDutchAirlinesv.Tuller,119App.DC282,292F2d775,certden368US
921,7LEd2d136,82SCt243AmericanAirlines,Inc.v.Ulen,87AppDC307,186F
2d529Goeppv.AmericanOverseasAirlines,Inc.,281AppDiv105,117NYS2d276,
affd.305NY830,114NE2d37,certden346US874,98LEd382,74SCt124.
ANGELINAP.SANTIAGO,Petitioner,vs.TheHonorable
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY and HICEMENT
CORPORATION,Respondents.
30.NorthwestAirlines,Inc.v.Cuenca,14SCRA1063Lopezv.PanAm,16SCRA43.
31.AirFrancev.Carrascoso,18SCRA155.InOrtigas,Jr.v.LufthansaGermanAirlines,64
SCRA 610 (1975), plaintiff's seat in the firstclass section was given to a Belgian, and
consequently plaintiff, who held a firstclass ticket, confirmed and validated, was
relegatedtoatouristoreconomyclassseat.
LUCIOR.CRUZ,Petitioner,vs.COURTOFAPPEALSAND
CONRADOQ.SALONGA,Respondents.
S & A GAISANO INCORPORATED, CANUTO CUPIN,
representedbyhissonSalvadorP.CupinasAttorney
inFact
VICENTE
CUPIN
EVARISTO
CUPIN,
represented by his wife Marites R. Cupin as Attorney
inFactRAMONCUPINFECUPINandBUENAVENTURA
CUPIN,bothrepresentedbytheirbrotherRamonCupin
as AttorneyinFact, Petitioners, vs. HON. VICENTE A.
HIDALGO, Executive and Presiding Judge of Regional
TrialCourtofButuanCityandAgusandelNorteBranch
V,RegionXVICTORCHANATTY.ARTURORICAFORTE,
in his capacity as Register of Deeds of Butuan City
CITY ENGINEER VICTORIOSO GO, in his capacity as
NationalBuildingOfficialofButuanCity,Respondents.
32. Korean Airlines Co., Ltd. v. C.A., 154 SCRA 211 see also, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines v.
C.A.,65SCRA237.
33.Zuluetav.PanAm,43SCRA397.
34.CivilCode,ART.2208,par.(2)seeRiverav.Litum&Co.,Inc.,4SCRA1072(1962)
FilipinoPipe&FoundryCorporationv.CentralBank,23SCRA1044(1968)Ganabanv.
Bayle,30SCRA365(1969)Valenzuelav.CA.,G.R.No.56168,Dec.22,1988.
35. Id., id., par (11) see Civil Aeronautics Administration v. C.A., G.R. No. 51806, Nov. 8,
1988.
ANTIPAZ PRESCO y PARAS, ANTONIO AMORES y
PARAS, and ANSELMA PARAS, Petitioners, vs. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS, HON. MARIANO UMALI, Judge of
the Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch 25, Trece
MartiresCity,HON.EDWINAP.MENDOZA,Judgeofthe
MunicipalTrialCourtofGeneralTrias,Cavite,MODESTO
PARAS,andSIMPLICIOSANCHEZ,Respondents.
GRGR
CaseGR
VSJose
ERNESTOAVILAyMENDOZAANDJOHNDOE,Accused
Appellant.
ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. HON.
SECRETARY SEDFREY ORDOEZ (Public Respondent)
and
ALFREDO
CHING
(Private
Respondent),
Respondents.
[G.R.Nos.8413233:December10,1990.]192SCRA
257 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND NEW
AGRIX, INC., Petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE VETERANS
BANK, THE EXOFFICIO SHERIFF and GODOFREDO
QUILING,inhiscapacityasDeputySheriffofCalamba,
Laguna,Respondents.
AMANDOTASARRAandABELARDOTASARRA,Accused
Appellants.
LYDIARAMA,DefendantAppellant.
JOSE A. SADDUL, JR., Petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT
OF APPEALS and THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondents.
