Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
-318-
Introductory Review
In a review of the relevant literature and previous
studies, it seems to be a fact that the effects of attitude
and motivation on foreign/second language learning as
variables,
independent from aptitude
and general
intelligence have been studied extensively by Gardner and
Lambert ( 1972 ), who distinguish between two basic kinds
of motivation : integrative motivation , when the learner
has a genuine interest in the second language community
to the point of eventually being accepted as a member of
it, and instrumental motivation , when the learner is more
interested in the second language as an instrument for
reaching particular goals , such as getting ahead a job . This
suggests that the relation of attitude to motivation is
dependent on the type of motivation. An integrative
motivation, for example, presupposes a positive attitude of
the learner towards target language speakers and their
culture, but a learner who is instrumentally motivated does
not necessarily have a positive attitude towards the target
language group. Other attitudes which are relevant to L2
learning, such as attitudes towards the language, the
teacher and the course, are probably related to both types
of motivation. The results from the earlier studies indicate
that learners with a higher integrative orientation are likely
to achieve greater proficiency than those with instrumental
-319-
-323-
research
-324-
Research Hypothesis
My hypothesis is that the students of English major at the
Faculty of Education and the Faculty of Arts are
instrumentally motivated to read, write and speak English
fluently because of the importance of English as a world
language. This hypothesis comes from the interest shown
by the learners to get high marks in the English subject in
the secondary school leaving certificate and to pass the
English courses at the University with distinction, a shortterm goal, and their interest in becoming fluent speakers of
English and acquiring good posts, long-term goals.
and %38.55 and Arts %47.67, 38.37 and %44.18)) and agree
(Education-Zabid %40.90, % 33.33 and %27.27, EducationHodeidah %39.75 ,%34.93 and %45.73 and Arts %41.86, %
44.18 and %46.51) . The results also show that there are
considerable percentages under the category undecided.
This probably gives rise to the question of unemployment
which leads to the students' frustration and confusion of
the future. As shown through the tables , more than half of
the target students under the first two categories enjoy
their English movies and songs
because of English
knowledge, item 6: strongly agree (Education-Zabid %
25.75, Education-Hodeidah% 33.73 and Arts % 32.55) and
agree (Education-Zabid %33.33, Education-Hodeidah
%39.75 and Arts %44.18). The percentage of Education
Zabid students, however, is less than the other two
colleges. This might be due to the fact that the latter are
situated in the urban area (Hodeidah city) so students are
more open to such a western culture while Zabid students
are otherwise. In response to item 7, the vast majority of
the students in the three colleges (above %70 under
strongly agree and agree) endorsed the view that English is
the language of science and technology. The results of item
8 revealed that about 200 students out of 235 (above %80
between strongly agree and agree) considered English as an
international language. The students' responses to item 9
-330-
-334-
Strongly
Agree
%
M
No.
of
Ss
Agree
Undecided
Strongly
Dis
%
M
Disagree
66
36.06
23.8
34.17
22.55
13.94
9.2
9.85
6.5
5.98
3.95
83
37.35
31
40.54
33.65
10.26
8.5
7.41
6.15
4.46
3.7
86
43.26
37.2
40.58
34.9
7.67
66
4.88
4.2
3.60
3.1
The table above also shows that Arts students are more
instrumentally
motivated
than
Education
students.
-336-
the object
needs to be
Phonology and
during a
-341-
References
Al-sohbani, Y (1998). Attitudes and Motivation of Yemeni
Secondary School Students and English Language Learning,
Doctoral Thesis. Pune: University of Pune.
Els, T. V . Bongaerts, T . Extra, G . Os, C.V and Dieten, A.M.J,(1983).
Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of
Foreign Languages. Nijmegen: Tilburg.
Ely, C. M. (1986)." Language Learning Motivation: A descriptive and
casual analysis". Modern Language Journal , 70,1.
Gardner, R. and Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in
Second Language Learning . Rowley,Mass: Newbury House.
Gay. L.R. (1976). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis
and Application . Merrill Publishing Co.: Columbus, Ohio.
Harmer, J. (1983). The Practice of English Language Teaching.
London: Longman.
Harlech-Johns, B. (1987). Implementing Language Policy Decisions
in Education. Cape Town: The Language Education Unit.
Littlewood,W. (1984). Foreign and Second Language Learning.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lukmani, Y. (1972). Motivation to Learn and Language Proficiency.
Language Learning, Vol. 22. P: 72.
Mackey, W. (1984). Bilingual Education and its Social Implications.
