Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Elizabeth Cook
from a general agreement and many kept their expression extremely private
due to fear of the SS and their ability to arrest, torture and murder, an ability
which was to enforce fear into the lives of many Germans. This disagrees with
source 4 which suggests that Hitler disagreed with the concept of terror used by
the soviet style dictators. Stalin was heavily involved with terror and used this to
encourage compliance amongst the Russian people something which source 5
also suggests Hitler did. However, source 6 agrees with source 5 to some extent
as this also suggests that there was an element of terror within the regime,
although unlike source 5 it suggests that this posed little threat to ordinary
Germans.
Source 6 suggests that there was agreement with the regime to some extent.
However, it does not suggest that terror was the reason for compliance in the
same way as source 5 as it makes it implicit that terror did not affect all lives.
Eric A. Johnson states that most Germans enjoyed their lives during the
peaceful years of national socialist rule due to improvements in both
employment and the economy. He also proposes that despite the awareness of
the persecution affecting groups such as the Jews and communists it did not
inflict terror directly upon them and therefore it is something they simply read
about and did not experience. This lack of compassion for those affected may
have also derived from the heavy use of Nazi propaganda which was headed by
Joseph Goebbels. Propaganda had the ability to influence and encourage beliefs
amongst the people and was used to Hitlers advantage in creating scapegoats
as well as ensuring those who were nationally German that they were safe and in
a better position as a result of the regime. Source 6 also suggests that many
were aware of the changes such as danger for those who did not comply and
increasing police presence, however it suggests that most found little difficulty
in conforming. This infers that Hitlers dictatorship was consensus to some
extent as most Germans appeared to find no difficulty in adjusting to the Nazi
regime with only some complaining privately. This agrees with source 5 which
also suggests that most were private with their expression and withheld their
real views and opinions concerning Hitlers dictatorship.
Overall I believe that Hitlers dictatorship was consensus, many Germans came
together and bonded regarding the exclusion of the racially unfit. I believe that
this worked in Hitlers favour as scapegoats are particularly successful in times of
socio-economic downturn as it allows the people to attribute blame. It is also
suggested that terror was responsible for conformity, despite this being a
forceful method it worked as despite private disagreements as far as the regime
was concerned the people agreed with Hitler and whether or not this was out of
fear had little effect on the party. However, this was not genuine which suggests
that his dictatorship was privately despised and therefore may encourage
difficulties experienced later on within the regime. Finally it has also been
suggested that people found little difficulty in conforming as the terror used did
not have a direct effect on them, this suggests that people were aware of the
constant changes but were prepared to ignore these in order to abide by the
laws which they felt were protecting them.
Elizabeth Cook