LawGR DigestGR GRVS

NoGR
OftheGR CourtGR
CivilCase Appellate CourtCases
BacktoHome|BacktoMain
QUICKSEARCH
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2014
2012
[A.M. No. P8632 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

288 ALFREDO LLANES, complainant, vs. GAUDIOSO
BORJA,DEPUTYSHERIFF,RTC,BRANCH19,NAGACITY,
Respondent.
DIRECTOR OF LANDS, DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY and
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. HON.
JUAN P. AQUINO, as Judge of the Court of First
Instance of Abra, Second Judicial District and ABRA
INDUSTRIALCORPORATION,Respondents.
MainIndicesoftheLibrary>
Go!
TRADERS ROYAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. HON.
INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE
COURT
and
HON.
GREGORIO S. CENDAA, in his capacity as DIRECTOR
OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA PRODUCTION CENTER
(NMPC),Respondents
CAGAYAN DE ORO COLISEUM, INC., Petitioner, vs.
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT,representedbyDeputyMinisterVICENTE
LEOGARDO,JR.andANGELCHAVES,Respondents.
DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Petitioner, vs. SPOUSES
FRANCISCO K. REDOR and ANGELITA CASTRO, and
HON.SALVADORP.DEGUZMAN,JR.,PresidingJudgeof
the Regional Trial Court, Branch XXVII, Sta. Cruz,
5/18
Laguna,Respondents.
DR. OFELIA P. TRISTE, Petitioner, vs. LEYTE STATE
COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, namely: Hon. Lourdes
R. Quisumbing, Secretary of the Department of
Education, Culture and Sports and Chairman of the
Board and/or Dr. Minda C. Sutaria as the authorized
representative Dr. Purificacion M. Flores, President of
the Leyte State College and ViceChairman of the
BoardDirectorVenancioBaclagon,NationalEconomic
and Development Authority, Regional Office No. VIII
andMemberoftheBoardHON.SEDFREYA.ORDOEZ,
Secretary of Justice and Chairman of the Review
Committee under Executive Order No. 17 and DR.
CRESV.CHANGONZAGA,Respondents.
CRISTITO AUSTRIA y RODIS, PetitionerAppellant, vs.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE HONORABLE
COURTOFAPPEALS,RespondentsAppellees.
SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., Petitioner, vs. HAYDEE B.
YORAC,inhercapacityasACTINGCHAIRPERSONofthe
COMMISSIONONELECTIONS,Respondent.
363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs.
ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB) MARCELO N.
FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG REX V.
TANTIONGCO and OSCAR E. ALA, in their collective
official capacities as Chairman and Members of the
Board(ERB),respectivelyCATALINOMACARAIG,inhis
quadruple official capacities as Executive Secretary,
Chairman of Philippine National Oil Company Office of
theEnergyAffairs,andwithMANUELESTRELLA,intheir
respectiveofficialcapacitiesasChairmanandPresident
of the Petron Corporation PILIPINAS SHELL
PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
with
CESAR
BUENAVENTURA and REY GAMBOA as chairman and
President, respectively CALTEX PHILIPPINES with
FRANCISABLAN,PresidentandChiefExecutiveOfficer
and the Presidents of Philippine Petroleum Dealer's
Association,CaltexDealer'sCo.,PetronDealer'sAsso.,
Shell Dealer's Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum
Gas Institute of the Phils., any and all concerned
gasolineandpetroldealersorstationsandsuchother
persons, officials, and parties, acting for and on their
behalf or in representation of and/or under their
authority, Respondents. [G.R. Nos. 9511921 :
December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 OLIVER O.
LOZANO, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD
(ERB), PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION,
CALTEX (PHIL.), INC., and PETRON CORPORATION,
Respondents.
JUVENALKYAMKO,AccusedAppellant.
[A.C.No.2756:December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 381
PRUDENTIAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. BENJAMIN M.
GRECIA,Respondent.
