New Criticism (Formalism)
e New Criticism was the movement in literary theory
that dominated American literary criticism
throughout the mid 2oth century.
e It was developed as a response to older schools of
criticism that examined things like history, language,
culture and the author's life to glean meaning from
literary works.Focus on the text structure
New critics focused on the link between the structure of a text and its
meaning.
¢ They wished to do away with reader response, and considerations of a
work’s cultural and historical context.
For the New Critics, there is only the text; everything we bring from
the outside is irrelevant. High quality texts should be timeless and
universal (apolitical).
New Criticism focuses on the close reading of a text, especially of
poetry, to uncover how a work of literature functions as “a self-
contained, self-referential” piece of art.Important figures in the movement: ig
John Crowe Ransom--The New Criticism. (1941) {Vanderbilt University} (where
the movement got its name) (Tennessee)
Cleanth Brooks~The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (1947)
and Modern Poetry and the Tradition (1939)
Brooks helped to formulate formalist criticism, focusing on what he called “the
interior life of a poem’ (Leitch 2001). He was instrumental in organizing the
principles of close reading. {Southerner from Kentucky, also taught at Vanderbilt}
Robert Penn Warren--American poet & literary critic (also at Vanderbilt and
from Kentucky) Founded The Southern Review with Brooks
LA. Richards—Practical Criticism, and The Meaning of Meaning (Claimed to
offer a “scientific approach” to literature) {British}
He actually studied philosophy at Cambridge, not literature.T. S. Eliot
Essays: "Tradition and the Individual Talent"
"Hamlet and His Problems"
(Accused Shakespeare of underdeveloping the motivations behind Hamlet's
emotional response in the play)
“He developed the idea of the "objective correlative,” which refers toa
symbolic article used “to give explicit, rather than implicit, access” to abstract
concepts like emotion or color. (In other words, he believed writers should show
rather than describe emotion)
“He believed poetry should remain “impersonal”ene
Critics
Critics of the movement felt that it took a far too
narrow and apolitical approach to text.
In the second half of the 20th century, its central place
in American literary criticism was usurped by New
Historicist, Marxist, Feminist, and later Postcolonial
and Queer literary theories.