Rubric for Evaluating Prayer Making

Group Name

Criteria

Content

Mechanics

Design and
Creativity

Teamwork

Evaluator

Excellent

Satisfactory

Fair

Poor

10
The texts
are wellchosen and
they
significantly
contribute in
the
attainment
of the
objectives
of the
prayer.

8
Some texts
are
irrelevant.
Some do not
significantly
contribute in
the
attainment of
the
objectives of
the prayer.

6
Most of the
texts are
irrelevant.
Most of them
do not
significantly
contribute in
the
attainment of
the
objectives of
the prayer.

The content
is free from
errors in
grammar
and the
mechanics
is great.
The prayer
is very
creative. Its
designs are
very
attractive
and
appropriatel
y fit with
the content

The content
has only few
errors in
grammar and
the
mechanics is
great.
The prayer is
creative. Its
designs are
attractive and
appropriately
fit with the
content.

The content
has many
errors in
grammar but
the
mechanics is
great.
The prayer is
creative. Its
designs are
attractive and
appropriately
fit with the
content.

3
Most of the
texts
included are
irrelevant.
Most of
them do not
significantly
contribute in
the
attainment
of the
objectives
of the
prayer.
The content
has many
errors in
grammar
and
mechanics.

All group
Members of

Only three
members of

Only two
members of

The prayer
is dull. Its
designs are
not
attractive
and do not
fit with the
content.

Only one
member of

Points

the group
worked
collaborativ
ely and
cooperativel
y to come
up with the
output.

the group
worked
collaborative
ly and
cooperatively
to come up
with the
output.

the group
worked
collaborative
ly and
cooperatively
to come up
with the
output.

the group
worked to
come up
with the
output.

TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______/40

Comments and Suggestions