JULITA FRANCISCO and her husband, HERMENEGILDO
TANKENKO, and RESTITUTO FRANCISCO and his wife,
FELISA ABEJO, Petitioners, vs. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA,
Judge of the Court of First Instance of Bulacan
FRANCISCA FRANCISCO, MAXIMA FRANCISCO and
FRANCISCOFRANCISCO,Respondents.
396 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES (UFE), MANUEL L.
SARMIENTO, BENJAMIN M. ALTAREJOS, RODOLFO D.
PAGLINAWAN, CARMELITA G. NUQUI, CORAZON Y
SAZON, RODRIGO P. LUCAS, RUDOLPH C. ARMAS,
EDUARDO A. ABELLA, ANGEL A. CANETE, JUANITO T.
CAPILI, ADOLFO S. CASTILLO, JR., PONCIANO A.
CARINGAL, ERIBERTO S. LEONARDO, ADELAIDA B.
MIRA,EUGENIAC.NUEZ,PAZB.SANJOSE,VENUSITO
S. SOLIS, EMMANUEL S. VILLENA, ALFONSO R.
RICAFRENTE, MELANIO C. LANTIN, AMADOR M.
MONTOJO, RODOLFO M. MUNSOD, RENATO P. DIAZ,
RODRIGO M. URGELLES, CARLOS B. SAN JOSE,
EUSTAQUIOE.BUNYI,NELSONP.CENTENO,SOTEROA.
GACUTAN, GUILLERMO G. DE BORJA, DIONISIO H.
NIPALES, EUGENIO S. SAN PEDRO, MANUEL DELA
FUENTE, CARLO MEDINA, CESAR B. PONCE, JORGE B.
CASTRO, JR., RICARDO AREVALO, REY M. BEO, FELIX
ESGUERRA, REYNALDO ALMENANZA, MELITON C.
ROXAS (as represented by his surviving spouse, MA.
CORAZON ROXAS), ROMEO A. ARANDELA, ISIDRO A.
NATIVIDAD, EMILIANO M. SAYAO, CELSO J. CENIDO,
PAULC.MEJARES,SILVERIOC.PAMPANG,DIONISIOS.
CANLOBO, GILBERT C. NOBLE, RODOLFO D. CALONG
CALONG, SR., PEPITO Q. QUITLONG, DIONISIO C.
COMPLETO, ANTONIO T. AVELINO, ANGELITO
PAYABYAB,ISAIASA.RIEZA,DEODITOM.BELARMINO,
QUEZON G. MATEO, CARLITO PRE, CIPRIANO P.
LUPEBA,EFRENP.DINSAY,WILDONC.BARROS,SUSAN
A. BERRO, MANUEL A. LAVIN, ROY U. BACONGUIS,
JEROME T. FIEL, ANASTACIO G. CABALLERO, JR.,
ROGELIO E. RAIZ, JOSE T. ISIDTO, ANGELITO M.
ANICIETE, RAUL ROBERTO C. NANQUIL, LIZA T.
VILLANUEVA,CESARS.CRUZ,REYNALDOL.CALIGUIA,
ERNESTO M. SOLOMON, OSCAR G. AGUINALDO, DIEGO
P. OLIVA, JAIME D. NILLAS, ELPIDIO A. HERMOCILLA,
DANTE L. ESCOSURA, FEDERICO P. CONTEMPRATO,
LAUROC.MAKILING,RENATOO.MINDANAO,RAFAELC.
6/18
TURA AND QUINTIN J. PEDRIDO, JR., Petitioners, vs.
NESTL PHILIPPINES, INC., NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION, HON. EDUARDO G. MAGNO,
HON. ZOSIMO T. VASALLO and HON. EVANGELINE S.
LUBATON,Respondents.
UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, Petitioner, vs. THE
HONORABLE
NATIONAL
LABOR
RELATIONS
COMMISSION and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC.,
Respondents.