London: Academic Press.
-342-
-343-
Appendix 1
Questionnaire
Sex:
Age:
Name (Optional):
Level: Faculty:
Country:
INSTRUCTION: With reference to each statement, please tick honestly ONLY ONE
BOX that reflects some of your reasons for learning/studying English.
No. of
items
1
2
10
11
12
13
14
Reasons
Strongly
Agree
-344-
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Appendix 1
No
.of
items
15
16
17
18
19
20
Strongly
Agree
Reasons
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Note: If you have any other reasons for learning English, please write them
below. Thank you in advance for your kind cooperation.
-345-
Appendix 2
Table (A)
Students' Results, Faculty of Education-Zabid
Faculty of Education-Zabid
No.
Reasons
S.A
Un
S.D
71.21
27.27
1.52
40.91
53.03
3.03
1.52
1.52
33.33
40.91
22.73
1.52
1.52
24.24
33.33
25.76
16.67
43.94
27.27
16.67
7.58
4.55
25.76
33.33
21.21
9.09
10.61
31.82
37.88
13.64
10.61
6.06
50.00
28.79
7.58
13.64
43.94
37.88
12.12
6.06
10
45.45
27.27
13.64
10.61
3.03
11
48.48
30.30
7.58
10.61
3.03
12
25.76
37.88
18.18
13.64
4.55
13
28.79
37.88
15.15
13.64
4.55
14
19.70
31.82
21.21
18.18
9.09
15
45.45
30.30
12.12
6.06
6.06
16
18.18
22.73
15.15
10.61
33.33
-346-
Faculty of Education-Zabid
No.
17
18
19
20
key
S.A
A
Un
D
D.S
Reasons
Strongly Agree
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
-347-
S.A
Un
S.D
28.79
28.79
10.61
13.64
18.18
42.42
37.88
9.09
9.09
1.52
18.18
40.91
18.18
15.15
7.58
34.85
37.88
13.64
9.09
4.55
Table (B)
Students' Results, Faculty of Education-Hodeidah
Faculty of Education-Hodeidah
No.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Reasons
-348-
S.A
Un
S.D
71.08
26.51
2.41
45.78
48.19
4.82
1.20
44.58
39.76
6.02
7.23
2.41
34.94
34.94
15.66
8.43
6.02
38.55
45.78
9.64
2.41
3.61
33.73
39.76
8.43
12.05
6.02
37.35
36.14
9.64
8.43
8.43
67.47
26.51
3.61
1.20
1.20
43.37
43.37
9.64
1.20
2.41
31.33
51.81
9.64
7.23
33.73
45.78
14.46
4.82
1.20
22.89
37.35
27.71
9.64
2.41
27.71
51.81
8.43
7.23
4.82
28.92
45.78
14.46
6.02
4.82
33.73
54.22
9.64
2.41
Faculty of Education-Hodeidah
No.
16
17
18
19
20
key
S.A
A
Un
D
D.S
Reasons
Strongly Agree
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
-349-
S.A
Un
S.D
9.64
30.12
8.43
28.92
22.89
21.69
32.53
7.23
24.10
14.46
53.01
24.10
16.87
1.20
4.82
25.30
49.40
13.25
10.84
1.20
42.17
46.99
4.82
6.02
Table (C)
Students' Results, Faculty of Arts
Faculty of Arts
No.
Reasons
S.A
Un
S.D
79.07
19.77
1.16
47.67
50.00
2.33
47.67
41.86
8.14
2.33
38.37
44.19
12.79
2.33
2.33
44.19
46.51
8.14
1.16
32.56
44.19
12.79
5.81
4.65
40.70
44.19
8.14
4.65
2.33
70.93
19.77
3.49
5.81
58.14
37.21
3.49
1.16
10
44.19
40.70
6.98
4.65
3.49
11
41.86
48.84
5.81
3.49
12
34.88
50.00
9.30
4.65
1.16
13
40.70
46.51
4.65
5.81
2.33
14
38.37
46.51
10.47
1.16
3.49
15
40.70
47.67
8.14
3.49
-350-
Faculty of Arts
No.
16
17
18
19
20
key
S.A
A
Un
D
D.S
Reasons
Strongly Agree
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
-351-
S.A
Un
S.D
20.93
26.74
5.81
19.77
26.74
27.91
32.56
8.14
16.28
15.12
47.67
31.40
6.98
9.30
4.65
37.21
41.86
16.28
1.16
3.49
31.40
51.16
11.63
5.81