EDUARDO ACOP, ROGER ALMENDAREZ, BIENVENIDO
AMBRAY, BENITO ARELLANO, WILLIAM ARMENDARES,
HERMINIO ARREZA, TEODORO ARREZA, PEREGRINO
BANGUIS, MOISES BARENG, HIPOLITO BONGGOT,
RAMON BUCALON, MELITO BUENAVIDES, FELIX
CAGONG, LORENZO CALIWATAN, ANGEL CALUMBA,
HENRY CARIAGA, GEORGE CASANO, REYNALDO
CAPUTOLAN,FELOMENOCHATO,JULIETOCONGSIGNA,
REYMUNDOCUADRA,EUFRONIOCUBERO,BIENVENIDO
CURAYAG, RUDICASTRO CURAYAG, JOVENCIO DARAY,
DAVIDDELEON,NELSONECHIN,ROLANDOESCATRON,
BERTINO ESPINOLA, CRESENCIO FRANCIS, MATEO
FRIAS, RODOLFO FUENTES, BENEDICTO GALLOGO,
HERMANOGALOPE,JORGEGALVE,ERNESTOGONABO,
VIRGILIO GRUMO, JEMELITO GUBAL, RICARDO
GUILLEN,GENEROSOHERNANDEZ,JR.,NELSONJABAY,
EMILIO JACINTO, EMELIANO JALA, JR., IGNACIO
JURALBAR, ALFREDO LOMOLJO, CELESTINO LOMOLJO,
EDUARDO LOPEZ, LUCIO LOPIO, SAMUEL LOREDO,
NORBERTO LORIA, MARCOS LOSIS, MARIO LUENGAS,
NICOLAS MAGHINAY, ROGELIO MATILDO, FLORANTE
MIRANDA, ANACLETO MONTON, NARCISO MONTON,
ERNESTO OROZCO, CHARLITO ORQUITA, MERLCHOR
PANTO, CASIMIRO PEREGRINO, EDUARDO PLAZA,
NELSON PLAZA, PAQUITO PLAZA, PEDRO PLAZA,
FREDIOMIO QUIONES, PEPE RAMIREZ, JOEL
REMEDIO,EDUARDOREVELLEZA,GERALDOROSIL,JR.,
TEMESTOCLES RUBENAL, REMEGIO SABUSIDO, ROGER
SOTES, BELTRANO SULLANO, JAIME SULLANO, ERNIE
TACUGDOY, WENIFREDO TOCMO, SR., PAQUITO
TRUGILLO, ANIOLITO URBIZTONDO, ROMARICO
URIARTE DARIO ORQUIZA, BERTINO VALLEJO,
FRANCISCO VEGA, CRESENCIO YPARRAGUIRRE, RUDY
YPARUAGUIRRI and EDUARDO SACRAGON, SR.,
Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION,(FifthDivision),SURIGAODEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION(SUDECOR)andRET.GEN.REYNALDOG.
DILAN, Vice President for Field Operations &
Administration,Respondents.
[A.M. No. RTJ89380 : December 19, 1990.] 192
SCRA 434 EFREN JAVIER and PEDRO JAVIER,
Complainants, vs. JUDGE SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN,
JR.,Respondent.
DOMINGO REYES, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
JUDGESERAFIN
LILIA AGUIRRE, GENATO AGUIRRE and BENITO
AGRAVA, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF
FIRST INSTANCE OF LEYTE, BRANCH III, EDUARDO
TAMPILandLETICIAA.TAMPIL,Respondents.
WORLD MACHINE ENTERPRISES, Petitioner, vs.
INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE
COURT
AND
J.R.
LITHOPLATES,Respondents.
ROMEOJ.ORDOEZ,Petitioner,vs.THEHON.ALFREDO
J. GUSTILO, in his capacity as presiding judge of
RegionalTrialCourtofCavite,BranchXVI,CaviteCity,
MunicipalityofRosario,Cavite,formerMayorCalixtoD.
Enriquez of Rosario, Cavite, and Valeriano Espiritu of
Mabolo,Bacoor,Cavite,Respondents.
FRANCISCODEGUZMANyDEDIOS,AccusedAppellant.
483 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff
Appellee, vs. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE, Defendant
Appellant.
PENTAGON SECURITY and INVESTIGATION AGENCY,
Petitioner, vs. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL., and
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND
DIVISION,Respondents.
HON.RAULS.MANGLAPUS,inhiscapacityasSecretary
of Foreign Affairs, Petitioner, vs. HON. ANDRES E.
MATIAS, Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Manila
(Branch45)andGAVINOP.ABAYA,Respondents.
507NICANORG.DEGUZMAN,JR.,Petitioner,vs.HON.
COURT OF APPEALS, Former Fifth Division, HON.
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, National Capital Judicial
Region, Br. 48, Manila, and ENRIQUE KP. TAN,
Respondents.
FNCB FINANCE, Petitioner, vs. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO,
7/18
Respondent.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. HON.
FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and FEDERICO DE
GUZMAN,Respondents.
533 KOH TIECK HENG, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINESandCOURTOFAPPEALS,Respondents.
PEOPLEOFTHEPHILIPPINES,Appellant,vs.SALVADOR
MONTEIRO,Appellee.
DIONG BI CHU, alias PATRICK CHANG, CHANG KA HEE
andLULIONGCORPORATION,Petitioners,vs.THEHON.
COURT OF APPEALS, HON. GREGORIO G. PINEDA, as
PresidingJudge,CourtofFirstInstanceofRizal,Branch
XXI JAIME NAVOA and MILAGROS DE LEOS,
Respondents.
561PEOPLEOFTHEPHILIPPINES,PlaintiffAppellee,vs.
GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ARTURO DEVARAS, ARTEMIO
TULANG (at large), and RUFINO CAMINONG (at large),
accused. GREGORIO BERINGUEL and ARTURO
DEVARAS,AccusedAppellants.
TIMOTEO POJAS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
MERCEDES GOZODALOLE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
JUDGE,CITYOFTAGBILARAN,IRENEAPOJAS,CESARIA
LAGROSAandCORNELIABETINOL,Respondents.
ROLANDO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA and ANTONIO
MARCEDONIOyVILLANUEVA,AccusedAppellants.
SALVADOR V. LUTAEZ alias "Jun Plementero",
DefendantAppellant.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE TRADE UNIONS
(NAFTU),Petitioner,vs.MAINITLUMBERDEVELOPMENT
COMPANY WORKERS UNIONUNITED LUMBER AND
GENERAL
WORKERS
OF
THE
PHILIPPINES.
(MALDECOWUULGWP),Respondents.
HYDRO RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION,
Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS and THE
HON.DEPUTYMINISTEROFFINANCE,ALFREDOPIODE
RODA,Respondents.
612 OSIAS ACADEMY and MONICA R. DE CASTRO,
Petitioners, vs. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, CONCHITA MERCADO, NECITAS GACIS,
EVELYN B. GARAIS, ESTRELLA GATON, EVA L.
CAYETANO, TERESA G. BILAZON, SUSAN G. FUELLAS,
ELVIRA D. GACIS, LOURDES CORREA, JULIETA A.
MANALO, NILA G. GABELO and TEODORO GUANIZO,
Respondents.
DANTEBARTULAYAccusedAppellant.
PEOPLEOFTHEPHILIPPINES,PlaintiffAppellee,vs.ED
FERNANDEZAVILA,DefendantAppellant.
ISAGANIDESLATEandROMYFRANCISCOalias"Romeo
Francisco",Accused,ISAGANIDESLATE,Appellant.
ISABELOSANCHEZyPANDILI,AccusedAppellant.
BENJAMINHERICO,DefendantAppellant.
GERONIMOGOLES,DefendantAppellant.
ATTY. TEODORO V. CABILAN & ALEJANDRO A.
PARALISAN, Petitioners, vs. HON. JUDGE JOSE R.
RAMOLETE&PROVINCIAL/CITYJAILWARDENofCebu
City,Respondents.
RICARDO VILLAFLOR, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,**
Respondents.
VICENTE GERARDO, VALENTINA GERARDO, CORNELIO
GERARDO, BENJAMIN GERARDO, ANGEL GERARDO, &
CONSTANTE
GERARDO,
Petitioners,
vs.
HON.
FLORENTINODELAPEA,PresidingJudge,BranchVI,
Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte, TERESA
8/18
ANTONIO BELZA, VISITACION ANTONIO ADINA,
ILUMINADA PASCUA ANTONIO, FELICIDAD BATACAN
MATA, POLICARPO BATACAN, BASILIO BATACAN,
ISABEL BANGLOY, IRINEO BANGLOY, EDUARDO
BANGLOY, DIONICIO BANGLOY, DOMINGA BANGLOY,
andERMINIOBANGLOY,Respondents.
MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE
GUZMAN,PEDROLADIANA,ZENONSAMONTE,ALFREDO
DELMUNDO,BRUNOABLAO,ISIDOROGALEMA,DANILO
MERCADO,
RUSTICO
LIWANAG,
FRANCISCO
BALDEMECA, HECTOR SAMONTE and DAVID ABLAO,
accused, MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI SACOP, LEOPOLDO
DE GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA, ZENON SAMONTE, and
ALFREDODELMUNDO,AccusedAppellants.
SPOUSES EUFRACIO ROJAS AND CONCEPCION ROJAS,
Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, AND
SPOUSES FELIX E. MEDALLA AND DIONISIA PACATAN
MEDALLA,Respondents.
INVESTMENT AND UNDERWRITING CORPORATION OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. COMPTRONICS
PHILIPPINES,INC.andGENEV.TAMESIS,Respondents.
FRANCISCO JOSE, ANTONIO, ERLINDA, JOVITA,
ARACELI, DOLORES, VIRGINIA, MARTA, LEDINIA, and
ANITA, all surnamed RAMON JAO, Petitioners, vs.
COURTOFAPPEALSandLAUREANAC.VDA.DEBAIRAN,
as administratrix of the Estate of Pablo Bairan,
Respondents.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. THE
HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (FIRST DIVISION),
Respondents.
JOSE ORDA and IMELDA LOZADA, Petitioners, vs. THE
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and GIL GALANG
Respondents.
G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 MARIANO T.
NASSERv.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 FRANCISCO
MANLAPAZ,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R.No.55466December3,1990MANILASURETY&
FIDELITYCO.,INC.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 LEONIDA
CORONADO,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R.No.79560December3,1990ANDRESE.DITAN
v.
PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATOR,ETAL.
G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 BALTAZAR
PANTIG,ETAL.v.VENANCIOBALTAZAR
G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 PEOPLE OF THE
PHIL.v.ROMEOB.ORTIZ
G.R.No.84884December3,1990EULALIOM.RUIZ,
ETAL.v.DOROTEON.CANEBA,ETAL.
G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 MARIANO
DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 ROLANDO
DOLORFINO,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 RUFINA VDA. DE
TANGUBv.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 SANTIAGO
ESCARTE,JR.,ETAL.v.OFFICEOFTHEPRESIDENTOF
THEPHIL.,ETAL.
G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 ALITALIA v.
INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURT,ETAL.
G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 CONSOLACION
VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.
PHIL.v.MARIOL.TANDOY
G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 PEOPLES
FINANCINGCORP.,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO,ETAL.
G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 LUZ FARMS v.
SEC.OFTHEDEPT.OFAGRARIANREFORM
G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 DOLORES A.
PAREDESv.CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION,ETAL.
G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 ALEXANDER P.
ORDILLO,ETAL.v.COMMISSIONONELECTIONS,ETAL.
9/18
G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 EUFRACIO D.
ROJASv.CONSTANCIOB.MAGLANA
G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 DIRECTOR OF
FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ,ETAL.
G.R.No.44749December10,1990PEOPLEOFTHE
PHIL.v.MELVINS.GIRON
G.R.No.50661December10,1990RUBENDELFIN,
ETAL.v.AMADOG.INCIONG,ETAL.
G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 TEOFILO
ERCILLO,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 ERNESTO
DICHOSOv.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 FILIPINAS
MILLS,INC.,ETAL.v.ABELARDOM.DAYRlT,ETAL.
G.R. No. 6986365 December 10, 1990 LINO
BROCKA,ETAL.v.JUANPONCEENRILE,ETAL.
G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 COMMERCIAL
MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECONDDIVISION
G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 ANGELINA P.
SANTIAGOv.DEPUTYEXECUTIVESECRETARY,ETAL.
G.R.No.79962December10,1990LUCIOR.CRUZv.
COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R.No.80397December10,1990S&AGAISANO
INC.,ETAL.v.VICENTEA.HIDALGO,ETAL.
G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 ANTIPAZ P.
PRESCO,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
PHIL.v.ERNESTOM.AVILA,ETAL.
G.R.No.82495December10,1990ALLIEDBANKING
CORPORATIONv.SEDFREYORDOEZ
G.R. Nos. 8413233 December 10, 1990 NATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE
VETERANSBANK,ETAL.
PHIL.v.AMANDOTASARRA,ETAL.
PHIL.v.LYDIARAMA
G.R.No.91041December10,1990JOSEA.SADDUL,
JR.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
A.M. No. P8632 December 10, 1990 ALFREDO
LLANESv.GAUDIOSOBORJA,ETAL.
LANDS,ETAL.v.JUANP.AQUINO,ETAL.
G.R.No.68514December17,1990TRADERSROYAL
BANKv.INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURT,ETAL.
G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 CAGAYAN DE
ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
LANDSv.FRANCISCOK.REDOR,ETAL.
G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 OFELIA P.
TRISTEv.LEYTESTATECOLLEGEBOARDOFTRUSTEES,
ETAL.
G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 CRISTITO R.
AUSTRIAv.PEOPLEOFTHEPHIL.,ETAL.
G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 SIXTO S.
BRILLANTES,JR.v.HAYDEEB.YORAC
G.R. Nos. 9520305 December 18, 1990 ERNESTO
MACEDAv.ENERGYREGULATORYBOARD,ETAL.
PHIL.v.JUVENALKYAMKO
A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 PRUDENTIAL
BANKv.BENJAMINM.GRECIA
G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 JULITA
FRANCISCO,ETAL.v.CRISPINV.BAUTISTA,ETAL.
G.R. Nos. 8871013 December 19, 1990 UNION OF
FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC.,ETAL.
G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 UNION OF
FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION,ETAL.
G.R.No.95478December19,1990EDUARDOACOP,
ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,
ETAL.
10/18
A.M. No. RTJ89380 December 19, 1990 EFREN
JAVIER,ETAL.v.SALVADORP.DEGUZMAN,JR.
G.R.No.46198December20,1990DOMINGOREYES
v.SERAFINE.CAMILON,ETAL.
G.R.No.53556December20,1990LILIAAGUIRRE,
ETAL.v.COURTOFFIRSTINSTANCEOFLEYTE,ETAL.
G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 WORLD
MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE
COURT,ETAL.
G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 ROMEO J.
ORDOEZv.ALFREDOJ.GUSTILO,ETAL.
PHIL.v.FRANCISCODEGUZMAN
G.R.Nos.8649294December20,1990PEOPLEOF
THEPHIL.v.LEOPOLDOMONTANTE
G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 PENTAGON
SECURITY,ETAL.v.VICENTET.JIMENEZ,ETAL.
G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 RAUL S.
MANGLAPUSv.ANDRESE.MATIAS,ETAL.
G.R.Nos.9202930December20,1990NICANORG.
DEGUZMAN,JR.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R.No.93394December20,1990FNCBFINANCEv.
NAPOLEONESTAVILLO
PHIL.v.FELICIDADCARANDANGVILLALON,ETAL.
G.R.Nos.4853536December21,1990KOHTIECK
HENGv.PEOPLEOFTHEPHIL.,ETAL.
PHIL.v.SALVADORMONTEIRO
G.R.No.49588December21,1990DIONGBICHU,
ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 6375354 December 21, 1990 PEOPLE OF
THEPHIL.v.GREGORIOBERINGUEL,ETAL.
G.R.No.76519December21,1990TIMOTEOPOJAS
v.MERCEDESGOZODALOLE,ETAL.
THEPHIL.v.ROLANDOMARCEDONIO
PHIL.v.SALVADORV.LUTAEZ
ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT.COMPANYWORKERS
G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 HYDRO
RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OFTAXAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 8325758 December 21, 1990 OSIAS
ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
PHIL.v.DANTEBARTULAY
PHIL.v.EDFERNANDEZAVILA
PHIL.v.ISAGANIDESLATE,ETAL.
PHIL.v.ISABELOP.SANCHEZ
THEPHIL.v.BENJAMINHERICO
PHIL.v.GERONIMOGOLES
G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 TEODORO V.
CABILAN,ETAL.v.JOSER.RAMOLETE,ETAL.
G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 RICARDO
VILLAFLORv.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 VICENTE
GERARDO,ETAL.v.FLORENTINODELAPEA,ETAL.
PHIL.v.MARIOABLAO,ETAL.
G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 EUFRACIO
ROJAS,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 INVESTMENT
AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICSPHILIPPINES,INC.,ETAL.
JOSE,ETAL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 REPUBLIC OF
11/18
THEPHIL.v.SANDIGANBAYAN
G.R.No.92625December26,1990JOSEORDA,ET
AL.v.COURTOFAPPEALS,ETAL.
v.
PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT
PHIL.v.ROMEOB.ORTIZ
AL.
THEPHIL.,ETAL.
AL.
REGINO,ETAL.
FERNANDEZ,ETAL.
SECONDDIVISION
12/18
VETERANSBANK,ETAL.
PHIL.v.LYDIARAMA
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
ETAL.
INC.,ETAL.
COMMISSION,ETAL.
ETAL.
COURT,ETAL.
NAPOLEONESTAVILLO
13/18
DEVT.COMPANYWORKERS
OFTAXAPPEALS,ETAL.
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
v.
PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT
PHIL.v.ROMEOB.ORTIZ
AL.
14/18
THEPHIL.,ETAL.
AL.
REGINO,ETAL.
FERNANDEZ,ETAL.
SECONDDIVISION
VETERANSBANK,ETAL.
PHIL.v.LYDIARAMA
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
ETAL.
15/18
INC.,ETAL.
COMMISSION,ETAL.
ETAL.
COURT,ETAL.
NAPOLEONESTAVILLO
DEVT.COMPANYWORKERS
OFTAXAPPEALS,ETAL.
EMPLOYMENT,ETAL.
16/18
17/18
|Disclaimer|EmailRestrictions
Copyright19982015ChanRoblesPublishingCompany
ChanRobles VirtualLawLibrary |chanrobles.com
RED
18/18

(G.R. No. 71929 - December 4, 1990.) 192 SCRA 9 ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

(G.R. No. 71929 - December 4, 1990.) 192 SCRA 9 ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

1/24/2015 [G.R.No.71929:December4,1990.]192SCRA9ALITALIA,Petitioner,vs.INTERMEDIATEAPPELLATECOURTandFELIPAE.

2. a) In the carriage of registered baggage and of cargo, the liability of the

[G.R. No. 39430 : December 3, 1990.] FRANCISCO

[G.R. No. 55466 : December 3, 1990.] MANILA

[G.R. No. 87264 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO

[G.R. No. 80791 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 34

LawGR DigestGR GRVS

[A.M. No. P8632 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 NATIONAL

ChanRobles VirtualLawLibrary |chanrobles.com

S-ar putea să vă placă și